Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Afghan Update
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Around the Globe
Av Week Extra
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Body Armor Blues
Bomb Squad
Brownshoes in Action
Bubbleheads, etc.
Cammo Green
Catch the "Buzz"
Chem-Bio
Civilian Apps
Cloak and Dagger
Commandos
Comms
Contingency Ops
Cops and Robbers
Cyber-warfare
Data Diving
Defense Tech Poll
Defense Tech Radio
Dissent Tech
Door Kickers
Drones
DT Administrivia
Eat DT's Dust
Extra! Extra!
Eye on China
Fast Movers
FCS Watch
Fire for Effect
FOS Files
Friday Funnies
Gadgets and Gear
Going Green
Grand Ole Osprey
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
In the Weeds with Eric
Info War
Iraq Diary
Jarhead Jazz
JSF Watch
Just War Theories
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
M4 Monopoly
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Most Wanted
MRAP Edge
Net-Centric
Nukes
Old Skool
Our Shrinking Planet
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Podcast
Politricks
Polmar's Perspective
Popular Mechanics
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Robots
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Snipertech
Soldier Systems
Space
Special Ops
Star Wars
Strategery
Stray Trons
Tactical Development
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
The Defense Biz
The Peoples' Site
The Sunday Paper
The Tanker Tango
The View from Av Week
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
Trimble on the Case
Video Lounge
War Update
Ward'z Wonderz
You can run...

See all Archives
Newsletters

Edited by Christian Lowe | Contact

On Its Way

The V-22 copter-plane hybrid hasn't had it easy in recent years, as readers of this site are no doubt aware. But Inside the Navy today brings good news to program supporters: Navy testers, at least, think the beleaguered tiltrotor is ready for prime time. (Reuters gets in on the act here, rightly giving credit where it's due.)

v22.jpg

Naval operational testers have recommended declaring the Marine Corps’ MV-22 Osprey aircraft operationally suitable and effective for military use, meaning it is now up to the Pentagon’s operational testing directorate to decide whether to endorse the recommendation. . . .

Last month, the MV-22 finished its operational evaluation, which went quite well, according to Pentagon, naval and industry sources. The official results of the testing have not yet been publicly announced, but Inside the Navy has learned the Navy’s operational testing command issued a summary report to defense officials June 30.

According to government sources familiar with the report, it recommends declaring the MV-22 operationally suitable and effective and introducing the aircraft to the fleet. The report also cites some deficiencies that must be corrected. For instance, there are issues with certain radios, passenger seat restraints and electronic combat equipment, said a Pentagon source.

The Defense Department’s operational testing office has made no final decision yet on whether to declare the MV-22 operationally suitable and effective. But in the Pentagon and among program proponents, it is considered likely that DOD will support such a declaration, based on positive data from the recent testing.

As the story notes, however, Navy testers gave the same thumbs-up back in 2000 -- and that turned out to be, well, a bit premature.

THERE'S MORE: Wired does the V-22 story right in its July issue.

And here's a little something for the kids.

-- posted by Dan Dupont

Comments

dunk sb shoes

Posted by: jian at June 18, 2009 01:03 AM


tiffany jewerly

Posted by: angle at June 17, 2009 03:54 AM



adidas shoes

Posted by: jian at June 16, 2009 03:01 AM


nike dunks

Posted by: jian at June 15, 2009 01:31 AM



nike designer shoes

Posted by: jian at June 14, 2009 08:05 PM


timberland boots

Posted by: jian at June 12, 2009 10:54 PM



ugg boots
nike designer shoes

Posted by: jian at June 11, 2009 02:47 AM


puma shoes

Posted by: angel at June 8, 2009 01:29 AM


puma shoes

Posted by: angel at June 6, 2009 12:38 PM


nike air max
nike shox
nike dunk sb
puma shoes
coach shoes

Posted by: jian at June 6, 2009 02:16 AM


nike store,air max shoes,dunk sb shoes,nike shox shoes

Posted by: tyr at June 5, 2009 02:51 AM


描述:Enjoy luxury from FENDI,100% original,Free shipping,No Sales Tax

Posted by: any at May 29, 2009 10:39 PM


nike shox
nike shox fusion
nike shox nz
nike shox R2
nike shox R4
nike shox TZ
women's nike shox R5
nike shox Turb
 

Posted by: http://www.kicksadidas.com at May 27, 2009 11:10 AM


nike shox
nike shox fusion
nike shox nz
nike shox R2
nike shox R4
nike shox TZ
women's nike shox R5
nike shox Turb
 

Posted by: http://www.kicksadidas.com at May 27, 2009 11:08 AM


we offer hermes kelly,hermes birkin,Balenciaga Bags,Mulberry handbag,mulberry purse,prada handbag,prada fringe bag,coach handbags,coach bags,Dior bags,Dior bag,fendi handbag ,gucci handbags,gucci messenger bag

kobe shoes,adidas kobe shoes,,kobe bryant shoes,new kobe shoes,kobe shoe,nike kobe shoes,kobe bryant's shoes,kobe basketball shoes,air kobe shoes,kobe bryant new shoes,kobe basketball shoe,kobe bryant shoe,adidas kobe bryant,adidas kobe bryant shoes,basketball bryant kobe shoes,kobe bryant dunks,kobe nike,kobe zoom,nike zoom kobe,zoom kobe shoes,nike air zoom kobe


coach men shoes,men's coach shoes,mens coach shoes,coach shoe,coach shoes,coach shoes sale,coach tennis shoes,men's coach shoes , coach sneakerscoach sneaker,coach sneakers women,discount coach sneakers,new coach sneakers,coach women shoe,coach women shoes ,women coach shoes,women's coach shoes
cheap dunk cheap dunk shoes cheap dunks dunk sb dunks sb nike dunk,nike dunk sb nike dunks nike sb sb dunk cheap dunk high dunk high dunk high premium dunk high premium sb dunk high pro, dunk highs, dunk sb high,dunk sb high top,dunks high,nike dunk high,nike dunks high,nike sb high,womens dunk high,dunk high pro sb,cheap dunk low,dunk low,dunk low pro sb,dunk low sb,dunk sb low,dunks low,low nike dunk,nike dunk low,nike dunk sb low,nike dunks low,nike sb low,sb dunk low,buy nike sb mid,dunk mid premium,dunk mid pro,dunk mid pro sb,dunk mid sb,dunk mids,dunks mid,dunks mids,nike dunk mid,nike sb mid
 

Posted by: steven Young at May 16, 2009 04:02 AM


Paul Smith
Paul Smith Sale
cheap paul smith wallets
buy paul smith wallet
paul smith leather wallets
Paul smith men's wallet
paul smith women's wallets
Paul Smith Wallets
Paul Smith Bags
Paul Smith Necktie
Paul Smith Notebook
Paul Smith Belts
Paul Smith Shoes
Paul Smith Trainers
Paul Smith Cufflinks
Paul Smith">Paul Smith T-shirts
buy paul smith belt
Paul Smith Authentic
paul smith belt
paul smith belts
black leather suit belt
Paul Smith Blonde Naked Lady Belt
trainers uk
trainers shop
trainers reviews
health trainer
trainers sale
new trainers
comfortable Trainer

Posted by: http://www.paulsmithsale.co.uk at May 15, 2009 04:17 AM


Replica A Lange & Sohne
Replica Accutron
Replica Audemars Piguet
Replica Baume & Mercier
Replica Bell & Ross
Replica Breitling
Replica Bvlgari
Replica Cartier
Replica Chanel
Replica Chopard
Replica Christian Bernard
Replica Christian Dior
Replica Citizen
Replica Coach
Replica Concord
Replica Corum
Replica D&G
Replica DKNY
Replica Ebel
Replica ESQ
Replica Fendi
Replica Fila
Replica Franck Muller
Replica Girard Perregaux
Replica Givenchy
Replica Gucci
Replica Guess
Replica Hamilton
Replica Haurex
Replica Invicta
Replica IWC
Replica Jacob & Co
Replica Jacques Lemans
Replica Jaeger LeCoultre
Replica Levis
Replica Longines
Replica Mont Blanc
Replica Movado
Replica Omega
Replica Orient
Replica Oris
Replica Panerai
Replica Patek Philippe
Replica Piaget
Replica Rado
Replica Rolex
Replica Sector
Replica Seiko
Replica Skagen
Replica Swatch
Replica Swiss
Replica Swiss Army Victorinox
Replica Tag Heuer
Replica Technomarine
Replica Timberland
Replica Tissot
Replica Ulysse Nardin
Replica Vacheron Constantin
Replica Wenger
Replica Wittnauer
Replica Zenith
Replica Zodiac ecommerce
open source
shop
online shopping
Rolex Sports watches
Rolex Datejusts watches
A Lange & Sohne watches
Aigner watches
Alain Silberstein watches
Audemars Piguet watches
Bell & Ross watches
Breguet watches
Breitling watches
Bvlgari watches
Cartier watches
Chanel watches
Chopard watches
Concord watches
Corum watches
Dior watches
Dolce & Gabbana watches
Ebel watches
Emporio Armani watches
Glashutte watches
Gucci watches
Hermes Watches
IWC watches
Jacob & Co watches
Jaeger LeCoultre watches
Longines watches
Louis Vuitton watches
Mont Blanc watches
Movado watches
Omega watches
Oris watches
Panerai watches
Patek Philippe watches
Philip Stein watches
Porsche Design watches
Rado watches Roger
Roger Dubuis watches
Sarcar watches
Tag Heuer watches
Technomarine watches
Vacheron Constantin watches
Zenith watches ecommerce
open source
shop
online shopping
rolex replica-
rolex replica watches-
best replica watches-
watches-
diamond watches-
replica watches-
rolex watches-
watches online-
timex watches-
ladies watch-
luxury watch-
wrist watches-
casio watches-
watches online-
ladies watch-
men's watch-
wrist watches-
replica watches-
fine watches-
casio watches-
watches online-
replica rolex watches-
rolex watch-

