Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Afghan Update
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Around the Globe
Av Week Extra
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Body Armor Blues
Bomb Squad
Brownshoes in Action
Bubbleheads, etc.
Cammo Green
Catch the "Buzz"
Chem-Bio
Civilian Apps
Cloak and Dagger
Commandos
Comms
Contingency Ops
Cops and Robbers
Cyber-warfare
Data Diving
Defense Tech Poll
Dissent Tech
Door Kickers
Drones
DT Administrivia
Eat DT's Dust
Extra! Extra!
Eye on China
Fast Movers
FCS Watch
Fire for Effect
FOS Files
Friday Funnies
Gadgets and Gear
Going Green
Grand Ole Osprey
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
In the Weeds with Eric
Info War
Iraq Diary
Jarhead Jazz
JSF Watch
Just War Theories
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
M4 Monopoly
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Most Wanted
MRAP Edge
Net-Centric
Nukes
Old Skool
Our Shrinking Planet
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Polmar's Perspective
Popular Mechanics
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Robots
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Snipertech
Space
Special Ops
Star Wars
Strategery
Stray Trons
Tactical Development
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
The Defense Biz
The Peoples' Site
The Sunday Paper
The Tanker Tango
The View from Av Week
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
Trimble on the Case
Video Lounge
War Update
Ward'z Wonderz
You can run...

See all Archives
Newsletters

Edited by Christian Lowe | Contact

Enter the BomBot

One of the nice things about being editor of Defense Tech is that people occasionally show up at your apartment with military robots. Take last Friday, for example, when Bradley DeRoos and Alex Gizis dragged one of their brand-new BomBots into my dining room.

bombot_home.JPG600 of the machines have already shipped to troops in Iraq. Another 1800 are being built. And if the BomBots look more like toy trucks than military-grade hardware well, there's a reason for that. That's exactly what the things are.

Gizis spent several years designing bad-ass digital controllers for RC cars -- the fastest of their kind, working in the 2.4 GHz band. They transmit drivers' orders in a hurry. And the controllers send all kinds of telemetry data back, like engine temperature and battery strength.

It all worked so well, Gizis figured the military might be interested in some cheap, remote-controlled bomb-spotters. The current crop of ordinance-disposal robots cost $100,000 or more, he knew. Even the smaller, dumbed-down Marcbots, used on route patrol, can run about $15,000 each. Maybe, Gizis thought, he could come up with something cheaper.

So Gizis started playing around with Traxxas E-maxx RC trucks, to see if they could do the job. At the same time, some Air Force Research Laboratory engineers (working with the Naval Explosive Ordnance Disposal Technology Division) were also fiddling with E-maxxes, to handle the same duties. But they couldn't get the radios to work.

Eventually, everyone was brought together by the National Center for Defense Robotics. And within a couple of months, the first BomBots were being sent off to Iraq for testing.

At 15 pounds, 22 inches high, the miniature truck isn't exactly bomb-proof. It doesn't have to be be. At $5,000 a pop -- dirt cheap, by military standards -- the bot becomes a sound investment even if it's blown sky-high after the fourth or fifth use. You could even imagine the BomBots keeping up with Humvees on route patrol, since the machines have a top speed of 35 miles per hour and a range of 1500 feet.

Now, Gizis claims the trucks are also going to be used for bomb disposal, as well as bomb spotting. And that's a little harder to imagine -- despite the nifty, six-inch loading bay, big enough to dump off a C4 brick. EOD techs tend to be pretty particular about where they place their bang. The BomBots don't have the dexterity to pull off much precision. But for a souped-up RC truck, the machines are pretty cool.

Who's that at the door now, I wonder?

