The Navy’s Newest Drone Chopper

That’s right, the Navy is moving ahead with its plan to replace it’s relatively small MQ-8B Fire Scout drone helicopters with an unmanned version of the Bell 407 chopper, dubbed the MQ-8C Fire Scout (sometimes FireX, that will carry increased cargo and more than double the robot chopper’s endurance.

“We’ve been asked to carry more packages on-board the aircraft, we’ve been asked for more endurance especially in high-hot environments, and so because of that we got an urgent requirement to upgrade the aircraft to give us greater endurance,” said Rear Adm. William Shannon III, program executive officer for the Navy’s unmanned aircraft and strike weapons programs during the Navy League’s annual Sea, Air, Space Conference in National Harbor, Md. “As a result of that we are in the process of signing a contract with Northrop Grumman that would ostensibly swap out the airframe [for the Bell 407]; 95-percent of the software remains the same from [the original Fire Scout]; all the links, all the comms systems, all the avionics remain the same. Essentially, what we’ll do is swap out the air vehicle, the airframe, with a Bell 407, and we’ll go from about six-hours of endurance to about 14-hours of endurance. For those of you that are familiar with vertical lift and helicopters, that’s pretty remarkable. About a six-to-seven hundred pound payload and 14 hours of endurance.”

The MQ-8C will replace the smaller MQ-8B as a robot helicopter supporting special operations forces with everything from ISR overwatch and cargo resupply to close air support with rockets and missiles by 2015, according to Shannon.

Click here to read about the recent crashes involving the smaller Fire Scout.

The Bell 407 is basically an upgraded version of the civilian chopper that the Army’s OH-58 Kiowa Warrior attack scout helo is based on. I’ve got to wonder, how long will it be before we see other, previously-manned weapon systems like say M1 Abrams tanks become unmanned and sent downrange?

  • Andrew

    Did they just indefinitely ground the MQ-8B? Seems like the same software and comms could be a problem.

  • TMB

    Seems premature (maybe even reckless) to make what they’re essentially calling a bigger Firescout before they figure out what was wrong with the original Firescout.

    • majrod

      True, when the drone refuses to land on a ship it definitely limits the drone’s use then again it’s not their money.

  • Lance

    There Firescout is in shambles with most malfunctioning. And yet they want to go with another UAV. Maybe the Navy could get there UAV skills built up before they go with a BIGGER and alot more expensive UAV which may crash into the sea if not maintained better than the current Firescout.

  • SJE

    There are several advantage of going with this UAV.
    1. Use a well tested airframe and systems could be a LOT cheaper than the firescout
    2. Using the Firescout electronic systems on this airframe may help isolate the problems with the Firescout. As it is, the firescout has too many things that are new that it can be harder to isolate the cause of the problems.
    3. It would be interesting to see if they can start to RETROFIT old helos with UAV packages. That is, when a helo gets too old to be safe for pilots, can you gut it an get some more mileage as a UAV for a lot less. It does not have to be the latest and best electronics.

    • FormerDirtDart

      The MQ-8B Firescout is based off of the Schweizer 330SP/333. Which is a development of the Hughes 269, commonly know to decades of Army pilots as the first helicopter they ever flew, the TH-55 Osage.
      The MQ-8B is based on a pretty mature system.

      • Curt

        True, but that doesn’t fit his narrative.

      • SJE

        My concern is that the airframe has evolved too far from the original Schweizer design that you cannot assume that handling will be the same. Lets run the experiment with bigger choppers with the exact same airframe and see what we get.

  • Kosme

    Why not just use a manned Bell 407 chopper ??

    • guess

      Not fancy enough
      Duh lol

    • tiger

      They cost money, benifits & and take away from payload.

    • Curt

      14hr endurance maybe? Paying for two helo pilots? Oh wait, 4 pilots due to crew rest! Reduced payload maybe?

  • Andy

    use MQ9 , folder wing add the hook and is a done deal quick and effective.

  • S O

    A navy helo without tyres?!?

  • Belesari

    “how long will it be before we see other, previously-manned weapon systems like say M1 Abrams tanks become unmanned and sent downrange?”

    Never what would be the point. When a tank breaks down you need the crew to do maintanence. Its one of the reasons that crews are so big. The more hands to help the better.

    • Ronaldo

      Crew size in the M-1 has nothing to do with anything other than inefficiency. The Army can’t wait until they get that fourth crew member ( the loader) outta there !

      Check the latest T-90 for a small crew platform for 2010 and beyond.

  • Mastro

    How long before the Navy decides they need UAV versions of the Chinook?

    • TMB

      Probably never since they don’t use the Chinook.

    • Sgt_Buffy

      Lol, nice one TMB. But even so, the dual-rotor system might just be easier for a computer to handle, I wonder. After all, one use for robotic anything is to take over the bulk transport jobs so that we don’t have to risk people flying over hostile territory with just cargo or something, or even sending in a chopper to a heavy firefight to resupply troops without risking the pilots and crew.

  • stephen russell

    Needs NOTAR & or ducted tail rotor & use FireScout for Spec Ops & Gunship role, light Recon?
    Still viable with bigger weapons payload?

  • The 14 hour endurance (NG say 15 hours) seems pretty remarkable for a helicopter.

    Is this why drones keep crashing? No one bothers checking or inspecting anything anymore?

  • Rohan

    This is really awesome !!!! I wanna meet the engineers who are working up for this !

  • Old Ranger

    “I’ve got to wonder, how long will it be before we see other, previously-manned weapon systems like say M1 Abrams tanks become unmanned and sent downrange?”


  • Erich

    Someday certain select people will be able to control one of these right from home taking direction finding and firing orders from the at home commanders. But one will get shot down and wind up in China.

    Wonder whatever happened to that drone that the Iranians got a hold of a couple of months ago?