Navy set to deploy laser aboard Ponce

The Navy will deploy a high-energy, solid-state directed energy, or “laser” weapon early next year on board the amphibious transport dock Ponce, Navy officials said Monday.

This will be the first such deployment of the Navy’s Laser Weapons System after it completed test shots last summer aboard the destroyer Dewey. The laser targeted fast boats and unmanned drones in the tests completed in the Pacific off the California coast.

Navy leaders have spent $40 million developing the solid-state laser weapons system over the past six years. Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Greenert displayed a video of the laser weapons system at the Sea Air Space Expo on Monday at National Harbor, Md.

The laser weapon system began as a developmental effort by the U.S. Naval Sea Command and the Office of Naval Research.

“The CNO has tasked us to move this capability into the operational domain,” said Rear Adm. Matthew L. Klunder, Chief of Naval Research.”This is a new innovative technology to give sailors and Marines the advantage they need for the current and future fight.”

The idea is deploy a low-cost, high-energy effective weapon against a range of potential threats, including enemy drones, fast-attack boats and what is referred to as small boat swarm attacks wherein large numbers of small watercraft attack simultaneously.

The laser weapon system uses heat energy from the laser to destroy targets, Klunder explained. Each round is remarkably cheap compared to other forms of ammunition.

“One round of directed energy is equivalent to one U.S. dollar. This is real data for real performance,” Klunder said.

In fact, the laser weapons system can easily integrate with the electronics on-board Navy ships, most of which produce more than enough electrical power to support the weapon, said Rear Adm. Thomas J. Eccles, chief engineer and deputy commander for Naval Systems Engineering.

Thus far, the laser weapons system is a perfect 12 for 12 in test shots, said Eccles. At the Expo, senior Navy officers showed a video of a successful test engagement involving a test-firing of the laser weapon system on board the Dewey. The weapon successfully incinerated a “dummy” or mock UAS target.

The directed energy power emitted from the laser can be adjusted to lethal and non-lethal modes — giving ship commanders a range of options when it comes to executing their missions, Eccles said.

In fact, the senior Navy leaders explained that laser or directed energy weapons are likely to increase in use in the future as a way to supplement kinetic weapons or solutions, Navy leaders explained.

“As we look at a future of more and more energetic weapons like this, you can see efficiencies gained in a number of ways,” Klunder said.

Photo courtesy of the U.S. Navy

About the Author

Kris Osborn
Kris Osborn is the managing editor of Scout Warrior and a former associate editor at Military.com.

59 Comments on "Navy set to deploy laser aboard Ponce"

  1. Good. Looks like a spotting laser to the right of the main laser?

    I'm assuming that the covering stays open for the most part, and only closes up for the rain?

  2. Destroying drones and fast boats is nice but its real worth comes if it can destroy a DF-21 anti-carrier ballistic missile. That'll be a real game changer!

  3. Don't we already have a laser on some of these ships?

  4. what type of Laser? What power? Who make it? Will it operate when it is rainy?
    I assume is a 100 kW fiber laser
    We need one Mega Watt laser (there is an US Patent by MA Stuart from Oakland, Ca?.
    Is there any one building this MW Laser? Can it be used for peaceful works?
    Thank you

  5. Why on the Ponce? Last I heard it was being used by SOCOM as a seabase.

  6. Hopefully they put these on the White house roof & defense points.

  7. For those worried about the Chinese DF-21, let me put it into perspective. Do you really think the Navy and the chain of command, would assume that a ballistic missile heading toward a CSG is anything but a nuclear tipped missile? No they wouldn't. You have to assume all ballistic missiles have nuclear warheads thus you prepare retaliation accordingly and you simply tell the Chinese (through back channels) that all ballistic missile fired will be assumed to be nuclear tipped and we will respond by targeting your country with our nuclear warheads-but we won't send just one, we'll flatten their country with one of our SSBNs that is patrolling in the western pacific.

  8. William_C1 | April 9, 2013 at 3:30 am |

    Is it soon to be mounted on sharks? We cannot have a laser-shark capability gap.

  9. “One round of directed energy is equivalent to one U.S. dollar. This is real data for real performance,” Klunder said.

    Excellent. What are the maintenance/component costs like?

