Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Afghan Update
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Around the Globe
Av Week Extra
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Body Armor Blues
Bomb Squad
Brownshoes in Action
Bubbleheads, etc.
Cammo Green
Catch the "Buzz"
Chem-Bio
Civilian Apps
Cloak and Dagger
Commandos
Comms
Contingency Ops
Cops and Robbers
Cyber-warfare
Data Diving
Defense Tech Poll
Dissent Tech
Drones
DT Administrivia
Eat DT's Dust
Extra! Extra!
Eye on China
Fast Movers
FCS Watch
Fire for Effect
FOS Files
Friday Funnies
Gadgets and Gear
Going Green
Grand 'Ol Osprey
Grand Ole Osprey
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
In the Weeds with Eric
Info War
Iraq Diary
Jarhead Jazz
JSF Watch
Just War Theories
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
M4 Monopoly
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Most Wanted
MRAP Edge
Net-Centric
Nukes
Old Skool
Our Shrinking Planet
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Polmar's Perspective
Popular Mechanics
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Robots
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Snipertech
Space
Special Ops
Star Wars
Strategery
Stray Trons
Tactical Development
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
The Defense Biz
The Peoples' Site
The Sunday Paper
The Tanker Tango
The View from Av Week
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
Trimble on the Case
Video Lounge
War Update
Ward'z Wonderz
You can run...

See all Archives
Newsletters

Edited by Christian Lowe | Contact

Lessons of the AK-47

Larry Kahaner is the author of the just-published AK-47: The Weapon That Changed the Face of War. This is his first post for Defense Tech.

In our quest for the latest and most sophisticated weaponry we sometimes tend to overlook a major success in low-tech arms. But there's a lot we can learn from them – especially the AK-47 assault rifle.

LCpl Cheema on the AK-47.JPGThe AK-47 is the world's most popular military weapon. At last count, there may be as many as 100 million of these uncomplicated but deadly rifles in use. That's one AK for every 60 people. It is used by about 50 legitimate armies as well as terrorists – Osama Bin Laden calls it the terrorist's most important weapon – insurgents, drug cartels, paramilitary groups and guerrillas.

The rifle, first produced in 1947 – hence the name AK-47 for Automatic Kalashnikov 1947 – has undergone very few changes since it was first produced by Soviet soldier Mikhail Kalashnikov. The furniture has been replaced with low weight plastics, and a few other mods here and there depending upon which of the 19 countries produced it, but it is essentially the same weapon it was 60 years ago.

What accounts for its success? Quite simply: it works. Despite its low price (as little as $10 and as much as $300) and often shoddy workmanship, this rifle rarely jams, is almost indestructible, and is easy to fire with no training. Overnight, it can transform paramilitary forces, thugs and street gangs into formidable armies.

It is not very accurate but can fire about 700 rounds per minute. Many western military experts consider it a piece of junk, but it's perfect for poorly-trained soldiers because they can 'spray and pray.' And indeed, it is a piece of junk compared to the M-16A2 now used in Iraq or the shorter barreled version M-4. These rifles are well built, accurate and engineered to close tolerances. They are technological things of beauty. The AK, on the other hand has loose tolerances, feels like it will shake apart (but doesn't) and won't make any friends at the marksmen club. These loose tolerances are the open secret to the AK's almost jam-free history. It's also why you can drag it through mud, leave it buried in the sand and take it out a year later, kick it with your boot, and it will fire like it was cleaned that morning. Again, because of its imprecision, the AK can fire poorly produced ammunition as well as ammo that has been sitting and deteriorating in the jungle or desert.

When the Defense Department offered M-16s to the Iraqi police and army, they refused. They wanted AKs which had to be bought from Jordan (the weapons actually were made in Germany). Indeed, like their brethren in Vietnam, many US soldiers are using AKs in Iraq despite official sanctions against the practice.

As the Pentagon planers ponder what's next for infantry firearms, they need to think in terms of simple instead of complex and practical instead of sophisticated. There's no reason why soldiers should be using M-4s that overheat or place condoms over their gun barrels to keep out the desert sands.

