Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Afghan Update
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Around the Globe
Av Week Extra
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Body Armor Blues
Bomb Squad
Brownshoes in Action
Bubbleheads, etc.
Cammo Green
Catch the "Buzz"
Chem-Bio
Civilian Apps
Cloak and Dagger
Commandos
Comms
Contingency Ops
Cops and Robbers
Cyber-warfare
Data Diving
Defense Tech Poll
Dissent Tech
Drones
DT Administrivia
Eat DT's Dust
Extra! Extra!
Eye on China
Fast Movers
FCS Watch
Fire for Effect
FOS Files
Friday Funnies
Gadgets and Gear
Going Green
Grand 'Ol Osprey
Grand Ole Osprey
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
In the Weeds with Eric
Info War
Iraq Diary
Jarhead Jazz
JSF Watch
Just War Theories
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
M4 Monopoly
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Most Wanted
MRAP Edge
Net-Centric
Nukes
Old Skool
Our Shrinking Planet
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Polmar's Perspective
Popular Mechanics
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Robots
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Snipertech
Space
Special Ops
Star Wars
Strategery
Stray Trons
Tactical Development
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
The Defense Biz
The Peoples' Site
The Sunday Paper
The Tanker Tango
The View from Av Week
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
Trimble on the Case
Video Lounge
War Update
Ward'z Wonderz
You can run...

See all Archives
Newsletters

Edited by Christian Lowe | Contact

Air Force Wants Software Spies

What if you could send a computer program to do the job of a spy, or a bomber, or drone? It sounds like science fiction -- and it'll probably stay that way, for a long, long time. But Air Force researchers think there's enough to the idea to start funding a trio of companies for initial work into these attacking, snooping "Cyber Craft."

cybercraft1.JPG"Using the Cyber Domain to conduct military operations... has significant potential," an Air Force paper announces. Examples include long-term intelligence activities, like "being to monitor a military barracks, accumulate financial information on a potentially hostile nation, or provide status on the political climate of a South American country."

Researchers think the programs could answer shorter-term, tactical questions, too. "Like who is in this building across the street, where are the tanks located in a particular town or village that is going to be entered by friendly forces, or what’s the latest intelligence regarding adversarial forces in a particular town or village."

Obviously, it would take more than a bulked-up Web crawler to get the job done. Cyber Craft would have to be able to hop from standard computer networks to electrical grids to wireless nets and back, over and over again.

Cyber agents will need to embody the ability to covertly travel across these mediums, constantly assessing the network layout, morphing itself as networks change, and remaining covert while maintaining the integrity of its mission. Increased use of data hiding techniques and data hiding detection techniques add additional complexity to the Cyber craft weapon arsenal... Cyber weapons will need to perform real-time continuous self-assessment of the adversary’s detection capability and be able to make instant decisions to morph or self-destruct. Both these functions will be required in covertness and with the decision information sent back to its Cyber Craft home.

"As an example of a Cyber Craft application, consider a squad of marines entering a residential area," the Air Force paper offers.

Current intelligence is about 20-mins old and the squad leader requires updated information. The squad leader finds an electrical outlet and plugs in. This outlet allows access to the power grid of the town and subsequently access to the adversary’s computer network. The squad leader injects a Cyber Craft into the system, whose mission is to locate a) any insurgents or b) locate any hidden military facilities... The Cyber Craft detect[s] some activity at a military installation within 1000-ft of the Marines location. The Cyber Craft performs a 'recce mission' to gather intelligence on the insurgents (exact location, number, arms, etc.) and sends back data/information to the marines. However, in the meantime the marines have moved and have located a different means of connecting to the network. The Cyber Craft has 'sensed' this shift so readdresses the feedback information to the marine’s new location and port. The 'Cyber Craft' acquires a positive ID, and sends an alert message back to the marines that the insurgents are about to leave and may be heading their way... The Cyber Craft executes its orders (turns power off, locks the doors), sends back an acknowledgement and self destructs.

There's not much of this that today's software can do, the Air Force researchers acknowledge. "Agent development, agent size and complexity, detection technology, realtime agent learning and self morphing technology, RF and network penetration technology are a few of the technological challenges requiring additional investment."

But the Air Force, earlier this year, did hand out contracts to three firms to start working the problem. Assured Information Security of Rome, NY got a $99,170 grant to "research and develop a CyberCraft software tool that will be able to covertly enter a network and move about the network to detect intrusions or other abnormalities." Indialantic, FL outfit 3 Sigma Research is looking to build "Cyber Craft organized in to 'cells' to enhance survivability and increase resiliency to attack." And Solidcore Systems, out of Palo Alto, will try to put together a system that include[s] a harbor (a host), and a dock (a control environment for Cyber Craft execution) and cyber craft themselves (ordinary programs that can get launched to hosts and run there)."

