Air Force Reaper Crashes Over Lake Ontario

Training to huntA U.S. Air National Guard MQ-9 Reaper unmanned aircraft dropped out of the sky while conducting training operations at altitudes greater than 18,000 feet above  Lake Ontario, service officials said.

“The satellite control link failed and the aircraft descended into the lake. The U.S. Coast Guard went looking for the aircraft but did not find anything,” Erik Durr, director of public affairs for New York state division of military and naval affairs, told

The Reaper was assigned to the 174th Air Attack Wing operating out of Wheeler Sack Army Airfield, Fort Drum, Ny.

“No one was injured and the aircraft had no weapons on board,” Durr added. “The 174th Air Attack Wing is the MQ-9 school house for the entire Air Force. Pilots and sensor operators from around the country come here to learn how to operate the Reaper.”

The training exercise was taking place in approved military training airspace over Lake Ontario.

“They’ll conduct an Air Force investigation,” Durr said.

This crash comes a less than a month after an MQ-1B Predator drone crashed at Holloman Air Force Base, New Mexico.

About the Author

Kris Osborn
Kris Osborn is the managing editor of Scout Warrior and a former associate editor at

20 Comments on "Air Force Reaper Crashes Over Lake Ontario"

  1. "The satellite control link failed and the aircraft descended into the lake."

    Shouldn't these drones have some sort of automatic return-to-base-mode if they lose their satellite control link??

  2. I'm still not impressed with drones capability to fly correctly when there not working properly.

  3. The higher the number of drone crashes, the higher the probability of figuring out the real causes of the crashes. So let's hope the drones will keep crashing. 30-60 crashes a month sounds good.

  4. Like in Star Wars Ep1, "The control ship has been destroyed – Look! They are broken!"

  5. If it had gone down in Lake Superior – Gordon Lightfoot could write a song about it.

  6. This is definitely an issue to address. There are plans to expand the use of drones into all sorts of police activity. They can't be falling out of the sky or even getting close to commercial aircraft routes when out of contact with the ground pilot.

  7. ImNoRocketSurgeon | November 14, 2013 at 10:17 am | Reply

    By "satellite control link" could that include GPS? Assuming that's the case, how does it get home without GPS? How does it even know the direction toward home?
    I guess it could just retrace it's path in reverse – if it had enough fuel.
    The suggestion about going into a holding-pattern makes sense.
    My hobby is RC multi-copters and the logic on the control board is set to do the same thing – holding patter.
    ANYWAY…in the scheme of my meager life, I just assume it's magic and go on about my day.

  8. If we can spend $4.3 million on each drone, we should at least program it to switch to auto pilot or even ILS when connection is lost.

  9. The U.S. Coast Guard went looking for the aircraft but did not find anything,”

    Soon the Canadians will reveal they brought down the drone and are probing its secrets to stop us from spying on their communications. Obama will ask for it back and threaten an embargo of Canadian maple syrup unless they cooperate…

  10. "Satellite control link lost" sounds like it was under full remote control. Nothing to do with GPS. The craft had no autonomy. Just a USAF officer staring slack-jawed at a blank screen.

  11. At least when flying over friendly territory they might add a parachute for the whole thing. There are chutes available for small planes like a Cessna so shouldnt be too difficult nor expensive. Ok unless you ask Lockheed :-)

  12. The automatic return to home function is probably disabled in the crowded N.Amercan airspace, where the cost of a drone is small compared to the risk of it hitting a civilian plane, and the huge stink that would result.

  13. Proof that Drones should not replace manned planes. They do have the Army out in full force from Ft Drum to find the remains of it.

  14. TG we're not paying for them. Best to get the bugs out of drones before the F-35s are swept from the sky and carriers are diving to the bottom.

  15. Everyone knows the air force can't fly over water (that's the Navy's job), that's why they crash ;-P

  16. This is so funny! One of the most high tech airplanes can't even be located. Call in the a Navy.

  17. Risking the aircraft on an actual mission in enemy country is one thing.
    To lose an aircraft on a training mission in friendly country is another.
    Hang some devices under the wings to either have parachutes, flotation devices, or something to help save the aircraft. Perhaps in friendly country we need to have a backup to the satcom system, or an enhanced UHF com system or a lower frequency system with greater range.

  18. Since it's only training and over water, why not fit them with a chute and inflatable floats. Shouldn't be too hard to put in an autodeploy chute if the engine cuts out and there is no weight-on-wheels. Sure would make it easier to troubleshoot the probelm.

  19. Law makers should fund our own rockets….As far as hitting Iran with "small" nukes. Let Israel handle this unspeakable deed.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.