Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Afghan Update
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Around the Globe
Av Week Extra
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Body Armor Blues
Bomb Squad
Brownshoes in Action
Bubbleheads, etc.
Cammo Green
Catch the "Buzz"
Chem-Bio
Civilian Apps
Cloak and Dagger
Commandos
Comms
Contingency Ops
Cops and Robbers
Cyber-warfare
Data Diving
Defense Tech Poll
Defense Tech Radio
Dissent Tech
Door Kickers
Drones
DT Administrivia
Eat DT's Dust
Extra! Extra!
Eye on China
Fast Movers
FCS Watch
Fire for Effect
FOS Files
Friday Funnies
Gadgets and Gear
Going Green
Grand Ole Osprey
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
In the Weeds with Eric
Info War
Iraq Diary
Jarhead Jazz
JSF Watch
Just War Theories
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
M4 Monopoly
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Most Wanted
MRAP Edge
Net-Centric
Nukes
Old Skool
Our Shrinking Planet
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Podcast
Politricks
Polmar's Perspective
Popular Mechanics
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Robots
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Snipertech
Soldier Systems
Space
Special Ops
Star Wars
Strategery
Stray Trons
Tactical Development
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
The Defense Biz
The Peoples' Site
The Sunday Paper
The Tanker Tango
The View from Av Week
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
Trimble on the Case
Video Lounge
War Update
Ward'z Wonderz
You can run...

See all Archives
Newsletters

Edited by Christian Lowe | Contact

"Parasitic" Weapon Eyed for Space

The Air Force's cadre of space war planners has always liked to dream big. Take the current issue of Air & Space Power Journal, for instance. In it, fifteen USAF officers muse about how best to apply (and extend) the American military's superiority above the skies. Maj. Mark Steves foresees a fleet of airships, operating at the atmosphere's edge, keeping watch and relaying communications around the globe. Les Doggerel, a civilian at Air Force Space Command, looks forward to an array of cheap, "plug and play" satellites that can be launched at a moment's notice.

hulk2-103.jpgBut perhaps the most ambitious plan comes from ICBM combat crew commander Capt. Joseph T. Page II, who calls for launching cyberattacks on enemy satellites -- and then capturing the orbiters, or tossing them into the atmosphere, if the need arises.

Military planners have long considered space to be the "ultimate high ground." And to defend that high ground, Air Force doctrine calls for two main strategies – defensive counterspace (protecting our satellites) and offensive counterspace (knocking out the other guys').

Capt. Page isn't too impressed with playing defense. "It will not increase the balance in our favor but only 'hold the line' against enemy attacks,'" he writes.

But offensive counterspace has proved tricky, with the specter of shards of broken satellites strewn in space, or crashing down to Earth. Page's suggestion: hijack an enemy orbiter's attitude control system -- which runs everything from propulsion to communications – and replace it with a "parasitic attitude control system," or PACS.

The idea of covertly supplanting a satellite’s ACS is technologically feasible and may become a desired, mature capability when conflict arises in space…. [It] involves controlling an enemy satellite by supplanting its original ACS and negating the satellite’s mission with the PACS. [It] can control a satellite in numerous ways…

Depleting the satellite’s primary fuel until the satellite is drifting (denial/disruption). Once a satellite runs out of maneuvering fuel to counter drifting, it is considered dead.

Stressing and straining the satellite bus until body-part separation occurs from changes in angular-momentum spin rates (destruction). Assuming the satellite is three-axis stabilized, enough rotational velocity would put tremendous stress on the solar panels/deployed antennae. Application of enough stress and strain will separate the appendages, depending upon the rate of spin applied to the satellite bus.

Realigning... antennae for friendly-force intelligence collection by moving the directional antenna’s “footprint” away from hostile ground-station coverage areas and towards space-based signals-intelligence satellites or simply aiming the antennae into deep space, away from Earth (deception/denial)...

