Russians Moving ‘Carrier Killer’ Cruiser to Pac Fleet AO

Not sure why, but for those of you who track foreign military moves, it seems that the Russian navy is planning to move one of its most modern and powerful guided missile cruisers out of the Northern fleet operations area and into the more dynamic — and contested — Pacific fleet AO.

The Russian missile cruiser Marshal Ustinov may reinforce Russia’s Pacific Fleet in 2013 after repairs, a high-placed official of the Russian Navy said on Sunday.

The Ustinov is the second of four Slava class guided missile cruisersand is now stationed in Severomorsk in Murmansk. It’s unclear why the Russians want to move the Ustinov to warmer Pacific climes, but if the armaments on this ship are any indication, it’s going to be a major influence on the sea lanes — that is if the Russian government has enough cash to fill ‘er up and let her leave Vladivostok.

The Marshal Ustinov cruiser has been designed as a surface strike ship with some anti-air and ASW capability. It is fitted with sixteen SS-N-12 Sandbox nuclear-capable supersonic anti-ship missiles, which are mounted in four pairs on either side of the superstructure.

In addition, the cruiser reportedly carries 64 SA-N-6 Grumble long-range surface-to-air missiles (SAM) and 40 SA-N-4 Gecko short-range SAMs.

NATO experts had dubbed Russian combat ships of this class “the killer of aircraft carriers,” as it can carry 1,000 kg of high-explosives, or a tactical nuclear warhead, out to a range of 300 nautical miles.

(Gouge: DID)

— Christian

  • jamesb101

    First the Chinese demo a aircraft carrier killer…Now this?

  • Chops

    Does anyone notice these moves by Russia are happening as China increases its naval presence in the Pacific.Russia has a tiger at their back door and they know it-they are not worried about the U S Navy-they’ve sparred with us for 40yrs.We know and understand each other-China ia a wildcard that no one can turn their back on right now.

  • brian

    Too bad without support craft the range of these missiles are only 20 Nautical Miles. What you can’t see, you can’t shoot.

  • Tony C

    This move is in response to the increased uncertainty of the Pacific region.
    North Korea threatens a war with South Korea, The Chinese tensions
    with Japan, and now the earth quake/ tsunami in Japan. Russia has more
    at stake there then the Black Sea. The Russian’s have to make a show of force
    in this region.

  • steve

    Is a guided-missile cruiser really a threat to most navies anymore? I mean, it seems like even a full salvo of 16 missiles can easily be intercepted by a modern anti-air destroyer with dozens of SAMs…at leas thats the way it always plays out in Janes’ Naval Warfare sim

    • asdf

      and 1000kg per missile is not that much versus a 100.000ton carrier…

  • roland

    I was just wondering with all technology and all ship manufacturing capabilities we have, why do we still dont have this type of modern and powerful guided missile cruisers for defense?

  • Bob

    Does the James Naval Warfare Sim still let you fly F14’s with Phoenix on-board? Our ability to kill these missiles early on in their flight path is diminished as the 18’s with AMRAAM don’t have the legs. So, know you are going to depend on a Hawkeye to pick them up over the horizon and then hope you have an outer-boundary picket (Burke DDG) in place to take a bunch of SM-3 shots that will be head-on or passing shots (where speed differential is going to be a killer).

    It only takes one decent hit to put flight ops on hold for awhile.

  • ben

    Generally the main target for a “big, SSM armed, surface combatant”, is the US Navy.

    The same US navy that contains several dozen “big, SSM armed, submarine combatants”

    The only advantage a big ship like those cruisers has is speed, being able to run away from the subs.
    But because these particular cruisers aren’t nuclear, they can only run faster than a sub for a short time, which means that they can be tailed all around the world at their slower cruising speed.

    Either way, this deployment is pretty clearly another move in the russians pis sing contest with china.
    And the chinese do NOT have the layered naval countermeasures to prevent this thing from being a threat.

    • TLAM Strike

      China’s new DDGs have a long range air defense missile that can combat high flying ASMs like the ‘SANDBOX’, and the phased array radars to detect them.

      • Robotzilla

        Plus China isnt bringing carriers into the mix just yet. A surface action group of PLAN destroyers isnt as big of a target as the carrier groups those birds were built to seek.

  • Lance

    Whats the fear? Isn’t Russia and the US on good terms now? We can combine our forces and blow China away LOL!

  • roland

    We need to redesign our sea fighters, fit it iwth SAMS and anti ship missiles and place it in the pacific to defend our territory and USA security when attack. We may need about a 100 modified sea fighters in the pacific.

  • ragincajun5454

    Mk-48 ADCAP

  • Tad

    This move is linked to something. What do the Russians want from the US right now? Do the Russians care about Libya? Is there some kind of treat talk going on? Maybe a pipeline being built? Some sort of trade deal going on? I really don’t know, I just am tossing out this idea that the Russians make such moves in order to provide leverage for something entirely different, quite possibly a non-military issue taking place far away.

    • roland

      I hope your right . I think they were eying on our US aircraft carrier near South Korea

    • Curt

      It could just be because their Pacific fleet is so feeble they wanted some reinforcements. Or because the Slava in their Pacific Fleet needs to go back for an overhaul.

