ATK’s Light Gunship Package

A few years ago I helped break the story that Air Force Special Operations Command wanted to turn twin-engine, C-27J cargo planes into a “gunship lite” to bolster the command’s fleet of aging AC-130 gunships. AFSOC was all about the idea for a while until budgeteers nixed the gunship lite proposal in FY 2010 and the command opted to recapitalize its AC-130 fleet with new C-130Js.

Imagine my surprise last week when I came across a “light gunship” display at ATK’s booth at the Association of the U.S. Army’s annual conference here in Washington. The aircraft appears to be a CASA CN-295 — instead of a C-27J — and it’s shown bristling with missiles, rockets and a 30mm cannon.

While no one from ATK was available to tell me more about the airplane, a marketing sheet I took from the display describes the plane as a “robust day/night ISR solution now available with precision strike/close air support capabilities.” From the brochure, I deduced that ATK is marketing this as an equipment package that can turn any medium-size transport into a gunship — the CN-295 is simply being used to show off the concept.

According to the fact sheet, the proposed gunship would be equipped with:

  • an electro-optical/infrared sensors and a laser target designator
  • fuselage-mounted weapons pylons capable of carrying both AGM-114M/K Hellfire missiles and 70mm rockets
  • a side firing M230LF 30mm cannon
  • a sythetic aperture radar
  • countermeasures
  • cockpit and passenger armor
  • datalinks that can transmit full motion video taken by the plane’s sensors
  • beyond line of sight communications gear

It may be that ATK smells a global opportunity to provide light gunships to air forces around the globe who can’t afford to buy dedicated aircraft for the mission.  Remember, while AFSOC didn’t move ahead with the AC-27J concept, AFSOC and the Marine Corps have both installed roll-on light gunship kits on some of their MC-130W and KC-130 tankers/cargo haulers. These modified tankers — called Dragon Spears and Harvest Hawks, respectively — have proven to be very useful.

Here’s a model of the light gunship that was on display at ATK’s booth below the giant picture shown above:

19 Comments on "ATK’s Light Gunship Package"

  1. Hmm, a mix of forward and side-firing weapons, though mostly forward attack.

    Anti-radiation missiles to engage enemy air defense, or air-to-air in case of helicopters might not be a bad idea…

  2. A few Of these hovering around my head in Afghanistan for a few hours would be nice. Screw UAV’s I’ll take missle pods and a 30mm any day!

  3. What's that new missile that's a 1/4th the size of a hellfire? I'm thinking they need a kit that's less than 300 lbs that includes a camera pod, line-of-sight video link, and a handful of these mini-hellfires. Griffin? Spike missile?

    For those emergencies when a cargo plane is all you've got.

  4. I wonder if something like this, with a few mods, could be used on Ospreys to make an AV-22? Granted that with the gynormous props all of the hardpoints would probably have to be attached to the belly but it would be interesting to see if it could be done.

  5. An awesome idea – so good their is no way the AF would ever do it…

  6. But, didn't CNAS just declare Counterinsurgency is dead? ;)

    The odds of this seeing the light of day is nil. Institutional resistance and a growing apathy of Congress towards Afghanistan will see to that.

  7. Can we say the potential leading customer is Brazil?

    Would be a great complement to the armed Super Tucanos.

  8. Hard to believe anyone would want to compete with Lockheed after the bang up job they did on their gunless gunship (with helicopter missiles — it's not that it doesn't have any teeth at all).

  9. Surely something like the 20mm M197 package tried with the OV-10 NOGS in Vietnam could be slung under a UAV?

    It would certainly be a much more economical option for taking out individuals and soft targets than missiles.

    As to operating on a budget, worth noting that the venerable AC-47 is still soldiering on in Columbia, albeit with Basler airframe and powerplant upgrades:

  10. I must've missed it:
    why would ATK even waste time displaying this at AUSA, when the Army opted out of the JCA program?
    Granted, the C-23 Sherpas need replaced,
    and of the JCA offerings, the Army actually preferred the C-295 for its longest floor space than the other contenders (Air Force kept pushing the commonality of the C-27J with the C-130J, and that the Spartan could haul wide Humvees internally, something the Army was never seeking to begin with.
    Then the USAF had to come along crying all KeyWest BS and stuff, basically fenangled the Army out, then cut the numbers down so low that the available aircraft won't anywhere near be available to the Army to replace Sherpa duties on the Army's schedule (when the Army needs it done).

  11. (pt2)
    The USAF doesn't like flying into "austere" and actually having to land, not on a routine basis. We've all seen those C-17 airdrops from A-stan where stuff is scattered over a somewhat-controlled large area.
    A Sherpa could actually land in many of those places, that's what the original Shorts 330 airframe was built capable of: STOL from dirt.
    And that's what the Army eventually wants. Not a gunship lite.
    They actually have very useful gunships already, called Apaches.
    Soon to be joioned by Gray Eagles (Predator drones wearing US Army decals).

  12. Along with everyone else here I think the story is BS…..

    Even if the Army said they wanted the a/c….
    As someone pointed out ….
    The Air Force would steal it from them then bury it….
    Just like the C-27J….
    The Army has enough on it hands trying to keep what air assets it has from the Air Force pick pocketing them….

  13. Yes
    We've ALL become jaded on the Army vs The Air Force in the fixed wing area….

  14. It wouldn't match a AC-130J but a return of a Puff the Magic Dragon style gunship would work well in Afghanistan.

  15. Good Evening Folks,

    What's missing of course are the costs. The concept is good its proof being Vietnam and "Puff". Ground troops (Army and Marine) are in need of close air that can loiter around for awhile and the get in close and personal with in 200 meters of blue forces. The C-27J appears to be an ideal platform for such a weapons system.

    We know that the ac130J in 2008 dollars was $190 million a copy, with about $98 million being for the c130J. The last quotes price for the C27J was in 2009 euros and the conversion brought it out to about $30 million for the airframe.

    No one is doubting the utility of the ac130J, it has and every night proves itself in combat in Afghanistan and tother war theaters but as with everything else its the cost. The USAir Force only plans on buying about 10-20 ac130J'J and they will all be under the operational control of the USSpecial Operation Command. This leaves noting at call unless released from Spec. Ops for the conventional forces.

    The problem here seems to be that such an aircraft doesn't fit into the image of the USAir Force. Like the A-10 in the 1970's the Air Force simple didn't want a much needed aircraft and thus all ended up on Air National Guard units where training until the 1991 Gulf war was sparse to say the least.

    The USAir Force would rather have the f-22's and f-35's and train endlessly for a mission, the air superiority/dominace of the battle field, that has largely fallen to the budget ax in every country but the United States and has becomes the US's by default. This is not a sexy aircraft and it doesn't have a sexy mission, USAir Force is not interested, period.

    Byron Skinner

  16. Forget it Go Big or Go Home! Convert existing C-17's to Mega Gunships! It will haul more ordinance, ammo and guns PLUS loiter longer than any propeller AC. Also C-17's can carry directed energy weapons once those are fielded.

  17. Bring back the Army's 1st Aviation Brigade and give them a squadron of these Tac Air Fixed Wing platforms.

  18. screw it.. just use some old American Aircraft that you are wanting to get rid of already.. I want to see an AC-5 concept. Go big or go home

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.