Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Afghan Update
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Around the Globe
Av Week Extra
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Body Armor Blues
Bomb Squad
Brownshoes in Action
Bubbleheads, etc.
Cammo Green
Catch the "Buzz"
Chem-Bio
Civilian Apps
Cloak and Dagger
Commandos
Comms
Contingency Ops
Cops and Robbers
Cyber-warfare
Data Diving
Defense Tech Poll
Dissent Tech
Door Kickers
Drones
DT Administrivia
Eat DT's Dust
Extra! Extra!
Eye on China
Fast Movers
FCS Watch
Fire for Effect
FOS Files
Friday Funnies
Gadgets and Gear
Going Green
Grand Ole Osprey
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
In the Weeds with Eric
Info War
Iraq Diary
Jarhead Jazz
JSF Watch
Just War Theories
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
M4 Monopoly
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Most Wanted
MRAP Edge
Net-Centric
Nukes
Old Skool
Our Shrinking Planet
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Polmar's Perspective
Popular Mechanics
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Robots
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Snipertech
Space
Special Ops
Star Wars
Strategery
Stray Trons
Tactical Development
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
The Defense Biz
The Peoples' Site
The Sunday Paper
The Tanker Tango
The View from Av Week
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
Trimble on the Case
Video Lounge
War Update
Ward'z Wonderz
You can run...

See all Archives
Newsletters

Edited by Christian Lowe | Contact

Not your father's B-52

b52dt.jpgWell, maybe it is, actually. But the Stratofortress continues to fly high, more than five decades after its introduction, thanks to continual upgrades. The latest is a new $8.6 million avionics system.

A B-52 from Barksdale Air Force Base, La., was launched with Boeing’s prototype integrated weapons interface unit that allowed the bomber to release, for the first time, eight 2,000 pound joint-direct attack munitions from the internal bomb bay. The test took place at the Utah Test and Training Range.

The unit was developed by Boeing during a two-year sustainment program aimed at replacing the four aging line replaceable units currently carried in the B-52. The June 14 demonstration showed that the prototype interface unit, when fully developed and qualified for production, is capable of replacing the existing replaceable units and as a result, extending the combat role of the B-52.

The test sortie also demonstrated the B-52’s capability to increase the number of JDAM weapons the B-52 can carry from 12 to 20, an increase of 60 percent. There is no existing program to formally pursue this capability, however, the demonstration allowed proof of the concept and provides future risk reduction.

These planes remain workhorses, and there's no end in sight. The newer B-1B Lancer and B-2 Spirit bombers, while both have served well, are not available in the numbers that today's wars require while simultaneously maintaining a strong deterrent force. And since America's current crop of enemies are without air forces or even modern air defense systems, the big lumbering B-52s (affectionately called BUFF for "Big Ugly Fat, um, Fellow") can continue to make great contributions.

That's just as well, since the operating cost of the newer planes and the per-unit price tag means that there won't be more rolling off the assembly line any time soon. The next heavy bomber isn't scheduled to be introduced until around 2040.

The current fleet of heavy bombers is expected to serve until the middle of the century, with the B-52s around until the 2030s. At peace, that might have been reachable. But the war has already put a heavy load on the planes and to count on them to hold up for fifty more years is probably a bit over-optimistic. The B-52s, being both the oldest and currently the most-used, will obviously wear out first. Their upper wing surface is the limiting factor.

In related news, the Royal Air Force is looking at converting some of its Nimrod reconnaissance planes into long-range bombers. This would give Britain the capability to send missile-armed planes to trouble spots far more quickly than ships could be deployed. The RAF hasn't had a long-range bomber since the Vulcan was retired shortly after the Falklands War in the early 1980s.

These old, slow planes keep chugging along. And they'll continue to do so as long as they don't have to go up against a top-line opponent. Cruise missiles, advanced electronics, and GPS-guided bombs have made deadly weapons out of old airframes. Now if we can just keep them in the air.

-- Murdoc

Comments


replica rolex watches

http://www.watchinstyle.com/chanel-j12-white-chronograph-fully-high-grade-ceramic-p-910.html?zenid=9m7rdns1qli5ntbq2uevks5ve0

http://easyforbuy.com/nike-air-zoom-lebron-c-49.html?zenid=c0enle2a7n4rgumpq0g5t9bqb6

http://lowestmall.com/nike-air-max-c-44.html?zenid=e62d2m88ej0b70vn97n4e9pkd6

http://onestoptown.com/

Posted by: instylewatch at October 9, 2008 12:09 AM


Haw-haw !It is a very beaufitul writing! The moderator is really a man of intention. I

really appreciate his wisdom and philosophy of life
replica watch

http://www.watchinstyle.com/rolex-datedate-white-diamondsswiss-eta-2836-p-768.html?

zenid=teg6g8jtnlurrhkmbomsugkuj7
http://easyforbuy.com/002-puma-shoes-all-black-p-4029.html
http://lowestmall.com/9826-nike-king-black-sapphire-p-5367.html?

zenid=iu1fq75j2cmr6534iltfb807i5
http://onestoptown.com/


Hack mechanism (second hand stops when crown is pulled out to set the time-standard

Rolex watches).

Posted by: replicawatches at October 8, 2008 10:30 PM


Iam searching for my father;goes by "Jerry" the officer in vietnam war; bien hoa, cu chi.

Please visit www.myspace.com for picture.

Posted by: an ton at October 1, 2008 10:13 PM


replica watches

Posted by: replica watches at August 25, 2008 02:36 AM


replica watches

Posted by: replica watches at August 25, 2008 02:34 AM


I will cost my all money to buy warhammer gold to change for our love, but the time is not come back. I can only yearn.

