Pentagon Denies Downed U.S. Drone Report in Crimea

HunterThe Pentagon is denying reports by Russian sponsored media companies that a U.S. Army drone crashed while flying an intelligence mission over Crimea.

An unnamed Pentagon official told ABC News the report was false because the U.S. is not flying any drone missions over Crimea, the segment of Ukraine that Russian troops are stationed.

Rostec, a Russian state owned media company, reported the U.S. drone was flying at 12,000 feet when a cyber attack forced it to make an emergency landing. The Voice of Russia reported the drone was an MQ-5B Hunter with the “66th U.S. brigade of military intelligence with the main location in Bavaria.”

A couple issues with that report besides the denial from the Pentagon.

First, the MQ-5 Hunter is one of the oldest, most basic drones in the U.S. fleet that the Army has since replaced with the RQ-7  Shadow. Even if the Russians mistook the drone for a Shadow, it seems unlikely the U.S. would fly one of their slowest and least powerful drones in the U.S. fleet.

If the U.S. military flew an intelligence and surveillance collection mission over Crimea with a drone, it seems a lot more likely the U.S. would tap the Air Force to fly its stealth drone for such a sensitive mission — the RQ-170 Sentinel. Tough to mistake the Sentinel for the RQ-5 Hunter.

rq170kadar

31 Comments on "Pentagon Denies Downed U.S. Drone Report in Crimea"

  1. Either way, you'd think we'd have learned our lesson. At least make them shoot the damn thing down.

  2. I don't care if it ws the newsiest drone the Russian defense will make mincemeat of crappy drone this President wants to replace all is not most manned planes.

  3. If this were true, it would be a serious problem.

  4. Or of course it could just be another blatant attempt by the Russian Govt to spread more lies baout what is going on in Crimea…

  5. I seem to remember reading about Germans doing similiar tactics to the Polish in 1939….

  6. Isn't it funny that every news story that comes out now about a "Take down" of American aircraft has to do with a drone?

  7. Communists were born "natural liars".

  8. Just like the drone over Iran the Pentagon has been caught with its pants down and is doing the only thing it can – deny everything.

  9. anthony bauwens | March 15, 2014 at 8:21 am | Reply

    Another lie,if true we would have heard it first..

  10. purpleheartpark | March 15, 2014 at 10:08 am | Reply

    I did not have Sex with that woman "Ms. Lewinsky, If you want to keep your Health Care you can, We were attacked in the Tonkin Gulf, There was no U-2 Flights over the Soviet Union, I am not a Crook etc. etc of course you can Believe in our Government to tell the Truth….

  11. AsktheOnewhoKnows | March 15, 2014 at 10:08 am | Reply

    Umm guys…this is more about reporters not asking the right questions to the right people. Whenever a drone goes down, they automatically contact the DoD "Did you guys lose something?"…"No WE didn't lose anything"……

    Rather than asking the CIA.. "Did you guys lose something" …"ummm well umm well, we can't really comment on operational events…"……

  12. It's a MQ-5 Hunter. There are private citizens with more advanced RC planes in the United States. I very seriously doubt the powers that be are sitting around wringing their hands over losing a 20 year old, low altitude "drone".

  13. Putin is making Obama look like the rank amateur he is.

  14. Im guessing it was a mq-5 hunter but not ours hmmmm Poland?

  15. Two military planes of NATO landed at night near Kiev.
    For the morning there was Dron Pentagona who denies
    flight and the subsequent plane landing in the Crimea.

  16. Maybe counter int. lose an aging drone and make it relatively easy for them to take it. Let them take it home, (god forbid theyre dumb enough to hook it up to some computer systems). Add some other backasswards encryption to the thing, tamper w some of the tech in areas where there is need, lead them down the wrong path, get them to tip there hand, mislead them in specific areas where you know they’re in need of help. Obviously the enemy has likely imagined all of this and will go out of their way to detect and disable any basic funny business…but there are other ways to manipulate them. Of course you just deny it.

  17. It was Bush's fault

  18. The first half of this article by Mike Hoffman reports what the "state owned Russian sponsored media companies" say,…. the rest is line after line of reasons why the Russian reports must be wrong. But I guess it is reliable reporting because defensetech.org is not state owned like Russian news outlets. But wait ,…. don't they cater to veterans, the military and contractors? So they do have a huge financial incentive to state "the party line". The pentagon doesn't need spokesmen with "journalism" like this. I grieve for the benefits of a free press. These days all one has to do is to follow the money trail to understand the motivation behind a simple list of talking points like the above, pretending to be a news story.

  19. Can you say Bulls**t. The MQ-5B Hunter has a raduis of action of about 124 miles. So, the report would have to assume that we have troops in the Ukraine already as all other locations are much to far away. Second, the Hunter is a tactical UAV not suited for stategic intelligence gathering. The Hunter also offers almost no better intelligence than what we can gather with our satellites. In fact, our satellites are far more useful in this case anyway. The only reason to send a UAV would be to send the Russians a message, but it is a very weak message. Finally, based on the fact that the Russians are copying the Iranian, "we brought the UAV down using a cyber attack," is a too obvious a slip. Are we to suppose that the Russians have a sophisticated anti-uav cyber unit in the Crimea? Don't waste your time waiting for the paper mache model of a Hunter UAV to be displayed.

  20. Doesn't A Co. 1st MI Bn (AE), 66th MI Bde fly MQ-5Bs?

  21. Leo Gerald Johnson | March 16, 2014 at 10:58 am | Reply

    Isn't it great how "Politicians" deny that they've been caught with their "Drone's down"

  22. Yea we heard all the same excuses when the drone over Iran came down – no drone is missing, the wreckage is a fake on and one until a month later the admission that it was a real drone downed.

    Obviously the Russians wont be fooled – the denials are for the simple folk in the US who you can fool all the time.

  23. Do we still have drones? What a waste of free phones money.

  24. if you can't kill the story, then deny deny……….ask the administration

  25. Hard to follow that logic since they sent in F15s not F22s

  26. Walk softly and carry a big apology. The Obama doctrine.

  27. Why would anyone use a low and slow drone to do the same or better with a satellite?

  28. What else is the Pentagon good at beside denying its big screw-ups? Anyone who follows IA knows the US and NATO were behind the murders, chaos and coup in Ukraine.

  29. a lot of people acting like they know what the heck they're talking about, its cute. i fly these aircraft and theres a reason why they've been around so long. they're an incredibly reliable and capable aircraft, better then those garbage lawn mower shadows. so that whole story is definitely propaganda bs. if you don't want to take it from the pentagon, take it from a soldier who knows first hand.

    also to the writer, "slowest and least powerful"..?? you do realize that UAV's conducting reconnaissance and surveillance missions have no need to break the sound barrier…no, no you don't. and most basic would also not be a correct statement. good try though, champ.

  30. Be it true or not, I don't see using the "Deniability" of such events as a wrong course of action to take. It makes one question their own source/media (The ones being of the opposing faction in this case 'Russia') and leaves only question to those not directly involved in the matter. It may have gone down just like the news said or not, it creates a shrode on the truth and makes finding out the exact detials harder. That's how I see it, I may be absolutely wrong on all accounts but that's my two cents.

  31. After viewing a very poor quality photo of this same drone
    on another site, same subject
    my Guess would have be a Israelie Heron I Prop UAV Drone
    check the actual picture of the Drone and look for thr Top mounted Radar Dome
    and check the rear taill fins on the bird
    it most certainly is not either one pictured

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*