Boeing Developing JDAM Wing Kits, Tripling Range

SAINT LOUIS, Mo. — What’s better than a Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM) capable of flying 15 nautical miles to destroy a moving target? Why a JDAM capable of flying 45 nautical miles to reign down death and destruction on some bad guys fleeing in a pickup truck (or tank). The engineers at Boeing — and an unnamed U.S. ally — think so too and are developing a wing kit for the 500-pound and 2,000-pound version of the bombs (shown above) that will triple the effective range of the famous GPS and laser-guided bombs, Boeing officials told DT during a June 7 briefing at the company’s facility here.

The company has already tested the 50-pound wing kit in a wind tunnel and will do the same with the 2,000-pound version later this year. The wing kit can be added to JDAMs in the field, giving aircraft the ability to hit targets while flying a safe distance away. (The bomb would even fly dozens of miles behind the plane after launch to strike targets the jet had already streaked past. If this isnt enough, Boeing is considering developing a engine engine plug that could be insterted between the JDAM’s guidance fins and the body of the bomb.

For anyone who isn’t familiar with the JDAM, it’s basically a kit consisting of a GPS receiver and steering fins that is strapped onto a conventional bomb in under ten minutes turning it into a smart bomb. Boeing has even developed a laser seeker that can be screwed into the bombs nose and can update the weapons GPS receiver 20 times a second while tracking a moving target. This means that even when a truck is moving at “highway speeds” the bomb can lock-on and destroy it.

While the U.S. isn’t officially involved with the development of the JDAM-ER (extended range), company officials assured DT that big blue would love to sell it to the Pentagon as a low-cost, high-capability weapon.

Boeing officials wouldn’t reveal international customer that they are building the weapon in partnership with (the foreign country apparently designed the initial wing kit, Boeing is tweaking the design). However, a quick Google search turns up a 2006 press release from the Australian defence department discussing a JDAM wing kit capable of extending the weapon’s range by a “significant” amount. Boeing again refused to say if the Aussie’s are the partner country.

  • Black Owl

    YES! Turning ordinary bombs into gliding guided munitions is an excellent and effective way to provide high capability at a low cost!

  • Paul

    death and destruction REIGNS!

  • tiger

    If only the 8th AF had JADAM’s? A lot of men would not have had to die in a flaming bomber.

  • Belesari

    Maybe we need a large long range long loiter tie turboprop bomber to just sit above a target and crop when called. Hell it could have a 80nm range.

    Hell maybe a airship lol.

  • GUEST

    doesn’t matter. glide bombs are only good against primitive foes. C-RAM would shoot these down before they could reach a modern mechanized force.

  • Nick

    Need to make one that can operate without GPS, any potential enemy worth worrying about will have anti-satellite weaponry. Perhaps something like a cruise missiles terrain following radar

  • Vok

    Glide bomb is too slow. A decent C-RAM can shoot it out of sky long before it reaches the intended target. Its usefulness is limited to combating a foe with non-existent air defense. GPS guidance is another Achilles heel. Try use it against the Chinese and you will find it out how “effective” it can be.

  • Not especially new.Just that DOD will now spend some money to deploy this capability with U.S. Forces. Way…way back when Boeing, LM and others were competing to get the contract to what is today called JDAM…(remember early INS/GPS assistant bomb kits for the B-2 were “GAM’s” by NG. …) anyway, DOD tested all kinds of associated JDAM tech, different terminal seekers like DAMASK (now fielded today has HART-JDAM with the USN) and wing kits. Wing kits on JDAM-like weapons flew many years ago. …Paying for capability only you need….the US up to recently has only fielded the basic JDAM (and now laser terminal seekers…. and of course HART-JDAM)….. That other government you mention in the article is either Australia (deHavilland) see this link http://goo.gl/8zEhF or Korea…see this link… http://goo.gl/6T0EQ Australia has already fielded JDAM-ER for 500 pounders for their legacy Hornets; associated with their defence program called AIR-5425 I think…A photo here. http://goo.gl/TjCkW For some target scenarios, JDAM-ER competes with the much more expensive JSOW. So against legacy air defenses, legacy aircraft can do a whole…”I can touch you but you can’t touch me” scenario where with no fancy laser seeker… ( DAMASK or HART/JDAM seeker…). JDAM INS/GPS only… in one pass you can hit a lot of fixed and known targets from 30 or more miles away.

  • STemplar

    I’d like to know the range boost from this plug in engine.

  • Josh

    I love how theres finally a low cost advanced weapons system, aka good news and people begin to bash its effectiveness and use against “an actual enemy”. Its not like china or iran has flying robots equipped with laser guns and bla bla bla. Stop jumping the gun and doubting our ability jesus lol.

    • Technoweapon

      +1

      But what is the point of posting if we’re not going to show our yellow hides and bark at the eViL China and Iran?

      As if Iran and China are of any threat today. China is one step away from being an ally, for crying out loud. And Iran might put some mines in the water, oh noes!

