Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Afghan Update
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Around the Globe
Av Week Extra
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Body Armor Blues
Bomb Squad
Brownshoes in Action
Bubbleheads, etc.
Cammo Green
Catch the "Buzz"
Chem-Bio
Civilian Apps
Cloak and Dagger
Commandos
Comms
Contingency Ops
Cops and Robbers
Cyber-warfare
Data Diving
Defense Tech Poll
Defense Tech Radio
Dissent Tech
Door Kickers
Drones
DT Administrivia
Eat DT's Dust
Extra! Extra!
Eye on China
Fast Movers
FCS Watch
Fire for Effect
FOS Files
Friday Funnies
Gadgets and Gear
Going Green
Grand Ole Osprey
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
In the Weeds with Eric
Info War
Iraq Diary
Jarhead Jazz
JSF Watch
Just War Theories
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
M4 Monopoly
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Most Wanted
MRAP Edge
Net-Centric
Nukes
Old Skool
Our Shrinking Planet
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Podcast
Politricks
Polmar's Perspective
Popular Mechanics
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Robots
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Snipertech
Soldier Systems
Space
Special Ops
Star Wars
Strategery
Stray Trons
Tactical Development
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
The Defense Biz
The Peoples' Site
The Sunday Paper
The Tanker Tango
The View from Av Week
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
Trimble on the Case
Video Lounge
War Update
Ward'z Wonderz
You can run...

See all Archives
Newsletters

Edited by Christian Lowe | Contact

B-52s Axed for More Raptors

Air Force chiefs want their new stealth fighters, bad -- so bad, they're willing to scrap some of their best-performing planes early, in order to free up cash for their controversial, next-generation jet.

raptor1.jpgInside Defense reports that "nearly half the B-52 bomber force and the full U-2 spy plane and F-117 stealth fighter fleets" will be retired ahead of schedule, under a Pentagon budget plan endorsed by the Air Force. It's part of "a bid to save $16.4 $2.6 billion and boost spending" for the F-22 Raptor program.

About a year ago, a similar Pentagon "Program Budget Decision," or PBD, cut $10 billion out of the F-22's budget. Originally designed to duel with Soviet fighters, the Raptor seemed to be a plane without a mission; the Air Force touted the F-22 as everything from a cargo lifter to an IED-stopper. A fleet of 277 Raptors was downsized to 179 -- despite a massive PR campaign from the Air Force.

This PDB, Inside Defense notes, "would allow the Air Force to inject an additional $1 billion into its prized F-22A program," and add a grand total of four planes to the Raptor roster.

Cuts to the long-range B-52 bomber fleet would reduce the inventory from 94 aircraft to 56... The Air Force is banking on $4.6 billion in savings with this early retirement: $680 million in the procurement accounts and $3.9 billion in personnel reductions associated with a smaller B-52 fleet...

The Pentagon also plans to terminate the B-52 Stand-off Jammer System, an electronic attack capability, saving $1.1 billion across the five-year spending plan, according to the PBD.

Convincing Congress to go along won't be easy, however.

Similar attempts in recent years -- including moves to stand down B-1B bombers, KC-135E aerial refueling aircraft, and the F-117 -- have met stiff resistance on Capitol Hill. But this time around, the Pentagon appears to be taking a new approach in proposing to retire three programs at once.

“Now they’re going for the whole enchilada,” Christopher Bolkcom, an aviation expert at the Congressional Research Service, said. “You can see that they seem to be launching a frontal assault.”

UPDATE 12:36 PM EST: "Privately, the Air Force sold the B-52 SOJ [stand-off jammer] on the merits of the very large antennas" that would jam the most dangerous enemy radar, Bolkcom tells Defense News. "If the B-52 is replaced with a smaller jamming platform, one may wonder how these frequencies will now be jammed, or whether the original argument for the B-52 was valid."

UPDATE 2:42 PM EST: "Remember, this is the same Air Force that tired everything it could to retire the A-10s early," Murdoc reminds us. "What is it about these guys that drives them to retire the most effective planes in the inventory for expensive new fighters?"