Posted by: buy warhammer gold at August 18, 2008 03:32 AM


And later, you met another girl, you said me that you and she had the same love, you forgot our stipulation, you forgot our joy which we spend the time, I think our reins like the cheap warhammer Online gold, no any price, do you forget the time we spend together.

Posted by: cheap warhammer Online gold at August 18, 2008 03:30 AM


I hurt by them, you run back me, gave me the warhammer Online gold and a lot of equipment, I cried, you said that don’t cried, you will protect me forever, whatever the game or the real life, you would protect me, I was so feelingly.

Posted by: warhammer Online gold at August 18, 2008 03:27 AM


I was scared die, you always told me only killed more golliwog, can get the more warhammer money, but you know I was a new, I had no ability to kill the big golliwog.

Posted by: warhammer money at August 18, 2008 03:26 AM


I tired the tiger, although only get the little warhammer gold, I would not move, I was scared die.

Posted by: warhammer gold at August 18, 2008 03:25 AM


My wife use her seal cege buy a lot of blood, she said she is a doctor, she can use the lowest price to buy the blood, when I met the accident, she can save me, my wife is very kind, when she met the people who need help.

Posted by: seal cege at August 18, 2008 03:18 AM


rolex replica watches - $98 swiss , we don't sale replica watches.The Art of E-commerce

Posted by: replica watches at August 5, 2008 09:05 PM


No longer, I met a boy, he help me earn goonzu gold and teach me use them to change for goonzu money. We get a good relation each other, we became good friends, at the last days, we build team to kill enemy and buy goonzu gold. I forgot my boy friend. I think he forgot me, too. I hadn’t pull out in it when he came back to find me.

Posted by: goonzu gold at August 5, 2008 08:45 PM


I thought my husband who married in game was very kind, he always sent the goonzu online gold to the new that started to played the game. Perhaps the reason I like him. However our reins last long time, I was so sad at beginning. But the game is only the game, like the cheap goonzu gold. It had no worthiness.

Posted by: cheap goonzu gold at August 5, 2008 08:39 PM


At beginning , you are a poor, but dont worried, the style of game give you a little habbo credits, it is very cheap, you can use them to buy equipment, you can use this equipment to exercise the rank, when you get to a certain rank valid, you dont need the equipment, you should buy the better equipment. This time, you need the habbo gold.

Posted by: habbo credits at August 5, 2008 08:23 PM


Being limited in what I can say:

New bomber research is and has been current for some time, but there is no pressing need to build a new long range bomber fleet for the following reasons:

Most nations can not shoot down/intercept the BUFF
Long Range Bombing is largely handled by the B2
Long range missile systems and drones look to be the future.

I personally love the BUFF, and I imagine that an engine retrofitting will take place in the not to distant future. The BUFF will be in service, I imagine, until 2050 with ease.

Posted by: Agent at February 18, 2008 03:32 PM


Does anyone out there remember the 99th Bomber Wing Squadron that flew the B-52s in VietNam (Bien Ho)? Approximately 1968-1972.

Posted by: Lynn at July 5, 2006 11:07 AM


Jerry

You can read about the structural life limits of the B-52 at this site

http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/systems/b-52-life.htm

Basically, in theory an airplane such as the B-52 could be flown indefinately, if cost was not a factor. The frame structure, has a certain structural life, and the upper wing surface is the first major structural component predicted to fail.

So yes, it is possible to replace the surface, but from a cost perspective it would not make sense. It is my understanding that the B-52 production molds have been destroyed or lost years ago. One of the reasons the bone yard is maintained, is to have a ready supply of spare parts for the old gals.

If [and its a big if] the technology developements in rapid protyping machinery continue to the point that large scale high strength components can be produced, the economic case against rebuilding the B-52 will go away.

The H model, was reengineered to address the stress issues. Wing stress was one of the main reasons the older B-52's were retired. With the B-52 going back to its original role of a high altitude bomber, the structural upgrades to allow it to act as a low level bomber are allowing the B-52 to become the longest active duty bomber in existance.

Posted by: James at June 18, 2005 05:16 AM


I flew the H model back in 69-73 out of the Kinch in the U.P. of Michigan. Great plane then and sounds like it still is. Question: The article states the current problem with the BUFF is its "upper wing surface." Could you elaborate on that. Is it possible to replace that surface? The big problem in the '70's on the D models out of Thailand was wing spar cracks. All flights were red lined as one flight only back then. Cracks were spanded by thick slabs of steel bolted to each side of the crack.

Posted by: Jerry Hatch at June 17, 2005 08:04 AM


I would guess that re-producing the B-52 is totally out of the question. Those lines are long gone.

I've long been in favor of a commercial jet-based JDAM or cruise missile platform, though. I don't know that the 787, which is built for economic efficiency, would be the Boeing of choice because it's intentionally lightweight and probably less durable under heavy duty like military planes generally find themselves. But some of the other Boeings might be fine.

Just as long as we don't let them within a thousand miles of an enemy with a real air force.

Posted by: Murdoc at June 16, 2005 12:21 PM


If the Air Force is planning to keep the B52s around for the next fifty years, they should upgrade the engines on the airframe now.The R+D was done on an engine upgrade in the late 90s.
A engine upgrade would extend the range of the B52, lower the operating costs and pay for itself it 3-4 years of use. It needs to be done now.

Posted by: Ctzhenderson at June 15, 2005 08:50 PM


Would it be cost effective to divert money on the more advanced bombers to have Boing start up a B-52 production line or something?

Or maybe convert some 787s? Dunno, just sounds like good old fashioned bombers are the better way to go, save up our money for advanced stuff further down the road.

Posted by: KTLA at June 15, 2005 03:23 PM


Post a comment




Remember Me?


Please enter the code as seen in the image below to post your comment.