Comments

Intresting site! Thanx!... visit [url=http://rasklad.net.in/levitra/#online]buy levitra[/url] cheap levitra http://rasklad.net.in/levitra/#online [url=http://rasklad.net.in/propecia/#generic]cheap propecia[/url] generic propecia http://rasklad.net.in/propecia/#cheap

Posted by: hooligan-viagra at May 9, 2007 02:00 AM


http://angela-grande-fratello.syigvz.info
http://matura-succhia-cazzo.qtrntu.info
http://rivincita-bionda-colonna-sonora.syegvz.info
cristina-bella
http://grattugia-per-spatzle.syigvz.info
http://cerco-contatto-email-ragazza-asiatica-napoli.qtrntu.info
http://giovane-studentessa-scopata.syegvz.info
confessioni-erotiche
http://mini-bus-renault-master.syigvz.info
http://film-culo-sfondati-free.qtrntu.info
http://foto-da-guardoni.syegvz.info
ficha-pelosa

Posted by: JKK at January 19, 2007 07:55 PM


wow. that is cool. glad someone is doing this, as i had this same idea and have built prototypes in my garage. 5k is cheap money to save lives. Replacing the plastic drive train should not be that difficult or expensive. The key here is we are improvising a bit. Americans are taking off the shelf technology and using it with some minor mods to save lives. How about a little solidarity here guys. The guys you call “geeks” are very important in creating technology that can make our military more effective in this war and future wars.

Posted by: cj at December 29, 2006 04:00 PM


I do not know alot about these bombots,but what I could find out came from one of the partners
on this project, as my company manufactured the springs for this project.If anyone has a little more information about these that they could share without breeching any security I would appreciate it.

Posted by: Jim Breeding at November 15, 2006 11:20 PM


i wondered when you guys would catch up!!, want more precision? email me backand I'll send pics of some of my hardware, also you missed the point on the loading bay, why not put an eject mech in it and drop off some C-4 with a remote triger on it, pop the bombs BEFORE they pop YOU!! sounds like you need an old bot builder like me to help out. please, give me a chance, I'm ex-mil (US Army) and the less body bags we send home the better, they are my friends too,
ncc1776@comcast.net Thom Rutherford
besides, Dell is boring me to death at their company...

Posted by: Thom Rutherford at November 5, 2006 10:17 PM


The Bombot sounds like a great opportunity to bring technology to the battlefield. As in past conflicts the US soldier is creative and innovative. The Bombot and its roll will evolve as our troops work with it. Despite any shortcomings it needs to go out and work so that it can evolve to meet the challenges. Bombot: $5,000 Iraq Expedition: $Billions Soldiers coming home alive and well: PRICELESS!!!

Posted by: Les Akre at November 4, 2006 01:19 PM


seems pretty cool. defiantly worth the investment.

weird thing is that right as i read the line "Who's that at the door now, I wonder?" Someone knocked at my door.

Posted by: alex at October 27, 2006 12:52 AM


Forget about having someone remotely control it from the internet, program the buggers to drive themselves! They can do it much faster that way using software recognition functions and multiple cameras and sensors, a remote operator could never see or react like a properly programed drone. Nor would they work like a hive to map the area around the hummer/transport convoy. If you think the military is going to pay you to log in to xbox live and command a bot in Afganistan for an hour your on the wrong path. Last thing we need is for the military to recruit thousands of joystick jockys to secure the highways and byways of backwater jerkoffistan. To keep the military lean they need to automate it and record the data for later review. Humans would mess it up.

Posted by: Bryan at September 16, 2006 12:11 PM


All great ideas...problem is if you have ever personally encountered an IED; the explosive blast is a threat EVEN to the operator of these RC vehicles. did you see the picture posted for the "BomBot" and the guy holding the remote control? Well IED will make all those disappear depending on the amount of explosives used in the device. Frequency jammers...might be more effective to explode the devices.

Posted by: K. Hudgens at September 14, 2006 01:56 PM


Max Anderson,
your concept with the car over the internet is novel, but nowhere, and I mean NOWHERE near practical. The lag time of signal alone would be enough to make it dangerous to not only occupants of the car, but other vehicles on the road. Focus your efforts on a self-piloted car system.

Posted by: Davoh at August 9, 2006 03:41 PM


these are not "little rc trucks". The proper term is Traxxas E-maxx. These truck are amazingly durable and will work wonders for the Army.

