Iran Claims It Has Obtained S-300 Air Defense Missile System

Iran’s Fars news agency, which is described as a semiofficial new agency (I guess that means they speak for the Iranian government, except when they don’t), says Iran has obtained four S-300 surface-to-air missiles from Belarus and some other unidentified supplier. I’m assuming the report means four S-300 systems, and not just missiles; the system includes the launcher and tracking and targeting radars.

Israel has long suggested that Iran’s acquisition of the S-300 would constitute a red-line that would compel Israel to launch an air attack. Steven Simon of the Council on Foreign Relations, wrote in a brief back in November that S-300 deliveries to Iran would almost guarantee Israeli air strikes.

As Simon and other analysts note, Iran’s current air defense system is so weak and the S-300 is considered so good that if the system became operational it would greatly raise the costs of any Israeli strike. Most of Iran’s SAM systems are leftovers from the Shah days, such as their large inventory of U.S. built Improved Hawk, a medium range, mobile SAM system, that was delivered in the late 1970s.

What’s missing from Iranian air defenses is a modern, long-range SAM. That’s where the S-300 comes in. Iran announced in December 2007 that it had contracted to buy an unspecified number of the systems from Russia. The high-altitude, long-range S-300 is considered by some accounts to be comparable to the U.S. built Patriot air defense missile.

Israel views the S-300 as such a threat that in early June 2009, Avigdor Lieberman, Israel’s foreign minister, went to Moscow to convince Russia to halt the sale. In June, Russia said it would abide by UN Security Council sanctions against Iran and would not deliver the missiles; but the Russian Foreign Ministry then said the sale was still possible.

Earlier this spring, we posted photos of an Iranian military parade that featured a clearly not real mock-up of an S-300 launcher.

— Greg Grant

26 Comments on "Iran Claims It Has Obtained S-300 Air Defense Missile System"

  1. No more oil drums? I'm highly skeptical of these claims.

  2. chaos0xomega | August 4, 2010 at 2:22 pm | Reply

    Well… I guess now we wait for the Israeli's to make their move…

    …it's been a pleasure, gentlemen…

  3. Perhaps the sniper attack on the Israelis the other day was instigated by Iran, in order to drum up international opposition to Israel by causing another incident in an attemp to prevent them from conducting an air strike?

  4. And just how accurate/successful are these missiles? If they only have four it seems simple enough to get them to waste them all on decoys or whatever.

  5. Well, what if Israel already knows how to thwart these missiles? Pretty shrewd. Metamaterials and Israeli nanotechnology are making great strides….

  6. Can the US block "U.S. built Improved Hawk" from working if needed? Or provide Isreal with the means to do so?

    I hipe they wouldn't do that else everyone eles would stop buying US made gear just a ? tx

  7. Only the later S-300 variants would pose any serious threat to the Israeli Air Force. The question is however if these are older models (NATO designation SA-10) or newer models (SA-20)?

    The SA-20, SA-21 (S-400), and SA-23 are the long range Russian SAMs that get people worried, but Israel and the United States are always working on improving their ECM equipment. Lets hope it works if Israel does have to strike Iranian targets.

  8. This might be a compromise on Russia's part. Belarus isn't some little rogue ex-USSR CIS state like Georgia that does what it wants to spite Russia. It's heavily reliant on Russia and it has probably the best relations with Russia of any state. I highly doubt that Belarus would have sold Iran S-300s if Russia didn't want Iran to have them. It's akin to Canada selling surplus CF-118s to Venezuela. It isn't going to happen without the US okaying it.

    I think this is just a sly way for Russia to please the UN and avoid a bunch of negative press by not selling the missiles to Iran, while still getting the capital from the sale and boosting Iran's security, which hurts the US and Israel. The only negative press is going to come down on Belarus. US relations with Belarus have been in the pits since 2008 anyway, so there's no harm done there.
    http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C

    It doesn't affect Belarus since the only foreign relations they really care about anyway are those that it has with Russia, which are just peachy. All the more reason I think it unlikely that they did this without Russia's blessing. I doubt it was even Belarus' idea.

    This really is a win-win for Russia.

  9. Even the SA-10 is a pretty nasty piece of work. I wouldn't want to go up against it were I an Israeli pilot.

    As for ECM, both the SA-10 and SA-20 have a home on jam capability, so active ECM is going to be a dicey proposition. How's IAF's passive ECM capability looking these days?

  10. Greg's memory is faulty – the parade had what was clearly a Chinese system on it.

    The delivery of the S300 should be welcomed by Americans. It will finally put an end to the relentless attempts by Israel to drag America into yet another bloody pointless war.

  11. You assume that the S-300 will perform as advertised in a real combat environment against a serious opponent. If it does, then the Russions do indeed benefit. If it does NOT, however, the Russions lose big time. Certainly the Israelis (and likely the US as well) will have to deal with some fallout (hopefully, only the figurative variety), but the Russian arms industry (which is a big source of foreign revenue) will take a serious hit. Air defense systems are high-dollar products where the Russians have (at least right now) a solid enough reputation, but if the Israelis and/or the US walks through them, the possibility of a lot of Russian customers having second thoughts about potential purchases would be a Very.Bad.Thing.Indeed.