  10. Mr. Wharf, arm the forward Phazers!

  11. The next thing you know, we'll have Quantum Torpedoes. I can't help but remember that Old saying, "Sooner or later, everybody will wan't one"…..The way I figure, it'll take about ten years before somebody else build one, and it won't mater if they are friend or foe. Perhaps the Navy should not have talked so much about this…..

    "I am become Death, The Detroyer of Worlds"

  12. I am sure someone will correct me if I am wrong – but I believe it is against the Geneva convention to use lasers to blind enemy combatants. So, if the Ponce is attacked by a swarm of Iranian motor boats – they must destroy/disable the boats without hitting the drivers.

    Seems pretty backassed to me.

  13. Infidel4LIFE | April 9, 2013 at 11:27 am |

    What happened to the laser system that was mounted on a jumbo jet? Cancelled? It sits in a warehouse s/where with all the equipment needed but I guess its $$ that killed it. So wat gives? The Ponce? I also read SOCOM platform, but a change of mind perhaps?

  14. Shawn McFadden | April 9, 2013 at 5:35 pm |

    First they retire the Ponce, then they give it to MSC, now they’re gonna outfit it with a laser. What’s next?

  15. Why WAIT till next year ??? We need that NOW as North Korea is Threatening War
    so
    WHY WAIT ??? It is already Operational so begin the LASER BEAM now.

    T L Van Akin

  16. Beam me up, Scotty.

    Raytheon is notorious for overstating their product capabilities and doing so with enormous cost overruns. This would be more believable had the "drone" been a hydrogen filled dirigible.

  17. Would they work on enemy communication satellites? Now that would be a defense weapon. Amp up!

  18. Jerry Wilson | April 10, 2013 at 12:18 am |

    Can I get one of these rigged-up to my 9mm Semi-automatic hand gun? I am putting in my order now; before the "o" Bans them…

  19. Can I get one of these to play with the cat??? She'd love it!

  20. I wonder how much one costs to build and install. The story mentions a $40 million development cost (which seems stunningly low for a new weapons system) and I agree with others that the maintenance cost and durability should be good compared to kinetic systems with more moving parts, but the story does not mention a per unit cost to build and install one. Low "per round" costs only matter if the system used to fire the round isn't too expensive (e.g. there is no cost efficiency in a rifle that costs $100,000 even if it fires 1 cent bullets).

    There have been efforts, rather successful to develop anti-ordinance lasers, but this doesn't seem to be what is at work here.

  21. Another operationally worthless system simply deployed to secure contractor money.

  22. Nothing like aid & comfort to the enemy. This is some pretty cool gee-whiz stuff for the nintendo gen gizmo fans but stories and discussions like this are EXACTLY WHY several of the promising IED interdiction devices never made it to the field. So let's tell the bad guys all about this new system and help them guess at how to defeat it. Bunch of questionable loyalty dipwads. Shut the F up about things like this. Whether it really does what underinformed people think, it is a stepping stone. A lot of the star trek stuff has and will become reality thanks to DARPA & brilliant contractors.

  23. When I read that the captain can chose between setting it for lethal and non-lethal power, did anyone think of setting their phasers on "stun"? Welcome to the 21st century. This seems like one of the biggest bangs for the buck. I mean 40M to develop this? That's one vacation trip for the president and his family.

  24. this probably explains the rash of commercial aircraft crashes out of JFK in '98….suspicious electrical fires my ass

  25. Tribulationtime | April 10, 2013 at 4:38 pm |

    How cost (Right now that all we know about this laser) put a "Blue" laser detector, and switch off the FLIR?. Tiny manouvers keep the laser out of focus so it can´t bring enough power on the target. Chinese engineers had make a lot of research about to "blind" IIR guided bombs and seems there is many details to fix. Second, I ´m very suspicious about open sources defense news; i think it became a pawn in a wider chess board.

  26. i gotta say it, drones? lets see who couldn't hit one. but like the man said, why tell somebody you got a bigger gun. let'em find out the hard way. but if you let the cat out of the bag, ya better hit something a little faster than a drone.
    i also like what someone said about raytheon. so true.

  27. Will this thing work in heavy weather or sea spray ? Heavy rain or snow will degrade a concentrated light beam over a short distance. How will you over come that ? Where seconds count; will it knock down a fast moving target, especially one that is skimming the sea surface ?

