Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Afghan Update
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Around the Globe
Av Week Extra
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Body Armor Blues
Bomb Squad
Brownshoes in Action
Bubbleheads, etc.
Cammo Green
Chem-Bio
Civilian Apps
Cloak and Dagger
Commandos
Comms
Contingency Ops
Cops and Robbers
Cyber-warfare
Data Diving
Defense Tech Poll
Dissent Tech
Drones
DT Administrivia
Eat DT's Dust
Extra! Extra!
Eye on China
Fast Movers
FCS Watch
FOS Files
Friday Funnies
Gadgets and Gear
Going Green
Grand 'Ol Osprey
Grand Ole Osprey
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
In the Weeds with Eric
Info War
Iraq Diary
Jarhead Jazz
JSF Watch
Just War Theories
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Most Wanted
Net-Centric
Nukes
Old Skool
Our Shrinking Planet
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Polmar's Perspective
Popular Mechanics
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Robots
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Snipertech
Space
Special Ops
Star Wars
Strategery
Stray Trons
Tactical Development
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
The Defense Biz
The Peoples' Site
The Sunday Paper
The Tanker Tango
The View from Av Week
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
Trimble on the Case
War Update
Ward'z Wonderz
You can run...

See all Archives
Newsletters

Edited by Christian Lowe | Contact

Darpa Wants Mach 2, Uneven Flying Wing

Back in the 1940's, scientists suggested that a plane with uneven, or oblique, wings might be the best shape for supersonic travel. Sixty years later, no one has been able to make a working, Mach-speed model. Now, the Pentagon's fringe-science arm, Darpa, not only wants to take a whack at the decades-old problem -- the agency is looking for a plane that's one giant, cockeyed wing.

flying_wing.JPGOblique wings, in theory, provide more lift and less drag than standard aircrafts. But engineers haven't figured out how to build a plane that could handle the "aerodynamic control, aero-structural design, and propulsion integration" that come with the asymmetric approach, Darpa says. There's not even enough "data to date to assess the feasibility" for a supersonic oblique flying wing [OFW] design, the agency notes.

In its new "Switchblade" program, Darpa is aiming to "demonstrate the feasibility and controllability of a supersonic, tailless, variable sweep OFW concept; validate the design methods and control approaches for the design; and facilitate consideration of an OFW planform in the design of potential future operational aircraft."

To start, Darpa wants a good set of OFW plans. They'll have to include:

• Non-expendable aircraft with a wheeled, retractable undercarriage for take-off and landing

• Air breathing propulsion

• Supersonic demonstration at a Mach number greater than or equal to 1.2

• Tailless configuration in supersonic cruise and subsonic loiter conditions

• Variable wing sweep demonstrated in-flight from a minimum wing sweep of not more than 30 degrees to a maximum wing sweep of not less than 60 degrees

• Aspect ratio greater than or equal to 7 at the minimum sweep condition

• Wingspan greater than or equal to 40 feet at the minimum sweep condition.

Darpa isn't exactly sure what an OFW craft would do, if it ever got built. But the agency has some ideas about the kind of tasks a flying wing could handle. Maybe the OFW would spy on targets 2,500 miles away, loitering in the air for 15 hours at a time. Or maybe the plane could become a Mach 2 bomber, dumping 15,000 pounds of ordnance on unsuspecting foes, wondering what the hell that strange thing was, flying overhead.

THERE'S MORE: In the comments, Giovanni links to some of NASA's oblique wing attempts. And Murc points us to Northrop's response to the "Switchblade" chalenge.

Comments

nice to meet you

Posted by: wowpowerleveling at April 15, 2008 02:13 AM


The stock has gained 150% from Oct 8, 2007 to Oct 22, 2007.
By the way check this company MDFI. Their stock is set to increase because of their association with Apple iphone and Complete Care Medical. Find more about this company and stock http://www.growurmoney.com/medefile/

Posted by: gowri at October 26, 2007 02:54 AM


And now we have a first flight date in 2010 !

BR

Posted by: Ben R. at April 3, 2006 12:26 PM


sure will be pretty seeing one fly along... and then it will tumble gently down to earth as if falls out of the sky plumeting into a huge fireball. :(
Lets hope they do all the flight testing with remote control. this looks like a death trap.

Posted by: Aaron at October 19, 2005 09:41 PM


Heres Northrop Grummans concept pic, they think they could have it built by 2020.
They probably have the best shot, since they built the B-2 bomber, so they have experience with a tailess flying wing.

http://www.flightinternational.com/Articles/2005/09/27/Navigation/250/201775/Northrop+responds+to+US+Switchblade+challenge.html

Posted by: Murc at October 18, 2005 01:05 AM


AD1 here we go:

http://www.dfrc.nasa.gov/Gallery/Photo/AD-1/HTML/index.html

Posted by: giovanni at October 18, 2005 12:12 AM


Back in 79-82 is when Nasa had one...Called the AD-1 Oblique Wing, its wing turned up to a 60 degree angle.

But this would be much harder to build. Since this would have its engines internal, and would have to go supersonic, be unmanned, and have a well engineered thrust vectoring system.

Posted by: Murc at October 17, 2005 11:46 PM


There are a few designs in the patent office if you want to go searching there website. I know Boeing has a forty year old, or so, design that was two big for conventional runways of the time, our professor showed us the pictures.

Posted by: Harry Toor at October 17, 2005 07:39 PM


Didn't NASA test w/ a variable sweep OW a/c back in the 80's? If I remember - it was a wing tacked on the top of a -104 fuselage....

Making the whole thing a flying wing - that's a whole nother beast.

Posted by: Robert at October 17, 2005 06:38 PM


Post a comment




Remember Me?


Please enter the code as seen in the image below to post your comment.