Polyurethane Might be the Key to Next-Gen Body Armor

A cool new development in bullet stopping tech happening at Rice University.  This from the school’s web site:

A Rice University lab, in collaboration with researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and its Institute for Soldier Nanotechnologies, decided to find out by creating the nanoscale target materials, the microscale ammo and even the method for firing them.

Ned Thomas, dean of the George R. Brown School of Engineering at Rice and a materials scientist, holds a polyurethane disk with the bullets it stopped and sealed inside. Thomas is leading an investigation into the characteristics of such materials at the nanoscale.

In the process, they gathered a surprising amount of information about how materials called block copolymers dissipate the strain of sudden impact.

This video explains more:

Long time DT readers will remember the “Dragonskin” issue a couple of years ago.  This polymer tech could render that discussion moot and be a big game changer in the world of personal protection.

(Gouge: Mike Archer)

  • nate

    So is this the same stuff one would use to coat and protect hardwood floors? If so, then could one just go down to the hardware store, buy a gallon or two, pour it in a frame, and make their own bullet proof glass?

    • Jeff

      It’d probably be more involved than that. Layered applications of controlled thickness at varying specific temperature and humidity drying conditions.

    • blight_

      Probably not.

      On the plus side, it might hold up better than bulletproof glass. I note that the example unit didn’t shatter; but I have no idea what was fired into it.

    • Thematerialsguy

      Unlikely; they use the generalized “polyurethane”, which is just a type of bonding which characterizes this polymer, the rest of the chemical composition (chemical backbones) are likely very different from your typical store bought urethane coating; which will yield very different material properties.

    • Fil

      Sure, just like how the carbon in your pencil and the carbon on your engagement band are the same thing. Right?

    • tim

      yeah, that’s how it works.

    • Steve

      Not the same stuff Nate. The polyurethane that this article is referring to would be a 2 component system, i.e. a (polymer and catalyst) or hardener if you prefer. Similar to you mixing an epoxy 2 component system together.
      Typically for the properties they are looking for it would be a hot cure system. High end bowling balls are made of castable polyurethane. Currently some Jet planes are using a uniroyal polyurethane 2 component 85D hardness product that is in the same hardness range of bowling balls for their windshields. It keeps geese from landing on the pilots lap.
      My guess is that for body armor its likely that the material (urethane) used would be a softer durometer than windshield material. Maybe not tho, I spose they could mold plates that connect together of harder material. It sure wouldn’t be comfortable to have a rigid jacket to wear.
      Its quite interesting. I produce custom polyurethane components for various industries & now I will have to play with several different scrap parts I have laying around and see if anything I have would work. Might be able to make myself some custom armor. Think I can purchase various weapons and do some R & D and write off the purchase’s?? hmmm.

  • tiger

    I think folks on this board will not be happy till they have Stormtrooper outfits from Star wars to wear. We need light saber resistant Armor!

  • blight_

    Finally, something tech related.

    Under rubber toughening, another wiki article:

    “Many thermoplastics such as polystyrene and PMMA are brittle when stressed, a property which limits applications. A good way of strengthening such polymers is to copolymerise elastomeric chains during manufacture. The elastomer chains form separate phases in the solid, typically 10-20 micrometres in diameter, so that when the material is strained, crazes form at their surfaces, increasing the energy needed to break the material”

    Might mitigate one of the weaknesses of boro-ceramics, which is that they are strong but brittle, and heavy. That said, what kind of weight, density and effective volume of material is required to stop an AK-47 round? Does the copolymer spall?

    On the plus side, polymers can be molded and cast perhaps much more reliably and cheaply than ceramic plates. Curious where it’ll go.

