Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Afghan Update
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Around the Globe
Av Week Extra
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Body Armor Blues
Bomb Squad
Brownshoes in Action
Bubbleheads, etc.
Cammo Green
Catch the "Buzz"
Chem-Bio
Civilian Apps
Cloak and Dagger
Commandos
Comms
Contingency Ops
Cops and Robbers
Cyber-warfare
Data Diving
Defense Tech Poll
Defense Tech Radio
Dissent Tech
Door Kickers
Drones
DT Administrivia
Eat DT's Dust
Extra! Extra!
Eye on China
Fast Movers
FCS Watch
Fire for Effect
FOS Files
Friday Funnies
Gadgets and Gear
Going Green
Grand Ole Osprey
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
In the Weeds with Eric
Info War
Iraq Diary
Jarhead Jazz
JSF Watch
Just War Theories
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
M4 Monopoly
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Most Wanted
MRAP Edge
Net-Centric
Nukes
Old Skool
Our Shrinking Planet
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Podcast
Politricks
Polmar's Perspective
Popular Mechanics
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Robots
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Snipertech
Soldier Systems
Space
Special Ops
Star Wars
Strategery
Stray Trons
Tactical Development
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
The Defense Biz
The Peoples' Site
The Sunday Paper
The Tanker Tango
The View from Av Week
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
Trimble on the Case
Video Lounge
War Update
Ward'z Wonderz
You can run...

See all Archives
Newsletters

Edited by Christian Lowe | Contact

BLIMPBALL IN NAVY TESTS

CyberAerospacePhotos781.jpgThey may look a litle silly -- like giant volleyballs, kinda. But the Navy thinks that big, round blimps may just be the key to spying on terrorist camps, and communicating with its sailors.

As we've mentioned before, the U.S. military has been on a bit of an airship kick, lately. That's because the helium-filled, lighter-than-air craft can stay in the skies a whole lot longer than fuel-eating jets. And that means the blimps could work as floating cell towers or observation posts.

Round airships have some advantages over their cigar-shaped cousins, said Hokan Colting, who designed the SA-60 spherical blimp for the Navy.

"It's more maneuverable than a traditional airship," Colting told Aerospace Daily. "It's amphibious, it can land and take off from water. And it can go to high altitudes. Traditional, cigar-shaped airships can go to 5,000-6,000 feet ... We have been up to 22,000 feet with [a spherical] airship, and that's the absolute world record in altitude for airships."

The SA-60 can be transported in a truck and set up by a small group of people in roughly 24 hours, according to the companies. Although it requires a pilot, the companies plan to make the airship unmanned to allow for longer flights...

The companies are developing a larger operational version of the SA-60 that would have a diameter of 76 feet, an operational ceiling of 16,000 feet, and a flight endurance of roughly two days. In 12 months, the companies plan to build a 200-foot diameter version that would be capable of wide-area surveillance or telecommunications relay at altitudes up to 65,000 feet.

But there are a whole lot of kinks to work out, first. When the SA-60 was tested recently by Naval Air Systems Command, the helium gas inside heated and expanded, making the vehicle extra buoyant and leaving it underweight. That made it a bitch to bring the orb back to earth.

Aerospace Daily dryly noted, "During some aborted landing attempts, the airship briefly contacted the ground and bounced like an enormous beach ball."

THERE'S MORE: "I know I'm nitpicking here," says Defense Tech reader GW, "but Hokan Colting needs to check his basic history on airships. World War I German airships routinely operated at 22,000 ft, and that was in 1916."

The only reason that American airships of the 20s and 30s operated with lower maximum ceilings was to conserve helium, an extremely expensive gas back then. At one time the U.S. only had enough gas to operate one of their 3 airships. German passenger zeppelins (which used cheap, plentiful hydrogen) operated at lower altitudes for the comfort of their passengers and for greater cargo lift capacity.

AND MORE: GW "is flat-out wrong. According to the Balloon & Airship World Records Homepage, the altitude record for an airship is 6,234 m or 20,453 feet and was made in June of 2003," says Defense Tech reader BP. "What GW may have been thinking of was a balloon altitude. According to the same site, the current altitude record for a balloon is 34,668 m or 113,740 feet which was made in 1961."

Comments