Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Afghan Update
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Around the Globe
Av Week Extra
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Body Armor Blues
Bomb Squad
Brownshoes in Action
Bubbleheads, etc.
Cammo Green
Catch the "Buzz"
Chem-Bio
Civilian Apps
Cloak and Dagger
Commandos
Comms
Contingency Ops
Cops and Robbers
Cyber-warfare
Data Diving
Defense Tech Poll
Dissent Tech
Door Kickers
Drones
DT Administrivia
Eat DT's Dust
Extra! Extra!
Eye on China
Fast Movers
FCS Watch
Fire for Effect
FOS Files
Friday Funnies
Gadgets and Gear
Going Green
Grand Ole Osprey
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
In the Weeds with Eric
Info War
Iraq Diary
Jarhead Jazz
JSF Watch
Just War Theories
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
M4 Monopoly
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Most Wanted
MRAP Edge
Net-Centric
Nukes
Old Skool
Our Shrinking Planet
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Polmar's Perspective
Popular Mechanics
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Robots
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Snipertech
Space
Special Ops
Star Wars
Strategery
Stray Trons
Tactical Development
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
The Defense Biz
The Peoples' Site
The Sunday Paper
The Tanker Tango
The View from Av Week
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
Trimble on the Case
Video Lounge
War Update
Ward'z Wonderz
You can run...

See all Archives
Newsletters

Edited by Christian Lowe | Contact

Big War Machines Pushed for Korea Fight

There are still a whole heap of unknowns, in the wake of North Korea's nuclear test. But here's something you can take to the bank: every admiral, every Air Force general, and every Congresscritter with a big, hulking, weapon system is going to crow about how his gazillion-dollar machine is the key to fixing the Korean problem.

ddxs.jpgEven before Kim's October surprise, Air Force officials like Maj. Gen. Charles Dunlap Jr. were railing against "boots-on-the-ground zealots" and "neo-Luddites" who "quot[e] counterinsurgency manuals from the horse cavalry era." Instead, Dunlap insisted, we should be pouring money into "air power — our most effective national security component."

With the Army lobbying for a bigger chunk of the Pentagon budget, expect the volume on these Air Force and Navy-first screams to be turned up several notches in the months to come. Wanna shell the Norks' nuke facilities from way out in the sea? Then you need a big ol' DD(X) destroyer to do the shelling. Attacking from the air? For that, you just have to have a next-generation, long-range bomber. Oh, and a whole bunch of conventionally-armed Trident ballistic missiles, too. And so on...

Of course, "American air units in South Korea, Japan, and the United States, plus the US Third and Seventh Fleets, are available to blockade North Korea and strike at targets of opportunity" today, Arms and Influence notes.

However, it remains to be seen what opportunities for punitive and disarming strikes exist, or what the North Korean response would be... The facilities are too dispersed, often in the worst kind of geography for precision bombing, mountainous terrain. Even if the US were able to hit every North Korean nuclear and production facility, the obvious question would be, What's next?

We can predict at least one immediate consequence: a North Korean attack on South Korea. Whether the North Korean army tries to seize control of the South, or merely retaliate with conventional and chemical artillery attacks on Seoul and other population centers, the US would need ground forces to take the next step: eliminate the North Korean government. Even with its nuclear fangs removed, the North Korean government would remain a menace to the South, and perhaps would have reasons to try for one last gamble to end the decades-long stalemate on the Korean peninsula...

The United States has an impressive array of carrier battle groups, attack submarines, tactical air assets, and strategic bombers that it can hurl at North Korea. However, the last several years have taught Americans an important lesson about warfare: your own strength matters far less than what you actually do with it.

UPDATE 4:39 PM: The Herald-Tribune has a good rundown of just how piss-poor the Norks' conventional forces really are.

The military in North Korea is by far the largest consumer of the country’s scarce resources. But even so, its combat jet pilots get only about two hours of flying time a month, its soldiers sometimes have to grow their own food, and much of its equipment is old and outclassed by that of its neighbors. According to South Korean and Western experts, if a conventional war breaks out on the Korean Peninsula, the best the North Korean military could manage would be to fight to a bloody stalemate.

It is the deep insecurity born of these shortcomings, the experts say, and not any desire to grab attention or gain leverage, that drove President Kim Jong-il’s decision to defy international warnings and declare this week that his country had tested a nuclear weapon.

Comments

I am sorry to my friends, sorry to my husband. I was too silly and too not care, I lost the account, lost the all cheap mesos.

Posted by: cheap mesos at August 13, 2008 11:37 PM


95 levels, to me this had been a friend of the people around, the new service first hand the hand of a person to manually 95, it is really difficult for my themselves, but I have been have a lot of iro zeny.

Posted by: iro zeny at August 13, 2008 11:34 PM


Leave for three years, I have quite repeatedly returned to the Rappelz game. I continue for good equipment to buy rupees. Three years of time I have played many games, but no a game can let me real input. By now I have found that the original is the lack of a person accompanying me.

Posted by: buy rupees at August 13, 2008 11:31 PM


I really cry powerless, you said you put together training, and earned a lot of rohan online crone, you will protect me. I was killed; I was bullied by other people. I think, no matter, after my husband will double back here again. You know you said that the phrase, how sad I am, my tears was disappointing down. That day I said I want to leave, you said nothing. You know how I think you can retain me. But you just said you send text messages to you over time. I really collapse, I left angry.

Posted by: rohan online crone at August 13, 2008 11:28 PM


So I know my paradise Nana, and some friends. Bu then, I added AQQI. And a variety of reasons, and the summer of cake, magic rabbit, blue shocks, such as several friends built a new council: Return of the King. And I recognized the beiertuo brotherhood. As the help of this friends and will help in growing, and this time sheikhs left the group B, the new president rose, lead us to defend the B group. We Society of Friends also actively participated in the mine warfare, winning glory for the family. Later, because a number of reasons I left the RF. And I took my all RF money send my friends.

Posted by: rf money at August 13, 2008 11:26 PM


Cheap metin2 gold can also be used at the appropriate time! 4-5 in class when the Timberwolves should be killed, but I think the Timberwolves seemed to brush less, like a fault, this time there's two ways upgrading, 1 Slowly killing small wolf, 2 for technical operation of fixing the wolf, snow wolf, I kill four wolves linked to the two 1-2 can kill, can not be lucky to see (experience not out) 4 killing snow wolf 1 Only 19 percent in the experience of fixing the wolf probably about 12 percent bar, did not remember. So you have to Buy metin2 gold timely added!

Posted by: metin2 gold at August 8, 2008 11:40 PM


Although you may use cheap Lord of the Rings Gold to solve! Sometimes you do not want to know the outcome. Because of how there may be a happy ending in so many terrible things, how could return to this world Former terrible shadow over the final, eventually will disappear.

Posted by: cheap Lord of the Rings Gold at August 8, 2008 11:22 PM


We bought a cheap NosTale gold, was very tense because! Shenmo two in our group, with the assistance of the rapid development of human civilization, a vast territory of the human world.


Posted by: NosTale gold at August 8, 2008 11:21 PM


Therefore, only buy cheap mabinogi! Towing tired body to the southeastern city of weapons stores, as a group and I are begging for the orphans within the Cheryl part-time to give them a little bit of money, clothing at me Broken Zeta not like the poor, she actually asked me to want to buy things that did not take enough money in the sense of not about to disappear the moment, I support what is the end of this damned two frontline whole body has only the feeling of prostration , The lights the streets of non-Resist I step forward, God guide me forward, the town church Kleist nuns, I also hope for the suffering of her people some relief subsistence fruit points.

Posted by: cheap mabinogi at August 8, 2008 11:20 PM


In fact, we take the risk on the island for what, mesos, what the plan is, is not happy? Of course, you can buy cheap mesos in my game, not blindly upgrading; if training wash your face as its own estimates BOSS can see a mirror.

Posted by: mesos at August 8, 2008 11:19 PM


We provide all wow goldservices. You can buy World Of Warcraft gold Cheap WOW Gold here ! Age of Conan gold(buy aoc gold)is on sale on wow7gold.com.We provide cheap aoc Goldaoc goldLord of The Rings Online goldLotro Goldbuy warhammer golddiablo3 goldgames gold

Posted by: World Of Warcraft gold at July 10, 2008 01:04 AM


nice to meet you

Posted by: wowpowerleveling at April 15, 2008 03:47 AM


nice to meet you

Posted by: cheap wow gold at April 14, 2008 02:01 AM


Colleen, thanks for the rant. Wonderful punctuation btw. Now, take another deep hit off that crack pipe you are smoking, and stop your off-topic whining.

Posted by: inarguable at December 28, 2006 10:59 AM


its crazy that bush said as long as he was president hes not sending our troops home
do you know how many troops died since the month of october 75 and counting its so wrong to have them killed and send more over so they too can get killed by a car side bomb its just not right

Posted by: colleen at October 24, 2006 11:03 AM


First of all The United States has never lost a Battleship. Except in peace time and while it was anchored in port! The Main [by acident!] And Pearl harbor {All those battleships save two later fought in the war and saved the lives of a lot of ground pounders.

The bad points about Battleships are the exspence of running them [over a million dollars a day!] The advantage would be in fire support and the ability to take punishment.

By replacing some five inch guns with the new 155's, new shells for the big 16" guns you can unload a tremendous amount of fire power up to 500 miles or beyond with the new sabo rounds and rocket boost and scram jet shells.

Today any ship that stands ten miles off shore and is blasting away and destroying very valuble targets on land is going to get return fire and with todays weapons is going to be hit!

All the strealth tec ever dreamed up is not going to prevent that. The diffrence is the DMX has one to two inches of aluminum for protection and world war two battleships have 16 to 18" of armour plate to protect the ship.

Perhaps the soultion is to have these ships maintained in a ready condtion. Use one ship to train four crews 3 months at a time. Red crew trains for three months then go back to their normal service. Blue crew takes their place, trains for three months then go back to their normal duties in the fleet and so forth. The other three ships don't sail don't burn fuel and have just enough crews to maintain them in port.

Then in an emergency the scathered crews are brought together man each battleship and sail into harms way.

another objection was that if one of these ship sink we can lose 1000 men. if a big flat top goes down we can lose 2 or three thousand!

But perhaps what you should do is not worry about 1000 sailors who might be lost. But the thousands of ground pounders those 4 old ladies can save!

Posted by: davids at October 14, 2006 12:41 PM


People here are thinking too small. An old army Sgt. told me he was stationed on the DMZ for a while way back in the day. The Norks poured across the border and killed some American soliders. We fought them back to their side, then the CO ordered nuclear rounds from howitzer's lobbed at them. So they were. Another nuclear exchange that you never knew about. They are just waiting to fire up those guns again.

Posted by: Fred at October 13, 2006 08:18 PM


Boy, the retards are out in force today. Must be field trip day.

The reasons we don't use old battleships are numerous. For one, they're expensive as all hell, not only to build, but to maintain, as well. Not to mention those things are too antiquated, and don't have the power systems to operate a modern radar system. You overestimate their durability as well. Battleships weren't invulnerable in WWII, and they aren't today either. The difference is, when a battleship sinks, you lose 1000+ sailors, instead of the hundred or so on a DDX. One mine is all it takes, and those things will sink like a stone.

Posted by: Brian at October 12, 2006 12:09 PM


Anyone want to explain why, more than 53 years after a cease fire was signed between North Korea and the U.S., there is still no peace treaty between the two? Or why the U.S. fails to answer the DPRK's calls for a peace treaty?

Enemies are good. They justify a whole bunch of stuff that you couldn't otherwise do ... what would a hot war in Asia accomplish, aside of course from further global destablization, more indirect economic attrition of American citizens, higher profits for military industrialists, etc.?

Posted by: Noah (the other one) at October 11, 2006 09:12 PM


The Navy Admirals/Defense Contractors strike again. Betting on the DDX Destroyers with their paper thin plating, 5 inch guns, slow speeed. I believe the cost of one round is $1,000,000 each. Their stealth capabilities are useless now since China, Austraila, France, etc. have bought the next generation of radar. These ships cannot be reloaded from the sea they have to go back to a base to be reloaded. In addition, the first ship will not be ready until 2010.

The Battleships not just two of them but all four of them need to be recommissioned. Yes, these ships are 60 years old but what about the B-52 Bombers. Aren't they over 50 years old? They are still in service and keep on getting upgraded. Why not the Battleships? The Battleships were designed to go toe to toe with the Japanese 18" guns and survive. During WWII, the Battleship USS Carolina (smaller battleship than the Iowa Class) took a torpedo hit from a Japanese sub. The Carolina was not damaged and continued the fight. This torpedo was load with 2,000 pounds of TNT, almost the same amount used on the USS Cole. The Cole almost sunk. Currently, there is nothing out their as far as the anti ship missles that would put a scratch in the Iowa Class Battleships. In 1968, the military already had tested rounds fired from the 16" guns that had a range of 100 miles. These ships are fast. They can do up to 35 knots. They can refuel other ships. They have the facilities to serve as a hospital. They have served as an additional air traffic controllers. These ships can hold a ton of supplies. They could sustain shore bombardment for a week/s where the DDX (approximately 20 DDXs would be needed to equal the firepower of one Battleship) and in two to three days would have to leave to get resupplied. The history of the ships prove how valuable they have been in the US war efforts. These ships can save many lives (There is no dollar amount that you can assign to a life)and aircrafts. Plus if there is bad weather, where are you going to get your air support if needed. It would take numerous flights (aircraft at appx $350 million each)to deliver the same amount of firepower from one shell from a Battleship.

Finally, please see the Commentary dated 6/18/06, the "Iranian Threat Defined" by William L. Stearman.

In August 2002, the Pentagon Joint Forces war game, Millennium Challenge 2002 (Persian Gulf Area), the Red(Iranian) Team headed by ace war gamer Lt. Gen. Paul Van Riper USMC (Ret.), launched a salvo of cruise missles, including Sunburns, from aircraft, small ships, and shore batteries which overwhelmed the Aegis cruiser defense and sank 16 Blue Team (US)ships including an aircraft carrier, Aegis cruisers, and six amphibious ships. (Gen. Van Riper's far to realistic scenario was disallowed and remains closely-held by the Pentagon).

Posted by: Bill Pojedinec at October 11, 2006 11:55 AM


A comment on the "lets use the old WWII Battleships " posting .
This battleships were magnificent and pretty much invincible -in the 1940s.As you say they could sail up and down the coast of the two Koreas and shell the hell out of something .And nothing could stop them -unless you count a nuclear device as a threat ? Hello! Massive ground or sea operations against a quirky nuclear power - no there is a plan with a few big IFs in it..
Rolf

Posted by: Rolf Larsen at October 11, 2006 05:17 AM


Don't forget the CG(X), which is now being touted as a missile defense cruiser, repurposed a year or two ago from previous missions to fit the latest hot threat and the Navy's success relative to the Air Force in missile defense program tests.

Posted by: ohwilleke at October 11, 2006 01:40 AM


The United States should not undertake any unilateral action against the North Koreans. Whatever we would do, the greatest pain which would be the consequence of such action would be borne by the South Koreans first, and by the Japanese second. We have so little at risk, compared to what is at stake for these two countries; but what we have at risk is not insignificant: about 30,000 servicemen and an equal number of American civilians in South Korea; and there are even more stationed in and around bases in Japan.

North Korea has been preparing for a confrontation with American and South Korean forces for decades. Everyone is free to speculate how the North would try to gain a quick military advantage against the US/ROK joint forces. But it is entirely feasible that the North could take 25-50 miles of South Korean territory, capturing or killing most of the U.S. military and civilians in and near Seoul. Given our small and exhausted military, the U.S. can't be sure of preventing this catastrophe from occurring without resort to immediate and first use of tactical nuclear weapons against the North on our part.

We have no options but to defer to the political wills of South Korea and Japan on this matter.

Posted by: AGBrina at October 10, 2006 11:03 PM


BT captured the two key reasons why an air power/naval bombardment campaign wouldn't work:

1) The Norks have hundreds of artillery pieces scattered just beyond the DMZ that could easily reach Seoul.

2) An attack on the Norks will spark an enormous humanitarian crisis within the DPRK, causing thousands of refugees to flood towards the Yalu and the DMZ.

Any attack on the DPRK will result in the leveling of Seoul by conventional muntions. It could be even worse if the Norks actually use their antiquate chemical weapons or manage to piece together a functioning nuke. Scale and unconventional weapons are the poor man's answer to a technological superior force armed with PGMs.

Furthermore, a large number of troops will be needed to stablize North Korean society and take out the remnants of the Kim regime. Even though the humantarian situation in the DPRK is more dire than it was in Iraq circa 2003, we shouldn't underestimate popular resistance to the U.S. and ROK.

The Kim regime has cultivated a nationalistic ideology (Juche) that emphasizes suspicion towards foreigners and the U.S. and South Koreans in particular.

My biggest concern is that the current debate over air power/naval bombardment doesn't consider the role of third parties. What if the People's Liberation Army crosses the border to stabilize the situation in the DPRK when the dust settles? They definitely have the manpower and the relatively good image to successfully occupy North Korea if it appears that the Dear Leader and his allies will crumble.

Although the Chinese wouldn't annex the DPRK outright, I wouldn't put it past them to install a puppet regime in Pyongyang. They would claim the north isn't ready to be integrated into a democratic, captialist society and needs to be managed by a revisionist Communist party. That would really muck things up, wouldn't it?

Posted by: Robot Economist at October 10, 2006 08:19 PM


So you want to shell the hell out of Korea! Tell you what to do. We have these real old ships with really big guns that shoot 3000 pound shells 25 miles. The same guns with a smaller sabo round can travel about 75 miles. Put a ram jet boost [they are all ready working on it] and you can put a shell weighing half a ton down a well at a range of 500 to 750 miles!

The ships are real old but built to last. They cost a lot to run but then again there a lot cheaper when a lucky shot with a 40 MM anticraft gun that knock's down a 2.5 billion dollar B-2. Pretty much anything the Norks have won't do much damage to one of these ancient dinasours. In fact any missile the cognac swelling toad's would send it's way would just bounce off!

They are over 60 years old, but with 18" of armour they can sail up and down the two costs of Korea performing the classic forn of battleship diplomacy.

Posted by: davids at October 10, 2006 07:39 PM


If it wasn't for the thousands of artillery pieces lobbing shells into Seoul at the first sign of an Allied attack, NK would have been history, and finally reunited with the South. We could destroy most targets by air. Unfortunately it would be the mother of all humanitarian and peacekeeping operations after the war, and we have proven clueless and impotent in that particular mission.

It is anyone looking forward to another 50 years of that nut job Kim in power? Why does the world tolerate this BS?

Posted by: BT at October 10, 2006 06:34 PM


Damn... great insightful write up. I read your posts everyday and this one really kept my attention from the first word to the last. Thanks...

Posted by: pacificdave at October 10, 2006 06:32 PM


Post a comment




Remember Me?


Please enter the code as seen in the image below to post your comment.