Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Afghan Update
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Around the Globe
Av Week Extra
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Body Armor Blues
Bomb Squad
Brownshoes in Action
Bubbleheads, etc.
Cammo Green
Catch the "Buzz"
Chem-Bio
Civilian Apps
Cloak and Dagger
Commandos
Comms
Contingency Ops
Cops and Robbers
Cyber-warfare
Data Diving
Defense Tech Poll
Dissent Tech
Door Kickers
Drones
DT Administrivia
Eat DT's Dust
Extra! Extra!
Eye on China
Fast Movers
FCS Watch
Fire for Effect
FOS Files
Friday Funnies
Gadgets and Gear
Going Green
Grand Ole Osprey
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
In the Weeds with Eric
Info War
Iraq Diary
Jarhead Jazz
JSF Watch
Just War Theories
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
M4 Monopoly
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Most Wanted
MRAP Edge
Net-Centric
Nukes
Old Skool
Our Shrinking Planet
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Polmar's Perspective
Popular Mechanics
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Robots
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Snipertech
Space
Special Ops
Star Wars
Strategery
Stray Trons
Tactical Development
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
The Defense Biz
The Peoples' Site
The Sunday Paper
The Tanker Tango
The View from Av Week
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
Trimble on the Case
Video Lounge
War Update
Ward'z Wonderz
You can run...

See all Archives
Newsletters

Edited by Christian Lowe | Contact

Attack Of The Genius Robot Cockroach Swarm

I have seen some radical ideas for attacking deep bunkers, but this beats 'em all...

crawler.jpgHaving previously looked at Deep Digger and the Supercavitating penetrator, I was intrigued by an Air Force research Laboratory program called “Creative Robots to Defeat Deeply Buried Underground Targets” After finally getting clearance, I was able to interview Stephen Thaler of Imagination Engines Inc, the man behind the project. Thaler is evangelical about his brand of artificial intelligence, and the result is a piece in Wired News - "Experimental AI Powers Robot Army."

It’s quite a project. The idea is to develop software to make a collection of robots smart enough to break into, explore and neutralize deep bunkers. The challenges are gigantic.

The robots have to deal with an unspecified number of unknown obstacles as they travel via cable runs, air ducts, service pipes or other channels, dealing with grilles, bars, doors or other checks.

Then they need to correctly identify the target (waste bin, or WMD container?), which is easy for people but hard for robots – and this task requires being out of radio contact.

They have to act in concert and help rather than hinder each other, co-ordinating their efforts to explore and map the facility.

And all the time they have to be able to avoid, outwit or defeat the human defenders of the bunker, whose tactics, numbers and abilities cannot be predicted.

Thaler’s believes his software can do all this. It’s an unusual neural network with the ability to ‘dream up’ new ideas, exploring likely approaches before putting them into action. For example, give it a set of robotic limbs and it will quickly find the most effective way of using them – a video here shows a six-legged robot figuring out how to walk from scratch with no programming in eight minutes flat.

Imagination Engines’ capabilities also extend to sensors. Thaler describes products including a million-pixel array which can interpret input ‘an order of magnitude’ faster than any comparable system and another with formidable powers of recognition, such as distinguishing a T-72 from an Abrams. There is no programming involved: just show the system the two different objects and it figures out how to tell them apart.

The most guarded aspect of the Creative Robots is their tactical intelligence, which seems to be considerable – Thaler describes them as "Machiavellian" in how devious they can be. The Creativity Machine's ability to explore the entire range of possibilities means that in principle it could dream up any tactic that a human could, and more besides.

Within the next few months the software toolkit for Creative Robots will be available for the military. It will run on any standard hardware, turning a pack of dumb robots into smart team players capable of carrying out missions on their own. Thaler believes their speed makes Creative Robots superior to those that rely on human control, “performing at near-human levels of intelligence at Terahertz clock rates, while our joy-stick controlled robots are performing effectively at the 4 Hz clock rates characteristic of the brain.”

The possibilities for civilian use are tremendous. There are a vast number of ‘hard problems’ involved in getting robots to interact with the everyday world which require intelligence. Thaler believes that he has the solution. Look out for a host of commercial and industrial applications.

Dean Vieau, a consultant with many years of experience in the fields of Controls and Machine Vision, is an enthusiastic supporter. In one case study he carried out, Vieau found that a solution using Imagination Engines software was twenty times faster to develop and a hundred times cheaper than the existing approach.

“Imagination Engines represents a significant advancement in the realms of AI. Not just esoteric academic conjecture but real world paths to concrete results.”

As usual the military are developing world-changing technology that will filter down to the rest of us later. But are we really ready for killer robots yet?

“There is a reluctance to entrust lethal missions to autonomous robots,” says Thaler. “However, the bad guys may not share the same reservations. The escalation is inevitable.”

-- David Hambling

Comments

www.androiduniversity.com
Thomas Edison

Posted by: Thomas Tdison at December 20, 2007 06:57 AM


I know the TRUTH.

Posted by: The Brother at April 15, 2007 10:19 AM


How about the movie Screamers?

Posted by: Evra at March 19, 2007 03:54 PM


Hmmm... any of you ever read the book "Prey" by Micheal Chrighton? Sound familiar?

Posted by: Leeman at January 31, 2007 01:00 PM


As the founder/operator of http://www.antimullah.com and also screenplay writer with a project called "History of the Future" I acknowledge the www.LindaSog.com post and link to this site a terrific find.

Whether my android/robotic fighters which develop over the next 3,000 years of future history or flesh eating locusts, as warrior or cleanup squads are all a figment of imagination they can be put to practical use.

Posted by: Alan Peters at October 1, 2006 02:48 PM


I find it strange that several posters just post ad hominem attacks on Stephen Thaler as opposed to actually taking the time to read what Dr. Thaler has published in peer reviewed journals. I have (for private enterprise) and the technology is a significant improvement in AI. The military is more open to trying unproven technologies than other large organizations so it's not surprising the Air Force is conducting tests. The fact that they have distributed follow on grants, is further evidence that it works.

Posted by: Gregg Dippold at September 21, 2006 08:44 AM



Dean Vieau does now work for IEI, but his comments preceded his employment. In effect, he like the product so much, he joined the company.

"We haven't seen any demonstrated ability here"

The Air Force have, and they sounded highly satisfied with its performance. Clearly the robot cockroaches are performing as required...which is quite awesome.

"But AI robots that plan and create new strategies? Yeah, right. "

Those are actually a lot easier than the perception and locomotion tasks. Computers have long been the masters at games of strategy.

"A machine that is infinitely adaptable is one that represents an infinite number of possibilities that things could go terribly wrong."

Very true. But someone will have these things soon even if the US does not - and as far as I can tell the best defence against a swarm of robots is another swarm of robots.

Posted by: David Hambling at September 20, 2006 11:16 AM


No, it doesn't scare the crap out of me. We haven't seen any demonstrated ability here. For all we know, even if these things could think or reason, they're just as likely to decide that attacking some terrorist is scary and they'd rather sit in an air duct, or watch TV, or that the best method to attack a terrorist is to jump into the trash can and deactivate themselves.

Posted by: Brian at September 18, 2006 01:23 PM


The most guarded aspect of the Creative Robots is their tactical intelligence, which seems to be considerable – Thaler describes them as "Machiavellian" in how devious they can be. The Creativity Machine's ability to explore the entire range of possibilities means that in principle it could dream up any tactic that a human could, and more besides.

Does this scare the crap out of anyone else?

I mean, when we endow machines to determine which "tactics" to use, "Terminator" stops sounding like science fiction. This is one of those "great ideas in theory" that could represent huge problems in practice. A machine that is infinitely adaptable is one that represents an infinite number of possibilities that things could go terribly wrong.

Posted by: paul lukasiak at September 18, 2006 12:15 PM


Well, I'm not at all convinced that AI will ever work, but there is some potential here. I don't think his robots will communicate or plan with each other any better than a 14 year old with his parents, but the identification software looks pretty neat. Distinguising an Abrams from a T-72 by sight, or learning to walk in 8 minutes looks interesting. I can see that a new programming technique could allow robots to do those things, and that's nifty.

