Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Afghan Update
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Around the Globe
Av Week Extra
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Body Armor Blues
Bomb Squad
Brownshoes in Action
Bubbleheads, etc.
Cammo Green
Catch the "Buzz"
Chem-Bio
Civilian Apps
Cloak and Dagger
Commandos
Comms
Contingency Ops
Cops and Robbers
Cyber-warfare
Data Diving
Defense Tech Poll
Dissent Tech
Door Kickers
Drones
DT Administrivia
Eat DT's Dust
Extra! Extra!
Eye on China
Fast Movers
FCS Watch
Fire for Effect
FOS Files
Friday Funnies
Gadgets and Gear
Going Green
Grand Ole Osprey
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
In the Weeds with Eric
Info War
Iraq Diary
Jarhead Jazz
JSF Watch
Just War Theories
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
M4 Monopoly
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Most Wanted
MRAP Edge
Net-Centric
Nukes
Old Skool
Our Shrinking Planet
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Polmar's Perspective
Popular Mechanics
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Robots
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Snipertech
Space
Special Ops
Star Wars
Strategery
Stray Trons
Tactical Development
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
The Defense Biz
The Peoples' Site
The Sunday Paper
The Tanker Tango
The View from Av Week
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
Trimble on the Case
Video Lounge
War Update
Ward'z Wonderz
You can run...

See all Archives
Newsletters

Edited by Christian Lowe | Contact

Subway Surveillance on Track

New York's Metropolitan Transportation Authority is getting set to announce their subway security plan. And from the details reported in today's Times, the MTA appears to be basing their $200 million effort on the smart surveillance systems we've profiled in places like Chicago and the port of Corpus Christi.

chicago_camera_wall.jpg

Lockheed Martin will lead a team of contractors in creating an "integrated electronic security system" that will include closed-circuit television cameras, motion detectors and "intelligent video" software that can automatically determine if a package has been left on a train or if a person is in a restricted area.

The MTA could have gone the London route, stringing tons of cameras throughout the subway, and only paying careful attention to the footage once something bad went down. Instead, by using software to detect suspicious behavior, New York transit officials seem to want their thousand new cameras and three thousand electronic sensors to serve as deterrents, tipping cops off to potential bad guys before they act.

The system is a long, long time in coming. Back in 2002, the MTA was given $591 million to shore up New York's mass transit security. As of last month, it had spent just $30 million of that. Finally, the London tube bombings shamed the MTA into making a move.

THERE'S MORE: Bruce Schneier thinks the subway cams are a waste, dealing with the "'movie plot threat'" of the moment... The terrorists bombed a subway in London, so we need to defend our subways."

New York City officials are [also] erring on the side of caution. If nothing happens, then it was only money. But if something does happen, they won't keep their jobs unless they can show they did everything possible. And technological solutions just make everyone feel better.

Comments

Many people think that Meisha good kill. The sense of aversion to the, No friends (pegged out) and of course there will be no joy. No maple story mesos, you will not feel happy! I just like playing a few career, spent a total of 100 to block it.

Posted by: maple story mesos at August 8, 2008 07:43 PM


The first time played game, the first time made friends, first time chatted with MM, and the first time earned Archlord money, communicated from the language he started to like her.

Posted by: Archlord money at August 7, 2008 08:19 PM


nice to meet you

Posted by: wowpowerleveling at April 14, 2008 11:17 PM


Of course the security of the mass transit system in New York is very important,but as I understand it the whole system is in disrepair and needs serous money spent on upgrades and many improvements,just so that it can operate at all.

Posted by: Eddiemyboy1 at July 18, 2006 01:03 PM


The MTA delays in implementing a security system may prove to be advantageous because of the tremendous advances in Video Threat Detection hardware and software used to automate the monitoring process. This technology allows focus on the most immediate threats in real time, not unlike the missile targeting systems in jet fighters.
As for the cost of such a system, whatever it turns out to be, It will far less than the losses incurred by a massive and prolonged subway disrution!

Posted by: stu dragon at July 15, 2006 10:23 AM


We have so many persons without work let them watch the streets city safety they can also write tickets thus the police can do priority work!634

Posted by: anthony bauwens at October 19, 2005 12:35 PM



MTA Security slogan: If you see something,
say something. Well, people saw something.
The fare is too high, and now the people
are saying something, lower the fare today.

Remember: A low fare Transportation System
will help stimulate the New York
City's economy.

Posted by: Robert at October 11, 2005 09:19 PM



The MTA should cut expenses, streamline
operations, and use the $591 million dollars
to lower the fare. To improve security on
the subway system, add more auxiliary Transit
police.

Posted by: David at September 11, 2005 02:14 PM



The MTA must provide a not-for-profit transit
system, and any expenses for security equipment
can not be passed onto the rider.

Posted by: Robert at September 11, 2005 01:47 PM


Bruce Schneier is correct that this is a kneejerk policy designed to look as though it will do something useful rather than actually being useful.

However he is a security professional well versed in evaluating security measures for effectiveness.

We the general public are not. All we can do is look at how CCTV has performed so far and ask if we want that.

So the London CCTV has allowed us to see the faces of those who killed 50+ people a few days after they did and for the police to cover up a wrongful shooting.

Who finds that useful ?

Posted by: Tank at August 25, 2005 06:38 AM


Post a comment




Remember Me?


Please enter the code as seen in the image below to post your comment.