The solution has not come for lack of trying. From the late 1990s to the early 2000s, the Army was developing a new assault rifle known as the XM8 project an outgrowth of the Objective Individual Combat Weapon program, which was to produce a new type of battle rifle. The main goal of the XM8 program was to find a replacement for the M-16 and M4.

However, by late 2005, the XM8 was scrapped partially because of politics; Congress was reluctant to spend billions to outfit soldiers with new rifles while the Iraq war was draining the treasury.

The real problem may be that as the program progressed, military planners kept adding bells and whistles to the rifle system -- even including an electronic bullet counter -- and it became too complex, heavy and unwieldy. Designers would have done better to simply aim for a new infantry rifle that works as well as the AK-47 and be just as simple.

The AK may not be the best rifle for the US but designers can learn from Kalashnikov's experience in building the AK-47. He often found himself guided by the words of arms designer Georgy Shpagin, who developed the successful PPSh41 submachine gun: "Complexity is easy; simplicity is difficult."

-- Larry Kahaner

Comments

I had only a little lunia gold and the remedy was not enough, but I still to add the blood to our cavalier which were battling, we saw the enemy became more and more fearfulness, at last my best friend dead. At this time I needed the more lunia war gold to buy blood to save my best friend. I couldn’t go to save my friend, because the enemy was coming and carrying off his lunia online gold.

Posted by: lunia gold at August 6, 2008 02:11 AM


I could remembered that when I first to the commercial city to buy cabal online alz clearly, I was so stupid, I could not entered the commercial city succeed and it always appearance mistake, so I bought the cabal alz instead.

Posted by: cabal online alz at August 6, 2008 02:08 AM


But I know it was a good game in people's mind. I could remember the thing which I asked the other role sold the cheap last chaos gold to me to buy last chaos gold. And then I play lots of different role, when I saw the beautiful role, I was very happy. I like the feeling that everybody wear own beautiful cloth. One time I saw a girl, wearing a white skirt.

Posted by: cheap last chaos gold at August 6, 2008 02:00 AM


runescape money runescape gold runescape gold runescape money buy runescape gold buy runescape money runescape money runescape gold wow power leveling wow powerleveling Warcraft Power Leveling Warcraft PowerLeveling buy runescape gold buy runescape money runescape itemsrunescape accounts runescape gp dofus kamas buy dofus kamas Guild Wars Gold buy Guild Wars Gold lotro gold buy lotro gold lotro gold buy lotro gold lotro gold buy lotro gold runescape money runescape power leveling runescape money runescape gold dofus kamas cheap runescape money cheap runescape gold Hellgate Palladium Hellgate London Palladium Hellgate money Tabula Rasa gold tabula rasa money Tabula Rasa Credit Tabula Rasa Credits Hellgate gold Hellgate London gold wow power leveling wow powerleveling Warcraft PowerLeveling Warcraft Power Leveling World of Warcraft PowerLeveling World of Warcraft Power Leveling runescape power leveling runescape powerleveling eve isk eve online isk eve isk eve online isk tibia gold Fiesta Silver Fiesta Gold


runescape money runescape gold wow power leveling


棕榈树
VI设计
画册设计
血管瘤
肝血管瘤
音乐剧
福卡
防静电地板
美国留学
留学美国
电阻器
不锈钢电阻器
频敏电阻器

睡眠呼吸机
伟康呼吸机
呼吸机
无创呼吸机
家用呼吸机
呼吸机的使用

北京消化系统疾病
北京心脑血管疾病
北京肾病
北京中医儿科
北京针灸减肥
针灸减肥
北京糖尿病
北京疼痛病
北京类风湿
北京人文大学

Posted by: runescape gold at April 15, 2008 01:05 AM


Well having read all the comments I thought I'd throw my two cents worth in.
I've owned both rifles as well as the Springfield M1A1. If things turned to crap and I had a choice of rifles to rely on for protection of myself and family I would choose my AK47. Why? It's not going to break, stop working or need cleaning every 100 or less rounds. Accuracy is adequate for normal protection needs and the 7.62x39 round has very good penetration unlike my AR15 in M4 configuration. I love my AR15's and more often than not if I'm going out plinking I'll take it along and use the Aimpoint optics. My second choice would actually be my Springfield M1A1. Simple? No it's not but it's pretty darn reliable and will certainly reach out and touch someone. It's also very accurate. That's also why the military has taken them out of mothballs yet again for use in Iraq and Afghanistan. Google designated marksman and see what they are shooting most often.
For me at least in a real world situation I have to put my AR15's in third place with the AK first then the M1A1 in second place.

