Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Afghan Update
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Around the Globe
Av Week Extra
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Body Armor Blues
Bomb Squad
Brownshoes in Action
Bubbleheads, etc.
Cammo Green
Catch the "Buzz"
Chem-Bio
Civilian Apps
Cloak and Dagger
Commandos
Comms
Contingency Ops
Cops and Robbers
Cyber-warfare
Data Diving
Defense Tech Poll
Dissent Tech
Door Kickers
Drones
DT Administrivia
Eat DT's Dust
Extra! Extra!
Eye on China
Fast Movers
FCS Watch
Fire for Effect
FOS Files
Friday Funnies
Gadgets and Gear
Going Green
Grand Ole Osprey
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
In the Weeds with Eric
Info War
Iraq Diary
Jarhead Jazz
JSF Watch
Just War Theories
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
M4 Monopoly
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Most Wanted
MRAP Edge
Net-Centric
Nukes
Old Skool
Our Shrinking Planet
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Polmar's Perspective
Popular Mechanics
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Robots
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Snipertech
Space
Special Ops
Star Wars
Strategery
Stray Trons
Tactical Development
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
The Defense Biz
The Peoples' Site
The Sunday Paper
The Tanker Tango
The View from Av Week
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
Trimble on the Case
Video Lounge
War Update
Ward'z Wonderz
You can run...

See all Archives
Newsletters

Edited by Christian Lowe | Contact

Tech Undermining Israeli Army?

Israel has one of the most wired armies on the planet. Relying on overlapping networks of flying drones, hidden cameras, and unattended ground sensors, the Israeli Defense Forces have become a model for how information technology ought to be used in combat. Even the Americans rely on Israeli gear to help them keep tabs on battlefields.

Masua-100.jpgBut now, some Israeli security experts are beginning to wondering whether all that equipment is such a good idea, after all -- "whether misplaced reliance on high technology created the conditions that have plunged the nation into its first twin-fronted, gloves-off war against Islamic terror," Barbara Opall-Rome writes in this week's Defense News.

In interviews here, security experts and military officers not directly involved in the fighting say there are fundamental flaws in Israel’s budget-draining techno-centric defensive strategy, which is being funded at the expense of training and discipline throughout the lower echelons of active-duty and reserve forces.

It is intolerable, sources here assert, that Hamas commandos from Gaza and Hizbollah fighters in south Lebanon — within a 10-day period and despite early warnings — were allowed to sneak across borders fortified by a network of manned, unmanned and ground-based systems.

Hizbollah operatives found holes in the system of networked surveillance sensors, throwing doubt on Israel’s highly touted method of low-signature warfare. Particularly shocking was the penetration at Za’arit, which is monitored by an installation heralded as an example of the military’s ability to maintain virtual control over the northern border area.

Evading dozens of eyes trained on computer screens in the base’s combat information center, the operatives disabled at least one camera, penetrated a so-called dead zone of the border fence, and ambushed reservists dispatched to investigate alarms...

While all here appear to embrace the military’s corporate, almost sacrosanct pursuit of information superiority and standoff, remote-controlled capabilities, many are urging renewed emphasis on basic soldiering pending a more thorough validation of high-technology, networked operations...

One IDF brigadier general said... "With all due credit to technology and the capabilities it provides, we cannot neglect basic soldiering and discipline. But time and again, we’ve seen our training budget gutted to allow for full-bore investment in Tzayad [the IDF’s digital Army program, a rough equivalent of the U.S.' Future Combat Systems]. And now we’re seeing the results blowing up in our faces."

UPDATE 10:59 AM: Meanwhile, the Jerusalem Post has a must-read diary of an Israeli F-16 pilot.

Hitting the target is expected, no misses are acceptable. There aren't any congratulations for a well-performed mission. Only a hammer on the head if something goes wrong. Personally, I think it's a healthy attitude; it causes the whole system to be less rash and hot on the trigger.

Comments

nice to meet you

Posted by: wowpowerleveling at April 15, 2008 02:29 AM


One abduction from under the wall, and an incursion, abduction, and wrecked tank on the northern border, in the grand scheme of things, does not indicate the failure of technology or transformation. We can only know the success or failure of the wall and its hi-tech surveillance if we also know how many bombings, abductions, etc. it has prevented.

Same thing goes for current operations in Lebanon. We do not know the final outcome; there is much currently that we do not know; and a particular outcome (victory, defeat, or draw) is not determined.

I'm not saying that Israel hasn't screwed up, that technology and transformation have not failed, just that we cannot make that determination based on the arguments and evidence presented here.

Next, it is merely assumed that technology and training are mutually exclusive, that there is a necessary and inevitable trade-off, and that that trade-off has in fact been taking place in Israel. But, not evidence is given in the post to indicate that Israel has cut training programs and that these cuts, moreover, were the direct result of buying technology. You can't just assume what you set out to prove.

This post is just one of many that follows a pattern of analysis found often on this site: New technology is always criticized, and anything less than perfection is portrayed as failure. But that is an unreasonable standard and a self-fulfilling prophecy, great for saying "Gee look I was right again!" but not, ultimately, very useful analysis. New technologies will never be perfect. Neither will wars and the strategies used to carry them out. Holding ourselves to a standard of perfection, in technology or strategy, is a sure way to guarantee failure.

Posted by: Sean Lawson at July 20, 2006 11:53 PM


Loved the Israeli pilot excerpt - it contrasts really beautifully with the poignant interview that was run on UK TV earlier today with the British expat farmer who has a dairy farm with creamery attached that supplied dairy products to the Lebanese market.

His creamery was apparently hit by no less than 6 Israeli bombs, reducing it to rubble. I'm sure the gunners or pilots who were responsible for its destruction are still admiring the neatness of their handiwork. Quite how blowing up a creamery has any military significance beats me, but then again the sheer idiocy of much Israeli targetting has been marvelled at in some quarters for a long time now.

Posted by: dan at July 18, 2006 03:20 PM


Hi Tech, Low Tech, US and Israeli pilots are a bunch of Baby Killers! Who, when they are flying are tough guys but when they are shot down become Homos! Add to the list the Coward Hezbollah Missile and Rocket boys too.

Posted by: Jaye at July 18, 2006 03:04 PM


High Ingenuity vs. High Teck every time.
Also, ti would seem the Israelis would have learned about the inherent weaknesses of a static defense (even if it is high tech) after what happend to the Bar-Lev Line

Posted by: sid at July 18, 2006 01:02 PM


Good Morning Folks,

First rule of warfare in the Middleast, never underestimate Israel and it's intelligence either human or technical.

So far in the current conflict He(i)zbollah has yet to show where they have defeated Israel defenses in any meaningful way. To date all they have managed to do is fire rockets at random into Israel with their precious mobile launchers being destroyed by Israeli Artillery after a first launch.

I see in the Hezbollah's propganda machine shades of Baghdad Bob say the Americans we on the runs as M-1 Tanks were in the background.

ALLONS,
Byron Skinner

Posted by: Byron Skinner at July 18, 2006 12:52 PM


Post a comment




Remember Me?


Please enter the code as seen in the image below to post your comment.