    • Thematerialsguy

      If your thinking about personal body armor; polyurethane alone will not supplant B4-C or Si-C. Look at how thick of a section of urethane they needed to stop just a 9mm bullet. You would be extremely bulky wearing that. In fact to my knowledge, there is no better way to currently stop a bullet in such a confined space then ceramics (since they erode the bullet, while crumbling=energy absorption). A support liner is used to support the ceramic-plate and catch any debris with forward momentum. These guys are actually trying to understand the fundamental mechanisms behind what makes polyurethane an effective energy absorber. And that piece they have in the photograph is mainly for show. This objective is far removed from any practical armor application. If you want to learn more about the challenges of developing ultra-light weight armor materials a good, albeit technical overview is found in “Progress in Ceramic Armor” published by the American Ceramic Society (http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-1574981951,descCd-tableOfContents.html). And no, the co-polymer wouldn’t spall because it’s elongation to failure is too high/(it’s not brittle); it would fail ductility first, I imagine.

    • Daniel Thaler

      I’m sure your calculations are correct. Isn’t it amazing that nanotechnology, at its beginnings, started with close examination of the lotus leaf.

    • scott2311

      any thoughts on BAE systems liquid body armor ‘ shear thickening liquid ‘ ?

  • TomUK

    I think the keywords here may be ‘nanoscale’ and ‘microscale ammo’. Interesting start, though.

    • blight_

      There’s always an issue with model systems, but the specific aim is a very standardized test system that can be eventually used to test all materials.

      From: http://www.nanotech-now.com/news.cgi?story_id=462

      Testing their ideas took special equipment. The research team came up with a miniaturized test method, dubbed the laser-induced projectile impact test (LIPIT), that uses a laser pulse to fire glass spheres about 3 microns in diameter. The spheres sit on one side of a thin absorbing film facing the target. When a pulse hits the film, the energy causes it to vaporize and the spheres to fly off, hitting speeds between .5 and 5 kilometers per second. Since the kinetic energy scales with velocity squared, the factor of 10 in speed translates to a factor of 100 in impact energy, Thomas said.

      Lee calculated the impact in real-world terms: The spheres strike their target 2,000 times faster than an apple falling one meter hits the ground, but with a million times less force. However, because the sphere’s impact area is so concentrated, the impact energy is more than 760 times greater. That leaves a mark, he said.

      The team tested their materials in two ways: horizontally, with the impact perpendicular to the micro grain, and vertically, straight into the layered edges. They found the horizontal material best at stopping projectiles, perhaps because the layers reflect part of the incident shock wave. Beyond the melt zone in front of the projectile, the layers showed the ability to deform without breaking, which led to improved energy absorption.

      “After the impact we can go in and cross-section the structure and see how deep the bullet got, and see what happened to these nice parallel layers,” Thomas said. “They tell the story of the evolution of penetration of the projectile and help us understand what mechanisms, at the nanoscale, may be taking place in order for this to be such a great, high-performance, lightweight protection material.”

      Thomas would like to extend LIPIT testing to other lightweight, nanostructured materials like boron nitride, carbon nanotube-reinforced composites and graphite and graphene-based materials. The ultimate goal, he said, is to accelerate the design of metamaterials with precise control of their nano- and microstructures for a variety of applications.

  • dee

    Look at the 1 and 2 minute marks there is no advantage to be gained.

  • Lance

    Interesting for LE but doubt it can stop a 7.62x39mm bullet or a 5.45 or a 7.62x54R with out being VERY VERY THICK. Who knows but I doubt this will blow armor plates away tomorrow. more test need to be done and while interesting I do have doubts on it can stop rifle bullets.

    • Guest

      Whew! Good thing we have Lance here to set things straight. Those damn scientists just don’t have a clue as to what they’re talking about!

      ….idiot.

      • Lance

        Your a butt-head guest of I know your name on kit up pal. Just saying its a new technology and needs to see how it can work if at all against real weapons from a 9mm or .45 cal pistol. The thickness to stop a AK-47 round may be too thick to wear who knows I dont say this is crap im saying it needs more research before idiots in the army start buying them only to find out in combat it doesn’t work as well.

        • orly?

