Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Afghan Update
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Around the Globe
Av Week Extra
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Body Armor Blues
Bomb Squad
Brownshoes in Action
Bubbleheads, etc.
Cammo Green
Catch the "Buzz"
Chem-Bio
Civilian Apps
Cloak and Dagger
Commandos
Comms
Contingency Ops
Cops and Robbers
Cyber-warfare
Data Diving
Defense Tech Poll
Dissent Tech
Door Kickers
Drones
DT Administrivia
Eat DT's Dust
Extra! Extra!
Eye on China
Fast Movers
FCS Watch
Fire for Effect
FOS Files
Friday Funnies
Gadgets and Gear
Going Green
Grand Ole Osprey
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
In the Weeds with Eric
Info War
Iraq Diary
Jarhead Jazz
JSF Watch
Just War Theories
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
M4 Monopoly
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Most Wanted
MRAP Edge
Net-Centric
Nukes
Old Skool
Our Shrinking Planet
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Polmar's Perspective
Popular Mechanics
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Robots
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Snipertech
Space
Special Ops
Star Wars
Strategery
Stray Trons
Tactical Development
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
The Defense Biz
The Peoples' Site
The Sunday Paper
The Tanker Tango
The View from Av Week
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
Trimble on the Case
Video Lounge
War Update
Ward'z Wonderz
You can run...

See all Archives
Newsletters

Edited by Christian Lowe | Contact

China Wants Weapons Whizzes

Forget buying arms -- the real way to develop your military is buying arms designers.

RMB.jpg The seems to be the verdict of China's People's Liberation Army, anyway.

Remember the Australian Metal Storm system? You know, the one that fires more than a million rounds a minute? You might remember Sharon Weinberger used it last month as an illustrative example of her new Stupid Weapons Score Card. Presumably it scores pretty high on the scale…

Well, I guess the Chinese Government disagrees with that assessment, since they reportedly offered the system’s designer more than $100 million dollars to move to Beijing, after repeated attempts to by various pieces of equipment [and after Al-Qaeda just put out a recruiting call to all nuclear scientists with a jihadist bent -- ed]. It’s hard to understand why he didn’t head north to the Middle Kingdom after assurances like this: “We don’t need any Metal Storm weapons, we don’t need any of the paperwork, none of that. What we want is you.”

If nothing else, I guess it’s good to be wanted.

-- Matthew Tompkins

Comments

china needs to take a hike they just steal all their ideas or equipment from everyone else. china does not need metal storm they need to go build their own stuff. china even copied a whole street from london england including the buisnesses and got a bunch of people upset for using their buisness trademarks without their permission. china is a wanna be superpower plain and simple.

Posted by: beavis at October 30, 2007 08:59 PM


METAL STORM never caught on?Are you kidding?They have just brought out 50.cal sniper gun that shoots 3 rounds off before muzzle flip!!

Posted by: wisperingdeath at February 1, 2007 04:38 AM


METAL STORM never caught on?Are you kidding?They have just brought out 50.cal sniper gun that shoots 3 rounds off before muzzle flip!!

Posted by: wisperingdeath at February 1, 2007 04:35 AM


METAL STORM never caught on?Are you kidding?They have just brought out 50.cal sniper gun that shoots 3 rounds off before muzzle flip!!

Posted by: wisperingdeath at February 1, 2007 04:32 AM


China should give up communism, if they weren't and they agreed to all the treaties, i'm sure China would have metal storm and whatever.

Posted by: HMMM at October 13, 2006 06:37 PM


Two things, the Metal Storm has advanced technology that can be engineered into various forms. China has more money than sense right now, and it's only getting worse.

Second, you have to understand that a large portion of the intelectuals in China plagerise a large marjority of their research. So, Chinese weapon designers may not be thinking out of the box. This is purely an assumption on my part, but I think the Chinese are smart enough to know that communism is not the best enviorment for innovation.

Finally, regardless of their intentions with the Metal Storm, China is positioning itself as a Superpower. They have to be stopped.

Posted by: Will at October 5, 2006 03:34 PM


You've missed the point of metal storm, like most defence concepts, its a platform to build off, we might not need a million bullets a minute, but later on, there might be a need for a high rate of fire in a weapons platform, Metal storm is weapon in progress. The chinese can get their own hands on a really cool gun, hands off mine!

Posted by: Matthew at October 5, 2006 05:39 AM



Nothing stupid about Metal Storm - it's not the answer to everything but, much like rocket pods, it has advantages over conventional tube-launched rounds for some applications. There are obvious advantages for smoke dischargers, for example.

And is it being adopted for certain applications in the US and elsewhere.

Posted by: David Hambling at October 4, 2006 11:15 AM



It must be a lot harder to recognize junk science when you're reading in a foreign language. It wouldn't be the first time a foreign country was fooled by propaganda from westerners experienced in selling dubious technology projects. Maybe they just liked the brochures, and didn't take the time to understand the limitations as they should have.

Posted by: Tim at October 3, 2006 09:01 PM


I agree. It might be useful to keep the rioting laborers and farmers inline though.

I will say the only bad idea is the one that doesn't make you any money, more power to Metal Storm.

Posted by: BT at October 3, 2006 05:08 PM


So the PLA is picking up our sloppy seconds? I might be a smarter move to go after a successful defense company. Metal Storm was a gimick company whose technology never caught on.

I don't see what buying a Western arms firm gets the Chinese military. The Department of Commerce and Department of State would probably catch them trying to use it as a front for exporting. The mark of China would also follow any firm competing for contracts in the U.S. or Europe.

Maybe they need the firm's business expertise? Most of China's arms manufacturers are state-owned enterprises, which hemorage money pretty badly. Corruption between the uniforms that run the PLA and the former uniforms in the Chinese "defense industry" is pretty bad too.

Definitely an interest, but puzzling bit of news.

Posted by: Robot.Economist at October 3, 2006 02:50 PM


Post a comment




Remember Me?


Please enter the code as seen in the image below to post your comment.