Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Afghan Update
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Around the Globe
Av Week Extra
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Body Armor Blues
Bomb Squad
Brownshoes in Action
Bubbleheads, etc.
Cammo Green
Catch the "Buzz"
Chem-Bio
Civilian Apps
Cloak and Dagger
Commandos
Comms
Contingency Ops
Cops and Robbers
Cyber-warfare
Data Diving
Defense Tech Poll
Dissent Tech
Door Kickers
Drones
DT Administrivia
Eat DT's Dust
Extra! Extra!
Eye on China
Fast Movers
FCS Watch
Fire for Effect
FOS Files
Friday Funnies
Gadgets and Gear
Going Green
Grand Ole Osprey
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
In the Weeds with Eric
Info War
Iraq Diary
Jarhead Jazz
JSF Watch
Just War Theories
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
M4 Monopoly
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Most Wanted
MRAP Edge
Net-Centric
Nukes
Old Skool
Our Shrinking Planet
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Polmar's Perspective
Popular Mechanics
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Robots
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Snipertech
Space
Special Ops
Star Wars
Strategery
Stray Trons
Tactical Development
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
The Defense Biz
The Peoples' Site
The Sunday Paper
The Tanker Tango
The View from Av Week
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
Trimble on the Case
Video Lounge
War Update
Ward'z Wonderz
You can run...

See all Archives
Newsletters

Edited by Christian Lowe | Contact

"FUTURE COMBAT" GETS FUNDS

If there was one part of the Pentagon budget that looked for sure like fat, waiting to be cut, it was the Army's $127 billion Future Combat Systems program, or FCS.

nlos_concept_demonstrator.jpgIn December, the Pentagon recommended cutting $1.5 billion a year from the hulking modernization effort. Congress called the program -- which revamps almost every element of soldiers' lives, from the guns they carry, to the officers they salute, to the armored vehicles they drive -- beyond unrealistic. Outside observers saw in FCS a disaster waiting to happen.

Nevetheless, FCS hasn't just escaped the axe in this year's Pentagon budget -- it's grown, from $2.8 to $3.6 billion, Defense Daily notes. The Defense Department has requested $231.6 million for the Non-Line-of-Sight Launch System, a set of guided artillery shells and loitering mini-missiles being developed as part of FCS. The Pentagon wants to put another $107.6 million into the Non-Line of Sight Cannon, a 20-ton, 155mm, tracked cannon that can blast targets up to 30 kilometers away.

The Army is also adding $35 billion over 7 years to restructure its forces into smaler, more mobile units -- a key component of the FCS effort, which sees soldiers fighting in smaller, more mobile groups. And the Stryker light armored vehicles, a FCS precursor, is slated for $905.1 million this year to pay 240 more of the personnel carriers. So much for trimming the fat.

THERE'S MORE: The Defense Department may have promised billions in budget rollbacks last month. But now, Defense News notes, "even the Pentagon admits it: the 2006 budget calls for 'a healthy increase,' not a deep cut in defense spending.

At $439.3 billion, the 2006 spending plan would give the military $18.7 billion more than it has for 2005. The Defense Department would get a 4.8 percent increase while other federal agencies are being held to less than 2.2 percent...

And there will be more to come — perhaps $100 billion more — in the form of emergency supplemental appropriations to pay war costs.

The 2006 budget Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld is sending to Congress Feb. 7 "continues our strong growth," a senior Pentagon official said. It pushes defense spending up 41 percent since President George W. Bush took office.

Comments