Pushing the satellite into transfer orbit for atmospheric reentry or physical capture (destruction/denial/degradation/disruption). Deliberate movement of the satellite out of its expected orbital plane would allow the PACS controller full, positive control over the satellite’s designated path. Physical capture by friendly spacecraft and crews becomes possible by bringing the satellite down to an acceptable orbital altitude. If the plan calls for its physical destruction, lowering the satellite’s altitude and speed can allow atmospheric friction to heat up and structurally weaken or burn up the satellite bus and payload. (emphasis mine)

Now, to be clear, this is just one Captain's concept – not some official Air Force program. And other writers in the current Journal take much more sober views of the limits of U.S. space power. Retired Lt. Col. “Mel” Tomme calls B.S. on the idea of launching little, "tactical" satellites into low-earth orbit. Space and Missile Systems Center commander Lt. Gen. Michael Hamel says that the military's space capabilities have badly eroded, and that it's time to get "back to basics."

But Page sees efforts underway now that could eventually lead to his "parasitic" space-weapon: prototype orbital tugboats, that would move satellites from one orbit to the next; small space ships designed for "proximity operations" near another satellite. Both are, in effect, physically correcting a satellite's flight. Maybe software could do a better job… Hey, a Captain can dream, can't he?

UPDATE 4:17 PM: Via Gyre, here's a bozo Captain arguing for an orbital constellation of death.

Comments

Replica A Lange & Sohne
Replica Accutron
Replica Audemars Piguet
Replica Baume & Mercier
Replica Bell & Ross
Replica Breitling
Replica Bvlgari
Replica Cartier
Replica Chanel
Replica Chopard
Replica Christian Bernard
Replica Christian Dior
Replica Citizen
Replica Coach
Replica Concord
Replica Corum
Replica D&G
Replica DKNY
Replica Ebel
Replica ESQ
Replica Fendi
Replica Fila
Replica Franck Muller
Replica Girard Perregaux
Replica Givenchy
Replica Gucci
Replica Guess
Replica Hamilton
Replica Haurex
Replica Invicta
Replica IWC
Replica Jacob & Co
Replica Jacques Lemans
Replica Jaeger LeCoultre
Replica Levis
Replica Longines
Replica Mont Blanc
Replica Movado
Replica Omega
Replica Orient
Replica Oris
Replica Panerai
Replica Patek Philippe
Replica Piaget
Replica Rado
Replica Rolex
Replica Sector
Replica Seiko
Replica Skagen
Replica Swatch
Replica Swiss
Replica Swiss Army Victorinox
Replica Tag Heuer
Replica Technomarine
Replica Timberland
Replica Tissot
Replica Ulysse Nardin
Replica Vacheron Constantin
Replica Wenger
Replica Wittnauer
Replica Zenith
Replica Zodiac ecommerce
open source
shop
online shopping
Rolex Sports watches
Rolex Datejusts watches
A Lange & Sohne watches
Aigner watches
Alain Silberstein watches
Audemars Piguet watches
Bell & Ross watches
Breguet watches
Breitling watches
Bvlgari watches
Cartier watches
Chanel watches
Chopard watches
Concord watches
Corum watches
Dior watches
Dolce & Gabbana watches
Ebel watches
Emporio Armani watches
Glashutte watches
Gucci watches
Hermes Watches
IWC watches
Jacob & Co watches
Jaeger LeCoultre watches
Longines watches
Louis Vuitton watches
Mont Blanc watches
Movado watches
Omega watches
Oris watches
Panerai watches
Patek Philippe watches
Philip Stein watches
Porsche Design watches
Rado watches Roger
Roger Dubuis watches
Sarcar watches
Tag Heuer watches
Technomarine watches
Vacheron Constantin watches
Zenith watches ecommerce
open source
shop
online shopping

Posted by: luxury watch at April 17, 2009 04:31 AM


I really appreciate his wisdom and philosophy of life.Haw-haw !It is a very beaufitul writing! The moderator is really a man of

intention.
fake rolex watches replica
http://www.onestoptown.com/
http://www.watchinstyle.com/rolex-datedate-white-diamondsswiss-eta-2836-p-768.html?
replica nike shoes sale
zenid=teg6g8jtnlurrhkmbomsugkuj7
http://easyforbuy.com/002-puma-shoes-all-black-p-4029.html
http://lowestmall.com/9826-nike-king-black-sapphire-p-5367.html

http://www.rolex8u.com/

Posted by: replicawatches at October 14, 2008 10:28 PM


Haw-haw !It is a very beaufitul writing! The moderator is really a man of intention. I

really appreciate his wisdom and philosophy of life
replica watch

http://www.watchinstyle.com/rolex-datedate-white-diamondsswiss-eta-2836-p-768.html?