Posted by: luxury watch at April 20, 2009 08:26 PM


Many people think that Meisha good kill. The sense of aversion to the, No friends (pegged out) and of course there will be no joy. No maple story mesos, you will not feel happy! I just like playing a few career, spent a total of 100 to block it.

Posted by: maple story mesos at August 8, 2008 08:11 PM


nice to meet you

Posted by: wowpowerleveling at April 15, 2008 12:14 AM


Re: Defensive weapons. The currently produced Block-A MV22 have no defensive capability (other than countermeasures), and are designated for training only. The Block-B units are supposed to have defensive armament.

Posted by: Brett Blatchley at October 22, 2005 10:02 PM


The V-22 is what they like to call transformational these days. It takes the whole concept of operational maneuver to another level. Certainly there have been tradeoffs (like the size, as it had to fit into the same space as a CH-53). Also, it really should have a nose turret gun and window and/or ramp guns.

What is really needed is an attack version of the V-22. Bell/Boeing should do what Bell did when they stripped down and buffed up the UH-1 to make the AH-1. It would make a very powerful attack craft, on par with the A-10 (though somewhat slower), and would be the perfect escort for waves of Marines going over the horizon in V-22s.

Posted by: Radical Rick at October 6, 2005 09:19 PM


First off, (Mr. Skinner) the amphibious capabilities of the Marines are not limited to landings. The doctrine has changed with the times. You should do some research on Operational Maneuver From The Sea and Seabasing. Bottom line we can still get places faster than the Army.

The Osprey is too delicate for use in combat. There is a narrow window in which it can transition safely from prop to rotor flight. There are no defensive weapons, in fact no windows at all to even put them in. This is also bad for embarked troops who can gain useful reconaissance from their flight over an area, and ensure they are at the right LZ before exiting. Someone said speed is a great advantage. Unfortunately, it is too fast to be escorted by Cobras, and too slow to be escorted by Hornets or Harriers. This is a huge downfall. This thing will be pushed into service because the Corps has put all its eggs into the Osprey basket. I think the aircraft would be a great deal more useful to the civilian sector, where it won't have to perform to combat standards.

Posted by: S. Cook at September 1, 2005 10:03 AM


As a former CH-46 pilot, I have to say that the Osprey is long overdue. Even with the over-hyped problems, I'd take it any day. To say that the CH-46 needs replacing is an understatement of the highest degree. Virtually the entire fleet is flying beyond its design life of 10,000 hours, so every flight is a crapshoot, waiting for something to fail.

Posted by: Chuck Phillips at August 9, 2005 10:55 AM


THE IDEA OF A HELICOPTER/PLANE HYBRID INTRIGUES ME. IT IS JUST A CRYING SHAME THAT THERE HAVE BEEN SO MANY BUGS FOR SO MANY YEARS. I SEE THE CRAFT PUT TO GOOD USE IN CIVILIAN LIFE AS AN AIR AMBULANCE AND IN FIRE FIGHTING AGAINST FOREST FIRES. HAVE A GOOD DAY.

Posted by: THOMAS WATTS at August 3, 2005 12:26 PM


I believe the V-22 is a waste and a deathtrap. I may be a retired door gunner, but even I wonder where is the defensive weapons? When it comes in VTOL, it is vunerable and all personel on board are a target. Is someone making money at the cost of GI's lives? The money can be used better on existing rotary aircraft and give our guys and gals a chance to live getting into and out of a hot LZ.

Posted by: Paul Cartter at July 31, 2005 11:36 PM


Anyone who thinks that the CH-53 is has even close to the same qualities is wrong. The V-22 is faster, has better range, and has one of the best qualities of all... speed. Speed is the difference between life and death. The V-22 will be able to get our troops to the hot spots faster and with less exposure than any other platform out there. It will also allow us to get wounded troops much faster to the the medical aid they need as well as provide a more stable environment for interim care. Overall is a step forward. Why keep working with technology that is now becoming dated... the V-22 is the future, here now.

Posted by: Troop Safety at July 21, 2005 03:20 PM


I think as a platform it has great potential in Search and Rescue, Drug interdiction and Border Patrol, outside of direct military application.

