Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Afghan Update
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Around the Globe
Av Week Extra
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Body Armor Blues
Bomb Squad
Brownshoes in Action
Bubbleheads, etc.
Cammo Green
Chem-Bio
Civilian Apps
Cloak and Dagger
Commandos
Comms
Contingency Ops
Cops and Robbers
Cyber-warfare
Data Diving
Defense Tech Poll
Dissent Tech
Drones
DT Administrivia
Eat DT's Dust
Extra! Extra!
Eye on China
Fast Movers
FCS Watch
FOS Files
Friday Funnies
Gadgets and Gear
Going Green
Grand 'Ol Osprey
Grand Ole Osprey
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
In the Weeds with Eric
Info War
Iraq Diary
Jarhead Jazz
JSF Watch
Just War Theories
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Most Wanted
Net-Centric
Nukes
Old Skool
Our Shrinking Planet
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Polmar's Perspective
Popular Mechanics
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Robots
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Snipertech
Space
Special Ops
Star Wars
Strategery
Stray Trons
Tactical Development
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
The Defense Biz
The Peoples' Site
The Sunday Paper
The Tanker Tango
The View from Av Week
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
Trimble on the Case
War Update
Ward'z Wonderz
You can run...

See all Archives
Newsletters

Edited by Christian Lowe | Contact

Secret Spaceplane's Final Flight?

030606p1.jpgFor 16 years, Aviation Week & Space Technology says, it has been investigating a hush-hush Pentagon program to put a "small military spaceplane in orbit. Considerable evidence supports the existence of such a highly classified system, and top Pentagon officials have hinted that it's 'out there,' but iron-clad confirmation that meets AW&ST standards has remained elusive. Now facing the possibility that this innovative 'Blackstar' system may have been shelved, we elected to share what we've learned about it with our readers, rather than let an intriguing technological breakthrough vanish into 'black world' history, known to only a few insiders."

After the shuttle Challenger disaster in January 1986, and a subsequent string of expendable-booster failures, Pentagon leaders were stunned to learn they no longer had "assured access to space." Suddenly, the U.S. needed a means to orbit satellites necessary to keep tabs on its Cold War adversaries.

The answer: a high-flying, hypersonic jet that would launch a small orbiter into space.

A large "mothership," closely resembling the U.S. Air Force's historic XB-70 supersonic bomber, carries the orbital component conformally under its fuselage, accelerating to supersonic speeds at high altitude before dropping the spaceplane. The orbiter's engines fire and boost the vehicle into space. If mission requirements dictate, the spaceplane can either reach low Earth orbit or remain suborbital.

The manned orbiter's primary military advantage would be surprise overflight. There would be no forewarning of its presence, prior to the first orbit, allowing ground targets to be imaged before they could be hidden. In contrast, satellite orbits are predictable enough that activities having intelligence value can be scheduled to avoid overflights...

Once a Blackstar orbiter reenters the atmosphere, it can land horizontally at almost any location having a sufficiently long runway. So far, observed spaceplane landings have been reported at Hurlburt AFB, Fla.; Kadena AB, Okinawa; and Holloman AFB, N.M.

The spaceplane is capable of carrying an advanced imaging suite that features 1-meter-aperture adaptive optics with an integral sodium-ion-sensing laser. By compensating in real-time for atmospheric turbulence-caused aberrations sensed by the laser, the system is capable of acquiring very detailed images of ground targets or in-space objects, according to industry officials familiar with the package.

One anonymous tipster asks, "Is it possible to design, build and operate such a complex and expensive system and still keep it secret for so long?"

UPDATE 03/06/06 10:15 AM: "Aerospace experts [are] question[ing] a number of claims made for the Blackstar concept," MSNBC's Jim Oberg reports.

