Humor at a Carrier’s Expense

Here’s British comedy duo John Bird and John Fortune’s hilarious take on the U.K.’s recent defense cuts  defense dilemmas (it’s three years old but still very relevant). They pay particular attention to the Queen Elizabeth class aircraft carriers and the F-35s the ships will someday carry. Not always 100 percent accurate, but funny nonetheless. 

What will the once mighty Royal Navy do with just one operational carrier? Possible answer; lots more collaboration with the French. Maybe.

Happy Friday.

— John Reed

8 Comments on "Humor at a Carrier’s Expense"

  1. Thats great–at least a good joke can hopefully lighten the British spirits a little during their financial woes.

  2. Richard Groves | October 30, 2010 at 3:42 am | Reply

    . They were funny back in 2000 for the first couple of episodes but it soon gets tiresome, its always the same old formula with no new or novel ideas. They are so left leaning they ignore any problems with left wing issues too which becomes tedious. Think i'll skip watching this as I know what it'll be like.

  3. Its funny I laughed while watching this video, the policies created due the ineptitude of our country's leaders are so bad they should be laughed at, I also cringed though the shame of it, cause most of the things said here I more or less know to be true. Afterwards I held my head in my hands and yeld out in shame, shame that my country and my so called fellow countrymen are letting these inept people continue these shameless acts of idiocy and selfishness. Truth be told there is probably only a minority sane people left who give a fuck. I hope somebody kills headboy Cameron and the band of idiot toffs in Westminster, in all partys. I hope the civilised world that exists as it does now fucks up big time and finally collapses so that there will at least be a chance that a useful, dynamic and progressive civilisation will rise from the ashes. Can sensible sane people please fucking do something? Cause as far as being able to laugh at the expense of ones self as well as others is part and parcel of what being British is about, this is beyond my limit and the shame is just too much to bare.

  4. The carriers are a silly anachronism.

    It's notable that the major reason always given – retaking the Falklands again – is a joke. Argentina no longer has an American backed military junta and now has the lowest military spending in South America – little more than15% of what the UK spends.

  5. It is not exactly on “U.K.‘s recent defense cuts”. I think it is a recording made some years ago. The video was uploaded on youtube 3 years ago.

  6. Oblat the falklands excuse is rarely even given by the navy when justifying its future because pretty much the entirety of the nations security and that of exerting force overseas rests upon it ultimately.

    Unfortunately so many ignorant idiots get told otherwise by other equally ignorant idiots and thus believe they are unequivocally in the right and thus; no need for a navy. It angers me even more that it is the navy specifically that has been targeted by media and parliament when it has already suffered the vast majority of cuts over the past 13 years or so (having reduced by some 60% under the labour government).

    An argument about what to cut shouldnt even exist. its simply political scapegoating because the military is not a vote-winning/changing subject of debate anymore and can thus be eroded away with minimal fuss when compared to the bloated welfare state. Though as we are in this situation it surely should be the RAF that is looked at for cuts over a navy that has lost more than half its numbers and a huge proportion of its capabilities in the past decade, or perhaps the huge % of the army that even to this day remains on a continent facing off against the red threat that hasn't existed for 20 years.

  7. Too funny!

    Unfortunately most of what the "admiral" said is true….

  8. Very funny! Poor UK, though. Sad to see them in this state.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*