Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Afghan Update
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Around the Globe
Av Week Extra
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Body Armor Blues
Bomb Squad
Brownshoes in Action
Bubbleheads, etc.
Cammo Green
Catch the "Buzz"
Chem-Bio
Civilian Apps
Cloak and Dagger
Commandos
Comms
Contingency Ops
Cops and Robbers
Cyber-warfare
Data Diving
Defense Tech Poll
Dissent Tech
Drones
DT Administrivia
Eat DT's Dust
Extra! Extra!
Eye on China
Fast Movers
FCS Watch
Fire for Effect
FOS Files
Friday Funnies
Gadgets and Gear
Going Green
Grand 'Ol Osprey
Grand Ole Osprey
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
In the Weeds with Eric
Info War
Iraq Diary
Jarhead Jazz
JSF Watch
Just War Theories
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
M4 Monopoly
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Most Wanted
MRAP Edge
Net-Centric
Nukes
Old Skool
Our Shrinking Planet
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Polmar's Perspective
Popular Mechanics
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Robots
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Snipertech
Space
Special Ops
Star Wars
Strategery
Stray Trons
Tactical Development
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
The Defense Biz
The Peoples' Site
The Sunday Paper
The Tanker Tango
The View from Av Week
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
Trimble on the Case
Video Lounge
War Update
Ward'z Wonderz
You can run...

See all Archives
Newsletters

Edited by Christian Lowe | Contact

"Shop and Awe"

Defense Tech pal and Army reserve officer Kris Alexander has a dynamite essay up on Intel Dump now, about how we need to start using our wallets to win the war on terror. "Call it 'shop and awe,'" Kris says.

souk.jpg

We have the world’s most powerful economy but haven’t leveraged it into the fight. We should be pursuing policies that capitalize on the success of several private sector companies and jump start the economy’s of strategically important regions helping to create a bigger middle class in the Middle East...

Last year, Bob Dukelow, a now-retired senior civilian pentagon intelligence analyst with on the ground experience in Afghanistan, began looking into new strategies to win the GWOT. He heard about an area on Overstock.com called “worldstock” where they sell goods from developing countries like Afghanistan. Bob concluded that Overstock, and companies like it, had a role to play in our counter-terrorism strategy.

“Venues like this create better opportunities for local craftsmen in remote areas to get their products to markets they normally would not reach,” Bob says. “We can pull these craftsmen and their families into the functional core of the world's economy lessening the chance they will fall prey to the rhetoric of fundamentalist terrorist recruiters...”

By giving a venue to craftsmen [the program] has helped create 15,000 jobs worldwide — 1,500 in Afghanistan alone... [And] some guy... who believes that he is getting a fair shake out of the New World Order is less likely to end up needing a JDAM parked on his head by some guy like me.

Comments

ood Morning Jeff,

I see that you are well versed in all the myths of the Native Americans.

Myth one: The white man took the land. Land ownership was not part of any Native American culture. Before the arrival of Europeans in North America (note South America has a far different history the the North American colonys) the Native populations wondered over vast land areas and often fought each other when they came in contact. There is no doubt that the European settlers moved onto Native American lands but they were just another competitor for the land.

Myth Two: The "White Man slaughtered entire families", other the "Wounded Knee" and a few other isolated cases, that were even at the time viewed as criminal offsenives, where did this happen?

The actual violent engagements between settlers and the Native Americans were few and most offen were the response by one side or other to a specific inicident. An eye for an eye if you like. When Native American attacked without provocation it was almost always in alliance with a European power, such as in the seven Years War.

In short there are few documented attacks, that were unprovoked by Native Americans against White European settlers. The begainings of this image of the Native Americans can be traced to James F. Cooper and stories such as "Drums along the Mohawk" and through the "Dime Novels" of the late 19th.Century.

Lastly your statement that Genocide won the west simply can't be supported by fact. Even the forced relocations of the Cherokee, Creek, Chocktaw, Chickasaw and Siminole under "The Indian Removal Act of 1837" was not Genocide. All these groups are still with us today.

The fact that this law signed by Andrew Jackson was struck down by the Supreme Court is testimony that U.S. Policy regarding the Native Americans was not as you say Genocide.

The sterotypical view of the Native Americans that prevails with in our culture is simply unsupportable by documented facts. In fact till about 1800 the Navive American population of North America was grester then that of the Eurpoeans and in few engagements between Native Americans the Naitve American gave as well as they took.

The Native American culture lost out to the Europeans because they were an early stone age culture when the Europeans arrived with an early Industrial Culture.

The Native Americans tried to catch up by adopting new cultural things like the horse, the wheel, farming etc. but they simply had to much cultural distance to make up. Native American birth rates fell while the European birth rates rose.

I expect that few of you will agree with me, the myths of the "Indians" are to well entrenched with our culture, so what.

ALLONS,
Byron Skinner

Posted by: Byron Skinner at March 3, 2006 03:19 PM


We use the same tactic to overcome and in time eradicate the Native Americans of North America. It's called trade and once you get a population aducted to western good you have won the battle.
----------------

Oh my God, you really think this don't you?

Ah, I see, so by 'trade' you must mean 'give- land-to-white-man, white-man-no-slaughter-entire-family' type trade right? Genocide won the west, not trade.

But, anyway, this strategy won't enrich politically-influential defense contractors or provide career opportunities for military officers, defense intellectuals, or national-security bureaucrat and, obviously, it won't ever be seriously considered.

Posted by: Jeff at March 2, 2006 05:22 PM


"We have the world’s most powerful economy but.." ?

Correction.. The world's SECOND most powerful economy.

Posted by: Donald Duck at March 2, 2006 08:05 AM


Good Morning Folks,

This is not exactly a new strategy from the Americans. We use the same tactic to overcome and in time eradicate the Native Americans of North America. It's called trade and once you get a population aducted to western good you have won the battle.

The either become Americans or the die out. An example is the Tomahawk and knife, the Native Americans didn't have the tech. to smelt iron or make steel, all those steel Tomahawk heads and knives that the Natives put wooden handles on and scalped settlers with came from the Europeans.

Trade goods are better then bullets any day and the really cool part is that the Natives have to buy the stuff. Thats called profit.

ALLONS,
Byron Skinner

Posted by: Byron Skinner at March 1, 2006 02:51 PM


I think this is a great idea for many reasons but keep in mind that Mohamed Atta, the lead hijacker of 9/11, was by no means "poor." He was educated at described as "middle class."

Posted by: Brad at March 1, 2006 01:01 PM


Post a comment




Remember Me?


Please enter the code as seen in the image below to post your comment.