Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Afghan Update
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Around the Globe
Av Week Extra
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Body Armor Blues
Bomb Squad
Brownshoes in Action
Bubbleheads, etc.
Cammo Green
Catch the "Buzz"
Chem-Bio
Civilian Apps
Cloak and Dagger
Commandos
Comms
Contingency Ops
Cops and Robbers
Cyber-warfare
Data Diving
Defense Tech Poll
Defense Tech Radio
Dissent Tech
Door Kickers
Drones
DT Administrivia
Eat DT's Dust
Extra! Extra!
Eye on China
Fast Movers
FCS Watch
Fire for Effect
FOS Files
Friday Funnies
Gadgets and Gear
Going Green
Grand Ole Osprey
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
In the Weeds with Eric
Info War
Iraq Diary
Jarhead Jazz
JSF Watch
Just War Theories
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
M4 Monopoly
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Most Wanted
MRAP Edge
Net-Centric
Nukes
Old Skool
Our Shrinking Planet
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Podcast
Politricks
Polmar's Perspective
Popular Mechanics
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Robots
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Snipertech
Soldier Systems
Space
Special Ops
Star Wars
Strategery
Stray Trons
Tactical Development
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
The Defense Biz
The Peoples' Site
The Sunday Paper
The Tanker Tango
The View from Av Week
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
Trimble on the Case
Video Lounge
War Update
Ward'z Wonderz
You can run...

See all Archives
Newsletters

Edited by Christian Lowe | Contact

Army Wearing Out?

Nancy Pelosi ordinarily bugs the living hell out of me. Every time I see her botoxed face on TV, I cringe. But someone one her staff Congressmen Dave Obey and John Murtha have just put together an extremely smart and provacative report on the state of Army readiness. Take a read, and post your thoughts. Here's a snip:

wartired.jpg

In June of 2003, the Pentagon’s planners assumed that the U.S. would withdraw all of its combat brigades from Iraq roughly 20 months after the end of major combat operations. Those plans were revised in September of that year, and assumed a complete withdrawal about one year later than had previously been expected. Today, there are 16 U.S. combat brigades in Iraq (including 2 Marine Corps regiments), and there is little prospect that the deployment rate will decrease in the near future...

The Army currently has 39 active-duty combat brigades, as it builds to a total of 42 under the restructuring plan known as “modularity.” Over the coming months, roughly 19.5 combat brigades will be committed to Iraq and Afghanistan. Army doctrine calls for 2 units to be held in reserve (for rest and training) for every unit deployed. As of today, the Army has only one unit in reserve for every unit deployed – a ratio that history shows cannot be sustained for any length of time without serious adverse consequences to the force...

Army military readiness rates have declined to levels not seen since the end of the Vietnam War. Roughly one-half of all Army units (deployed and non-deployed, active and reserves) received the lowest readiness rating any fully formed unit can receive. Prior to 9/11, only about 20 percent of the Army received this lowest rating – a fact driven almost exclusively by shortfalls in the reserves...

Of the 16 active-duty, non-deployed combat brigades in the United States managed by the Army’s Forces Command, the vast majority of them are rated at the lowest readiness ratings. These ratings are caused by severe equipment shortages.

Of particular concern is the readiness rates of the units scheduled to deploy later this year, particularly the 1st Cavalry Division. This division and its 4 brigades will deploy to Iraq in October at the lowest level of readiness because of equipment shortfalls. To meet its needs, this unit – like virtually all other units that have recently deployed or will soon deploy to Iraq – must fall-in on equipment in theater. Operating unfamiliar, battle weary equipment increases the potential for casualties and accidents...

Funding shortfalls have created backlogs at all of the Army’s key depot maintenance facilities. At Anniston Army Depot in Alabama, some 600 M1 tanks sit in disuse. At Red River Army Depot in Texas, 700 Bradley Fighting Vehicles and over 450 trucks have not been serviced. Roughly 2,600 Humvees are sitting idle at various Army depots. Tens of thousands of small arms, communications sets, and other key items have been similarly backlogged.

UPDATE 7:18 PM: It should be noted that this assessment closely mirrors what the Army has been saying itself, again and again, in private meetings on Capitol Hill.

"There are no more troops to send to Iraq," Daniel Benjamin writes in Slate. "That is the unmistakable message of an Army briefing making the rounds in Washington. According to in-house assessments... not a single one of the Army's Brigade Combat Teams — its core fighting units — currently in the United States is ready to deploy. In short, the Army has no strategic reserve to speak of."

Comments

Ugg Boots
Ugg Boot
Ugg Boots Sale
Uggs
Ugg Cardy
Ugg Cardy Boot
Ugg Cardy Boots
Ugg Crochet Boot
Ugg Crochet Boots
Crochet Boots
Ugg Mini Boots
Ugg Mini Boot
Classic Mini Boots
Ugg Classic Short Boots
Ugg Classic Short Boot
Classic Short Boots
Ugg Classic Tall Boots
Ugg Classic Tall Boot
Classic Tall Boots
Ugg Nightfall Boots
Ugg Nightfall Boot
Nightfall Boots
Ugg Sundance Boots
Ugg Sundance Boot
Sundance Boots
Ugg Ultra Short Boots
Ugg Ultra Short Boot
Ultra Short Boots
Ugg Ultra Tall Boots
Ugg Ultra Tall Boot
Ultra Tall Boots
Ugg Keychains
Ugg Insoles

Posted by: vivian at July 2, 2009 10:55 PM


dunk sb shoes

Posted by: jian at June 18, 2009 02:01 AM


tiffany jewerly

Posted by: angle at June 17, 2009 10:56 PM


adidas shoes

Posted by: jian at June 16, 2009 08:25 PM


nike shoes,men's nike shoes,women's nike shoes,
nike football shoes,nike shox shoes, men's nike shox, women's nike shox, nike airmax shoes, nike airmax 180, nike airmax 2003, nike airmax 2009, nike airmax 360, nike airmax 87, nike airmax 88, nike airmax 89, nike airmax 90, nike airmax 91, nike airmax 90, nike airmax 95, nike airmax 97, nike airmax tn, nike air stab shoes, nike air yeezy shoes, nike airmax ltd, Air Jordan 1 , Air Jordan 10 , Air Jordan 11 , Air Jordan 11.5, Air Jordan 12 , Air Jordan 13, Air Jordan 14 , Air Jordan 15.5, Air Jordan 16, Air Jordan 17, Air Jordan 18, Air Jordan 19, Air Jordan 2.5, Air Jordan 20+AF1, Air Jordan 23, Air Jordan 24,Air Jordan 25, Air Jordan 3, Air Jordan 4, Air Jordan 4.5+13 Fusion,Air Jordan 5, Air Jordan 6, Air Jordan 6+AF1 Fusion, Air Jordan 7 , Air Jordan 8 , Air Jordan 9, Air Jordan Embroidery 4.5, Air Jordan Fusion 11+23, Air Jordan Fusion 12, Air Jordan Fusion 23, Air Jordan Fusion 5, Air Jordan Gold, Air Jordan Fusion 9, Air Jordan Six Mixed One, Air Jordan Three Mixed One, Air Jordan+Obama 11.5, Jordan Six Rings+Obama, Air Jordan Six Rings 11, Jordan True Flight

Posted by: any at June 16, 2009 08:35 AM


nike dunks

Posted by: jian at June 15, 2009 02:25 AM


nike designer shoes

Posted by: jian at June 14, 2009 08:51 PM



nike designer shoes

Posted by: jian at June 14, 2009 08:50 PM


paul smith
buy paul smith
paul smith store
paul smith shop
paul smith outlet
paul smith online store
paul smith UK
paul smith authentic
paul smith sale
paul smith men's wear
paul smith women's wear
paul smith accessories
paul smith collections
buy paul smith shoes
buy paul smith trainers
cheap paul smith shoes
cheap paul smith trainers
paul smith shoes
paul smith trainers
authentic paul smith shoes
authentic paul smith trainers
Paul Smith Canvas Holdall bags
paul smith bags
paul smith bag
Paul Smith Blonde Naked Lady Belt
buy paul smith belt
paul smith belt
paul smith belts
paul smith clothing
paul smith clothes
buy paul smith t-shirt
paul smith men's tshirt
paul smith ps t-shirt
paul smith polo
paul smith clothes
buy paul smith cufflinks
paul smith cufflinks
paul smith credit card wallet
paul smith leather wallets
buy paul smith wallet
buy paul smith wallets
cheap paul smith mens' wallet
paul smith mini wallet
paul smith naked lady wallet
paul smith striped wallet
paul smith wallets
paul smith women's wallet
paul smith sweater
cheap paul smith sweaters
authentic paul smith sweater
buy paul smith sweaters
genuine paul smith sweater
paul smith flip flop
buy paul smith flip flop
authentic paul smith flip flop
paul smith scarves
buy paul smith scarves
authentic paul smith scarves
paul smith notebooks
paul smith neckties
paul smith underwears