          Keep in mind the ECH is constructed from ballistic polyethylene, and IS able to defeat 7.62 rounds.
          http://www.marinecorpstimes.com/news/2011/03/mari

          The ECH is NOT that much thicker than an ACH. It IS possible for this NEW Polyurethane to do the same.

        • tmb2

          Lance, nobody is suggesting the Army is going to stick this in a vest tomorrow, next year, or in 5 years.

    • zak

      it’s research, not even a prototype. If we never did any research unless it gave us exactly what we’re looking for today we’d never do research and in turn we’d never make advances.

  • Dillard

    ITS A START FOR PETES SAKE….

    • scott

      hey its better than nothing

  • Gustavo

    What about performance under heat?…

    • thematerialsguy

      That’s actually a great question. Since they claim they are using a block-copolymer of hard and soft segments; that means that the hard segments are below their glass transition temperature, and the soft segments are above it. So depending on these transitions, the mechanical properties drop off may be too significant at elevated temperatures and is definitely a concern.

    • Joe

      I know how your mom performs when under heat…

  • Conradswims

    Body armor that floats! That should be the goal.

  • orly?

    If the Enhanced Combat Helmet is any indication of progress, I am curious on what else could be made.

  • Speedy

    Would they layer it with Kevlar and other stuff, make it lighter then current armour.

    I do wonder if the guy in the photo was holding the disc when it was shot at… that would have been cool to see.

  • stephen russell

    Saw this in the TV show pilot Knight Rider 2008, bullets would hit car & body would absorb bullets like this MIT armor gel.
    Must for DoD & Security alone.
    Cut down on weight??

  • anthony

    I am glad to hear that our company helped to get this safety “polymers”on the market for safety purposes also..

  • fredhandy

    ok good ideer but how about using a ak round our a 45/7.62 round?

  • Lee

    It sounds like it is a hell of a lot better than the armor we had in Nam, where a bullet went in one side and came out of the other to go into your body.

    • Major Hassle

      that’s why they made great seat cushions in helo’s… the round that came through the helo belly, you at least could save your butt….

  • Josh

    This tech combined with an underlying layer of a rheostatic fluid could be a very effective body armor capable of protecting places that are basically impossible to protect now – like the armpit area for example.

  • Scott

    To Ward Carroll,__Call Leslie Duke at ballisticsreasearch.com. He’s already manufacturing a polymer based armor he developed. I don’t know how similar it is to the polyurethane technology, but I know it works incredibly well at bullet stopping and capturing. I believe it’s already in use in the field.

  • bobbymike

    We should insure large R&D dollars for materials research. It is incredible what the nano future will hold. That includes energetic materials as well for propulsion and advanced explosives.

  • echo charlie

    So, he said something to the effect that the polyurethane target performed better at stopping the slugs than an equivalent steel target while weighing less than a seventh as much…
    Huh?! That polyurethane chunk looks to be about two inches thick… Anyone doubt a steel chunk a seventh of that thickness would stop the 9mm slugs with zero penetration?

    If polyurethane is a little denser than water as I recall, his factor of seven comment seems to imply an equivalent thickness of steel target is being discussed. Two inches of steel for small arms armor is a lot of steel armor.

  • WALT VANCURA

    AS LONG AS IT SAVES MORE LIVES !!!!

  • Ed

    Best way to Stop a Bullet is to stop making guns the fire them. Then dont sell guns. Im kidding. really.

    • blight_

      Yeah, until someone makes a zip gun. Are you going to ban pipes and nails? Or when they melt a lead ball and make their own saltpeter at home?

      You can’t ban criminal.

  • ashurbanipal

    I’d settle for the Master Chief’s armor. (from Halo)

  • scott

    what does this have to do with the polyurethane body armor

  • Maybe, its because of the resistance. Polyurethane manufacturing companies innovations with their products are far beyond our reach because they expanded their knowledge in making many output products using polyurethane. I read in an article that there’s already some companies that manufacture armor made from polyurethane, their products are helm, vest armour etc.