Speaking on condition of anonymity, sources told MSNBC.com that they believed the concept was unworkable, based on principles of rocket design. One source said the mothership would be flying much too slow and too low for a space plane to reach orbital speed after release. When the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency sought proposals for an unmanned RASCAL satellite launcher five years ago, the specifications called for the carrier aircraft to go much higher, and the submitted designs still needed two stages to reach orbital speed.

Comments

nice to meet you

Posted by: cheap wow gold at April 13, 2008 09:39 PM


There is buzz floating around that the US has top secret orbital bases (more than one) and black space planes fly to and from them regularly. Of course, UFO believers and unreliable sources perpetuate such
rumors, which would be great for deniability issues.
Is it impossible for such hugely expensive black projects to exist? Probably, but....
Does the name Millenium Twain mean anything to anyone? He is probably spreading these rumors to bring web attention to himself and his own "out there" pet projects.
But, with the recent sightings of black silent triangles flying over Texas by dozens of eyewitnesses and the Air Forces tardy public explanations, who really knows what highly advanced top secret "toys" we have, right now?
Besides, a slow silent dark craft could just be a blimp with electric fans to move and steer with, and primarily be a distraction to throw the public off the trail of something much more secret.
We aren't meant to know, then are we, so speculation is all we'll ever have. National Security would always prevent disclosure of any such projects, even if they DON'T exist.

Posted by: imayberight8 at January 31, 2008 09:47 AM


Hello, I'm a habitual reader of DefenseTech from Spain and first of all I want to congratulate you for your excellent job. Well, I write you beacause of the recent issue of the Blackstar and the whole lot of reactions it has provoked. I want to send you the direction of a web page you might found interesting (many critics have been directed towards the hypothetical propulsion system of blackstar and the gel-like boron fuel, and this page shows a possible alternative for a two-stage-to-orbit vehicle).The direction is http://www.andrews-space.com/content-main.php?subsection=MTA5 Thanks for your attention.

Posted by: starman2006 at April 28, 2006 03:30 PM


Obergs association of Blackstar's impossibility with the DARPA RASCAL program was predicted by myself months ago. RASCAL was nothing like Blackstar. RASCAL was a fighter sized vehicle saddled with 4 obsolescent stock F-100 engines, absurd reference mission demands that included flying 300 miles to zoom point, loiter time of 30 minutes before zoom, as well as totally absurd hybrid rocket engines (and their horrendously poor Isp) for upper stages, and a requirement to retain fuel for powered flyback and landing. It was essentially designed to "prove" the "impossibility" of spaceplane launchers.
Blackstar allegedly used boron gelled fuels, which would allow Isp of 460 sec if gelled with kerosene, or as much as 600s if gelled with chilled LH2.

Blackstars boron connection is further corroborated by the 1990's federal lawsuit by Groom Lake employees for OSHA violations on base from OSHA violations, specifically the open pit burning of boron containing TPS materials and fuels. At a time when the F-117 no longer operated out of Groom Lake and the base was allegedly closed, employees couldn't get a federal court to force the governments admittance that the base even existed. Why is that?

Posted by: Mike Lorrey at March 8, 2006 10:32 PM


I actually don't see why this is such an exotic idea. It's already been recently done on a smaller scale, and in the privately funded civilian world at that......think Spaceship One (remember the winner of the X-prize).

Posted by: 10th at March 7, 2006 09:04 PM


I know if I say "airship"...that the first thought to come to mind is "blimp". This instead: a very large, RIGID, framed in carbon fiber Lighter-than-Air craft....can indeed reach extremely high altitude, just as stratospheric weather balloons are able to....the only hinderment really is payload. So, launch Pegasus-like from this "mothership"....orbit on demand, more or less.

When DARPA Walrus was first being touted, wording in the solicitation indicated that Pentagon was interested in development of "electrokinetic propulsion" for the airship. Doable, if the craft is big enough for unusual power source. (Like the "Aurora" slip of years back...this wording has been deleted from later writings from DARPA related to Walrus.)

