Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Afghan Update
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Around the Globe
Av Week Extra
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Body Armor Blues
Bomb Squad
Brownshoes in Action
Bubbleheads, etc.
Cammo Green
Chem-Bio
Civilian Apps
Cloak and Dagger
Commandos
Comms
Contingency Ops
Cops and Robbers
Cyber-warfare
Data Diving
Defense Tech Poll
Dissent Tech
Drones
DT Administrivia
Eat DT's Dust
Extra! Extra!
Eye on China
Fast Movers
FCS Watch
FOS Files
Friday Funnies
Gadgets and Gear
Going Green
Grand 'Ol Osprey
Grand Ole Osprey
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
In the Weeds with Eric
Info War
Iraq Diary
Jarhead Jazz
JSF Watch
Just War Theories
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Most Wanted
Net-Centric
Nukes
Old Skool
Our Shrinking Planet
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Polmar's Perspective
Popular Mechanics
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Robots
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Snipertech
Space
Special Ops
Star Wars
Strategery
Stray Trons
Tactical Development
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
The Defense Biz
The Peoples' Site
The Sunday Paper
The Tanker Tango
The View from Av Week
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
Trimble on the Case
War Update
Ward'z Wonderz
You can run...

See all Archives
Newsletters

Edited by Christian Lowe | Contact

"TIA" 2.0

The Office of the Director of National Intelligence is building a new terrorist profiling system, called Tangram. What's wrong with the old profiling systems, you might ask? Well, according to an unclassified document describing Tangram, they're not all that good at catching terrorists.

iaodarpa.jpgThe document, which is a description of the Tangram program for potential contractors, describes other, existing profiling and detection systems that haven't moved beyond so-called "guilt-by-association models," which link suspected terrorists to potential associates, but apparently don't tell analysts much about why those links are significant. Tangram wants to improve upon these methods, as well as investigate the effectiveness of other detection links such as "collective inferencing," which attempt to create suspicion scores of entire networks of people simultaneously.

Tangram's pedigree also is familiar. It is apparently the next generation of DARPA's Total Information Awareness system, which has been conducted in secret since Congress pulled public funding on the project in 2003. TIA programs form the foundation for Tangram, the document describing the system shows. (With one big difference: no privacy protections.)

Read the full story on Tangram in National Journal here.

-- Shane Harris

Comments

Oh, and I can't WAIT until the Bush Administration is finished with their field tests of these machines and roll them out for domestic use. This technology is disgusting.

Posted by: runescape gold at April 7, 2008 02:14 AM


Notice the Third eye and the Pyramid in the IAO logo ? Yep it's " Them " all part of the " secret " but yet not so secret behind the visable system we live under.

Posted by: Observer at October 31, 2006 08:47 PM


Concluding the sum of each person in America who travels, makes a purchase or uses a phone to a "terrorism coefficient"? Sounds like a real winner to me....

Privacy issues are important, but I think we should be more concerned with the intelligence community's obsession with statistics and sifting databases. Our efforts to idiot-proof the intelligence gathering and analysis process are slowly turning our intelligence agencies into idiots.

You can't find a needle in a haystack by merely adding more hay.

Posted by: Robot Economist at October 20, 2006 11:23 PM


"under current US law" doesn't really matter anymore - as of the last week or so, if you wish to press the issue of something's legality or Constitutionality, the President can declare you an enemy combatant because you're interfering with the War on Terror, and stash you someplace for a *long* time.

Posted by: Valdis Kletnieks at October 20, 2006 02:39 PM


Good Morning Folks,

An interesting idea but under current U.S. law it wouldn't be very effective, I'm afraid.

A better system of Airport Security would be to issue every passenger and their luggage an RFID, it would simply be printed on both the boarding pass and luggage check. Doing this would be simple enough at the check in counter. The printing of RFID's is no longer a big deal.

This tagging would allow the TSA to track every passenger and their bags while on the secure side of every airport that they would be in for their entire trip. If a passenger gets off their flight at the wrong airport red flags would go up the instant they left the secured area.

If the goal is to increase security while at the same time controling costs this may very well be the method of garding our airports. Any privacy issues are basicly a wash with other security measures already in place.

ALLONS,
Byron Skinner

Posted by: Byron Skinner at October 20, 2006 02:01 PM


Post a comment




Remember Me?


Please enter the code as seen in the image below to post your comment.