Posted by: http://www.paulsmithsale.co.uk/ at June 13, 2009 07:27 AM


timberland boots

Posted by: jian at June 13, 2009 12:18 AM


timberland boots

Posted by: jian at June 13, 2009 12:16 AM



ugg boots
nike designer shoes

Posted by: jian at June 11, 2009 03:52 AM


puma shoes

Posted by: angel at June 8, 2009 03:46 AM


nike air max
nike shox
nike dunk sb
puma shoes
coach shoes

Posted by: jian at June 6, 2009 03:13 AM


nike store,air max shoes,dunk sb shoes,nike shox shoes

Posted by: frs at June 5, 2009 08:20 PM


nike shoes
nike shoe
nike air max shoes
air max shoes
buy air max shoes
cheap air max shoes
air max 88 shoes
air max 87 shoes
air max 90 shoes
air max 91 shoes
air max 95 shoes
air max 97 shoes
air max 360 shoes
air max shoes on sale
nike free shoes
nike shoes online
nike infant shoes
nike men's shoes
baby nike shoes
nike basketball shoes
shoes nike dunks
nike shoes sale
nike women's shoes
toddler nike shoes
nike walking shoes
nike athletic shoes
buy nike shoes
women nike shoes
nike shoes discount
nike shoes on sale
nike casual shoes
blazer nike shoes
6.0 nike shoes
nike football shoes
baseball shoes nike
shox nike shoes
wholesale nike shoes
nike running shoesnike air shoes
6.0 nike shoes skate
nike jordan shoes
nike dunk shoes
cheap nike shoes
nike soccer shoes
nikes shoes
buy nike shoes onlinenike sports shoes
shoes or nike
nike air jordan shoes
nike air force on shoes

Posted by: anna at June 1, 2009 01:33 AM


nike shoes
nike shoe
nike air max shoes
air max shoes
buy air max shoes
cheap air max shoes
air max 88 shoes
air max 87 shoes
air max 90 shoes
air max 91 shoes
air max 95 shoes
air max 97 shoes
air max 360 shoes
air max shoes on sale
nike free shoes
nike shoes online
nike infant shoes
nike men's shoes
baby nike shoes
nike basketball shoes
shoes nike dunks
nike shoes sale
nike women's shoes
toddler nike shoes
nike walking shoes
nike athletic shoes
buy nike shoes
women nike shoes
nike shoes discount
nike shoes on sale
nike casual shoes
blazer nike shoes
6.0 nike shoes
nike football shoes
baseball shoes nike
shox nike shoes
wholesale nike shoes
nike running shoesnike air shoes
6.0 nike shoes skate
nike jordan shoes
nike dunk shoes
cheap nike shoes
nike soccer shoes
nikes shoes
buy nike shoes onlinenike sports shoes
shoes or nike
nike air jordan shoes
nike air force on shoes

Posted by: anna at June 1, 2009 01:33 AM


nike shox
nike shox fusion
nike shox nz
nike shox R2
nike shox R4
nike shox TZ
women's nike shox R5
nike shox Turb
 

Posted by: http://www.kicksadidas.com at May 25, 2009 11:40 AM


Links of London
Links of London Jewelry
Links of London Charm
Links of London Necklace
Links of London Bracelets
Links of London Earrings
Links of London Rings
Designer from UK
Diamond
Gold&Silver
Links Jewelry
Links Necklace
Links Charm
Links Earrings
Links Rings

Posted by: http://www.linksoflondons.co.uk at May 20, 2009 08:37 PM


Links of London
Links of London Jewelry
Links of London Charm
Links of London Necklace
Links of London Bracelets
Links of London Earrings
Links of London Rings
Designer from UK
Diamond
Gold&Silver
Links Jewelry
Links Necklace
Links Charm
Links Earrings
Links Rings

Posted by: http://www.linksoflondons.co.uk at May 20, 2009 08:36 PM


we offer hermes kelly,hermes birkin,Balenciaga Bags,Mulberry handbag,mulberry purse,prada handbag,prada fringe bag,coach handbags,coach bags,Dior bags,Dior bag,fendi handbag ,gucci handbags,gucci messenger bag

kobe shoes,adidas kobe shoes,,kobe bryant shoes,new kobe shoes,kobe shoe,nike kobe shoes,kobe bryant's shoes,kobe basketball shoes,air kobe shoes,kobe bryant new shoes,kobe basketball shoe,kobe bryant shoe,adidas kobe bryant,adidas kobe bryant shoes,basketball bryant kobe shoes,kobe bryant dunks,kobe nike,kobe zoom,nike zoom kobe,zoom kobe shoes,nike air zoom kobe


coach men shoes,men's coach shoes,mens coach shoes,coach shoe,coach shoes,coach shoes sale,coach tennis shoes,men's coach shoes , coach sneakerscoach sneaker,coach sneakers women,discount coach sneakers,new coach sneakers,coach women shoe,coach women shoes ,women coach shoes,women's coach shoes
cheap dunk cheap dunk shoes cheap dunks dunk sb dunks sb nike dunk,nike dunk sb nike dunks nike sb sb dunk cheap dunk high dunk high dunk high premium dunk high premium sb dunk high pro, dunk highs, dunk sb high,dunk sb high top,dunks high,nike dunk high,nike dunks high,nike sb high,womens dunk high,dunk high pro sb,cheap dunk low,dunk low,dunk low pro sb,dunk low sb,dunk sb low,dunks low,low nike dunk,nike dunk low,nike dunk sb low,nike dunks low,nike sb low,sb dunk low,buy nike sb mid,dunk mid premium,dunk mid pro,dunk mid pro sb,dunk mid sb,dunk mids,dunks mid,dunks mids,nike dunk mid,nike sb mid
 

Posted by: steven Young at May 18, 2009 03:38 AM


Paul Smith
Paul Smith Sale
cheap paul smith wallets
buy paul smith wallet
paul smith leather wallets
Paul smith men's wallet
paul smith women's wallets
Paul Smith Wallets
Paul Smith Bags
Paul Smith Necktie
Paul Smith Notebook
Paul Smith Belts
Paul Smith Shoes
Paul Smith Trainers
Paul Smith Cufflinks
Paul Smith">Paul Smith T-shirts
buy paul smith belt
Paul Smith Authentic
paul smith belt
paul smith belts
black leather suit belt
Paul Smith Blonde Naked Lady Belt
trainers uk
trainers shop
trainers reviews
health trainer
trainers sale
new trainers
comfortable Trainer

Posted by: http://www.paulsmithsale.co.uk at May 15, 2009 03:47 AM


Replica A Lange & Sohne
Replica Accutron
Replica Audemars Piguet
Replica Baume & Mercier
Replica Bell & Ross
Replica Breitling
Replica Bvlgari
Replica Cartier
Replica Chanel
Replica Chopard
Replica Christian Bernard
Replica Christian Dior
Replica Citizen
Replica Coach
Replica Concord
Replica Corum
Replica D&G
Replica DKNY
Replica Ebel
Replica ESQ
Replica Fendi
Replica Fila
Replica Franck Muller
Replica Girard Perregaux
Replica Givenchy
Replica Gucci
Replica Guess
Replica Hamilton
Replica Haurex
Replica Invicta
Replica IWC
Replica Jacob & Co
Replica Jacques Lemans
Replica Jaeger LeCoultre
Replica Levis
Replica Longines
Replica Mont Blanc
Replica Movado
Replica Omega
Replica Orient
Replica Oris
Replica Panerai
Replica Patek Philippe
Replica Piaget
Replica Rado
Replica Rolex
Replica Sector
Replica Seiko
Replica Skagen
Replica Swatch
Replica Swiss
Replica Swiss Army Victorinox
Replica Tag Heuer
Replica Technomarine
Replica Timberland
Replica Tissot
Replica Ulysse Nardin
Replica Vacheron Constantin
Replica Wenger
Replica Wittnauer
Replica Zenith
Replica Zodiac ecommerce
open source
shop
online shopping
Rolex Sports watches
Rolex Datejusts watches
A Lange & Sohne watches
Aigner watches
Alain Silberstein watches
Audemars Piguet watches
Bell & Ross watches
Breguet watches
Breitling watches
Bvlgari watches
Cartier watches
Chanel watches
Chopard watches
Concord watches
Corum watches
Dior watches
Dolce & Gabbana watches
Ebel watches
Emporio Armani watches
Glashutte watches
Gucci watches
Hermes Watches
IWC watches
Jacob & Co watches
Jaeger LeCoultre watches
Longines watches
Louis Vuitton watches
Mont Blanc watches
Movado watches
Omega watches
Oris watches
Panerai watches
Patek Philippe watches
Philip Stein watches
Porsche Design watches
Rado watches Roger
Roger Dubuis watches
Sarcar watches
Tag Heuer watches
Technomarine watches
Vacheron Constantin watches
Zenith watches ecommerce
open source
shop
online shopping
rolex replica-
rolex replica watches-
best replica watches-
watches-
diamond watches-
replica watches-
rolex watches-
watches online-
timex watches-
ladies watch-
luxury watch-
wrist watches-
casio watches-
watches online-
ladies watch-
men's watch-
wrist watches-
replica watches-
fine watches-
casio watches-
watches online-
replica rolex watches-
rolex watch-

Posted by: luxury watch at April 21, 2009 03:44 AM


My negative, as my boss’s brother was very sad. He said venting to find out the game we play games together, together fight monster, how to kill on how to kill. Later, we played the GuildWars game, my brother helped me apply a number, and she also bought some GW gold to me. Choose the name, I think a long time, in order to no longer immerse in the lovelorn, so I need to find individuals to love me, want to permanently, I hope that it is no longer the past fireworks fleeting. Finally, I choose love me 9 long time as my name. Brother saw and laughed; he said he hoped I will be happy. He let me go to play, beware of being cheated, do not give other people my phone and QQ.

