Marine Corps extends K-MAX Afghanistan deployment to 2013

The Marine Corps has approved another deployment extension for its experimental K-MAX unmanned cargo-carrying aircraft in Afghanistan.

This is the second extension for the K-MAX, a move that will keep platform in theater until March 30, 2013 with an option to stretch it to the following September, according to a Lockheed Martin press release. The Corps recently extended the first deployment K-MAX from May until Sept.30.

“K-MAX has proven its value as a reliable cargo resupply aircraft and an asset that saves lives,” Vice Adm. David Architzel, commander of U.S. Naval Air Systems, which manages the K-MAX program with the Marine Corps, said in the release. “The use of this aircraft eliminates the need for manned ground convoys, reducing the number of our warfighters exposed to improvised explosive devices.”

The two K-MAX unmanned helicopters being tested in Afghanistan have accumulated 525 flight hours during 485 sorties, while handling as much as 4,500 pounds of cargo per mission.

K-MAX features Kaman’s high-altitude, heavy-lift K-1200 airframe and Lockheed Martin’s mission management and control systems, enabling autonomous flight in remote environments over large distances. The helicopter can fly at higher altitudes with a larger payload than any other rotary wing unmanned aerial system, according to Lockheed Martin officials.

K-MAX will be among the highlighted products at Lockheed Martin’s booth at the Association of the Unmanned Vehicle Systems North America 2012 show August 6-9 in Las Vegas.

8 Comments on "Marine Corps extends K-MAX Afghanistan deployment to 2013"

  1. How long you planning on staying there?

    Dosent seem like there in any hurry to wrap things up

  2. Contractors probably still manning the things.

    As for how long in AfPak, we'll see. There is a subset of the Isolationists who want a strong military at home. There is a subset of peaceniks who want America "out of the war business".

  3. Looks like a giant flying insect.

  4. The USAF screwed itself out of a mission, light tactical resupply, with the cancellation or pending cancellation of the C-27J… replaced by this system and contractor based air mobility…

  5. I want to beat our enemies @$$3$ into the dust so that they absolutely *know* they are dogmeat and then remake them into something more tolerable than what caused us to go. If we're not up to doing that then it's time to cut the line and move on. Decade+ long running sores are not the American way of war.

    I'm tending towards the idea also that PGMs aren't necessarily the best tool for the job. They're too surgical, leave the civilian populace too detached. Give the Sherman Doctrine a try and make the sea in which the fish swim (the civil population) sick of the whole damn thing.

    You make war seeking to break the will of the enemy command structure. This necessarily include the civilian populace as without their support, overt or otherwise, there is no fight.

  6. Of course, robofighters are the future. But one shouldn't be surprised about the strength of the moral outrage nonAms can bring against automated killing machines.

  7. I personally don’t see much reason to stay in Afghanistan anymore

  8. If it takes a pilot, copilot, and a least a crew chief (and maybe a door gunner) out of the mix, and potential danger, I'm all for it. Smarter not harder, right?

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.