Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Afghan Update
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Around the Globe
Av Week Extra
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Body Armor Blues
Bomb Squad
Brownshoes in Action
Bubbleheads, etc.
Cammo Green
Catch the "Buzz"
Chem-Bio
Civilian Apps
Cloak and Dagger
Commandos
Comms
Contingency Ops
Cops and Robbers
Cyber-warfare
Data Diving
Defense Tech Poll
Dissent Tech
Door Kickers
Drones
DT Administrivia
Eat DT's Dust
Extra! Extra!
Eye on China
Fast Movers
FCS Watch
Fire for Effect
FOS Files
Friday Funnies
Gadgets and Gear
Going Green
Grand Ole Osprey
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
In the Weeds with Eric
Info War
Iraq Diary
Jarhead Jazz
JSF Watch
Just War Theories
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
M4 Monopoly
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Most Wanted
MRAP Edge
Net-Centric
Nukes
Old Skool
Our Shrinking Planet
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Polmar's Perspective
Popular Mechanics
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Robots
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Snipertech
Space
Special Ops
Star Wars
Strategery
Stray Trons
Tactical Development
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
The Defense Biz
The Peoples' Site
The Sunday Paper
The Tanker Tango
The View from Av Week
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
Trimble on the Case
Video Lounge
War Update
Ward'z Wonderz
You can run...

See all Archives
Newsletters

Edited by Christian Lowe | Contact

TEXAS DROPS NUKE LAB BID

horns.jpgDespite year after year of scandals, safety lapses, and swiss cheese security, it looks like the University of California might keep on running Los Alamos, the country's most important nuclear weapons lab.

According to an (as-of-yet) unconfirmed report, "the University of Texas (UT) will announce in tomorrow's Dallas Morning News that it will NOT bid" on Los Alamos' management contract. UT was considered one of California's biggest competitors for control of the lab – despite some particularly tenacious student opposition. Another major candidate, Lockheed Martin, which manages the nearby Sandia National Laboratories, dropped out of the race last summer. Texas A&M did the same in December.

None of this is particularly surprising, of course. California has had an uncontested contract to run the lab since its inception back in the 1940's. Energy Department officials finally agreed to put the $2 billion per year deal up for competitive bidding after the firing of two ex-police chiefs brought into the lab to invesigate corruption. But in their initial request for Los Alamos bids, those officials put together a set of criteria that heavily, heavily favored the incumbent. No wonder no one is interested in the job.

THERE'S MORE: It's confirmed.

Comments