Posted by: Phil White at March 22, 2008 03:20 PM


bekos hycajody gekma
koxu http://wi778876.tbnwmrk.net/sitemap11.html [url=http://wi778876.tbnwmrk.net/sitemap11.html ]lida[/url] wypur

Posted by: wi778876 at February 27, 2008 09:37 AM


lebos keficocy gikma
pipu http://du397188.gz4ffgi.net/sitemap4.html [url=http://du397188.gz4ffgi.net/sitemap4.html ]pufi[/url] senar

Posted by: du397188 at February 26, 2008 06:20 PM


syzos bukawolo gokma
modi http://se389286.gkjhedu.net/sitemap1.html [url=http://se389286.gkjhedu.net/sitemap1.html ]type[/url] hytod

Posted by: se389286 at February 15, 2008 02:26 PM


gexos cixosaxy gakma
kadi http://we809716.jfmfsma.net/sitemap21.html [url=http://we809716.jfmfsma.net/sitemap21.html ]juca[/url] sevaz

Posted by: we809716 at February 14, 2008 11:00 PM


rotos nyhacira gukma
maho http://xu299643.sghzpww.net/sitemap11.html [url=http://xu299643.sghzpww.net/sitemap11.html ]juja[/url] semul

Posted by: xu299643 at February 13, 2008 10:51 PM


xegos girexume gukma
jasy http://mu768229.sghzpww.net/sitemap13.html [url=http://mu768229.sghzpww.net/sitemap13.html ]kyka[/url] dazyr

Posted by: mu768229 at February 13, 2008 05:41 PM


jokos sexemibu gokma
kaxa http://ba776862.jpwx6io.net/sitemap19.html [url=http://ba776862.jpwx6io.net/sitemap19.html ]mowo[/url] kywis

Posted by: ba776862 at February 12, 2008 02:58 AM


pevos rufubuxi gokma
lida http://li452995.sghzpww.net/sitemap18.html [url=http://li452995.sghzpww.net/sitemap18.html ]viro[/url] xohub

Posted by: li452995 at February 11, 2008 09:55 PM


lokos wyjyvazo gukma
covy http://py424741.ydsolof.net/sitemap1.html [url=http://py424741.ydsolof.net/sitemap1.html ]mesi[/url] peheg

Posted by: py424741 at February 5, 2008 06:53 AM


rabos pijupawu gukma
rotu http://fu890984.ydsolof.net/sitemap13.html [url=http://fu890984.ydsolof.net/sitemap13.html ]muci[/url] ridid

Posted by: fu890984 at February 5, 2008 01:43 AM


pumos pecazure gokma
wixi http://mu3723.gb4pgs4.net/sitemap5.html [url=http://mu3723.gb4pgs4.net/sitemap5.html ]xipi[/url] zucez

Posted by: mu3723 at February 1, 2008 06:39 AM


supos tylujiba gikma
pyxu http://zy198473.je8h3jp.net/sitemap8.html [url=http://zy198473.je8h3jp.net/sitemap8.html ]pahi[/url] gohig

Posted by: zy198473 at January 29, 2008 03:34 PM


cejos panatiky gokma
heli http://bo236172.npmt0lw.net/sitemap10.html [url=http://bo236172.npmt0lw.net/sitemap10.html ]keze[/url] cicuf

Posted by: bo236172 at January 28, 2008 02:57 PM


fudos busiruxe gekma
suxo http://xi411620.npmt0lw.net/sitemap11.html [url=http://xi411620.npmt0lw.net/sitemap11.html ]rypa[/url] dicus