Posted by: gw gold at August 12, 2008 09:53 PM


I played the Goonzu game for a few months, my heart had too many feelings, and this game is playing what in the end, playing goonzu gold or playing the feelings.

Posted by: goonzu gold at August 12, 2008 09:51 PM


Unwittingly, I now have to play Gaia more than three years, during the six months I have not played, it is because the equipment and gaia gold stolen. I am a hot personality, impulses, its own people, had been a game of the girls to beat. She brought me happy, but also brought troubles to me.

Posted by: gaia gold at August 12, 2008 09:49 PM


I am an ordinary online game enthusiast. January, I walked inside into a new world called RF. In this new world inside, I find the feeling that all games there have never had. I also the first time spent money in the online to buy RF gold. I would like to put the feeling of the article inside, thank all the friends in RF, and wish you happy.

Posted by: rf gold at August 12, 2008 09:47 PM


Yesterday, because I miss you, I go back the game and I want to watch to see. The rohan crone that you give me is also in here. I unexpectedly met you; I think I should stay here because I still think around you. This afternoon, I let you played together me this night, you promised. In the evening I thought you would not have come, but I saw you really come, I really very happy.

Posted by: rohan crone at August 12, 2008 09:44 PM


Three years ago, after friends introduced, I played the Rappelz game. At that time, I dazed and confused, I like to go my own way, I have a lot of rappelz rupees, but I became the most evil villains in the game. Until I encountered her, I found the meaning of survival.

Posted by: rappelz rupees at August 12, 2008 09:42 PM


The friend took me to the game, but she own was leaving the game. A person to game is boring, every day, I only know to upgrade and earn ro zeny. I can not sad dot this mess of feelings and moving. Once, the two boys for me quarreled utterly, until I leaved and tool sad. Later, I found a boy to married, I think perhaps all this to change, and I pray to become a reality, a few days after he disappeared. A person was playing a marriage number, what would it have taken place.

Posted by: ro zeny at August 12, 2008 09:39 PM


I played Maple Story for two years, only this number, bring me is happy, although it spent me a lot of maple mesos, happy lost, I would like to how to do. When I see that prompted the password is wrong, my tears down the keyboard. I told myself that it is system question; I can be one of the landings. I know that it is impossible. My number is lost in this way, after I no longer have, I lost it is forever.

Posted by: maple mesos at August 12, 2008 09:37 PM


I thought my husband who married in game was very kind, he always sent the goonzu online gold to the new that started to played the game. Perhaps the reason I like him. However our reins last long time, I was so sad at beginning. But the game is only the game, like the cheap goonzu gold. It had no worthiness.

Posted by: cheap goonzu gold at August 6, 2008 12:23 AM


At beginning , you are a poor, but don’t worried, the style of game give you a little habbo credits, it is very cheap, you can use them to buy equipment, you can use this equipment to exercise the rank, when you get to a certain rank valid, you don’t need the equipment, you should buy the better equipment. This time, you need the habbo gold.

Posted by: habbo credits at August 6, 2008 12:20 AM


I had only a little lunia gold and the remedy was not enough, but I still to add the blood to our cavalier which were battling, we saw the enemy became more and more fearfulness, at last my best friend dead. At this time I needed the more lunia war gold to buy blood to save my best friend. I couldnt go to save my friend, because the enemy was coming and carrying off his lunia online gold.

Posted by: lunia gold at August 6, 2008 12:15 AM


rolex replica watches - $98 swiss , we don't sale replica watches.The Art of E-commerce

Posted by: replica watches at August 4, 2008 11:15 PM


nice to meet you

Posted by: wowpowerleveling at April 15, 2008 03:14 AM


Did any 1 consider that the actions taken of patrolling iraq and setting up strips and bases while over there give us in a great location if our troops had to go bust iran down if they were to get out of hand? Seeing how some on here decided 2 use great quotes to get their opinions across 2 the readers, has ne 1 ever heard of "keep ur friends close, and ur enemies even closer?" holding iraq keeps iran so close that they would fear doing ne thing 2 drastic that would result in an american retaliation

Posted by: miggy at March 30, 2008 12:14 PM


Reset is complicated, but the degree of change varies from unit to unit. For some organizations, there's a lot of equipment swapping, fielding, and serious change; for others - the three brigades I mentioned in the 82nd - it's essentially just institutionalizing their usual organization for deployment. It's hard to generalize without a fairly detailed level of knowledge. There's risk associated with the force transformation, but the maneuver brigades in the ac will be largely transformed by 2010 - but if it didn't happen quickly, what are the odds that it would ever happen at all? Stretch it out to fifteen or twenty years, and you leave a lot of wiggle room to every parochial service interest to subvert, alter, or slow the process.