Posted by: Jon at July 14, 2006 12:46 AM


I have recently sent out a webpage on wireless cars controlled by the internet . This application may be used by single car familys that have 2 or more family members . One family member can remote drive the car out to another without ever leaving the house in the comfort of the den by simply logging onto the internet and driving remote access vehicles or what I call wireless unmanned automobile vehicles or wuav's . The overall cost of a used car is $500-1000 and the laptops with wireless hubs and cams are about $2,500 tops for all equipment as follows : 6-8 directional booster wireless usb pan devices increasing distance to 1,500 feet 49.99 , 2 usb router hubs 49.99$ , 1 laptop $1,500 with pentium 4 processor dual page drop capability with sprint cell card and wireless card for dual drop in command signals and outbound broadband signals from webcams and ,4-6 webcams 25$ , instal kit for steering wheel $100 , pedals controls hardwired to brake and gas pedals 49.95 , gearshift flipper to flpi gears and turn signals and ingition controls 49.95 . That's it The mileage and time and speed is as of the used cars models specifications from the car dealer and if it is tuned up properly . Now we can go further and control cars off of the internet with smart-max car upgrades we need simply to add in robotics for hands/clippers/wires/demagnatizer/acid/water cannons/ and scooper on the bots the cars carry . I have a model tagged on my webpage . Go to search engine on aol or yahoo and type max1mos111 and read the blogs on the wuav . I have a thermodynamics model for smart car upgrades for fuel and battery upgrades vs. conventional fuels cars , steering wheel mods for wireless machinery conversion with motors to turn the steering wheel while under remote access , usb plug-n-play remote access and cell wireless acess from cell towers and radio towers , as well as steering controls from home pimped out real time cockpit for the at home usage of 4 way view just like when you are sitting in a car driving . I also have added in back-ups for cell signal blackout areas as arraying the dishes in areas and adding in a directional booster in the car to receive signal as well as the 1140 m model modems in major driving areas for better reception of internet in cars . We are on the verge of replacing tom toms with webcams live in the car on and running while you drive transmitting signals . Think about it taxicabs with no drivers who take payment by atm swipe or cash machine like at self check stations at the grocery stores . Safety is implemented as drivers positions will be dx'd out over the next 5 years as this technology is implemented with tinted window to throw off the insurgents guirilla warfare techniques with drones to send in in vehicles for resupply for fuel ammunition food water medical and transport as well as prison transport without endangering drivers hereout on top of ied or eod needs . The applications are endless . I have a programmer ready to start code immediately on the wuav . All I need is a written contract to draw out the specs and work hand on with the scientists on my own project to keep our troops safe and monopolize a commercial new product wireless internet conversion kits for all homeowners to wuav's . Think about it free energy maqy not be the way to stop pollution but cutting down on necessary cars per family may be a way to get convenience of 1 car to drive itself to pick up another freind or family . I thought of a way to refuel . We may need to implement pre-paid gas cards that eject out for full service pumps . Another words full service pumps may be the new in thing to refuel the newer smart cars and they will need to be able to take pre-paid gas cards or credit cards . Online accounts could be set up to scan with a sticker barcode glued onto the inside of the cars windshild as another alternative on present day engines using gasoline . However the newer modifications may use water electricity and or hydrogen/oxygen blends or natural gas in the twin engine design . I take all questions at max1mos111@yahoo.com
My philosophy is I am doing this not out of greed but for the betterment of mankind ; A team of bright individuals welders , computer programmers , it instrallers and car designers teams could virtually have a market of car pre-made under the 5,000 dollar mark in this article using older used cars and trucks as well as vans with the remoddeled parts specified I have integrated into this article .

Posted by: Max Anderson at June 25, 2006 11:07 PM


Actually we are not the first to come accross this idea. Early last year I was in both Iraq and Afghanistan. I was working as a contractor to the US Army for REF (Rapid Equipping Force). This is a small division that is responsible for engineering solutions, and introducing new technology to the battle field. One day a couple of gentlemen came in with these trucks. They introduced themselves as EOD (US, Canadian, and one other of our coalition forces Ukrainian - I think). They were really excited about these trucks. One of the vehicles the Canadians brought forth was even capable of firing a 308 catridge powered water cannon.

At the time this was still very experimental technology, and it was passed off as such (boys with toys). The REF was focused more on body armor antennas, FOB camera systems, personnel born IED full body X-Ray scanners (for which was my purpose in life) and other projects of the time. This did stick with me however; and I began testing/toyig with the idea more upon my return back to home last November. I have attained a lot of knowledge about these RC's since then. Does anyone know who is now leading this project from the US side? I would like to get more involved as there is a lot of very serious potential with this technology.