Comments

asdasdasd

Posted by: wow gold at April 20, 2009 07:31 PM


all the mistakescheap wow gold that our final world of warcraft goldruin. It takesbuy wow gold two to make a buy wow golddispute. I screamed, Idofus kamas wailed, and I begged forkamas dofus you to Final Fantasy XI gilstay. But all ffxi gilthe tricks Ilotr gold could conjure were flyff penyauseless againstbuy flyff gold a cold heart. I tried toMaple Story Mesos use your hands, you Maple Story mesosuddenly brokeEverQuest 2 gold away from my eq2 platgrasp, and without Runescape goldthe slightest compassion. Gazing Runescape moneylovingly numberRunescape Money after the Runescape Power levelingwithdrawal, I feltRunescape Gold my whole ffxi gilworld collapsed. For dofus kamasthe first few kamas dofusdays, like a walking dofus kamascorpse, I didkamas dofuswhat I do and dofus kamascried hard-to-day, under kamas dofusthe blanket, until deep dofus kamasinto the night. It is said kamas dofus that the frustration and failure are the richness of life. After all this, I gradually realized fracture was not the end of the world.

Posted by: asd at April 20, 2009 07:30 PM


And you do not think get the cheap SOF gold from me. And I has never trust you. From now on, I only want to choose a new life to live. Without sad and without bam, I hope you can get better, don’t bam the other, the women was very pity, you would think your mother is a women, too, don’t hurt women.

Posted by: cheap SOF gold at August 16, 2008 12:09 AM


In fact, you are a despicable and shameless indecency, theses is a saying of the crook is said by the women to eat, I was not addressed to you that first money, I can not give you any money to buy sof gold.

Posted by: buy sof gold at August 16, 2008 12:08 AM


why I always bam by other, if you are real, cost some Scions Of Fate money is not bid thing, I would use the money make me happy.

Posted by: Scions Of Fate money at August 16, 2008 12:07 AM


Because I had even hear a word, like this, if you sad, a man send a hand to you, whoever he is, only his hand is hot, you can give your heart to him. However I cost my heart again, but what I got. In the game, I cost my all SOF gold to let him happy, if the new equipment has appeared, I cost my all to let you happy, why you can not inspire.

Posted by: SOF gold at August 16, 2008 12:06 AM


And send it to you, when you cost the money, you must very waste. However, you do not think that how way you get the money, and when you waste the money, how could your heart be set free? In the game, you always ask us send the Scions of Fate gold to you.

Posted by: Scions of Fate gold at August 16, 2008 12:04 AM


rolex replica watches - $98 swiss , we don't sale replica watches.The Art of E-commerce

Posted by: replica watches at August 5, 2008 02:26 AM


I was so poor when I began to the Last Chaos, so I needed the last chaos gold. Someday, one of my friends asked me to go to a new place, we felt very happy when we saw the scene which was very sublime. We think that if we stayed there, we can earn more last chaos gold. And then we can use them to exchange the last chaos money.

Posted by: last chaos gold at August 5, 2008 02:05 AM


But I know it was a good game in people's mind. I could remember the thing which I asked the other role sold the cheap last chaos gold to me to buy last chaos gold. And then I play lots of different role, when I saw the beautiful role, I was very happy. I like the feeling that everybody wear own beautiful cloth. One time I saw a girl, wearing a white skirt.

Posted by: cheap last chaos gold at August 5, 2008 02:03 AM


I could remember the thing which I asked the other role sold the cheap last chaos gold to me to buy last chaos gold. And then I play lots of different role, when I saw the beautiful role, I was very happy. I like the feeling that everybody wear own beautiful cloth.

Posted by: buy last chaos gold at August 5, 2008 02:01 AM


I could remembered that when I first to the commercial city to buy cabal online alz clearly, I was so stupid, I could not entered the commercial city succeed and it always appearance mistake, so I bought the cabal alz instead.

Posted by: cabal online alz at August 5, 2008 01:59 AM


In my opinion it lick into shape the real myself, if you didn't like it, please didn't hurt it, my country people had never felt the other's feeling and used it to earn money, they sold the more cabal gold to change for the more money. I had never buy cabal alz to it I prefer to use a little money to buy the cheaper. I could use the cheaper to change for cabal money. Yes, I was so clever.

