Concept Plane Eye Candy: Boeing’s F/A-XX

While we’re on the topics of new Boeing jets, let’s take a look at the latest evolution of Boeing’s concept for a 6th-generation manned, carrier-launched strike fighter dubbed F/A-XX.

We saw the first drawings of the concept jet in 2010 during the Navy League’s annual Sea, Air, Space conference in National Harbor, Md. This year’s conference saw the Chicago-based company unveil a model of the plane.

Click through the jump for more pics (forgive the quality, I took them with an iPhone).


  • TMB

    What’s the in background of picture #2? It looks like another plane design with a bunch of suits standing around it.

    • Pat

      That looks like an F-18.

      • Andy

        look at again, F22 with no tail……..

        • Andrew

          while looking at things again, take another look at the 2 posts you just responded to

        • Boone145

          Thats no F-22, its to narrow in the body section, and the wings are longer and narrower as well. I would say it is a modified F-18.

  • Andy

    This look better than F35 , twin Engine? damn it a bad a$$ looking plane

    • Guest

      Hello Andy

      Definately the design of this aircraft looks way better than the lemon F-35, twin engines which is the best thing for overwater operations, long range and to improve survivability against engine failure. In my opinion this should be a best replacement for the F-35. For more information, search for Will the U.S. Navy Find a New Aircraft that Can Replace JSF? from defence.professionals.

      When I was looking at the F/A-XX airframe design I was thinking that Boeing should add two more features for e.g. extend the tail area to able to have horizontal stabilisers (simliar to the F-15s stabs) and twin tail fins.

      Hopefully this should be affordable aircraft to buy and maintain than the F-35.

  • RCDC

    Let it fly! Will this be flying on our territorial airspace, South Korea or Kuwait?

  • Hunter76

    6th gen manned fighter?

    Hyper-expensive fodder for next gen unmanned air wing.

    Main thing is the industrialists and politicians will have been paid off.

    The US cannot afford to lose the uav race. Even small powers such Iran can mass-produce uavs.

    • blight_

      Iran is a telecom leader with plenty of bandwidth to command and control these babies?

      • Hunter78

        Iran has the same amount of bandwidth as everyone else.

        Command and control will be based on 3 primary methods, which can mixed as desired:

        Narrow beam com (eg, lasers);
        Wide beam complex burst mode frequency shifting;
        Autonomous operations.

        Much of that can be put on a pc board.

    • Jim37F

      you really think a pilot remotely flying an aircraft hundreds (or even thousands) of miles away with only a tv screen to see whats going on, or worse, some piece of software is going to be able to defeat a trained and experienced pilot anytime in the near future?

  • Belesari

    OK for all the idiots who are going to start spewing “BUT MANNED IS THE PAST THE FUTURE IS UAV’s!!!!!!” Stealth was a MOVIE. Cool movie but a movie none the less.

    Right now one of our hardest problems is to

    OK just so its clear….


    Any vehicle capable of going toe-toe with a modern or hell let alone a 4th or 5th gen fighter is going to cost as much if not more than said fighter.

    They are also 30 or more years away atleast. If anything we will see them become the back seat drivers on the future aircraft. For EW and other jobs.

    This has been your serving of reality…..thank you calm the f**k down.

    • Andrew

      But my Iphone talks to me!!!! Surely I could get it to fire an AMRAAM with some added Objective C in there somewhere.

      • EJ257

        Pilot: “Fire the AMRAAM”

        Plane: “You want to ram him. Is this correct?”

        • blight_

          Fox One!

          You have selected: Guns.

          • asdf

            you need to buy an app for this

          • blight_

            The Lite version only fires Sidewinders. Buy Pro to get AMRAAM’s.

            Then there’s the advertisement subsidized version, but sometimes in the middle of dogfights you have to watch an advert…

        • Thomas L. Nielsen

          Actually, I think it will be more something like this:

          Plane: “Enemy aircraft on approch vector. Enemy Air Defence Sites coming active in sectors Alfa and Foxtrot”

          Pilot: “Activate laser PDS and countermeasures, and give me full offensive control”

          Plane: “I’m sorry, Dave. I’m afraid I can’t do that.”

          And if you don’t get the reference, you need a cultural upgrade :-)

          Regards & all,

          Thomas L. Nielsen

          • blight_

            Then the real bottleneck comes down to using a natural language syntax that is relatively clear, but takes time to communicate.

            There’s a real appeal of AI, but…

        • joe


          “Oh, Shiiiiiiiiiiiii……..”

    • tiger

      We have human pilots that smack into mountians And fall out of the sky into Apartment buildings……..

      • Jim37F

        mechanical problems wont be solved by removing the pilot

  • stephen russell

    FA 36? FA 45.
    New designation.

  • ajspades

    Looks amazingly similar to the X-44 MANTA
    Guess there are no copyrights on aircraft design.

  • Mars HQ

    This looks cool on the surface, but what engines will are expected to power this concept, and what is the expected weights and dimensions of this concept?

    Are those twin F414 EDE? F110 or F100? What’s the empty weight and length?

    It would appear to have capacity for longer endurance and better range than F-35, which would of course be a positive.

    But I must confess that while this looks good, I’d highly encourage Boeing to simultaneously propose a radical concept redesign of the Super Hornet, similar in scope to the F-16XL concept. Boeing could seek NASA and DARPA assistance and under a joint research.

    A radically improved Super Hornet platform with dramatic improvements in drag reductions, improved range and reduced RCS would be an interesting ‘generational bridge’ concept until 6th gen can better mature and until policy makers can get a better handle on what exactly can be afforded and what should be deployed as a 2040 US Tactical fighter.

    Off the shelf and currently being developed systems and avionics from an already existing international supply chain could be incorporated into a next-gen architecture, rather than trying to reinvent a brand new supply chain with new avionics, etc. Simply, cherry pick the most superior globally available systems or soon to be available and integrate them into the platform for a superior cost-effective product!

  • tiger

    Where is the rudder? Yes, the marvels of flight computers are nice , but I’d like to have one.

  • tiger

    I Guess I’ll have wait for Generation 7 to see a VF-1 Veritech “Valkyrie” fly?

  • Larry Chase

    the more High priced it is the merrier the armed services are when we have to foot the Billhow much about 1.8 Billion possibly just another toy for them last time it was the Raptor

  • What this needs is a STOVL version.

  • FtD

    next gen already? what about the still in development 5th gen F35??

    • passingby

      they will probably cancel it after spending 200 billion more.

  • The air intakes appear outdated, a F-18 copy.

    • passingby

      it’s OK. they can change it with some additional funding in the production phase. 99.95 billion at the most.

  • sam

    why do we need another expensive stealth plane why not just a realy realy good normal fighter that we can mass produce

  • asdf

    nice plane or not, augustine’s law is well on the way

  • Michael

    The intakes are not diverterless?

  • johnysmith

    a RFI has been launched to look into the new US Navy fighter to replace the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet and EA-18G Growler in the 2030s.

  • Genuinely no matter if someone doesn’t know then its
    up to other users that they will assist, so here it happens.