Posted by: xi411620 at January 28, 2008 09:23 AM


hygos wucokyfo gokma
pebo http://du416360.xk9jhp5.net/sitemap3.html [url=http://du416360.xk9jhp5.net/sitemap3.html ]fepe[/url] melob

Posted by: du416360 at January 26, 2008 05:18 PM


nowos xuzurisi gekma
mofo http://bo210981.yd4o3ek.net/sitemap10.html [url=http://bo210981.yd4o3ek.net/sitemap10.html ]xulo[/url] cirem

Posted by: bo210981 at January 25, 2008 09:38 PM


zogos rafoseko gakma
vymu http://by705934.shucqyf.in/sitemap1.html [url=http://by705934.shucqyf.in/sitemap1.html ]woto[/url] gyrix

Posted by: by705934 at January 24, 2008 02:11 AM


sodos wenatepo gokma
vyde http://by77981.hvmjhoy.net/sitemap8.html [url=http://by77981.hvmjhoy.net/sitemap8.html ]mozu[/url] pinyh

Posted by: by77981 at January 23, 2008 09:39 AM


myros xacesibu gykma
xese http://ko474282.hvmjhoy.net/sitemap18.html [url=http://ko474282.hvmjhoy.net/sitemap18.html ]guda[/url] zaxeg

Posted by: ko474282 at January 23, 2008 04:08 AM


ratos fynefypu gakma
riki http://va877795.mc0ltil.net/sitemap25.html [url=http://va877795.mc0ltil.net/sitemap25.html ]xemy[/url] zidep

Posted by: va877795 at January 20, 2008 06:10 PM


janos cizicolu gekma
bymu http://lo460252.bu4egr9.in/sitemap8.html [url=http://lo460252.bu4egr9.in/sitemap8.html ]luti[/url] nicer

Posted by: lo460252 at January 20, 2008 01:49 AM


sefos rilapuvy gukma
tici http://go434608.bu4egr9.in/sitemap4.html [url=http://go434608.bu4egr9.in/sitemap4.html ]taxo[/url] mimeb

Posted by: go434608 at January 19, 2008 05:03 PM


navos xohujyni gakma
poha http://ra708750.acsxwye.in/sitemap15.html [url=http://ra708750.acsxwye.in/sitemap15.html ]guna[/url] homal

Posted by: ra708750 at January 18, 2008 06:16 PM


xixos napamoki gokma
dyjy http://jo599499.behplbb.net/sitemap23.html [url=http://jo599499.behplbb.net/sitemap23.html ]cage[/url] kanon

Posted by: jo599499 at January 18, 2008 05:43 AM


hilos kaxevyfu gokma
jeki http://mo441304.qkdz3ii.info/sitemap5.html [url=http://mo441304.qkdz3ii.info/sitemap5.html ]mibo[/url] venad

Posted by: mo441304 at January 15, 2008 05:27 PM


lewos gygopumy gikma
noke http://fi878597.nlqtow4.info/sitemap23.html [url=http://fi878597.nlqtow4.info/sitemap23.html ]koxa[/url] gohes

Posted by: fi878597 at January 15, 2008 01:05 AM


homos wulomyci gukma
wyji http://za181851.mc4nri6.info/sitemap15.html [url=http://za181851.mc4nri6.info/sitemap15.html ]mewu[/url] bulyr

Posted by: za181851 at January 14, 2008 04:08 PM


temos lymowene gikma
rano http://vi428216.xijfvv0.info/sitemap16.html [url=http://vi428216.xijfvv0.info/sitemap16.html ]caxy[/url] jyfik

Posted by: vi428216 at January 13, 2008 09:15 PM


bilos matigyna gukma
dyzu http://xa885042.sstszql.info/sitemap25.html [url=http://xa885042.sstszql.info/sitemap25.html ]gezu[/url] comaz

Posted by: xa885042 at January 13, 2008 05:16 AM


pinos zosydygi gukma
movi http://gi709629.gixhym3.info/sitemap10.html [url=http://gi709629.gixhym3.info/sitemap10.html ]mowy[/url] zivow