Posted by: buy cabal alz at August 5, 2008 01:57 AM


I had never buy cabal alz to it I prefer to use a little money to buy the cheaper. I could use the cheaper to change for cabal money. Yes, I was so clever.

Posted by: cabal money at August 5, 2008 01:54 AM


I had only a little lunia gold and the remedy was not enough, but I still to add the blood to our cavalier which were battling, we saw the enemy became more and more fearfulness, at last my best friend dead. At this time I needed the more lunia war gold to buy blood to save my best friend. I couldn’t go to save my friend, because the enemy was coming and carrying off his lunia online gold.

Posted by: lunia gold at August 5, 2008 01:52 AM


I want to discuss my attainment shallowly about this game. Earned money, exercising rank and doing best quality equipment, these were very important part of this game. Let me say the gaia gold, I used the buy gaia gold usually, of course the cheap gaia gold is the lowest price in this game, because only you have the more money and best quality equipment, you can exercise rank easy.

Posted by: gaia gold at August 5, 2008 01:49 AM


If you carelessness, you will be killed by them perhaps. Expect that you must go to the shop buy the more gaiaonline gold, because you will met you accompanier, if he have difficulty, you should to help him and gave some equipment which he need.

Posted by: gaiaonline gold at August 5, 2008 01:44 AM


No longer, I met a boy, he help me earn goonzu gold and teach me use them to change for goonzu money. We get a good relation each other, we became good friends, at the last days, we build team to kill enemy and buy goonzu gold. I forgot my boy friend. I think he forgot me, too. I hadn’t pull out in it when he came back to find me.

Posted by: goonzu gold at August 5, 2008 01:42 AM


I thought my husband who married in game was very kind, he always sent the goonzu online gold to the new that started to played the game. Perhaps the reason I like him. However our reins last long time, I was so sad at beginning. But the game is only the game, like the cheap goonzu gold. It had no worthiness.

Posted by: cheap goonzu gold at August 5, 2008 01:40 AM


At beginning , you are a poor, but dont worried, the style of game give you a little habbo credits, it is very cheap, you can use them to buy equipment, you can use this equipment to exercise the rank, when you get to a certain rank valid, you dont need the equipment, you should buy the better equipment. This time, you need the habbo gold.

Posted by: habbo credits at August 5, 2008 01:37 AM


wow power leveling
wow power leveling
wow power leveling
wow power leveling
wow power leveling
wow power leveling
wow power leveling
wow gold
wow powerleveling
wow powerleveling
wow powerleveling
wow powerleveling
wow gold
world of warcraft power leveling
world of warcraft power leveling
wow power level
wow power level
power leveling wow
power leveling wow
power leveling wow
powerleveling wow
powerleveling wow
cheap wow power leveling
Maple Story mesos
MapleStory mesos
ms mesos
mesos
SilkRoad Gold
SRO Gold
eq2 plat
eq2 gold
eq2 Platinum
EverQuest 2 Platinum
EverQuest 2 gold
EverQuest 2 plat
lotro gold
lotr gold
Lord of the Rings online Gold
Rolex Replica
Replica Rolex

Posted by: 2e2ff at June 3, 2008 07:35 PM


runescape money runescape gold runescape gold runescape money buy runescape gold buy runescape money runescape money runescape gold wow power leveling wow powerleveling Warcraft Power Leveling Warcraft PowerLeveling buy runescape gold buy runescape money runescape itemsrunescape accounts runescape gp dofus kamas buy dofus kamas Guild Wars Gold buy Guild Wars Gold lotro gold buy lotro gold lotro gold buy lotro gold lotro gold buy lotro gold runescape money runescape power leveling runescape money runescape gold dofus kamas cheap runescape money cheap runescape gold Hellgate Palladium Hellgate London Palladium Hellgate money Tabula Rasa gold tabula rasa money Tabula Rasa Credit Tabula Rasa Credits Hellgate gold Hellgate London gold wow power leveling wow powerleveling Warcraft PowerLeveling Warcraft Power Leveling World of Warcraft PowerLeveling World of Warcraft Power Leveling runescape power leveling runescape powerleveling eve isk eve online isk eve isk eve online isk tibia gold Fiesta Silver Fiesta Gold


runescape money runescape gold wow power leveling


棕榈树
VI设计
画册设计
血管瘤
肝血管瘤
音乐剧
福卡
防静电地板
美国留学
留学美国
电阻器
不锈钢电阻器
频敏电阻器

睡眠呼吸机
伟康呼吸机
呼吸机
无创呼吸机
家用呼吸机
呼吸机的使用

北京消化系统疾病
北京心脑血管疾病
北京肾病
北京中医儿科
北京针灸减肥
针灸减肥
北京糖尿病
北京疼痛病
北京类风湿
北京人文大学

Posted by: runescape gold at April 14, 2008 10:52 PM


We live in a sad age where rank-hungry incompetents will sell out not only our best hardware assets but personnel as well. Sad indeed. That is why I have decided to seperate from the joke we call a military. I'm sick to my stomach at the lack of fortitude, integrity, constitution and overall leadership. Shame on them.

Posted by: Ryan at June 6, 2007 10:37 PM


I know its fiction, but talk to Dale Brown-Anyway the Raptor can sure help out everything else we put in the air.Navy please keep the Battleships-Kevin

Posted by: Kevin McCune at November 7, 2006 05:53 AM


The B-52 is the workhorse of the bomber fleet. Our Jets are currently unchallenged, and the B-52 along with the A-10 and C-130 are the main workhorses for the AF. We have already extended its longevity. We do need a new bomber program, but the B-1 should be cut.. it NEVER works, never launches, and is muuuuch more expensive to maintain.

Posted by: matt at April 13, 2006 02:12 PM


Here we go again. None military politicians deciding to throw away military hardware that works so their fat cat business [lobists] can make millions on a replacement that does not work. They retired the U-2/SR-71 2 or 3 times already only to find they had to put them into servie again.

Posted by: jerimiahuno at March 24, 2006 07:44 PM


What did I say, guys?

http://www.military.com/features/0,15240,90636,00.html

The Air Force is looking to get a fly-away bomber before 2018. They aren't cancelling the B-52 for nothing.

All may bow down and worship me now. Tell me you love me.

Posted by: Brian at March 13, 2006 04:35 PM


Axing the B-52s early may not be a bad move. They're wonderful aircraft, but last I heard, current plans were to try and extend their lifespan out to the 2050s. At that point, the planes would be nearly a century old, older than the grandparents of the pilots who would be flying them. Cutting them now for more Raptors may be a way to ensure that we get a newer long range bomber. "Oops, no more B-52s. Guess we need a new bomber now."

Posted by: Brian at February 18, 2006 04:17 PM


Mr. Skinner-
I certainly agree that the X-47 (but not, it seems, the X-45) will give us a leg up in strike capability, as will the Raptor... When they're available in sufficient numbers.

No, sir, I don't think stealth is dead yet. Not when you're taking on someone with a modern air defense. You might recall that F-117s dropped the first bombs of OIF.
As to the UHF/SHF backscatter detection method I can say that I'm aware of it as a prototype system but I don't buy that this method was used by the Serbs. Can you provide some references here?

The Serbian air defense commander was interviewed recently and none of the periodicals which covered it mentioned this- they all mention certain SA-3 tactics (optical guidance, radar tweaking) and the constant re-use of the air corridor as being key to the shootdown. It was posted on Strategypage, published in some aviation journals, and kicked around the message boards a bit so you shouldn't have a problem reading it yourself.

As a final note I'd like to point out why in my opinion we need to retain some of the systems for major theater war- North Korea, Iran, and China. And a low-observability strike capability just such a system.

Posted by: Trustbutverify at January 13, 2006 12:16 PM


New is allways better, or perhaps the generals and navy just want new toys! The f22 raptor designed for air to air combat. Now it will perform bombing missions, air refuleing and any thing else the pentagon can think up to get the tax players to fork up more of their money to buy them thir latest toys.