zenid=teg6g8jtnlurrhkmbomsugkuj7
http://easyforbuy.com/002-puma-shoes-all-black-p-4029.html
http://lowestmall.com/9826-nike-king-black-sapphire-p-5367.html?

zenid=iu1fq75j2cmr6534iltfb807i5
http://onestoptown.com/

Posted by: replicawatches at October 9, 2008 02:18 AM


Haw-haw !It is a very beaufitul writing! The moderator is really a man of intention. I

really appreciate his wisdom and philosophy of life
replica watch

http://www.watchinstyle.com/rolex-datedate-white-diamondsswiss-eta-2836-p-768.html?

zenid=teg6g8jtnlurrhkmbomsugkuj7
http://easyforbuy.com/002-puma-shoes-all-black-p-4029.html
http://lowestmall.com/9826-nike-king-black-sapphire-p-5367.html?

zenid=iu1fq75j2cmr6534iltfb807i5
http://onestoptown.com/

Posted by: replicawatches at October 9, 2008 02:01 AM


replica rolex watches

http://www.watchinstyle.com/chanel-j12-white-chronograph-fully-high-grade-ceramic-p-910.html?zenid=9m7rdns1qli5ntbq2uevks5ve0

http://easyforbuy.com/nike-air-zoom-lebron-c-49.html?zenid=c0enle2a7n4rgumpq0g5t9bqb6

http://lowestmall.com/nike-air-max-c-44.html?zenid=e62d2m88ej0b70vn97n4e9pkd6

http://onestoptown.com/

Posted by: instylewatch at October 8, 2008 11:31 PM


Haw-haw !It is a very beaufitul writing! The moderator is really a man of intention. I

really appreciate his wisdom and philosophy of life
replica watch

http://www.watchinstyle.com/rolex-datedate-white-diamondsswiss-eta-2836-p-768.html?

zenid=teg6g8jtnlurrhkmbomsugkuj7
http://easyforbuy.com/002-puma-shoes-all-black-p-4029.html
http://lowestmall.com/9826-nike-king-black-sapphire-p-5367.html?

zenid=iu1fq75j2cmr6534iltfb807i5
http://onestoptown.com/

Posted by: replicawatches at October 8, 2008 09:53 PM


fake watches

Posted by: fake watches at August 22, 2008 10:18 PM


watches replica

Posted by: watches replica at August 22, 2008 10:17 PM


I always Buy Runescape from the company http://www.gameim.com. Because the company provides us Cheap runescape Gold.

Posted by: Buy Runescape at August 19, 2008 03:42 AM


You can use runescape money or rs gold to upgrade and buy your favourite equipment.

Posted by: runescape money at August 19, 2008 03:40 AM


At last I tell something to you on this game the Runescape Gold is very useful.

Posted by: Runescape Gold at August 19, 2008 03:38 AM



To buy NosTale Gold win you must not only use your strength as a team, with the new features they plan to add cheap NosTale gold late. So no player will have to worry about ever losing their NosTale money account.

Posted by: cheap NosTale gold at August 19, 2008 03:32 AM


That is first time that I used the ice arrow, I was so excited, and in a week I got 4000 mabinogi money.

Posted by: mabinogi money at August 14, 2008 03:26 AM


In the hero2, I had already changed 4 regions. The hero online gold also has changed several times.

Posted by: hero online gold at August 14, 2008 03:24 AM


If we do not have the good fortune this life, we will see with each other and that time I will buy last chaos gold enough for you in next life.

Posted by: buy last chaos gold at August 14, 2008 03:22 AM


Finally, I gained have sufficed the LOTRO Gold, had the family. We were in together finally.

Posted by: LOTRO Gold at August 14, 2008 03:21 AM


As your apprentice, I always waste your cheap Habbo Coins. But I really not to think that you left so suddenly, then am duty-bound not to turn back!

Posted by: cheap Habbo Coins at August 14, 2008 03:19 AM


With a goods Quhuan mabinogi gold, first came to the grocery store in front of Ottawa and special, and he said to me Lengleng later time come back to patronize his store, watching his thin face, and reached the only pocket 1 money, the relentless heart, or do not buy today Gelinasi mother-in-laws delicious breakfast.