But AI robots that plan and create new strategies? Yeah, right. These guys aren't Cyberdyne Systems.

Although, wouldn't it be funny if we finally managed to create AI, only to discover that it was emotional and moody as a teenager?

Scientist: "We have created the world's first artificially intelligent robot!"
Robot: "No one understands me! I hate you all!" (goes into own room, slams door, turns up stereo)

Posted by: Brian at September 18, 2006 09:31 AM


C'mon: put it all together, and it's hard to deny the upshot of the deeply kooky aspects of Creative Intelligence's website. Fine, "near death" may be creative marketing, but the hype that Thaler attaches to it means one of two things:

(1) he's yet another AI or military scientist all too willing to hype his potentially mundane or fruitless experiments; or (2) he's a kook.

Also, did you see the "In it's image" links? Tell me THAT doesn't REEK of kook.

Posted by: Max at September 18, 2006 08:49 AM


This is an embarrassing piece of "journalism."

Did anyone notice that the experienced "consultant" (Dean Vieau) that he cites as having done an independent study on the company's technology actually *works* for the company?

Posted by: Dave at September 17, 2006 10:00 PM



"So what do these little buggers use for power? A real high pole in the tent of lots of neat concepts is batteries."

This is a software project - the real 'high pole' in this case is getting something anything like intelligent enough to carry out the task.


However, having talked to AFRL people about their minitature robotics programs, they have a number of innovative solutions to the power problem. (Watch this space).


"the bio of the founder listed research into consciousness and AI near-death experiences. Sounds more than a few steps into crackpot land."

Not if you read further. The 'near death' part is Dr Thaler's rather colorful way of describing how his AI generates new ideas by peturbing an existing set of ideas.

As their website puts it " Thaler found that if the connection weights were varied at just the right level, the network's output units would predominantly activate into patterns representing new potential concepts generalized from the original training exemplars"...but saying that 'a near-death experience causes the AI to hallucinate' makes better copy for the media.

Posted by: David Hambling at September 17, 2006 01:19 PM


I see a potential here,but only a potential,as i'm
sure this software of thalers is in its early stages
and isn't fully matured yet.but if all go's well,and
thia tech proves viable,it could be a real boon.
Just think,a militarized,micro spy-bot that can crawl into an suspected al qaida hideout and get
vital intelligence on the wereabouts of terrorist
bigwigs without risking special forces teams in the
bush ferreting around in hostile territory.or an
even more useful civilian application like searching
for trapped individuals in a mine cave in or an earthquake.Now that would be worthwhile.
I'm sure the robot a.i. takeover conspiracies
will no doubt be flying about,so long as some kind
of anti-rebellion algorithm is programmed into
the thing ahead of time we won't have to worry
about having to bow down to our conquering
mechanical overlords anytime soon.

Posted by: KATSESAMA at September 16, 2006 11:37 PM


I went to the company website, the bio of the founder listed research into consciousness and AI near-death experiences. Sounds more than a few steps into crackpot land.

Posted by: mike at September 16, 2006 03:48 PM


“There is a reluctance to entrust lethal missions to autonomous robots”

Yes, there is, to some extent. However it is easy to exaggerate this -- consider that autonomous lethal guided weapons have been around since 1943 (both Germany and the USA used guided torpedoes during WW2).

Posted by: Phil Hunt at September 16, 2006 07:28 AM



So what do these little buggers use for power? A real high pole in the tent of lots of neat concepts is batteries.

(In Steve Stirling's last Draka novel, there was an unpleasant scene involving invasive robot bugs not unlike these. You don't want them to get into your gut.)

Posted by: Trascorriente at September 15, 2006 09:07 PM


Uhugg! I've got a bad feeling about this.

Posted by: touhy at September 15, 2006 08:29 PM


Post a comment




Remember Me?


Please enter the code as seen in the image below to post your comment.