  28. NOTHING CREATES SLAVERY LIKE THE THOUGHT OF FREEDOM AND ITS MAINTENANCE, IN ORDER TO FREE YOURSELF FROM YOUR OWN CREATED FEARS YOU ARM YOURSELF TO DEFEND YOURSELF FROM THE OBJECT OF THE FEAR YOU CREATED. NOW YOU ARE BOTH THE SLAVE OF YOUR FEARS AND THE DEFENSIVE SYSTEM YOU CREATED PLUS THE WORTHLESS GOVERNMENT THAT WAS DESIGNED TO ELIMINATE YOUR FEARS. IT DOESN'T MATTER HOW BIG AND POWERFUL YOUR GOVERNMENT IS AND HOW MANY OR HOW BIG YOUR WEAPONS ARE, THEY WILL NEVER BE POWERFUL ENOUGH TO PREVENT YOU FROM CREATING BIGGER AND BETTER FEARS. AND IF YOU DON'T CREATE YOUR PERSONAL FEARS, THE GOVERNMENT WILL CREATE THEM FOR YOU AND ISSUE YOU GOVERNMENT CREATED, GOVERNMENT INSPECTED FEARS. I"TS CALLED THE AMERICAN WAY.

  29. What about multiple high speed targets? No talk of a demo…only the "capability".

  30. tm1charlie | April 11, 2013 at 8:29 am |

    I hope there are plans to adapt these lasers to be mounted on sharks for sneak attacks.

  31. Stan Zirkelbach | April 11, 2013 at 9:12 am |

    Imagine that on the USS Ponce! I was stationed on the USS Ponce LPD 15 many years ago, in the eighties. Love that ship.

  32. Jim Wheeler | April 11, 2013 at 9:59 am |

    Sounds good, but:
    Range? Weather limitations? Dwell time required for destruction? Tracking adequate for a violently maneuvering target? Can it be countered with mirrors or mirrored surfaces or paint? Does it blind personnel on the target? Maintenance reliability?

  33. Why doesn't it go Pew Pew? My childhood dreams are ruined!

  34. I think you can buy a better and cheaper version at Walmart. Made in China

  35. ron salatrik | April 11, 2013 at 9:36 pm |

    This is the greatest since Grandma's apple pie.

    Ron S.

  36. Next it will be the Battlestar Galactica with a fleet of Colonial Vipers.

  37. USS Challenger | April 16, 2013 at 4:59 pm |

    Why is the emphesis placed on lasers rather than rail-type guns? I heard that the weekness of lasers is that the targeted object could be coated with a reflective material to counter the laser, while on the other hand, a small projectile from a rail gun is nearly impossible to counter (until someone does that's the way things go anyway). I tried to look for some pratical explanation fot this but nada. anyone has any insight

  38. Allan Oines | May 4, 2013 at 2:08 am |

    Nothing like beating the war drums

  39. and there ends the 20th century dominance of small craft and aircraft carriers.

    put 30 of these on a 70,000 ton nuclear battleship with 16/50 2600 lbs shells and watch the money burn as planes try to sink it with rockets while it approaches the fleet. (and add a couple of iron domes for good measure, plus a couple of antiaircraft weapons)

    without such weapons and some serious flaws the yamato absorbed perhaps 40 thousand pounds of explosives before being disabled and remained afloat for over a day (IIRC) Old WW1 battleships couldn't be sunk using aerial burst 25 kt nuclear bombs. The only reason that they were defeated was the ability of a carrier to overwhelm them and the expense of loosing them.

  40. Everybody is talking of the total cost of 40 mil ,has anyone calculated what a burst of say 10000 fluenc will cost and the damage it can cause to the enemy target. This calculation will be good enough to keep the diplomats quite to justify the cost .

  41. mike anderson | February 17, 2015 at 7:40 pm |

    Lets see, just to expand the thoughts a bit. The platform flying that has the room and the shape to carry a Hi Watt Laser close to target and available to upgrade, Ta-Dah the A10 Warthog, log large diameter tunnel from nose the tail and large space towards rear where ammo and motors were for power pack and cooling and the tunnel for the laser it self. Oh yea the coup-de-grass add a limited traverse turret to fine tune the aim for hard targets. Say one of the BrightHogs to two Warthogs for Oh missiles, light vehicles and thin skinned water bearing targets.

Comments are closed.