Of course, building the Cyber Craft, hard as it is, may wind up being the project's simplest part. The real questions come if and when fighters start to deploy the things. For instance, "How can we trust the Cyber Craft to 'do the right thing?'"

The goal is to develop a system that follows the 'fire-and-forget' methodology. However, with this philosophy comes the danger of a Cyber Craft morphing into something that performs unintended actions that would be harmful to friendly forces or provide an adversary with information about the sender’s intentions, position, etc. One way of controlling a Cyber Craft is have it 'dissolve' after completing its’ mission. However, depending on the level of the Cyber Craft (strategic, operational, and tactical) the mission length can go from minutes to years... Thus, the damage that can be inflicted by a rogue Cyber Craft could be significant.

Comments

But I know it was a good game in people's mind. I could remember the thing which I asked the other role sold the cheap last chaos gold to me to buy last chaos gold. And then I play lots of different role, when I saw the beautiful role, I was very happy. I like the feeling that everybody wear own beautiful cloth. One time I saw a girl, wearing a white skirt.

Posted by: cheap last chaos gold at August 6, 2008 01:53 AM


I was so poor when I began to the Last Chaos, so I needed the last chaos gold. Someday, one of my friends asked me to go to a new place, we felt very happy when we saw the scene which was very sublime. We think that if we stayed there, we can earn more last chaos gold. And then we can use them to exchange the last chaos money.

Posted by: last chaos gold at August 6, 2008 01:50 AM


I could remembered that when I first to the commercial city to buy cabal online alz clearly, I was so stupid, I could not entered the commercial city succeed and it always appearance mistake, so I bought the cabal alz instead.

Posted by: cabal online alz at August 6, 2008 01:46 AM


hello
( i speak franch)
bon je suis djamel 31 ans de l algerie j ai envoyer presque 6 messages, pour etre un nombre de votre systeme ,et j ai pas trouvé le juste adrsse ou koi je s ai pas ?,
comme je ta dit je suis djamel 31 ans de algerie ,ingenieur en informatique, chomage pauvre ,et tous c est pour ça je cherche un que me aide par un travail meme il est trop risque
car mon présedant de l etat bouteflika es t un
connard ,et avec gouvrnement son des mafia
je suis pas seule il ya des millons jeun comme moi
je suis la ,avotre service
et je veux représenté ici en algerie

Posted by: blackhok at January 19, 2007 05:37 AM


I wan to go to the war.

Posted by: Aldo Arce at October 19, 2006 03:37 PM


bonsoir,

les guerres d'hier sont déjà de la préhistoire,la guerre au Pakistan, Irak, ne sont que pour nos généraux les derniers terrains de guerre, où les informations ont été retranscrit avec autant de paramètre qu'il y à de cailloux dans une carrière...oui, la prochain guerre, digne d'une guerre éclaire d'Hitler, sera robotiser, mécaniser à outrance, je ne parle pas de drone, ni de satellite espion, mais d'engin capable de se mouvoir dans un milieu hostile
le film Terminateur, bien que science fiction, reflète une certaine réalité, que nous même, refusons de croire, pensez donc, nous ne somme quand 2006 nous avons pas la technologie pour...détrompez vous messieurs, si certain ont peur de l'arme nuclèaire, prenez garde à la guerre de demain...
par exemple, aujourd'hui le mercredi 20 septembre 2006 21h33 , les pièces d'un échiquier mondiale ce sont déjà misent en places, demain, le monde tournera comme aujourd'hui...mais les pièces se déplacent pas toujours comme l'on voudrait, mais, les fait sont là...une guerre se preparent, une guerre se discute, une guerre se marchande, vous avez u la 1er puis la 2em, puis des conflits, des révoltes...regarder autour de vous, votre bocal n'est pas un bocal, vous êtes dans l'océan.
ce logiciel D'assured information security/sigma research/solidcore systems, n'est qu'une maquette.

Posted by: benoit at September 20, 2006 02:41 PM


He's a Witch!!!
Welcome to Massachusets.

...oh wait, wrong year.

He's a terrororist!!
Welcome to Anywhere, USA.
Here you will find fleeting freedoms and no peace of mind as your supposed representatives overlook your problems, stub your freedoms, obliterate your paycheck and feed you BS. Great...

Who's brilliant idea is this?