Posted by: mabinogi gold at August 7, 2008 11:40 PM


But he must buy fiesta Gold enough for your wedding, otherwise I will not agree.

Posted by: buy fiesta Gold at August 5, 2008 08:32 PM


My friends in order to help me, send me much Requiem gold, I was very thank him.

Posted by: Requiem gold at August 5, 2008 08:31 PM


We provide all wow goldservices. You can buy World Of Warcraft gold Cheap WOW Gold here ! Age of Conan gold(buy aoc gold)is on sale on wow7gold.com.We provide cheap aoc Goldaoc goldLord of The Rings Online goldLotro Goldbuy warhammer golddiablo3 goldgames gold

Posted by: World Of Warcraft gold at July 10, 2008 12:37 AM


nice to meet you

Posted by: cheap wow gold at April 14, 2008 03:35 AM


Foreign entanglements, against which George Washington warned, are especially inadvisable in space relations. We should not be on the International Space Station with covertly hostile Russia and Japan, and now China. Even if Colonel Bearden is wrong in stating that the Challenger explosion was a covert KGB hit via cold molding, as General Daniel Graham allegedly attempted to warn us, or if the Japanese Yakuza are not waging weather warfare against us, only exclusive U.S. predominance of air and space will do.

Posted by: Russell King at July 22, 2006 10:45 PM


Sorry for the confusion, Capt. Doggrell, my comments were aimed at the second article posted at the bottom of your piece -- the one in "The Space Review" by Christopher Stone. Indeed, I thought your piece on sat control was quite interesting, precisely because it seems that pieces of the technology required are emerging.

Posted by: Theresa Hitchens at June 6, 2006 02:35 PM


You could at least copy and paste my name correctly.

Posted by: Les Doggrell at June 5, 2006 03:33 PM


What is really of concern about Capt. Stone's piece is his apparent lack of understanding of the technical issues at hand in contemplating space-based weapons.

Among other issues (such as the howler that satellites are nearly invisible), he conflates space strike with ASAT operations -- two totally different mission sets with two totally different technical requirements for achieving.

Also, the fact that you only need a couple of sats in GEO to see targets on the Earth is of little relevance -- the problem is that the laws of physics dictate that you'd need THOUSANDS of space strike assets in LEO to get global, 24/7 capabilities. And the cost-benefit ratio of launching, maintaining and replacing every 7 to 15 years such a huge constellation in space is laughable. If you really think you need capability to target in less than an hour (which is questionable given factors such as chain of command approval and intelligence analysis), the conventinal ICBM route makes more technical and economic sense. Of course, you do then have the small problem of convincing the other nuclear powers your UN-blue painted ICBMs are conventional and it's only your green ones that are nukes.

Posted by: Theresa Hitchens at June 5, 2006 01:37 PM


Yes, by all means lets get ANOTHER military rivalry going. Lockheed Martin really needs the money, and there's sure to be oodles of "clever" think tank papers to look forward to. And after all, our resources are inexhaustible, right?

Posted by: sglover at June 2, 2006 02:23 PM


If one says that nothing will ever happpen and therefore we don't need these extravegent designs for space weaponry, then you really don't need those designs. America doesn't realize when it comes to space, we make it to be what we want. No other country is going to come in an tell us how to run the place (any time in the first half of this century at least).

For that matter, there are many classified programs dealing with anti-satelite technologies. Probably on the order of secrecy as with the F-117 or B-2 programs. Believe me if you like...

Posted by: Harry Toor at June 2, 2006 01:28 PM


If we look at how Russia and China will view our attempt at control of orbital space it would seem to be in our best interest to fund some serious study of alternatives. I can easily see a technical race to control and or, at least, protect the gear that each country has in space. How would inspections be accomplished if a treaty was proposed? We better get cracking on this. Not much time left to deal with it. It just appears to be way off in the future. If China and Russia decide to join in space defense we probably would not be able to compete.

Posted by: Stephen Douglas at June 2, 2006 12:09 PM


Post a comment




Remember Me?


Please enter the code as seen in the image below to post your comment.