Second X-37B Space Plane is Now on Orbit

Well, it’s official, the Air Force’s second X-37B mystery space plane took to the heavens yesterday afternoon to do who-knows what for the next few months.

The second Boeing-built X-37B Orbital Test Vehicle lifted off aboard an Atlas V rocket from Cape Canaveral, Florida, at 5:46 p.m., yesterday, according to a Boeing announcement.

Still, there are no details as to what type of tests the experimental spacecraft will be doing while on low Earth orbit. Here’s a nice vague statement about the  Boeing statement:

“Today, we took another important step with the successful launch of the second OTV, enabling the [Air Force’s Rapid Capabilities Office] to further experiment with the vehicle and its ability to operate in low-Earth orbit,” Cooning continued. “Close teamwork between the Air Force Rapid Capabilities Office, the United Launch Alliance Atlas team, and the 45th Space Wing at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station made this launch a success.”

However, there is one little hint at what the air service is doping with the craft. The announcement goes on to say that the two X-37Bs are being used to develop concepts of operations, or CONOPS, for this type of reusable space planes. This says that the Air Force might be trying, or simulating, just about every type of mission it can think the little robo-shuttles could be used for and developing blueprints for how to execute those missions in the future. What are those missions? Well, until the Air Force lets us know, we can only speculate.

19 Comments on "Second X-37B Space Plane is Now on Orbit"

  1. I am more interested in the cost and turn around time to orbit for the vehicle. What it's doing on those missions is really limited only to imagination and payload. The million dollar question in my mind is, how cheap/fast can we do it?

  2. but it IS a space ship…NOT a flying telephone booth capsule….

  3. He, he, he……

  4. I still say its for a prompt redundancy in space ops. When the Chinese shot down their weather satellite all the talk was how vulnerable the US is if we are denied space access. I bet this is to address that primarily.

  5. By carrying extra ones to replace those lost or payloads that can act is the same fashion on command.

  6. Kind of looks like what a next generation ISR platform might look like if you wanted it to fly in low earth orbit. If Global Hawk is the logical follow-on to the U-2 then this would be a logical follow-on to the SR-71, wouldn’t it?

  7. Perhaps it can rendezvous with enemy satellites and install some hardware that allows the US to alter their images.

  8. >What are those missions? Well, until the Air Force lets us know, we can only speculate.

    Perhaps they are for delivering ice-cream ?

    I get it a story about a dog-eared prototype replacement for the shuttle disaster is pretty boring. But trying to jazz it up is just silly.

    NASA has imploded the shuttle scrapped largely because pentagon interference in it's design screwed it from the start and now the DoD is cobbling together a cut down mini-shuttle built out of an old NASA program.

    So what no capabilities do you get for a cut down shuttle prototype ? That still cant go to high orbit and looks like about as reusable based on the slow turn around time and still carries the failed tile heat -sheld concept ? – a lot less.

    On the plus side making it a secret program means the budget can blow out again the milestones can ll be missed and you don't have to tell anyone.

  9. Snake Plissken | March 7, 2011 at 5:34 am | Reply

    The X-37B is very valuable because it can expend its delta-v budget on ad-hoc tactical orbital changes and then return the surveillance payload back to Earth for reuse on the next mission.

  10. I mentioned this in the earlier x-37b post, but the choice of vehicle configuration gives a strong hint at some of the mission specs.

    The only reason to use a space plane is for payload retrieval, they want whatever it is back down in one piece, and it is too fragile to survive a desert landing in a conventional capsule.

    If all they needed was orbital maneuverability, then a capsule can do the job just as well, and with lower vehicle weight.

    Also the next generation heat shields are massively more durable than the STS program's puffed glass thermal soak tiles, which lowers turn around time and cost.
    This in turn gives a reason for why they chose a runway landing system versus a water landing, which requires an expensive retrieval ship.

  11. dauntlessCelt | March 7, 2011 at 10:36 am | Reply

    Ram the chinese satellites!!!

  12. Matt Holzmann | March 7, 2011 at 1:13 pm | Reply

    It's meant to carry space ninjas of course. These ninjas will take apart Chinese ASAT satellites or redirect them at the mainland and/or Rooshian illegal space launch vehicles.

    This was all foreseen by Flash Gordon. After all, his nemesis was Ming the Merciless, whose only true desire is to kidnap Dale Arden and have his wicked way with her.

    Ninjas and microrobotic space weapons. I'm just sayin…..

  13. i personally think its for spying, low orbit plus its air force means it has option of being for spying……just my input

  14. I am sure that one of its missions is to scare the heck out of the Chinese and Russians who have been flexing their muscles since America has had its financial downturn…..

  15. They always deny any connection but I note the fact this thing just happens go up at the same time the shuttle is on orbit. Same thing with the first one too.

  16. I think they're using it to rendition Liberals

  17. I think Jack Bauer is onboard in the payload bay, which is just big enough for one man.

  18. They're going to strap a death ray on it, duh…

  19. PukinPutin | May 8, 2014 at 7:04 pm | Reply

    Hasn't anyone figured out that our "BLACK" space program is paid for by all the drugs the gubbamens imports to pay for it ? C-5B's full of Coke/Heroin from Columbia/Afganistan ? Why has there been a bumper-crop of Junk outta Afganistan since we took over from the Taliban in the last 12 years ???

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*