NIDS has postulated on this possible craft. While a lot of that may be dismissed as typical "UFO" hype.....so was stealth technology some years ago.

I vote for this airship. Why? because it is relatively simple, has built in "UFO" deniability, and because it allows the first stage of an orbit on demand system to be somewhat passive....let the actual missile/launch vehicle be the one with the most bugs to work out....

Just a thought....

Posted by: campbell at March 6, 2006 08:04 PM


AFAIK Black Horse/Black Colt were Mitchell Burnside Clapp's ideas for a system of similar capability but operating by in-flight refuelling of the oxidizer after takeoff.

He seems to have been serious about wanting to build one way back when...

Posted by: Phil Fraering at March 6, 2006 07:25 PM


I'm thinking Black Horse/Black Colt = Black Star system. Yeah, I know the Black Horse/Colt aircraft were described as SSTO in nature, but I have a feeling that was disinfo.

Posted by: DS at March 6, 2006 06:00 PM


Well let's see here:
1)It's Big
2)Expensive
3)On the verge of useless/inefficient

Yep the Pentagon would have it...

On a side note from what I have heard out of Northrop Grumman, I wouldn't be surprised if they had a hand in this.

Posted by: PresidenToor at March 6, 2006 01:13 PM


A lot of the details soudns pretty dubious, particularly the exotic Boron-based fuel (I believe this was researched previously, without success largely due to environmental concerns), as well as the fundamental structural problems of a craft similar to the XB-70 reaching speed and altitude with such a substantial payload.

Posted by: hughns at March 6, 2006 11:18 AM


I’m with Murc on this one. Sounds like SR-71’s little buddy attachment.

The best place to keep a secret is in plain site with false understated capabilities.

Can the gov keep a lid on such a project? Tip of the ice burg did you notice they said that they have been researching these rumors for 16yrs. There is a 20yr or so disclosure release curve on mill tech.

I still believe today’s UFO’s are just tomorrows front line forces. The stealth halve blue was first flown in the late 60’s and we had operational entire air wings pre-public disclosure.

Posted by: C-Low at March 6, 2006 10:18 AM


It sounds to me like the craft they are talking about is the SR-75, is has many names like Penatrator, Brilliant Buzzard, and Mothership. Which was the successor to the XB-70.
The craft the was attached to the SR-75 was the SR-74 Scramp. (much like how the SR-71 is with the D-21).

But its good to here some more info coming out about this.

Posted by: Murc at March 6, 2006 01:51 AM


On the contrary, I think it'd be quite easy to keep such a project relatively quiet, as long as it doesn't reach a certain stage. If it's well-funded but not extravagant, there's no need to advertise. The people working on the project won't talk.

Reporters and the like aren't exactly watching where academic experts and particular types of engineers are going. Sure, rumors will float inside the classified community (which reporters may hear), but those are rumors -- and more than one rumor has been started by somebody who read too much science fiction and wanted to mess with somebody's head. At least, until the project comes near to fruition, needs a budget upgrade, or runs into trouble, at which point the number of people who need to be briefed in grows by quite a bit.

It was quite a few years before people believed we had a stealth plane, and that was a humongous investment. Even then, a lot of what was going around was sheer speculation, and not that much removed from talk of Area 51, aliens, and flying saucers.

Posted by: Mycroft at March 6, 2006 12:13 AM


They make this sound like it's a DIFFERENT aircraft than aurora.

Posted by: Sarge at March 5, 2006 11:34 PM


>One anonymous tipster asks, "Is it possible to design,
>build and operate such a complex and expensive system and still keep it secret for so long?"

Nope, not with Pentagon officials having a bad habbit unable to keep and zip their mouth shut, tipping to Noah Shachtman and others about sensitive military information so often.

Posted by: pedestrian at March 5, 2006 11:18 PM


Post a comment




Remember Me?


Please enter the code as seen in the image below to post your comment.