The B-52 is cheap to run, it has the fewest brake downs and delivers the biggest pay load at the lowest cost. There are all most 600 earlier B-52's lying in the desert supplying the parts to keep the current fleet flying. Their air frames are still in perfect condtion.

The A-10 which the air force never wanted, but keeps proving it self in combat is another old war bird that gets the job done.

The f-16 and the F-15 are still unmatched in the world. The fact that with jets the electronics it carries and the weapons it fires are the real measure of a planes worth.

The navy wants to build over 20 plastic destroyers with two 155mm rapid fire guns at 3 to 5 billion each. There stealthy or so say's the navy. But one silk worm missile will blow it apart.

Yet the Navy wants to get rid of their last two battle ships, the perfect platform for gun fire support at no near the cost of the DMX.

The most effective weapon in Irag is M2 fifty cal. heavy machine gun. Designed in 1926 and still in service. The M2 or ma duce [when ma duce speaks every one listens acordding to the Marines.] Will be in service for years to come unless the army decides to replace it with some fancy new weapon that promises much and delivers little.

New is not always better and old is not somthing you throw away. Most of all when the old still works1

Posted by: davids at January 12, 2006 10:01 PM


Good Evenig Trust But,

The F-117 that was brought down in Kosovo was done using the mobile phone net works in the area. The open channels of an analog net are disrupted when an object that reflects radio waves pass through it. A moving hole if you like.

This method of tracing aircraft may in the future have a use as a civilian air traffic control infrtastructure. The only solution to this 'problem" is to invent anti-matter or shut down the mobile phone network.

I worked for Nokia in the late 90's when this "problem" was found. A lap top could be called into a system that had base stations on either side of an airport runway and the planes could be counted going through the gates.

It wouldn't take much of a software writer to come up with a program that would give all the tracking information for an air defense system. If you are the Serbs though and lack even this all you have to do is flood a zone with AAA and missiles and you have a good chance of downing an F-117.

Since the U.S. is relecunt to close down mobile phone systems, why I don't know, the rat line during the 2003 invasion of Iraq at Karabala was also the product of functioning mobile phone and cost the 11th. Avn. Bn. one Apache and 36 damage beyond use ,Stealth will remain Science Fiction.

ALLONS,
Byron Skinner

Posted by: Byron Skinner at January 11, 2006 11:36 PM


Skinner,
There's no such thing as radar invisibility for aircraft. (Properly, it's "low observability", anyway.) I don't know how much you know about the F-117 downed by the Serbs but the excellent Wonderland.org.nz site (presently down for rehosting so I cannot give you a direct link) covered this several years ago. Without giving a lecture on radar cross sections and radar types, if the radar is close enough to the target you'll eventually get a strong enough return for a shootdown. That NATO planners had their strike pacakges using the same air corridor every night. Eventually the Serbs wised up and got some SA-3s close enough to get a kill by a combination of optical cueing and luck. If the NATO air staffs hadn't used the same corridors every night this might never have happened.
So there you have it- that F-117 was killed more by complacent planning than anything else.

Your point about the new LO UCAVs is a good one, but I do not think we are well served by retiring the ol' Goblin before we have a replacement on call.
And four F-22As don't carry anything like the wallop of a B-52 full of JDAMs. Or a B-1. I'd prefer the Buff for reasons of economy.

And be careful, the casual reader might mistake your post as supporting the F-22!

(Ah, the old A-1. I wonder if even the A-10 will ever live up to the legacy of that old warhorse... Breathtaking in simplicity and effectiveness by any yardstick. Wouldn't want it near any kind of air defense, though.)

Posted by: TrustButVerify at January 11, 2006 04:34 PM


Good Morning,

May lightening strike me down, I can't find anything to disagree with Murc about. All his reasons for scrapping the aircraft in question seem to be valid.

The only thing I can add is that Stealth as in the F-117 just doesn't exist. That was shown during the Kosovo (I hate to call it a war) air exercise when an F-117 was shot down by the techonlogly advanced Serbs. A country that has put the M-98 Mauser in 7.92mm back into production.

Since currently there are only 97 B-52's and about 40 B-1B's still on active flying status I think the days of the large Strategic Bomber is more or less over.

With the X-45 and X-47's advancing at the pace they are it would seem that the F-22 and the F-35 JSF (if it is ever built) will be the last manned Fighter/Attack aircraft built.

The A-1 Sky Raider got us into jets and these two aircraft will ground the heros.

ALLONS,
Byron Skinner

Posted by: Byron Skinner at January 11, 2006 03:01 PM


They'll have an interesting fight this time, though. Not only does the appropriation bill contain money for the B-52s and 117s, the authorization conference report expressly prohibits retirement of any 117s in FY06. So they can't start until next year, by which time the fight will have been truly joined.

Posted by: AirSix at January 11, 2006 11:22 AM


Murc,
I just don't see it. You're going backwards in strike capability for an unequal gain in A2A.

Mind you, I think it's important that we bring out next generation fighter aircraft. This isn't the way to do it. Here's an idea: let's cut every general officer's pay 20%, and put forward a retroactive pay cut for all officers, and cut all retiree pay by 50%. THAT'll solve everything; we can even have a bake sale like in that stupid bumper sticker.

Posted by: TrustButVerify at January 11, 2006 08:56 AM


This doesn't shock me any.

The B-52 is very old, and its just keeps getting harder and harder to find replacement parts for it from bone yards.
Besides...The B-1 is newer, faster, and can haul nearly twice its load.

The U-2 should be retired because it no longer has a purpose to live, Any thing it can do the Global Hawk does better...and then some.

And the F-117, despite having an "F" designation, it isn't a fighter...hell, its barely a bomber, and it can only hold two 2,000 pound bombs internally and nothing externally. It was a great aircraft, but its time for retirement has indeed come.

Posted by: Murc at January 10, 2006 11:16 PM


the F-117 being retired...wow. i've actually seen the birth and death of a military plane. kinda sad. RIP Wobblin' Goblin.

Posted by: DS at January 10, 2006 09:34 PM


JSAllison: Nope. No answer expected. Rhetorical question. A "bang-the-head-against-a-wall" rhetorical question.

Posted by: Murdoc at January 10, 2006 04:22 PM


"What is it about these guys that drives them to retire the most effective planes in the inventory for expensive new fighters?"

You're not really expecting an answer, are you?

Posted by: JSAllison at January 10, 2006 04:18 PM


Axing the quantity of B-52's as reported will be a decision that the "stars" higher up will live to regret. The payload and reliability of the warhorse is unmatched in todays "electrified and computerfied" air force. They need to remember their history, or they are destined to relive it.

Posted by: gerald bailey jr. at January 10, 2006 03:08 PM


The F-22 may have a strike capability slightly bettern than the F-117, but surely we're loosing ground when we give up the entire 49th Fighter Group (about 35 airframes) for a gain of four F-22As.
Can anyone dispute the figures here? One F-22A demonstrably does NOT have parity with eight F-117s when it comes to stealthy strike capability. Even giving up stealthiness by hauling ordnance externally, you're still way behind.

Don't even bring up the B-52 tradeoffs.

Posted by: TrustButVerify at January 10, 2006 02:36 PM


Well, trading the F-117 for the F-22 is a no brainer. The U-2, a unique aircraft, but most of what it does can be replaced by drones.

But the B-52 is a completely different aircraft than the F-22. During the Iraq war we couldn't keep enough in the air. When you need to drop a whole lot of ordinance on one point, you just can't beat BUFF. It's reliable. It's sturdy. It sure ain't glamorous, but it gets the job done.

Posted by: Sean Woods at January 10, 2006 01:00 PM


Well, let's face it, despite what congress thinks, trading F-117s for F-22s does really make sense. The F-22 will have a similar ground strike capability and lower RCS than the F-117, and that isn't even its primary mission. Congressmen prone to nostalgic attachments to existing aircraft should not be allowed to vote.

Posted by: Me at January 10, 2006 11:33 AM


Post a comment




Remember Me?


Please enter the code as seen in the image below to post your comment.