  12. The sa-20 sale is sideshow and gamesmanship. The same way the sale of a nuclear Iran as a threat to Israel (absurd, since the Persians, smart folks they, realize the only value of nukes is in deterrence) is public relations for all of us.

    Zionist Israel, and the power mad Old Testament zealots who run it, will not tolerate and cannot stand any state that even countenances resistance to its empire. Thus the bluster of schmucks like Bibi and the blackmail of America and its feckless political class.

  13. Are you back again. Better be careful, the CDC may decide to quarantine you for your severe IDS. Bitter is better eh? How about an apology for your false comments regarding the murder in the DMZ? I guess those Hizb'Allah journalist got more than a ring side seat.

    Yeah those Persians are smart folks. Ban music, claim promiscuity causes earthquakes. Perhaps you would fit right in………

  14. Senor Hapscomb | August 5, 2010 at 2:32 am | Reply

    Umm, 45% of conservatives believe Sarah Palin is fit to serve in the Oval Office, but that doesn't mean that all of America is functionally retarded, as well. I'm sure your pronouncements on what the average Iranian is like is founded on personal experience and unbiased research, right? Or maybe you're just a hayseed…

  15. I'm not sure what announcing this does for the Iranians. Calling the bluff seems to run contrary to the stance they are currently taking in regards to now wanting to sit down and talk (again). I wonder if there aren't elements within Iran trying to pressure the hard liners into real talk by pushing the military option up on the to do list with this announcement.

    The whole back and forth between who is eviler, Iran or Israel is silliness.

  16. Belarus is at Odds with Russia since the spring of 2010
    Some indicators:

    #1 Russian refusal to keep USSR era economic subsidiary between the 2 nations
    #2 Belarus reduction of Gas supply to Europe by 30% (6% of Russian Gas supply)
    #3 Belarus improving relations with Georgia
    #4 Taking in the Kyrgyzstan Ex-President although Russia already blessed the new one

    That said the missiles could have been transferred directly from Russia & blamed on Belarus. Russia will have to make sure they install the best missiles they got otherwise nobody will want to order S300s!

  17. So now Israel can say if a country can obtain strictly defensive weapons? What hypocrites! Israel has the best air defense weapons US and German money can buy them. Not to mention the only country in the middle east with nukes. Maybe if Iran was able to get the defensive weapons they want they wouldn't feel so threaten by Israel's vast offensive military.

  18. Ah, guys, concerning your pooh-poohing "Earlier this spring, we posted photos of an Iranian military parade that featured a clearly not real mock-up of an S-300 launcher."

    Certainly the photo did not resemble an S-300 (did the Iranians claim that it was?), but to my untrained eye it bears a family resemblence to this: http://www.defence.pk/forums/china-defence/44347-
    and this: http://www.sinodefence.com/army/surfacetoairmissi

    Not an S-300, sure, but not necessarily "oil drums welded together"

  19. Israel just developed a new drone almost 737 sized which can reach Iran and loiter. My suspicious is that will be used to attack and absorb SAM so the manned fighters don't.
    Even losing a single crewed plane over Iran would be a nightmare for Israel and would probably require releasing hundreds of terrorists from Israeli jails for a swap.

    So a drone with ARMs may be key, but they would need time to take down the radars, especially if Iran doesn't turn them all on at once. And Israel probably won't be given a lot of time, since the minute bombs start falling the leftwing media, Europe, UN, and likely BHO are going to start raving for Israel to stop. They might get a couple days before "international pressure" comes to protect their favorite lunatics in Iran.

  20. the low flying profil is the best answer.overwerhelming iran defense with drones is enough for the success of the attack. Anyway the advantage is for the attacker as iran did not build sam ,israel can the finish the entire stock by sending drones for 100 sam israel can send 100 drones the iran will obliged to destroy them after that the door of the destruction is opened .so said the S-300 will not change the game!

  21. I don't think this has any thing to do with the defence system, it has to do with who gets their way, ans no matter howmuch pressure and menuvering the US and ISrrael put our IRan got their way at the end

  22. Maybe Russia, Georgia or Greece will sell us one of this us to study, modify and upgrade our (USA) defenses.

  23. Maybe Russia, Georgia or Greece will sell us one of this to us to study, modify and upgrade our (USA) defen

  24. Whats the point of attacking Iran ?

  25. In 2007, Spokesman of Iran’s foreign ministary said that Iran is able to make S300 missiles as same as other Iranian-made missiles and in 2010, Iran showed 2S-300 systems.

    In the other hand, they claimed that they are able to make a system similiar to S300.

  26. In the end you really can't count on Russia or China, to support anyone like the US supports Israel, they are in it for the profit and the game only.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*