X95 rifle gets new conversion kit

Israel Weapon Industries has introduced a new conversion kit for its X95 assault rifle, allowing operators to now choose between 5.45mm, 5.56mm and 9mm ammunition.

The X95 is a compact weapon designed for the Israel Defense Force and similar type units. The conversion kit was designed to make the X95 compatible with 5.45mm ammunition used by eastern militaries in addition to the NATO 5.56mm and 9mm calibers.

IWI officials maintain that the kit will make the X95 the only weapon in the world that can use these three popular calibers.

“We developed the kit in response to requests we received from our customers for a 5.45mm ammunition weapon so that they could use the ammunition in their inventories,” said Uri Amit, IWI’s CEO. “This enables considerable savings by allowing our customers to change the rifle barrel according to the ammunition on hand, as well as matching the weapon to the evolving operational scenarios.”

The X95 has an effective range of 500 meters in its rifle and carbine configuration and 150 meters in its 9mm submachine gun mode.

The new kit has tested in extreme conditions including dust, water, heat, and cold for reliability and shooting accuracy, IWI officials maintain.

Examples of the converted weapons will be exhibited at Interpolitex in Moscow, Oct. 23-26 and ExpoDefensa in Colombia, Oct. 31-Nov. 2.

About the Author

Matt Cox
Matthew Cox is a reporter at Military.com. He can be reached at matthew.cox@military.com.
  • Lance

    Not new news, Mr Hoffman.

    Ukrainian Special Forces use tavors with AK-74s for years. They make them in 5.45mm so that Spec Ops operators who use both AK-74s and tavors can have common ammo for operations.

    • Nick T.

      I see I’m not the only one who reads thefirearmblog. Interesting as it is, it’s not ground breaking tech to have a gun that switch calibers, unless it can feed both rounds (and magazine types) with no trouble or part swap. Then I’ll be impressed. Having to change just the barrel is a nice. Still, they claim that their gun is the only one that can field all 3 calibers, and I’m quite sure there are conversion kits for the AR-15 that let you go with 5.45 or 9mm. Is it just supposed to be a quicker change?

  • Sergei

    Now build gun they no need 3 billion US dollar or German sub cheap no yes?

    why u pay

  • Hefe

    I’d like some input please. I see so many articles about how the M4 and the M16 jam regularly in dusty conditions. The reason being is that the the gas piston system expels the dirty gasses into the chamber. Does it seem like it’s time for the U.S. to switch carbines? After all they were designed in the 70’s and there’s been major improvements in firearms since then.

    • Tiger

      1. Remington got a contract in April to build 24,000 New M-4’s, so nothing new coming.
      2. We have a DOD budget to cut. Adopting a New rifle is a low priority in a Drone/ IED world. Those are the weapons doing the real fighting today.

    • HiPowerGuy

      You know, if the M4 and M16 jammed and had as many problems as these so called stories, I would think we would have HUNDREDS of DEAD soldiers due to their failure. I think they fail just about as much or LESS than any other WORLD CLASS MILITARY RIFLE….but, we spend HUNDREDS of millions of dollars, and do nothing but cancel the contracts. hahahahahahaha Well, no wonder we are on the verge of bankruptcy.

  • Tiger

    When did the gun pick up up the “X95” designation? I though it was the Tavor tar -21?

  • I would love to see the line expanded to 6.5 Grendel, 6.8mm and 50 Beuwulf..

  • William C.

    Is this “X95” the new designation for the entire Tavor series, or just the MTAR-21?

    • Thomas L. Nielsen

      As I understand it, the X95 is an “improved TAVOR”, with (among other things) a modified handguard and picatinny rails everywhere.

      The IWI website (http://www.israel-weapon dot com/default.asp?catid=%7BFF7A51A4-4AF9-410D-A2B0-860E9D4F6D2F%7D) still lists both the TAVOR and the X95.

      Regards & all,

      Thomas L. Nielsen
      Luxembourg

    • steve

      as far as i can tell its a new designation of the micro-tavor ( for foreign marketing)

  • Guest

    Looks like a pistol with an ass.

  • jsallison

    A Kardashian? Forgive me lord and feed the starving pygmies of New Guinea, amen.

  • Tiger

    Any new news of the Tavor coming to the US for sale? Rumor mill last year had a import deal finally in place.

  • Joe America

    Don’t people know the difference between a caliber and a cartridge?

    5.45 & 5.56 are the same caliber.

  • doningram

    they can make a 5.56 round that will out perform the 5.45 by just using the bullet that was orignally designed for. it was designed as a varmit cartridge. with 45 grn. pills. that combination really works. using the heavy pills to stop from making a cal. change is nutso. shooting at long ranges by adding 7 grns. to the pill is not the answer. change the cal. to 7.62, go back to a longer barrel and put on a good sight and then let the soldiers expend lots of rounds at the range, before deployment. watch the price drop and the scores go up. keep the enemy in your controled range not his.

  • TJRedneck

    Chamber it for a .40 cal, .45 cal, and a 6.65 mm, then it’ll have some knock down power. Israelies make great weapons and I’m sure this will live up to their great reputation. I LOVE my Galil .308 AR.

    • Drew

      Remember, you’re probably firing your .308 semi-auto. The reason for the smaller calibers is to use the same round in a rifle as the squad based MG’s. It reduces logisitics problems to ship a single type or round to the front and let a working party chain link the ammo for the MG’s and pack the rifle ammo into magazines

    • Nmate

      You do know there is no such thing as “knock down power”, right? The .40 S&W isn’t a very good cartridge. It offers little ballistic benefit over a 9mm with a lot of downsides. The .45 ACP is a good cartridge, but you severely limit capacity with it. The best bet would be to forget the Hague Convention of 1899 and use expanding ammunition. A 5.56 NATO firing a 70gr Barnes TSX projectile is nasty. The 7.62x51mm NATO is both inefficient as a cartridge and far too heavy for service rifles. Going back to it would be a step backwards, not forwards.

  • Thomas L. Nielsen

    “….we tell the israeli when and what to do and only in 1 out of a 100 times they “disobey””

    Could you please get someone from Israel to confirm that?

    Regards & all,

    Thomas L. Nielsen
    Luxembourg

  • justin

    enough about conversion kits, I just want to when the promised Tavor for the us civilian market are going to arrive and how much they will be

  • brok3n

    Along with the 5.45 conversion, I really hope they add a 6.5 conversion kit too.. any one know the status of steel cased 6.5 coming out yet?

  • Kyle_A

    Is the X95 the standard-issue for IDF?

  • Petruszenko

    Ukrainian’s have this called “Viepr”. China have “TYPE97”. Austria have Steyr, Tar etc. A lot of countries have bullup guns. Gus Piston is better, but bullup? Better switch youre US guns to 7,62 or change CAR15, M16, FN and all others on other type of guns to something really new. All the “new” projects are really similar, like “revolutionary” Barrett REC7.

  • scott

    this thing looks totally awesome.

  • Jim Peterson
  • Right here is the right website for anybody who
    wants to understand this topic. You know a
    whole lot its almost hard to argue with you (not that I really would want to…HaHa).
    You definitely put a new spin on a subject that’s been discussed for a long time.
    Great stuff, just wonderful!

  • bob

    I own one. It is the finest rifle I have fired in 5.56