DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Missiles » Brilliant Pebbles Returns

Brilliant Pebbles Returns


Long-time space-based missile defense advocate Lowell Wood, officially a scientist at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, has been talking up the Brilliant Pebbles concept that he pushed during the better part of my elementary school years.
Wood was at the Capitol Hill Club for an event sponsored by the American Foreign Policy Council and the Marshall Institute. Sharon Weinberger at Defense Daily summarizes Wood’s talk (subscription only, I am afraid).
Wood’s presentation was entitled “Ballistic Missile Defense in an Ideal World”.
Wood’s “ideal world” is one, presumably, where the laws of physics are substantially relaxed. One of his slides caught my eye:

Total life-cycle cost to the Nation to own the Brilliant Pebbles defensive system was $11 B $11 B (89 $)
CAIG-validated, DoD-certified-to-Congress cost estimate
Tight consensus of 3 from the bottom up cost-estimation projects
All RDT&E, all production-&-deployment; 2 decades ops
Total deployed constellation of 2000 Pebbles
Worst-case GPALS threat: Typhoon salvo-launching off Bermuda
Clearly met Reagans ..impotent and obsolete.. spec for the SDI
Higher cost estimates come from critics-&-opponents
Manifestly, professional nafs ?Will you believe this?!?

Whatever you think of the critics, the American Physical Society and Congressional Budget Office (1996, 2002 and 2004) are not staffed by “professional nafs.“
Of all people to hurl this charge, Dr. Wood is not the person with the most credibility.
His days pimping the X-Ray laser remain a source of controversy. Worse, in my view, the technically savy Dr. Wood encrypted his .pdf file — something that took me three seconds to defeat with Elcomsoft.
Let’s hope Brilliant Pebbles fares better than Wood’s encryption when dealing with adversary countermeasures.
– posted by Jeffrey Lewis.

Share |

July 20th, 2005 | Missiles | 668 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2005/07/20/brilliant-pebbles-returns/Brilliant+Pebbles+Returns2005-07-20+18%3A06%3A15wonk You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « G.I. T.V. | North Korea’s One Ton Bomb? » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. conrad says:
    July 20, 2005 at 4:51 pm

    It’s a terrible idea that won’t die, both because it’s a money maker and because the egos of guys like this are invested in it.
    Dr. Strangelove rides again!

    Reply
  2. stephen says:
    July 20, 2005 at 5:04 pm

    Bravo, Dr. Wood. Good ideas, technical feasibility, and solid strategic vision remain your hallmark. The country needs more of this.

    Reply
  3. jtw says:
    July 20, 2005 at 10:19 pm

    This pebbles has been talked about since the early 1990’s.
    If these people couldnt develop it in 10 years since it has been conveived, they probably arent qualified to do so.
    Its a good idea, but its also a common sense idea. And doesnt automatically mean they should receive funding or are brilliant.
    But if pebbles worked perfect, it would be a good compliment to a ground based missile interceptor type defense system.
    But what if people shoot things from space, their idea is directed to missiles that could fly in “earths orbit range”.
    What is Russia or China already has nuclear missiles floating around million of miles away from Earth ready to launch back at the Earth from a sort of autonomous remote space station.
    THen this system would fail.

    Reply
  4. Directorate says:
    July 21, 2005 at 4:24 am

    The idea is not a bad idea, it is simply the lack of competing technological innovations that give it longevity. The US is experiencing a serious brain-gap. All those hours on the web, in front of the TV or on the X-box instead of the drawing boards will eventually do the US in. Old creative ideas have an ever-longer shelf life. Such explains the remaking of 30 year old tv shows into films. Creativity is stifled by pacification. Technology users and widespread scientific ignoarance in the US go hand-in-hand.

    Reply
  5. Chris Werkshage says:
    February 1, 2006 at 7:52 pm

    Space Based weapons have a few advantages.
    1-Mantinence is nill. But there is always the problem with mis-firing. For instance, durig any armor traing there is that possibility of a complete failure on both;
    a. The powder primer and;
    b. the electrical firing mechanism.
    2-But in non-essential targeting or low-prioity target, this method would be the best to advert any danger to U.S. troops with no need to enter that arena of battle.
    * Eletronic Warfare (such a the PREDATOR drone) has proved more than a useful tool in combat. But we may at times to fail to recognize what we tend to call ‘Dug-in’ troops. Fortified positions will forever require:
    SEALs
    Delta Force, including al of the 1st Special Ops.
    And just well trained soldiers. *
    Chris Werkshage
    Looking to tan soon.
    Brooklyn, New York.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • Putin Declares New Russian Built PAK-FA Stealth Fighter Better Than F-22 Raptor
    • Big Bucks Lure Crack Afghan Troops to Private Security Firms
    • Navy-Marine Corps Friction; All Is Not Well With the Sea Services
    • Protecting the SMART Grid From Cyber Attack
    • Testing of FCS Remnants Shows Reliability, Performance Improvements
    • Pass Supplemental Spending Bill Or We Start Doing Stupid Things: Gates
    • Army Recalls More Than 13K Armor Plates
    • CNO Roughead Disputes China Sub Claim
    • The Future Battlefield: The Advantage Has Now Swung Back in the Defender’s Favor
    • Does Prospective CMC Amos Have a Vision to Save the Marine Corps?
    Recent Comments
    • Putin Declares New Russian Built PAK-FA Stealth Fighter Better Than F-22 Raptor
      I think...
      @Earlydawn
    • Protecting the SMART Grid From Cyber Attack
      I think we should move on this immediately! Of...
      Ptsfp
    • Putin Declares New Russian Built PAK-FA Stealth Fighter Better Than F-22 Raptor
      Since the US...
      ZRH537
    • The Future Battlefield: The Advantage Has Now Swung Back in the Defender’s Favor
      ...
      Close The Borders
    • Does Prospective CMC Amos Have a Vision to Save the Marine Corps?
      I'm not talking...
      McKellar
    • Putin Declares New Russian Built PAK-FA Stealth Fighter Better Than F-22 Raptor
      Looks...
      609Gunner
    • Putin Declares New Russian Built PAK-FA Stealth Fighter Better Than F-22 Raptor
      People really...
      Matt
    • Putin Declares New Russian Built PAK-FA Stealth Fighter Better Than F-22 Raptor
      about the...
      Matt
    • “Merchant of Death” Nabbed by Feds
      Perfect write-up, I’m a large believer...
      Ziar Neamt
    • Putin Declares New Russian Built PAK-FA Stealth Fighter Better Than F-22 Raptor
      ANYTHING...
      Kayaker
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage