DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Bizarro » Sticky Foam Gets Serious

Sticky Foam Gets Serious

Sticky foam is the custard pie of the nonlethals world, often seen more as a practical joke than a weapon. In fact, it worked well enough at stopping people, but suffers from some critical disadvantages, as Noah pointed out a while back.

sticky.jpgOne of the big problems is that having slimed a rioter, you cant arrest them or take them away. And if the sticky foam covers their mouth and nose, it can be anything but non-lethal.

After some initial enthusiasm for the idea during the Marine deployment to Somalia in 1995, the idea faded and has been in limbo ever since. Now sticky foam is back, defending nuclear weapon stockpiles, according to this report from Government Security.

The report explains that some facilities storing uranium and plutonium now boast steel doors with containers of hydrocarbon solution built into them. Breach the door, and the liquid comes foaming out under high pressure, expanding in bulk by a factor of forty and sealing the breach with an impassable obstacle.

The idea is that sticky foam will delay any attackers for long enough for the defenders to call in reinforcements. Experiments with explosives found it was impossible to break through the doors without the foam barrier deploying. Another test showed how a defender could release the foam by shooting it with an M-16. According to Ronald Timm, president of RETA Security:

If you’re on the high security side of a door and attackers are attempting to break through, you can use your weapon to shoot the doorThe sticky foam will deploy, delay the attackers, and give you time to call for help.

The doors are already installed at undisclosed sites. In the new role, the foam’s drawbacks become advantages. Keeping attackers stuck in place for as long as possible is helpfuland there are unlikely to be protests if any of them tries to force a way through and comes to a sticky end.
– David Hambling

Share |

March 7th, 2006 | Bizarro, Less-lethal | 304816 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/03/07/sticky-foam-gets-serious/Sticky+Foam+Gets+Serious2006-03-07+12%3A20%3A41jason You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Blog Beg: Network-Centric Stories | Billion Bucks for Space Weaponry? » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. pedestrian says:
    March 7, 2006 at 10:58 am

    >Does any one remember 234 Riot Control Launcher?
    Oops, I meant M234 Riot Control Launcher

    Reply
  2. Allen says:
    March 8, 2006 at 9:33 am

    Seemed to work well on Mr. Incredible!

    Reply
  3. Albert Mond says:
    March 8, 2006 at 12:32 pm

    What a terrible weapon!

    Reply
  4. Dave Smith says:
    March 8, 2006 at 4:43 pm

    There is also a microwave weapon, that fires a beam of ultra high frequency waves, these make the attacker feel as if his skin is on fire should they approach the wave, although no burns appear, its just the unbearable sensation.

    Reply
  5. guest says:
    March 9, 2006 at 5:58 am

    they dont deploy m16(a1 or a2)‘s anymore to my knowledge. they have too large a footprint, accessories are basically nil, it was very heavy, and it only employs a single, 3 round burst and safety grouping, not to mention the huge solid buttstock. the us troops in iraq and afghanistan weild Colt M4A1’s as well as various other rifles, but as far as I know the m16(a2) was yanked not too long ago. i think the m234 was the non-lethal brother to the m203 (another m16(a2) 20mm grenade launcher attachment), and if so, then it can be fitted onto the m4a1…as far as i know…oh, and FINALLY! A USE FOR STICKY FOAM! looks like there’s frost in the underworld now.

    Reply
  6. James says:
    March 9, 2006 at 2:15 pm

    Being a screenwriter myself, in a movie I would have the attackers arrive equiped with a large tank of spray solvent or just plain compressed air to deflect the foam to the sides until it solidified. Might not work in real life, but it would get the bad guys inside in a James Bond film.

    Reply
  7. zzzzzzzzzzzzrp says:
    March 9, 2006 at 2:46 pm

    If I was a screenwriter, I would have the bad guys show up with truck loaded with 1000 goats to eat the foam

    Reply
  8. Terrain says:
    March 9, 2006 at 5:11 pm

    How would you get it off?

    Reply
  9. wesley hansen says:
    March 10, 2006 at 2:13 am

    baby oil or mineral oil takes sticky foam right off, it
    works quite well.