My hat comes off to those who have continued to push this type of project forward since the end of 2005. Anything to assist in saving lives is a really good thing!!!

Posted by: Mike Ferrante at June 20, 2006 03:18 AM


In Response to Mr? Smith's comments regarding the air conditioned comfort of "us" geeks. If the shade of a plywood building in Iraq constitutes air conditioned comfort, then I would have to agree with your comment.

Posted by: EOD3MC at June 19, 2006 12:09 PM


Now lets program these bots to actively scan and map and follow a hummer convoy to record and track down the enemy for us. The video would be used to learn the enemy's tactics for the next run. The software to run these 4x4's would be little more than sophisticated vacuum bots available at WalMart. There are plenty of smart Marines who could program it, that is if Microsoft isnt interested in the contract.
Bryan D. Moszer

Posted by: Bryan at June 18, 2006 09:56 PM


I have been wandering when someone would apply all of this video game experience and technology to something that is worth something. At $5000 a pop it is cheaper than some of the other units now in use, but I am sure they could be much cheaper than that and be truely a desposable unit. What ever happened to mass production. These things should be ubiquitous in the war zones, anywhere our young men and women are serving. This is the United States for God sakes we should have the newest and the best cutting edge gadets and tecnology for our fighting men and women.

Posted by: Paul Reamer at June 17, 2006 11:24 PM


I am an Air Force EOD tech, spent 6 months over in Iraq. Without releasing any sensitive info all I have to say is that those things work great.
Thanks for the support.

Posted by: WIth held at June 17, 2006 11:18 PM


These bots make me want to change my MOS!!!

Posted by: colorado_cowboy at June 17, 2006 05:26 PM


So aside from retrofitting the plas drivetrain to exceed 130F temp this works! Wonder how it holds-up to 45mph crosswinds on station? Better still at 1500' in the dark a sound emitter with cone might Play a Recorded 5ton truck racing along (especially with own battery pack). Telemetry controls for volume output. Hey,what if Go- Karts were better muffled to serve as stealth launch-mobiles? Why sound? Diversity of bot use to attract IED Triggerman.

Posted by: K9 at June 17, 2006 03:32 PM


air force guys are my heros!!!!!!!!!!!the air force rocks and so do the tecks!ty foryour souport in iraq,my dad is there so plz pray for him.he works in the department of def. thank you.

Posted by: kaden at June 17, 2006 02:28 PM


this thing rocks!!!!!!!!i cant wait to be in the air force!!!! thank you military.com

Posted by: kaden at June 17, 2006 02:24 PM


The bots are an answer to grandmas' prayers. Hoorah!

Posted by: Luanne at June 17, 2006 12:43 PM


Not surprising that a heat tolerance problem never crossed the minds of these geeks. Since they spend their entire lives in air conditioned comfort.

Posted by: smith at June 17, 2006 11:37 AM


I am a retired AF EOD tech, retiring in 1978. We didn't have robots back then, we used an airman as a remote bomb detector (just joking). It is great seeing all these improvements on equipment over the years. So many EOD techs from all branches are being maimed and killed in Iraq and Afganistan. You guys are my hereos.

Posted by: Harry Moore at June 17, 2006 09:49 AM


Actually, the new upgraded MarcBots cost $45,000

You can see the contract listing at the bottom of this post on my blog:
http://robotstocknews.blogspot.com/2006/05/irobot-wins-64-million-navy-contract.html

Posted by: thorn_stevens at June 13, 2006 10:20 PM


Uh, MARCbots cost $7k each, not $15k. And they run on standard military radio batteries for over six continuous hours of runtime, not proprietary hobby batteries. And they don't have the plastic bombot drivetrain that breaks in temps above 115F... like all of the first ones that are currently sitting broken in Baghdad. While I'm certainly a bit biased, I'm not as biased as this article.

Posted by: kzemach at June 13, 2006 08:00 PM


cute photo! i picked that up for our place.

Posted by: chicago dyke at June 13, 2006 03:49 PM


Post a comment




Remember Me?


Please enter the code as seen in the image below to post your comment.