It's great to talk about increasing active duty endstrength, but really - where are the troops going to come from? If we can just barely fill our quotas for the existing force, how on earth would we fill for a force that's 100,000 stronger? And once we get them, remember that we commit to a full career life cycle plus lifespan retirement costs for that force. DoD's budget looks like General Motors' already - add another 100k to that, and guess what you get - both now and twenty years down the road?

Posted by: Nanonymous at September 16, 2006 08:52 AM


"The US went into Iraq with the Army we had"

There is a vast difference between a conscripted (citizen's) army and a volunteer army, which in principle agrees with the mission. Vietnam taught that imperial wars of aggression cannot be fought with a conscripted army (draft dodgers, conscientious objectors, fragging officers, etc.).

"Prevailing wage rates are just too high in the private sector for the uniformed services to compete."

Which is why the volunteer army is primarily composed of the lower socio-economic strata, as they have little or no other opportunity. This level of recruits results in lower performance.

"Then no man, however wise, will be able to avert the consequences that must ensue."

The US administration has violated every rule Sun Tzu wrote as well as the entire Powell Doctrine, learned at such bitter cost in Vietnam.

"With out any quantinable political goals in Iraq the U.S. has no business in Iraq."

Ah, but with very definite strategic and economic goals, this administration will not revise what is essentially a very successful economic policy despite strategic and humanitarian failures, loss of life, loss of stature, etc. If you disagree with the economic success of this action, I suggest you look at the stock performance of various related industries and investment firms such as the Carlyle Group. (http://www.hereinreality.com/carlyle.html)

The size of the military is relevent only to wars of conquest the US initiates (and we clearly initiated this one). The US has enemies (comprised exclusively of those who have been trodden upon by empire), but none have even the slightest chance of raising a conventional military challenge (this may change as forces and capabilities are depleted and opponents trained in anti-US combat.

Posted by: Noah (the other one) at September 15, 2006 08:29 PM


The two theater war that the Pentagon pushed during the 1990's was always BS. It was totally not plausible, in the threat nor our ability to respond. They needed a justification for Congress' and the Pentagon's expensive weapons systems.

The military did a lot a COTW during the 90's though, we all know about them. Apparently no one ever listened to any after action reports, because if they did, they would have shifted resources, training and focus away from the conventional hi-tech nation-state war, that they dream of, to what we actually required then, and now.

Taking down Governments is easy, quick and requires few combat troops. Keeping the “peace” and the rebuilding afterwards is time consuming, expensive, and it requires lots of troops on the ground for a decade. In fact, the more troops the better, preferably multi-national.

You are right, there is no way the US military can supply the minimum 500,000 troops that we need. We need to find a nation or two that does have ample bodies (not Europe). It is time to BUY some Allies.

Posted by: BT at September 15, 2006 05:11 PM


I was always skeptical of whether or not a 500,000 man Army was big enough to handle the old 2 MTWs planning model. What if we didn't win that first war in 30-60 days and the other conflict flaired up?

After 9/11, I fully expected to see Rumsfeld nudge U.S. troop levels up by at least 100,000 if not 200,000. The problem is that doing so would be incredibly expensive. If military recruiters are dipping into Category 4 to fill the enlisted ranks. Adding more roles would only make a bad situation worse.

The only other way to draw up more warm bodies would be to bring back the dreaded "d-word." I honestly don't think even a Republican-dominated federal government could whether that decision. The political class is so devoid of former uniforms that I doubt either party could stomach a draft (or weather the 2008 election).

All the military logisticians who read this will probably agree with me when I say reset is more than just an administrative affair. You honestly can't push down too hard on the reset timeline without damaging unit cohesion and equipment turnaround.

Posted by: Robot.Economist at September 15, 2006 03:28 PM


I'd like to know how many of those units posted a low level of readiness because they were in the process of reorganizing. That's an entirely different matter from being worn out. And it's not true that units uniformly take 2-3 years to reorganize; the plans for shifting units and people around are complex, but some units (like, say, the three existing maneuver brigades of the 82nd Airborne) will essentially just be conducting an admin reorganization, and shedding a battalion.

Falling in on unfamiliar equipment isn't exactly a new phenomenon for the Army. Deploying brigades at the National Training Center used to fall in on complete unit sets when they deployed, to save on the rail load and transportation requirement; at the end of each deployment they turned the stuff back in again. The claim that it's hard to fall in on the equipment you're trained on seems pretty thin to me.

Posted by: Nanonymous at September 15, 2006 02:04 PM


Good Morning Folks,

Perhaps we are at the junction where war stops and politics begain. The efforts of the U.S. in Iraq and now Afghanistan are at best at a quagmire but more likely in reverse. The report from marine Col. Peter Devlin that was all over the web last week and badly quoted by the Washington Post and The New York Time this week in a nut shell sums up all of Iraq.