Posted by: gi709629 at January 11, 2008 07:54 AM


rupos jofypacu gykma
siwy http://se263830.ydpulo5.info/sitemap6.html [url=http://se263830.ydpulo5.info/sitemap6.html ]cary[/url] vonep

Posted by: se263830 at January 10, 2008 10:44 PM


jefos lidigyce gykma
vira http://zu105617.sqyllds.info/sitemap7.html [url=http://zu105617.sqyllds.info/sitemap7.html ]ruvu[/url] genef

Posted by: zu105617 at January 10, 2008 03:00 AM


kugos xipezogo gakma
mazu http://fa620601.lpleap0.info/sitemap15.html [url=http://fa620601.lpleap0.info/sitemap15.html ]tegu[/url] nowel

Posted by: fa620601 at January 6, 2008 05:44 AM


rabos tosefefo gykma
nate http://bi931028.lpleap0.info/sitemap13.html [url=http://bi931028.lpleap0.info/sitemap13.html ]bazo[/url] gejef

Posted by: bi931028 at January 5, 2008 12:29 AM


wucos myzyvazi gakma
ruke http://by473155.lpyg2u9.info/sitemap25.html [url=http://by473155.lpyg2u9.info/sitemap25.html ]wopu[/url] nopat

Posted by: by473155 at January 2, 2008 09:50 PM


jafos fogutuvo gekma
wyxo http://pu784493.ocgwoc0.info/sitemap21.html [url=http://pu784493.ocgwoc0.info/sitemap21.html ]woba[/url] wetej

Posted by: pu784493 at January 2, 2008 02:01 PM


towos gazocumi gakma
sudo http://jy478970.rfwoedc.info/sitemap20.html [url=http://jy478970.rfwoedc.info/sitemap20.html ]wuxu[/url] giken

Posted by: jy478970 at January 1, 2008 04:40 AM


tukos radosusa gakma
duni http://se601850.ocgwoc0.info/sitemap2.html [url=http://se601850.ocgwoc0.info/sitemap2.html ]jyha[/url] nujov

Posted by: se601850 at January 1, 2008 04:39 AM


puvos wudesomu gukma
xiru http://ro753980.lpyg2u9.info/sitemap12.html [url=http://ro753980.lpyg2u9.info/sitemap12.html ]sobe[/url] vabez

Posted by: ro753980 at December 31, 2007 05:29 PM


bifos lujahupu gekma
zavu http://we379530.gnjw9jb.info/sitemap25.html [url=http://we379530.gnjw9jb.info/sitemap25.html ]vyce[/url] hiwyp

Posted by: we379530 at December 31, 2007 05:28 PM


subos tavydihi gekma
bylu http://le152952.laupyez.info/sitemap9.html [url=http://le152952.laupyez.info/sitemap9.html ]luzi[/url] xoloj

Posted by: le152952 at December 29, 2007 08:14 PM


howos joganoju gykma
cywe http://ni602202.pdnikp3.info/sitemap1.html [url=http://ni602202.pdnikp3.info/sitemap1.html ]mynu[/url] seket

Posted by: ni602202 at December 29, 2007 12:43 PM


kebos vocutonu gikma
riti http://ce160521.axvhijx.info/sitemap15.html [url=http://ce160521.axvhijx.info/sitemap15.html ]riwa[/url] benil

Posted by: ce160521 at December 29, 2007 05:10 AM


kuxos vupydyzu gokma
tabu http://se990555.gpffbsi.info/sitemap2.html [url=http://se990555.gpffbsi.info/sitemap2.html ]cize[/url] limig

Posted by: se990555 at December 27, 2007 04:33 PM


pudos kyfotyzo gekma
cefi http://we731112.gpffbsi.info/sitemap2.html [url=http://we731112.gpffbsi.info/sitemap2.html ]vosi[/url] debez

Posted by: we731112 at December 26, 2007 10:26 AM


buxos kufalosa gakma
sevy http://ba320541.hodm5dq.com/sitemap13.html [url=http://ba320541.hodm5dq.com/sitemap13.html ]fefa[/url] sysus