Posted by: Doug Allen at July 18, 2005 09:41 AM


We lost plenty of Harriers in the late 70's and early 80's, while the bugs were worked out of the aircraft. I believe the Osprey program will follow a similiar road. The capabilities of the Osprey are well beyond what we now have in the Chinook and Sea knight. The aircraft will eventually save many lives.

Posted by: Robert Miller at July 17, 2005 09:38 AM


I actually am a supporter of the V-22. I was lucky to see the test flights of the XV-15 in the 80's at Tustin Marine Base, we had a personal demo from the test pilots. As to the comments on the Ch-53's, made earlier. Yes they can do most of the jobs that the V-22 will be able to do. But the Ch-53E has had its share of problems (speaking from experience, as a former Marine working on the 53E program in New River). Lots of people died until the bugs are worked out. And they are still working out bugs 20 years later. Any high performance Aircraft will have problems, people will die. That is the nature of the beast. I don’t like to hear about crashes of aircraft, but who said the Military was easy or not dangerous. But the V-22 has to potential to be a superb military aircraft, and it will lead the way for civil models to follow. Bell and Boeing, keep up the great work….

Posted by: Dave Maruska at July 15, 2005 07:18 PM


I think it's a bad idea to go operational. We lose enough people every day in Iraq. The V-22 has claimed over 30 lives in testing. I would rather face a court marshall than get into one of them. I'm in the Air Force. I have a friend that worked on the test program at Edwards. He lost a friend in an accident and hee said it was the worst nightmare of an aircraft he'd ever worked on. This thing has been mired in development hell for way too many years. It's time to cut our losses and stop trying to fly something that obviously doesn't want to fly. After all, they killed the Comanche helicopter which was probably a lot better (Yes, I realize one's a troop carrier and the other is an attack helicopter). If it does go operational, look for the death toll to rise and the lawsuits from family members to come rolling in by the truck loads. Good luck

Posted by: Eddie Nelson at July 15, 2005 09:58 AM


Good Morning Guys,

I know I'm going to cause the Bandani to hit the fan but the question begges to be asked, why do we need the V-22?

For that matter why does the United States need to spend tens of billion of dollars every year maintaining the Marines amphibious capabilities at all?

The last opposed amphibious landing was at Inchon in 1950 if I recall. Since then any seaborn operations have been cermonial events such as the 1965 landings in Vietnam or less then Battalion size. Keeping three ARG's at sea all the time seems to be legecy of the Cold War that like the "Midgetman" ICBM no longer has any operational need to exist.

The V-22's only purpose that I can see is that it is a poster child, like the Army's Comache of how not to develope a weapons platform.

It is time that Sec. of Defense Rumsfeld shows some ba**s again and scrap the V-22 once and for all. To say that the CH-46 needs replacing is obovious but new CH-53's can do the job and have that needs to be done at a fraction of the cost and with a much better safety record.

To say that the Marine Corps as it is structured today is being redundant of the Army's "Light Forces" is an understatement. The question of do we or do we not need the Marine Corps. is for another day though. But I see no use in throwing Billions of dollars more into that rat hole called the V-22.

I fired the first shot. So now it's you turn Marines, have at me. This is the dicussion that not one wants to have but it is the thousand pound gorilla sitting in the room when a dicussion of defense spending comes up.

ALLONS,
Byron Skinner
"Stewart's Platoon"

Posted by: Byron Skinner at July 11, 2005 02:16 PM


Good Morning Guys,

I know I'm going to cause the Bandani to hit the fan but the question begges to be asked, why do we need the V-22?

For that matter why does the United States need to spend tens of billion of dollars every year maintaining the Marines amphibious capabilities at all?

The last opposed amphibious landing was at Inchon in 1950 if I recall. Since then any seaborn operations have been cermonial events such as the 1965 landings in Vietnam or less then Battalion size. Keeping three ARG's at sea all the time seems to be legecy of the Cold War that like the "Midgetman" ICBM no longer has any operational need to exist.

The V-22's only purpose that I can see is that it is a poster child, like the Army's Comache of how not to develope a weapons platform.

It is time that Sec. of Defense Rumsfeld shows some ba**s again and scrap the V-22 once and for all. To say that the CH-46 needs replacing is obovious but new CH-53's can do the job and have that needs to be done at a fraction of the cost and with a much better safety record.

To say that the Marine Corps as it is structured today is being redundant of the Army's "Light Forces" is an understatement. The question of do we or do we not need the Marine Corps. is for another day though. But I see no use in throwing Billions of dollars more into that rat hole called the V-22.

I fired the first shot. So now it's you turn Marines, have at me. This is the dicussion that not one wants to have but it is the thousand pound gorilla sitting in the room when a dicussion of defense spending comes up.

ALLONS,
Byron Skinner
"Stewart's Platoon"

Posted by: Byron Skinner at July 11, 2005 02:15 PM


Post a comment




Remember Me?


Please enter the code as seen in the image below to post your comment.