Posted by: WitchHunter at September 5, 2006 11:33 AM


Hello Skyler & b,

Skyler it's pretty damn obvious that most "Terrorist" organizations now a days only use the net as a form of propaganda for their skewed vision and/or version of religion, economic, political or social political rhetoric; whether what they post on their website(s) be based on fact or propaganda BS because they realize that most if not all their web activity is closely monitored.
Now as for what "b" stated about networks or even the infrastructures for basic electricity or phone service and Hezbollah proves to be pretty much true.
They still had a very active communication system going based on the most ancient and oldest communications network known to man kind: walking, running or riding/driving to a particular spot and verbally communicating orders or instructions; even hand, mirror or cloth/flag signals from rooftop to rooftop or block to block still works.

When a country like the U.S. decides to pick on another country for either legitimate or made up BS reasons, as in Iraq, the first things to usually get hit are the military communications grids and electrical grids and then the civilian equivalents so that the enemies military can't resort to the civilian grids when their military grids has been eviscerated.
Then the enemy military has to resort to radio communications which can be inherently insecure and then all the enemy radio communications is closely monitored and decoded, if possible, so that our military can have the upper hand in defeating the enemy military.

So then the question I have to ask is this: Since our military is more than capable of finding and obliterating an enemies military and civilian communications and electrical grids and then closely monitoring and decoding enemy radio communications afterward; then why would they need such a "nice", "nifty", "secret swiss army knife" program for the infiltration, eve dropping and destruction of the enemies military and then civilian communications and electrical grids?
I mean if we are going to take out a enemy government and then occupy the conquered country and try to rebuild it into a infant democracy then why make it any more harder on our selves by making it so that we have to rebuild what we will destroy in the first place?

This pipe-dream project, if it ever does comes to fruition, will not be used "JUST" on an enemy country or terrorist organization, it "WILL" be used on us, as in you, me, your next door neighbor and whoever else our government deems necessary to watch.

Remember you got to think out side your safe little gold fish bowl.
Ignorance is bliss and I prefer not to know bliss, how about you Skyler?

Sorry about the long example/rant folks.

Posted by: Watchman at September 2, 2006 04:22 AM


ok, so I am dumb. Hezbollah didn't win. Sometimes I am so confused by my stupidity. But I am willing to admit it.

Posted by: b at September 1, 2006 02:32 PM


This air force report is science fiction. Training the best learning algorithms currently available to do simple tasks (like recognize peoples' names in text) takes hours on the fastest PCs available. This air force nonsense will never happen.

Posted by: Mr. Programmer at August 31, 2006 08:20 PM


Are you kidding? Do your research - the internet is where most terrorist related information and communication takes place. Even the American media has done an excellent job of reporting on this. As for flat out saying that it won't work? Don't you think that's a little narrow minded? Almost every leapfrog technology out there historically had dozens of naysayers saying that they wouldn't work, but research pressed forward because a few believed it could be done. Does the Bell X-1 sound familiar? I'm not saying it'll happen tomorrow, but to dismiss it alltogether is ignorant. Look at what DARPA is capable of bringing to fruition. Almost every project they dream up is "out-there", but they sucessfully demonstrate a large number of them each year.

Posted by: Skyler at August 31, 2006 06:54 PM


What makes the DoD think that a squad's enemies will have a network connection?

Hizbullah did not have any and did not need any. They did win. So why come up with such bullshit.

Posted by: b at August 31, 2006 02:30 PM


I neglected to mention the infinity of password gathering trojans, keystroke recorders and other such information seekers, all of which send the info back to the operator.

And let's not forget little gems like Chernobyl, that would simply destroy your system.

Posted by: zak822 at August 31, 2006 11:46 AM


Aren't various flavors of hackers doing exactly these things now?

Sometimes to DOD systems, but more often to banks and other places that do electonic cash transfers?

Posted by: zak822 at August 31, 2006 11:43 AM


I'm hoping that the Air Force doesn't expect a return in this investment for a decade. The key elements of this "CyberCraft" idea (artificial intelligence, information assurance software, user behavior modeling, and electrical grid communications) are not mature enough as individual technologies, let alone sophisticated enough for integration.

The DOD is just now experimenting with user behavior modeling to build algorithms for hacker detection. The problem is that detection is worlds apart from the process of meaningful intelligence gathering. The former involves recording events that meet predetermined conditions, the latter requires carefully evaluating the events in the context of a larger cosmology of information.

Call me old school, but until AI can mimic the sophistication of the human brain, effective intelligence gathering will require a human element.

Posted by: Robot.Economist at August 31, 2006 10:41 AM


Post a comment




Remember Me?


Please enter the code as seen in the image below to post your comment.