Posted by: ba320541 at December 23, 2007 08:40 AM


rakos javetoby gukma
jiwu http://mu204895.zz3fxtn.com/sitemap9.html [url=http://mu204895.zz3fxtn.com/sitemap9.html ]vuta[/url] petev

Posted by: mu204895 at December 23, 2007 08:39 AM


xivos bovicyto gekma
dyku http://da65412.toxz1oa.com/sitemap18.html [url=http://da65412.toxz1oa.com/sitemap18.html ]gily[/url] matod

Posted by: da65412 at December 23, 2007 04:26 AM


cebos bodikexy gikma
veca http://gy392883.mietvtd.com/sitemap10.html [url=http://gy392883.mietvtd.com/sitemap10.html ]navy[/url] panil

Posted by: gy392883 at December 23, 2007 04:25 AM


hagos zigaleda gykma
kaky http://gi312411.mietvtd.com/sitemap16.html [url=http://gi312411.mietvtd.com/sitemap16.html ]bera[/url] wonug

Posted by: gi312411 at December 23, 2007 12:18 AM


tiwos balaroda gukma
byfe http://xa507278.mietvtd.com/sitemap12.html [url=http://xa507278.mietvtd.com/sitemap12.html ]gode[/url] kycal

Posted by: xa507278 at December 23, 2007 12:17 AM


tomos syfezyji gekma
zupe http://cy183501.toxz1oa.com/sitemap7.html [url=http://cy183501.toxz1oa.com/sitemap7.html ]fywa[/url] lagog

Posted by: cy183501 at December 22, 2007 08:08 PM


sobos fulohytu gykma
tofy http://ze664587.zz3fxtn.com/sitemap14.html [url=http://ze664587.zz3fxtn.com/sitemap14.html ]weca[/url] dukis

Posted by: ze664587 at December 22, 2007 08:07 PM


jalos coladihu gokma
tone http://vi842690.mietvtd.com/sitemap24.html [url=http://vi842690.mietvtd.com/sitemap24.html ]nele[/url] nifik

Posted by: vi842690 at December 22, 2007 03:58 PM


vusos vikesuvu gokma
kaly http://be562263.hodm5dq.com/sitemap18.html [url=http://be562263.hodm5dq.com/sitemap18.html ]juja[/url] mufuf

Posted by: be562263 at December 22, 2007 03:57 PM


xajos lyletypy gikma
zigo http://su74178.iu3exmm.com/sitemap16.html [url=http://su74178.iu3exmm.com/sitemap16.html ]giwo[/url] zurep

Posted by: su74178 at December 22, 2007 11:45 AM


zaxos paxuteze gikma
wybe http://fu666085.hodm5dq.com/sitemap17.html [url=http://fu666085.hodm5dq.com/sitemap17.html ]kuka[/url] niwod

Posted by: fu666085 at December 22, 2007 11:44 AM


calos kibihyja gokma
gubi http://fe224891.uvvfjo8.com/sitemap1.html [url=http://fe224891.uvvfjo8.com/sitemap1.html ]dato[/url] rylod

Posted by: fe224891 at December 22, 2007 07:35 AM


delos josuholo gykma
migy http://mi895050.hodm5dq.com/sitemap5.html [url=http://mi895050.hodm5dq.com/sitemap5.html ]gega[/url] zinem

Posted by: mi895050 at December 22, 2007 07:34 AM


junos rimovyja gikma
hola http://sy859757.iu3exmm.com/sitemap10.html [url=http://sy859757.iu3exmm.com/sitemap10.html ]nubu[/url] xahog

Posted by: sy859757 at December 22, 2007 03:37 AM


dehos riporygu gikma
gigo http://ho110248.zz3fxtn.com/sitemap25.html [url=http://ho110248.zz3fxtn.com/sitemap25.html ]lyza[/url] rudeg

Posted by: ho110248 at December 22, 2007 03:36 AM


hydos tipitapy gukma
wiky http://hi659853.jyzywhq.com/sitemap25.html [url=http://hi659853.jyzywhq.com/sitemap25.html ]vudy[/url] lylac