More troops were needed back in 2003 but now I think any increase would be a waste of resources. With out any quantinable political goals in Iraq the U.S. has no business in Iraq.

All the point brought up by "Robot Economist" are correct, out ground forces are dieing both figuratively and literlly because of Iraq. Maybe the defination of winning in termsof the 19th.and 20th. Century no longer apply.

There are going to be other "Wars" in this struggle with Terrorists is waisting respurces in Iraq in the best interest of the future.

Politically Saddam didn't go away. The judge yesterday declaired him NOT TO BR A DICTATOR maybe that an opening Washington should use to reduce our burden we call Iraq.

Saddam is a politician not a religious zellot and cutting a deal with him is a real possibility. With in the proper constraints like U.S. forces based in Iraq and an Iraqi military structured for domestic purposes not agression agaist it's neighbors maybe he is the answer to the question the Bush Administration is to afraid to ask.

ALLONS,
Byron Skinner

Posted by: Byron Skinner at September 15, 2006 01:09 PM


I like the picture to guys I think I have even seen it on Aljizz. Great work everyone has to do thier part ya know greater good real evil and all that.

Posted by: C-Low at September 15, 2006 11:43 AM


Wow and just imagine that back pre-60's mentality we used to consider experienced soldiers battle hardened seasoned giving them a huge edge over green un seasoned forces. In WW2 we were actually so stupid as to waste thousands dead in Vichy France, North Africa, Sicily, Italy all before Normandy because we wanted to get our troops seasoned. What dum as*ses.

Our much more enlightened after-60's mentality of warfare experts like Pelosi, Durbin, rapid reaction support to Iraq from Okinawa Murtha “redeploy”, and of course the almighty US troops terrorizing innocent Iraqi women and children in the night Kerry. And let’s not forget we now have doctors well at least Physiologist that can vouch that once a man faces combat he is ruined ruined I tell ya.

I don’t think we need more troops in Iraq it may sound evil or cruel but if their wasn’t the violence currently in Iraq the Iraqi government would not be so willing to work together and our influence over the foundation principles of their government would be nill.

However I would fully support taking the military back to the levels of the early Clinton days when we could actually put 700k men in the field without calling guard and instituting a draft. I would fully support taking the military budget back to Reagan level percentages instead of the meager off hand don’t quote me 4-5% we are currently at.

I won’t be holding my breath for the Democrats to propose such a bill for such military increases. If I was Bush I would definitely call the Dems on such rhetoric with a bill of my own as my new by-partisan bill to drastically increase the military suggested by Pelosi, Murtha, Kerry, Durban ect….. I would love to see that one play out Pelosi co authoring doubling the military budget and force numbers to prepare for the widespread war we may have to commit to if our enemies refuse to comply.

Posted by: C-Low at September 15, 2006 11:38 AM


At the risk of sounding partisan, can Murtha really be trusted with military analysis after his "We could have bombed Zarquawi from Okinawa" remarks? The man clearly has an agenda.
If he is correct on the other hand, the state of the military is pretty said. Whether right or wrong, the world's strongest military power should have enough strength to occupy a third world country indefinitely. After all, if we cannot win in Iraq, how can we hope to do anything in Iran, should the need arise? What about china? Should we just surrender our superpower license now and be done with it?

Posted by: Vash at September 15, 2006 10:19 AM


When you engage in actual fighting, if victory is long in coming, the men's weapons will grow dull and their ardor will be dampened. If you lay siege to a town, you will exhaust your strength, and if the campaign is protracted, there sources of the state will not be equal to the strain. Never forget: When your weapons are dulled, your ardor dampened, your strength exhausted, and your treasure spent, other chieftains will spring up to take advantage of your extremity. Then no man, however wise, will be able to avert the consequences that must ensue.

Thus, though we have heard of stupid haste in war, cleverness has never been seen associated with long delays. In all history, there is no instance of a country having benefited from prolonged warfare. Only one who knows the disastrous effects of a long war can realize the supreme. importance of rapidity in bringing it to a close. It is only one who is thoroughly acquainted with the evils of war who can thoroughly understand the profitable way of carrying it on.

The skillful general does not raise a second levy, neither are his supply wagons loaded more than twice. Once war is declared, he will not waste precious time in waiting for reinforcements, nor will he turn his army back for fresh supplies, but crosses the enemy's frontier without delay. The value of time-that is, being a little ahead of your opponent-has counted for more than either numerical superiority or the nicest calculations with regard to commissariat.

In war, then, let your great object be victory, not lengthy campaigns. Thus it may be known that the leader of armies is the arbiter of the people's fate. the man on whom it depends whether the nation shal~ be in peace or in peril.

