Last MRAP to Serve in Iraq Heads Home

Here you have it. This photo shows the last MRAP to be shipped home after serving in the Iraq war. This particular MRAP is a Caiman PLus model and it drove out of Iraq on Dec. 18, 2011 as the last U.S. troops were leaving the country. She’s now en route back to the states after being loaded aboard the freighter OCean Crescent. Once stateside, the armored truck will take up residence at the 1st Cavalry Division museum at Fort Hood, Tx.

One has to wonder if this will be the end of an era? Will the military, now focused on cost cutting and pivoting towards operations in the Pacific theater, have a use for the trucks that came to be a symbol of the Iraq war?

  • mpower6428

    It looks like the automotive combat frankenstein.

  • Mastro

    They’d better keep a few- IED’s are here to stay.

    Sure- the Generals and colonels like to zip around in open air jeeps with flags fluttering- but the grunts still need some protection.

    • Jayson

      IED’s have been around since the Chinese developed gun powder. It’s not a new concept of war and more have died in WW2 from IED’s than Iraq and Afghanistan. In a few years there could be new more effective models proposed making these first gen models obsolete.

      • Mastro

        Well then- a few generals should be court marshalled for sending US troops to the sandbox in nothing but Hummers. Then crying that it would take 2+ years to up armor them and that would ruin their frames.

        As for “new more effective models”- maybe- physics still helps- nothing stops an IED like a big armored box- with a V bottom.

        Of course the Pentagon will have some $$billion program that will promise gold plated nonsense- but I’ll just take an MRAP if I’m ever there.

  • Anonymous

    Ahhh yes, another multi-billion dollar program that should have never existed in a war that should have never happened.

    • Jeff

      Well there are atleast 2900 and their families that would have wished we’d had spent it sooner. Please troll elsewhere.

    • zippo

      Ahhh, little grasshopper. Sleep safe and move aside while others fight to keep you safe. But , move aside when you sit at their table, for you are a coward and unworthy.

  • Klem

    Melt the steel and build more Zumwalts.

  • blight_

    They’ll go into deep sleep, like the extra five divisions worth of Abrams and Bradleys after GW1. They’ll be back when the nation needs them: though they may be obsolete when it’s time to use them! (or cynically, we’ll be back at war again so soon that they won’t be totally unfamiliar)

  • If it really is the last one out, it belongs in a museum. IMO

  • Jayson

    I’d say Afghan could use them but that’s winding down as well. Likely just a niche utlity vehicle who’s role comes and goes.

    Personally I like to see a small focus on the Pacific but moreso in Mexico. Help Mexicans clean up the cartels, then we can pull our manufacturing needs from China to onshore that’s faster to market and faster to adapt to market changes and more secure from having leaking secrets. A side plus is less money wasted on the border security when every day Mexicans are being prosperous enough to not wish to jump to the US to find work and more manufacturers sending jobs there taking advantage of NAFTA making products cost the same as being manufactured in China.

    Lets clean up Mexico first.

    • Big-Rick

      good theory Jayson, but Mexico will not change until it’s culture changes-which isn’t very likely

      Every wonder why 3rd world countries always stay 3rd world?

      • crumb

        i dunno, maybe part of it is because of imf/world bank ‘aid’ that goes to corrupt leaders propped up by US interests and the austerity measures that imposed when the funds are looted? go back to jerking off over guns and leave policy analysis to adults

    • tiger
  • Pat

    Hey this was on DODBuzz already today!

  • Robert

    With budget realities changing, they’ll likely hang on to number these vehicles (hopefully in serviceable condition) repurpose them into something more useful. RPG aren’t going to away in warfare, its likely this style warfare is going be way-its going to be. Though, MRAPs are bit of fuel-hogs, hopefully they can reconfigured to be less costly to operate.

  • These Guys replace my´╗┐ unit from mt lol

  • WRG01

    Overpriced garbage trucks. Many of them very effective so long as they don’t have to go off-road…certainly many need to be kept around. I would think it would be fitting to outfit our lesser capable allies, especially those operating in Somalia and the like, with some of them. Ugandan soldier lack basic body armor, yet ride in the back 5-tons facing IEDs, RPGs and snipers. They do this to combat terrorism…Just sayin’. As for my garbage truck comment…it’s appropriate.

    • Mastro

      Who the *&%$ wants to serve in the Ugandan army??

      I imagine their casualty rate is terrible compared to the US.

  • anantoniusbauwens

    If onlly we could put “WAR” in a museum?!

  • brianckramer

    The MRAP is what happens when you have to fight a war that doesn’t matter against an enemy that is just waiting for you to leave. It’s the mobile equivalent of a bomb shelter: defensive only, and only serve to protect it’s occupants, not win a war.

    couldn’t even see out the GD windscreen

  • All these dumbshits and their comments, who have never served in Iraq, and never seen how MRAPs have saved lives. And mainly, who have never served in Iraq.

  • ben

    hate them, Used MAXPRO’s and never had anything good come out of them. As a 19D we were unable to effectively do or job because we couldnt maneuver these where we wanted them. Also there were way to many maintance issues that were above the dash 20 level.

  • jordan hayden

    I drove a camon in Iraq in 2009-2010 and I miss that vehical I drove over 4,000 miles.

  • kola15

    Why have most people not put the blame on the one person who is responsible.. Saddam Hussein. For the past 10 years after Desert Storm how many times did he violate the UN sanctions and interfered with the weapon inspectors. Even Bill Clinton gave him a chance. You don’t keep a large military force in place unless the threat is that big. Like South Korea and West Germany during the Cold War with the Soviet Union. Since the other side used IEDs as their weapon of choice. The MRAP will have draw backs but what is the alternative?