S. Korea’s New Stealth Fighter Design

Check out these pictures that Steve Trimble snapped of the latest stealth fighter design to hit the international market. They pics show Korean Aircraft Industries’ proposed stealthy next-gen fighter that was unveiled at the Seoul Air Show this week. South Korea plans to field the plane, dubbed KF-X, in the next nine years as a replacement for it’s Vietnam War-era F-4 Phantom IIs and F-5E Tiger IIs. Going from fighters that first flew in the late 1950s and 1960s to a stealthy design resembling some sort of twin-engined F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, as Trimble puts it, is quite the leap. In addition to KAI, Eurofighter is also bidding a design for KF-X. In an example of how stealth fighters will be all over the place by the 2020s, Indonesia is already a partner in the program and F-35-buyer Turkey may join the KF-X effort soon. Seoul wants the KF-X to carry locally developed air-to-air missiles, guided bombs and anti-ship missiles. That’s right, a new fleet of stealth jets with new weapons in just nine years.

Keep in mind that South Korea is also looking at buying 40 to 60 Sukhoi PAK FAs, F-35s or F-15SE Silent Eagles under its F-X program which is supposed to kick off next year.

Click here for more info on the jet.

29 Comments on "S. Korea’s New Stealth Fighter Design"

  1. Definitely ambitious. New weapons, new aircraft, and a 5B budget?

    If they can get it done, maybe we should figure out what they're doing right and what we're doing wrong. Then again, we can still pitch our -35B's for the Dokdos, and if you have the -35B you may as well add the -A for your ground troops if you're in the market for a new air force.

  2. Looks like a F-35 with hints of the F-16. I like it! I hope that ROK goes with either the F-35 or F-15SE for the F-X program, but it is great to see them working on developing their own stealth aircraft. I doubt the aircraft can compete with the likes of the F-35 or F-22, but it could be a cheap stealth alternative to the F-35. Looking forward to hearing more from this craft.

  3. Turkey have already said they won't take part unless they are a equal partner

  4. All those years of Selling Hyundai's is paying off….
    Long term we seem to have a trend of 3rd tier nations like Iran, Pakistan & now South Korea domestically producing jets. Leaving the US & Mig with nobody to sell to.

  5. Either they plan on these fighters going on a one way trip toward the enemy and not coming back, or they figure they'll be so badass they won't leave any threats behind. I'm thinking the former instead of the latter. But what the hell, you can probably buy a dozen for the price of an F-35.

  6. First impressions can be wrong, but this sort of reminds me of the Yak-38 Forger, the Soviet vertical take off fighter that could only carry 2200lbs of weapons. Sure it's stealthy, but what good will that stealth do if it can't carry any weapons behind enemy radar?

  7. Looks more like a mini F-22 than a copy of a F-35. good for ROK. But do they have the resources to build such a complex thing as a stealth fighter? Other nations tried and failed to build such planes have to wait and see.

  8. At least THEY were smart enough to put two engines in it… F35?

  9. I can’t help but think all these new designs coming out of smaller countries are just 4th gen fighters Ina shiny new stealth lookalike body. The coatings,materials and tech needed for a truly stealth aircraft are immensely expensive. Plus electronics and an engine that’s capable of a good PtW ratio is a tall order for any military,especially a small one. I somehow see them buying F-15’s or F-35’s when this project runs over budget and behind schedule.

  10. FYI I’m not downing on the south Koreans,I feel all our allies should be striving for technology. But this is a very tall order. Best of luck!

  11. External weapons defeats the purpose of stealth, they should just maximize maneuverability and aerodynamics and call it a day

  12. Have they even built a plane before? Seems kind of a reach to building a stealth fighter from scratch.

    I'll log this one up as a "dream machine" that never sees the light of day.

  13. Didn't they just start making the T-50?

    Talk about ambitious-

    If Taiwan and India have had so much trouble with their indigenous programs- I'm a bit skeptical about this on-

    Maybe they are trying to mess with North Korea's minds? They are really being left behind- isn't half their airforce still MIG 17's?

  14. Just a taught while I am drinking my tea: Why wait nine years when they are already been threaten by North Korea 9 years past to present?

  15. They (SK) should have bought our (USA) F-35B, F-22,F-18, F15 eagle or YF-23 for their country's defense.

  16. Looks like the F-35, F-22, F-18 and Su-27 had a baby.

  17. Looks like the twin engine version of the Saab Stealth fighter the Saab and S. Korea went it to partnership with Indonesia to build. Here are a few links to testing of a 1:13 scaled demonstrator of a stealth fighter concept designed by Saab.

    I'm looking for the other links to the twin engine

  18. the first picture looks a lot like the xf-23 just without the triangular wings

  19. Part of that new trade agreement with the USA I bet, eh? Maybe we are going to generate some income selling Stealth tech to S Korea. Bonus the increased military buffer against North Korea and China…Sounds Great! Lets see how their defense industry handles itself – what will they learn from the US…our groundbreaking technology or our greedy fatcats and politicians who allow Billions in cost overruns. Let the engineers lead the way, and S Korea could develop a thriving aviation industry. Good Luck!

  20. As others have said before, conformal weapons bays like SE. And centerline pod maybe? Could get out 3-6 missiles and then run?

  21. Letsallbefriends | October 22, 2011 at 3:42 am | Reply

    At least it’ll come with a decent warranty.

  22. From above it's like a F-16 with a huge rear end :P

  23. I guess with all this upgrades SK were pursuing, NK are still not move, simply because they knows the Chinese were in their back.

  24. I think they could probably pull it off. Realistically, it wouldn't be up to the capabilities of the F-22 or the F-35, but I don't think that is their goal. I think they are trying to build something comparable to the F-15 Silent Eagle (ok, it probably won't have similar power to weight ratios though). Front the front, their design looks like it could be made to have a low radar cross section. They even have long angled air intake pathways, which significantly reduces reflection off the front turbine blades. I am assuming they will have non-metallic leading edges, similar to the F-117. No big secret, high-tech stuff there. Now, the rear turbine nozzles, on the other hand, are not low signature at all! And for the record, I am ignoring the fact that all of the armament is on external stores, another stealth no, no… It's possible they could put an internal weapons bay between the cockpit and the engines? Due to the way the design pictures are, it would only be stealthy when attacking?

  25. As long as it has the range to deliver a bomb to Pyongyang and return…

    Wonder if the United States keeps nuclear weapons in Seoul for this.

  26. Does not look as good as the Japanese Stealth Projects Model that came out last year. The Mitsubishi model looked very well finished. Dont know if they have continued on it. Still love the New Kawasaki P-2 and KC-2, awesome.

  27. We need to put DoD in charge and stop this progress immediately!

  28. What is "Russian copy cat method". PAK-FA is not near where copy of anything,
    S.Korean KF-X on paper does not look like a clone of F-22 too.

  29. I have been involved for many years in the FX and KFX campaigns in Korea.Over the almost 15 years of continous support of military campaigns in ROK I have learned that we as European OEMs never ever will srand a chance of selling a nut or a bolt for a strategical Project in this country.The almighty arm of uncle Sam is so strong ,that the Koreans never will decide for anything else other than US.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.