  • blight

    Russia is hedging bets before they get screwed in the Far East again. Losing two fleets to the IJA was probably humiliating, and the hypothetical possibility of not having enough combat power to protect Vladvostok has to be on someone’s mind.

    For a second I thought it was a Kirov-class missile cruiser, but I guess they’re kind of related.

    • Jacob

      You mean the IJN. The only thing the IJA had that could float were a bunch of troopships =P

      • blight

        Surprised that the IJA even had ships? Oh well. Thanks for catching it before the inevitable “omg you made a typo” brigade.

  • noone

    yes a big pipeline through serbia, greece, to russia afaik.

    • roland

      I hope they are drilling for a pipleline and not planting bomb on the seabed to cause any earthquake or tsunami.

  • roland

    I hope it’s nothing serious. I have a feeling they were eyeing on our US aircraft carrier in the pacific near South Korea

  • blight

    Naval bombers with ALCMs, like the Russians had always planned on using.

  • matt

    This ship pulled into Norfolk back in 89 I believe. I toured it and traded a zippo and some marlboro lights for 3 packs of horrible russian cigarettes, several soviet propaganda books and a dress hat. Still have the hammer and sickle pin from the hat, keep it on my desk at work. Sadly many do not recognize what it stood for, and I work on a Navy base…

  • noone

    they are just scared you will make a no flight zone like in lybia and then bomb them into YOUR kind of democracy ;)

    thats what im hearing from many different nations.

    its not real hate. its your politics and actions.

  • Tom

    One can hope that the USN will buy DARPAs LRASM.

  • Tim

    One single ship, no matter how hi-tech or armed to the teeth, is not going to cut it in a modern naval battle. This one is not even stealthy. Why are we shaking in our boots when even the Japanese Navy can still give it a run for their money? Russian armed forces are now just a shadow of the long gone Soviet Union.

  • Mike

    Attacking an aircraft carrier is a prelude to an all out nuclear war and whomever is in the White House has to be willing to pull the trigger immediately as when the other side takes out your fleet carriers, you don’t have the 2-3 weeks to decide on what to do next.

  • devildog7885

    wow what a replie. hiroshima and nagasaki. if there was no bomb to shed the light on the imperial military of Japan. there would of been an invasion of the main isle of japan and since there beliefs at the time was no surrender the act itself was considered dishonorable and the civilians actually believed we americans eat dead japanese the population would either died fighting or committed mass sucide for honors sake as they did on Sipain and okinawa to name a couple . then you would be screaming we committed geonicde in japan . Learn your history or go visit japan and take alook at the suicide cliffs were thousands died.

  • roland

    I am a christian and I love my country (USA). I hate to see my country fall against an enemy attack. I do think we should look at where we at, at the world stage. It seems that there is conflct brewing in the middle east and southeast asia. At this could be spiritually link. Faith in God, prayers and belief could make a big difference if not here on earth maybe on the after life.

  • William C.

    Apologize? Lets see them apologize for starting the war against us and every evil deed they committed during the conflict. Things like killing PoWs for sport come to mind. The atomic bombs spared hundreds of thousands of American soldiers and marines being killed fighting for every inch on the Japanese mainland. Far more Japanese are likely to have died too.

    Don’t want the US Navy patrolling the world, lets see how your country does protecting commercial shipping. Without the US Navy every country like Iran or North Korea could strangle shipping routes.

  • blight

    Tell it to the millions of Koreans, Chinese, Filipinos, Malaysians and Pacific Islanders who died under the thumb of Japan. But mostly Chinese. However, the Japanese basically were doing what the Europeans did for the 17th, 18th and 19th centuries to the hapless “natives” in faraway lands…

  • roland

    It could probably nothing. I just don’t trust the rooskies, whenever they have a naval activities.

  • devildog7885

    this cruiser although Evil Looking would be dispatched by a carriers screen. big threat would still be the sub’s that lurk the oceans. diesel electric sub’s are almost impossible to detect when running on batteries. depending on the size of the sub you would not know till it was too late.

  • devildog7885

    sometime when i think about it the smaller the carrier the more survivable it would be pretty hard to hide one of those ships if we entered into naval combat of the likes of WW2. we have not done ship to ship fighting since and battle wagons would hold up better in a dog fight like that. most ships hulls are designed for missile impacts rather than naval guns as evident with the USS Cole and USS stark. a heavy cruiser with heavy naval guns would wreak havoc with today’s naval ships!.

  • Chimp

    I agree with apologizing to Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Wrong choice of targets…

    McArthur should have started with Tokyo, then possibly moved on to Kyoto.

  • Old Crow

    Slava’s are old, SS-N-12’s are older, Russian maintenance is a joke. Pure window dressing.

  • zippy

    I was lucky enough to visit the Marshal Ustinov when it visited with two other soviet ships in 1989 in Norfolk, As an Intelligence Specialist in the Navy at the time it was a great experience. During their stay they visited a lot of places off base. I ran into them when they were visiting an el.electronics outlet. I can’t remember the place but it was like a Best Buy but not.