Sun Tzu wrote these words before christ, before the tribes of the hebrews, at the time when civilization existed in only a few pockets of the planet, yet his words are still relavent. Will rumsfield's reforms be remembered a thousand, two thousand or three thousand years hence? i highly doubt it.

The longer a force trained for fast motorized warfare is used to garrison iraq the more it will unravel as the disconnect betweeen doctrine and reality shake the faith of the rank and file. If the military transforms into an occupation force it will find that the traits to be successful as a "police force" will prove detrimental when engaged with revolutionary guard battle groups as the israelis have discovered in s.leb. The military is on the horns of a dilemma and the president and his staff are asleep at the wheel daydreaming about the new middle-east and containing china.

Posted by: Azrael at September 15, 2006 09:43 AM


BT - Its all about demographics and economics. Walter Russell Mead brought up your point two years ago in his "Power, Terror, Peace and War." The American population is just too wealthy to field a force of ground troops larger than 500,000-600,000. Prevailing wage rates are just too high in the private sector for the uniformed services to compete. Thankfully, we've been able to offset some of that by recruiting heavily from immigrant groups, especially Hispanic-Americans.

Things may be bad, but they are much worse in Europe. The social models practiced by most European states draw even more citizens away from military service than the private sector in the U.S. does. On top of that, low fertility and tight immigration policies are slowly draining their pools of ready manpower.

Its funny that so much has been made of the technologic side of the Revolution in Military Affairs, but no attention has been paid the socio-economic side. The military revolutions of the 16th, 19th and 20th Centuries had enormous impacts on their contemporary societies, governments and markets.

Why haven't people realized the 21st Century revolution would be no different?

Posted by: Robot.Economist at September 15, 2006 09:04 AM


The US went into Iraq with the Army we had at the time, not the Army of 1991, which was considerably larger but less 'shock and awe' inspiring. The JCS have decided, wisely, to not deploy the brigades with their heavy equipment, each brigade deploys and uses the Abrams, Bradleys, HETTs that are in theater. So if the Army is cash poor, should they emphasise maintaining the stateside equipment as highly as they would like? I don't think so, I think they are concentrating their money on the equipment their soldiers will be fighting with, I would like our reserve to be combat ready as well, but that isn't the real world. Bush refused to ask us to sacrifice to win this war on terror and one consequence of that is that we are fighting on the cheap.

The Army is simply too small to do much else, which accounts for Rumsfeld's much maligned comment, "you fight with the Army you have".

Posted by: ziv at September 15, 2006 08:09 AM


Gee Whiz! One more example of the Dubya-Rummy incompetence. What else is new? Think they can handle anything else - Iran, North Korea, Christian-Islamic war (see Pope's historic commentary and hysterical response)? Some of the above, all of the above.

Posted by: CelticCurmudgeon at September 15, 2006 07:26 AM


How pathetic. The US military can't sustain 150,000 combat troops plus their support troops indefinitely. Is the problem money, logistical resources or lack of personnel? The US military gets what they deserve for living in their China fantasy the last ten years.

Typical insurgencies and normal post conflict stabilizations missions last 10-15 years. Iraq, Afghanistan, and any other country we take on (Iran) are no different. Blame the Powel Doctrine, for wanting a "drive by shooting", instead of long-term recovery effort.

This reality needs to be planned and financed prior to interventions. If we do not plan for that contingency, then don’t even bother threatening anyone?

In the future, if we need more troops, I know of a few countries (BRIC) that would supply them at the RIGHT price.

As for Iraq, I say privatize the damn war with MERC’s. I believe at last count there was already like 20,000 private security people in theater.

Posted by: BT at September 14, 2006 08:36 PM


I was in a briefing about this time last year covering the rollout of the ARFORGEN policy. At the end of the brief, someone from the audience asked the briefer (he was an LTC I believe) whether ARFORGEN was compatible for deployment to Iraq. The answer was "Over the next 2-3 years, just barely."

Think of it this way, an active duty brigade that is fielded for one year needs at least 2 years (optimally 3) to reset when they return home. This is mostly because the unit needs to replace a fair amount of equipment and train up new soldiers. Thankfully, our brave men and women in green have been re-enlisting at really high rates, so they could afford to have their reset time short-circuited some.

The problem is that this trend cannot continue forever and in about a year or two, we will probably see retention rates drop significantly. No matter how patriotic or committed a soldier is, he or she will eventually tire of constant deployment or max out on rank. If you think recuitment shortfalls are bad now, just wait 9 to 12 months.

Posted by: Robot Economist at September 14, 2006 08:05 PM


Post a comment




Remember Me?


Please enter the code as seen in the image below to post your comment.