      Oh, wait… Iran is getting the bomb! Lol. It’ll be cute like the NK one. Or maybe they’ll use it on Israel. The price of glass will go down after Israel replies and turns Iran into a windshield.

      Give me a break, gentlemen. We Americans have a history of avoiding armageddon.

  • mpower6428

    GPS guided bombs depended on… GPS satilites.

    they’re a luxury folks, an effective one to be sure but, if the fudge hits the fan they’ll be WW2 style dumb bombs once again.

    • STemplar

      People tend to think that the GPS system just automatically disappears if Beijing wills it. For starters their one shoot down of a satellite was one of their weather satellites at a height of 537 miles above sea level. GPS satellites orbit at about 12500 miles above sea level, they aren’t going to shoot them down.

      They might try and jam signals in localized areas, but it isn’t like we are just lying down on that and not developing secure signal transmission and reception research. In addition anything that is spewing out enough energy to jam GPS signals in a significant area is electromagnetically lighting itself up like a road flare in a dark room. That subjects it to being targeted with other weapons.

      Also any jamming done requires a lot of power. In fixed locations its possible to affect a pretty large area but in a moving formation not so much. To say nothing of the fact that you may hide your precise location from targeting, but it’s easy enough to drop cluster munitions on the blank spots. Couple that with pesky little drones, JSTARs and such and GPS jamming doesn’t do an enemy alot of good, even if they can do it over a practical sized area.

      • Technoweapon

        Thaaank you. I always have to keep in mind that the majority of posters here are from the Vietnam days.

        Even if you pulled off the downing of a GPS sat there are a dozen more to fall back on. The only thing that I can think of to really put the hurt on our tech would be an EMP sat. And that’s still science fiction, as far as I know.

        • ben

          high altitude nuclear device in the megaton range would do the trick quite well for disrupting the GPS on a contintental scale.

          Even if the satellites themselves are hardened sufficiently to survive, the ionosphere would be saturated with high energy particles for a time. This would reflect most of the transmissions from the satellites back into space, effectively blinding every receiver beneath the area of effect.

          At best you would still be receiving signals from satellites low near the horizon, but those would be more vulnerable to getting shadowed by local geology, and would be weaker due to the greater distance.

    • toohey

      JDAMs have an inertial guidance and newer variants can ride a laser beam

  • Sam

    Reminds me of the time early in the last Iraq War when Iraq turned on one of those so called “GPS Jammers” from China or Russia and the Allied spokesperson said they destroyed it with a GPS guided bomb. Too funny!

  • SuttonHoo

    Pedantic

  • Lance

    Cool idea but the size makes it work only well for BIG bombers like the B-52 and B-1 like the pic shows. A F-16 or F-15E would have issues with such large bombs.

    • Technoweapon

      Well, lucky for us Americans! We’ve got plenty of BUFF’s and Bone’s to throw around!

    • GreensboroVet

      Lance it did say 500 lbs first. I am not expert on aircraft, but I sure the falcons and eagles wont have a problems hauling 500 lbs around.

  • ltfunk

    It’s little wonder that th epentagon is lookign at longer range everything from bombs to AAMs.

    Considering the miserable survivalibly of the aircraft comming up thier only hope will be to shoot as far away as possible and run. Though all the scenarios with the F-35 show that running is futile anyways.

  • William C.

    Seems like it would be a useful capability to have. I wouldn’t bother with the rocket boosted variants however. Leave that to JSOW-ER.

  • anthony

    Id say drop one fourth the size of a A-bomb were we know it would hurt,alot cheaper and ifficient instead of shooting match heads,eventually well have to drop one its size,by contineuing making bombs bigger and bigger??

  • EW3

    Depends; if it’s below freezing, you snow down death and destruction. ;)

  • zaphd

    I remember reading something about the South Koreans proposing this idea. I wonder if they are the unnamed ally.

  • elizzar

    gps-haters be hating … erm, surely one of the main points with this modification technology is the relative cheapness, turning a dumb-ish bomb into such a guided weapon compared to the cost of a cruise missile or similar? it could also have interesting naval applications for carrier strike aircraft etc.

  • Just a good attempt to copy the French ASSAM or Hammer being used by the French Military and now being intergrated onto UAE Desert Falcons. A large American source of these type of weapons is good. But with Boeing involved it will be over priced and way behind schedule.

  • It sounds similar to the South African Umbani program:

    http://preview.tinyurl.com/7pla22b

    Of course, it’s unlikely that Umbani is the foreign technology used by Boeing, but it’s an example of what another country is doing. I understand Australia is doing something similar, and China’s rumored to be working with Pakistan on a glide bomb project. Pakistan has bought the H-2 and H-4 (Raptor and Raptor II) guided glide weapons from South Africa in the past. For more information on the latter weapons, follow the link below and scroll down:

    http://preview.tinyurl.com/6ptaues

  • Infidel4LIFE

    Win win. Good move.

  • Woodswalker

    It was somewhat jarring to read…

  • blight_

    AGM-130 for the win?

    That said, is it safe to assume that the stated range would require very high altitude to maximize glide time?