    Reply
  10. Ron says:
    March 10, 2006 at 3:24 am

    You know how the sound of fingernails on a blackboard makes you feel? Or the sound of a fork dragged, tines down, across a stainless steel pan?
    Couldn’t those particular sound frequencies be amped up and used for crowd control? Wearing protective ear coverings wouldn’t work for the bad guys, ‘cuz they wouldn’t be able to hear what their leaders were saying.
    And while I’m here, I have a couple more thoughts along this general line of discussion:
    1. I’ve heard that touching pig blood, or any part of a pig for that matter, is like a deadly sin to those madmen killing our GIs. Why isn’t that fact, if it is a fact, used as a weapon? An explosive device that sprays pig blood instead of shrapnel, for example.
    How about using squirt guns filled with pig blood for interrogations of terrorists?
    2. “Humanitarian de-mining” is a big deal in many countries around the world. All the research I’ve seen focusses on mechanical, electrical and chemical devices and methods for finding buried anti-personnel mines. One method even tries to exploit the chemical sensitivity of bees to locate mines.
    By all the accounts I’ve read, clearing an area of mines, once they’re located, is a slow, dangerous and costly process. Extracting the mines seems to rely on variations of mechanical robots and a-brave-guy-with-a-bayonet poking around in the dirt.
    My question: Once a minefield is located, why don’t they just loft sandbags, old water-filled inner tubes, tires, sections of tree trunks or other round, heavy objects into the field and detonate the mines? There seems to be a definite reason for extracting the mines intact, but it’s never stated.
    Can anyone here shed some light on this?

    Reply
  11. Wembley says:
    March 10, 2006 at 6:38 am

    Setting off landmines — or any device likely to throw out shrapnel — is not a good idea if you’re within 100 feet of them. You could get away with it a few times, but it’s risky.
    As for the pig blood idea, it sounds like a great way to boost al-Qaeda recruiting and turn everyone in the world against the US.

    Reply
  12. EE says:
    August 20, 2006 at 2:18 am

    Where can we get sticky foam?

    Reply
  13. Stephen Furlani says:
    November 14, 2006 at 12:30 pm

    Mine fields aren’t cleared by “sandbags” mainly because most of the devices are more sophisticated than that.
    Second, because detonating them pollutes the landscape. Want your kids eating shrapnel? Howabout planting a garden in an area polluted by the reactants inside a mine? mmm poison

    Reply
  14. Matt says:
    June 29, 2008 at 12:21 pm

    This stuff looks to work out just great!
    Puts a whole new spin on “Getting stuck in”!

    Reply
  15. intentsly says:
    August 5, 2008 at 12:37 pm

    If its sticky and expands I guess that would work, just so long as it isn’t too easy to remove. If it’s flammable that would make for quite an > (napalm anyone?).
    Lets just hope these devices remain in the hands of the forces of good and not twisted some how by the bad ones.
    I didn’t see the minefield reference, but anyway.. The armed forces do have anti-mine field devices that are shot over a field and then remotely detonated. They’re quite effective.

    Reply
  16. mike says:
    December 11, 2009 at 9:54 pm

    i read about micro-organisims that glow when they come into contact with explosive ingerdients.
    They are developing it so you can spread it on a mine field to locate the mines.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • The Future Battlefield: The Advantage Has Now Swung Back in the Defender’s Favor
    • Does Prospective CMC Amos Have a Vision to Save the Marine Corps?
    • Budget Pressures Will Push Toward Future “Swing” Force That Can Do Both COIN and Conventional Ops, RAND Says
    • Kandahar Offensive Postponed Until Fall: McChrystal
    • VLS Underway Replenishment: When will the Navy get serious?
    • The Conference Will Be Televised
    • Russia Says S-300 SAM Sale to Iran Will Go Through Despite New UN Sanctions
    • Ratcheting Up Rhetoric Towards China; South China Sea Emerging Hot Spot
    • Gates and Co. to Axe Marine Corps EFV?
    • The “Lone Guerrilla Paradox” and the Failure of COIN Doctrine in Afghanistan
    Recent Comments
    • Does Prospective CMC Amos Have a Vision to Save the Marine Corps?
      and what screw ups would...
      Devilpup
    • Does Prospective CMC Amos Have a Vision to Save the Marine Corps?
      yeah, the Army has the...
      Devilpup
    • Does Prospective CMC Amos Have a Vision to Save the Marine Corps?
      How about first in, last...
      Steve__1
    • Does Prospective CMC Amos Have a Vision to Save the Marine Corps?
      seconded, Grenada,...
      Devil Pup
    • Does Prospective CMC Amos Have a Vision to Save the Marine Corps?
      spoken like someone who...
      DevilPup
    • Does Prospective CMC Amos Have a Vision to Save the Marine Corps?
      If the Marines depend on the...
      john
    • The Future Battlefield: The Advantage Has Now Swung Back in the Defender’s Favor
      ...
      Mark O'Connell
    • Does Prospective CMC Amos Have a Vision to Save the Marine Corps?
      I think SecDef is asking...
      Donnell
    • Does Prospective CMC Amos Have a Vision to Save the Marine Corps?
      Hey Bob, don't forget,...
      Dean
    • Does Prospective CMC Amos Have a Vision to Save the Marine Corps?
      I think an aviator is...
      Simple Bob
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage