Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Afghan Update
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Around the Globe
Av Week Extra
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Body Armor Blues
Bomb Squad
Brownshoes in Action
Bubbleheads, etc.
Cammo Green
Catch the "Buzz"
Chem-Bio
Civilian Apps
Cloak and Dagger
Commandos
Comms
Contingency Ops
Cops and Robbers
Cyber-warfare
Data Diving
Defense Tech Poll
Dissent Tech
Door Kickers
Drones
DT Administrivia
Eat DT's Dust
Extra! Extra!
Eye on China
Fast Movers
FCS Watch
Fire for Effect
FOS Files
Friday Funnies
Gadgets and Gear
Going Green
Grand Ole Osprey
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
In the Weeds with Eric
Info War
Iraq Diary
Jarhead Jazz
JSF Watch
Just War Theories
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
M4 Monopoly
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Most Wanted
MRAP Edge
Net-Centric
Nukes
Old Skool
Our Shrinking Planet
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Polmar's Perspective
Popular Mechanics
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Robots
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Snipertech
Space
Special Ops
Star Wars
Strategery
Stray Trons
Tactical Development
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
The Defense Biz
The Peoples' Site
The Sunday Paper
The Tanker Tango
The View from Av Week
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
Trimble on the Case
Video Lounge
War Update
Ward'z Wonderz
You can run...

See all Archives
Newsletters

Edited by Christian Lowe | Contact

Better Bomb-Sniffers?

Terrorists and insurgents still love things that go boom. So it's no surprise that the Defense Department is looking for smarter, more accurate ways to detect explosives. Here are a few research contracts Darpa, the Pentagon's bleeding-edge science agency, recently handed out, to build better bomb-sniffers:

War_in_iraq_explosion.jpgEIC LABORATORIES, INC.
111 Downey Street
Norwood, MA 02062
Phone: (781) 769-9450
PI: Jane Bertone
Topic#: DARPA 06-022
Title: Explosives Detection in Residential Building Ventilation Systems

Abstract: One approach to locating illicit bomb factories in Iraq and Afghanistan is analytical monitoring within the ventilation systems of suspect residential buildings. We are proposing a multiple sensor analyzer that sequentially interrogates individual vents or ducts in such buildings and produces fingerprints characteristic of present target substances. The basic premise of this proposal is to locate sensor probes in key ducts or vents and connect them with fiber cabling to a spectral analyzer located in the attic or roof of the building. This setup would monitor a number of different locations within the building with emission of a wireless alarm report to a regional Tactical Operations Center from all online sensors every 10 to 15 minutes. We will achieve reproducible and selective detection of explosives using novel self-assembled structures that create an inherently uniform pattern, leading to rapid, reproducible manufacturing. The specific instrument we propose to analyze the sensors is a field portable spectrograph, with accompanying fiber optic probes, coupled to an accessory containing the sensing elements. Phase I work will focus on the demonstration of reproducible detection of airborne explosives using the sensors in the presence of potentially confusing interfering substances. The Phase II program will focus on quantifying the extent of fouling of the sensors due to long-term exposure to building air, developing a fieldable self-contained and powered instrument including multiplexed probes and wireless communication, and testing the sensors in mock ventilation systems.

LYNNTECH, INC.
7607 Eastmark Drive, Suite 102
College Station, TX 77840
Phone: (979) 693-0017
PI: Anjal Sharma
Topic#: DARPA 06-022
Title: Inexpensive TSP Based Reagentless Explosive Detector

Abstract: It has become imperative to counter the escalating threat of improvised explosive device attacks on our armed forces personnel deployed in foreign locations by seeking out and neutralizing local terrorist operated bomb making factories. Such factories are typically located in apartment buildings or other large dwellings, where the level of out-gassed explosive marker vapors is so small and buried within numerous confusers such as common chemicals that current detectors cannot be utilized to aid in their location. Therefore, Lynntech proposes to address this critical DOD need by fabricating three novel TSP based colorimetric sensor elements each selective for DNT, TNB and picrate, and incorporating these into an automated bench scale detector to demonstrate our capability to reagentlessly detect and quantify trace vapor phase explosives markers in the presence of common confusers such as household chemicals and matches. During Phase II, we will fabricate additional selective TSP sensor elements for other molecular explosives markers encompassing groups A through D and integrate these into a prototype compact inexpensive explosives detection device which may be placed in the HVAC system of apartment buildings. The device will be tested for reliable operation with low false positives, multiplex-ability and wireless control during Phase II.

MICROSTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
604 West Evergreen
Vancouver, WA 98660
Phone: (360) 694-3704
PI: Joseph Birmingham
Topic#: DARPA 06-022
Title: Low Cost Distributed Explosive Detection Device

Abstract: Automated vapor sampling detectors could potentially provide a detection capability for high vapor pressure explosives such as nitroglycerine (NG). However, for materials such as HMX and RDX, the equilibrium vapor pressures are at least four orders of magnitude lower than conventional trinitro-toluene (TNT) explosives, making detection based on sampling of airborne vapor difficult for all of the explosives without concentration. MicroStructure Technologies (MicroST) has undertaken a mission to develop small, compact, microstructured array detectors for explosive vapors (both nitrogen and peroxide-based materials). The upstream micropillars on the microstructured array have a high surface area and the vapors are adsorbed. The laser energy is coupled by fiber optic into the microarray to desorb a concentrated pulse of concentrated explosive vapor. A Microstructured Array Sampler (MAS) with an inorganic polymer coating as a sensing element to detect the concentrated vapors. The use of the inorganic polymers for explosive detection on an air-sampling microarray for confirmation is innovative. The key innovation of the proposed approach is to use a chip-based laser to selectively desorb a concentrated energetic sample onto sensing polymers coated onto a microarray. Lastly, the alarm signal from the microarray is sent wirelessly to reveal the type of explosive detected.

Comments

How hard is to make these bomb sniffers? I think we could mount them to robotic or RC vehicles and drive them in front of out military convoys so they would at least detect the new 100 lb explosive IED's that those insurgent bastards are using. This could help to save many troops and there is nothing that those crazy insurgents could do to redeploy them if we detect them first.

Posted by: Dave at October 5, 2007 08:41 AM


Interesting comments. No doubt DARPA has already considered these issues, yet decided to hand out development contracts to these entities. Perhaps they know something we don't?

Posted by: Ken at January 10, 2007 09:38 AM


So options 1 and 2 state placing these "sensors" either within the ventilation systems or the HVAC. It seems obvious that the people working for these companies have no idea about the environment in Iraq and Afghanistan. Most buildings don't have ventilation systems or HVAC. There lucky to have a fan or window AC. Also, the military isn't a bunch of super secret ninjas that can just creep up to a dwelling and install something without being seen. There are people everywhere, and somebody will see you and tell the bad guys as soon as you leave. Never mind that if you know where the bad guy’s house is, and that they're actually making bombs, just raid the damn place. You don't need "proof" of explosives before going in. That's what Intel is for. This isn't Law & Order...... no need for a warrant. These companies seriously need to do some research in the field, interview people who have "been there, done that", and hire someone who actually knows what the hell their doing. Right now they're just wasting the government's money on crap that won't protect soldiers from dying.

Posted by: Justathought at November 27, 2006 04:35 PM


Some one needs too come up with a container that is large enough for a tractor trailer too drive through. Then at check points in verious places have each car drive inside of it with the driver in the car. A device inside of the container wough seek out cars with bombs in them, and exsplode them on site. Then the container would clean itself out and, Another car would drive inside of it. No vehicle would pass without going through one of these containers. Just A Thought jop

Posted by: Jim Pelkey at November 24, 2006 12:30 AM


Posted by: Gspiggs at November 23, 2006 12:42 PM

the post by the above is the best way to go this would get the bombs ,roadside,vehicular and maybe the "factory too

Posted by: paul at November 23, 2006 10:57 PM


If most if not all road side bombs are set off with a cellular phone or a garage opener then why can't you arm the vehicles with something that would send a signal out a head that would either jam the signal or set the bomb off before the convoy gets close to the bomb. Like garage door openers you can get a list of channels they operate on and these codes or signals could be broad cast over and over to set off the bombs. Granted you might even blow up a few of the homes or builds that are being used to make the bombs. You could even fly over an area and broad cast these signals. you might open a few garage doors, but you will find a few bomb makers killed by their own divice.

Posted by: Gspiggs at November 23, 2006 12:42 PM


If you just want to find explosives on-site we have one low-tech system available at most Int'l airports...we know them as DOG! This system was downsized after 'Nam due to lack of foresight by congressmen, lack of demand by military unit leaders, canines age,etc.

Posted by: K9 at November 17, 2006 12:07 PM


Item #3 has some nice potential to be used on some remote control bomb detection devices. Espically if they can rapidly detect and can be used in house to house searches to "QUICKLY" detect traps.
Items #1  seem like a total waste of time for a combat environment. It assumes you know where the potential bomb factory is, have time to wire the entire building and then no one finding any of the monitoring devices, plus keep it under observation the entire time.

It seems it could serve a better use guarding fixed public installations like airports or office buildings. It could potentially give some key warnings if an explosive is smuggled in and hidden for later detonation.

Posted by: John at November 16, 2006 02:53 PM


I personally would invest in remote ground penetrating radar. If UAV's could detect buried explosives and bomb making factories I think the investment would be worth it, as long as it didnt cost as much as the OSPREY (A good example of spending too much money on something that shouldnt have cost that much in the first place)

Posted by: jtw at November 16, 2006 09:48 AM


Post a comment




Remember Me?


Please enter the code as seen in the image below to post your comment.