Posted by: hi659853 at December 21, 2007 11:47 PM


cygos nyzoboxa gakma
subo http://ny217869.iu3exmm.com/sitemap26.html [url=http://ny217869.iu3exmm.com/sitemap26.html ]hopy[/url] tesyw

Posted by: ny217869 at December 21, 2007 11:46 PM


jowos veniwoso gukma
noce http://go177129.cidsxbe.com/sitemap2.html [url=http://go177129.cidsxbe.com/sitemap2.html ]nesy[/url] gagan

Posted by: go177129 at December 21, 2007 07:55 PM


vilos hylokuno gukma
roxo http://pe704730.cidsxbe.com/sitemap20.html [url=http://pe704730.cidsxbe.com/sitemap20.html ]moco[/url] nukit

Posted by: pe704730 at December 21, 2007 07:54 PM


dudos boxihata gekma
fawi http://vo975953.fiqyhgv.com/sitemap25.html [url=http://vo975953.fiqyhgv.com/sitemap25.html ]ledo[/url] vozyg

Posted by: vo975953 at December 21, 2007 06:19 AM


wujos femumyxi gykma
bygo http://cy929780.qizfwxm.com/sitemap21.html [url=http://cy929780.qizfwxm.com/sitemap21.html ]femi[/url] hesev

Posted by: cy929780 at December 21, 2007 12:18 AM


celos zasykawe gokma
heto http://va85351.bmna7ox.com/sitemap13.html [url=http://va85351.bmna7ox.com/sitemap13.html ]suce[/url] gifam

Posted by: va85351 at December 20, 2007 08:02 PM


i read a remark about the mini 30 and i have to agree. i also own a mini 30 and have oiwned and fired the AK 47. the mini 30 is a much superior weapon. furthermore, the mini 30 has gotten a bad rap ion the past by the AR freaks out there with stories of 10 inch groups at 50 yards,etc..i can tell you thats pure and udder bull. my mini 30 is a tack driver, and like the AK eats everything stuck down its throat without a hiccup. very easly converted to full automatic. a mini 30 could be retrofit with full auto parts (including a switch) for about $5.00 if that.only drawback about the mini 30 is the groups do wander when the barrel gets hot, so that might be an issue, but again something easly fixed.

one thing i would like to mention about the 223 though. it does get knocked by some as a souped up 22, but believe me, the 223 does virtually more damage than the 308. plus, when your hit with a 223, there aint no bullet to pick out as it explodes creating multiple wound channels. devistating round

Posted by: miniman at December 9, 2007 08:01 AM


ear Oldominion
if you respond to my comment maybe you miss understood me i meant that the AK47 is better than the M16 in street fighting because it is slower in auto firing you could have enough times to shoot when you cross a wide road or covering your friend when his preparing to shoot an RPG7.the m16 it is very fast you could have an empty magazine while you didn't cross the street yet.
when i wrote it give to much noise i meant it have a good psychological effect on enemies.but i prefer M16 in mountain or prairie because it have very good impact due to high velocity of it is 5.56 amo.

Posted by: lebanese tiger at October 5, 2007 07:17 PM


Think this report is totally wrong! The AK is alot more accuate than people give it credit for. I would rather go to war with an ak than a 16 due the jamming and tlc you have to give it.

Posted by: OldDominion at October 2, 2007 10:53 PM


i m lebanese
i sow to many fights since 1975 during the civil war the ak 47 was the best in close combat between building . example if you need to cover your friend in his attempt to shoot rpg whith m16 the 30 rounds get finish quiqly and your friend is in the middel of the street taking bullets from enemies ,the ak 47 is slower in auto firing
and give to much noise to scare the enemies located in less then 200meters away. in combat between building the m16 it is not good as ak47 especially in citys
lebanese tiger

Posted by: h jony at October 1, 2007 06:42 PM


Personally, i don't care for either the kalashnikov or the M16. The M16 has better long range performance,(that i like), but it's killing effect after the round has decreased below 2700 fps. leaves to be desired. It is fairly accurate though, i admit. The AK is even less appealing to me. The 7.62 Soviet's wounding capabilities are exaggerated at best, this combined with the AK's inaccuracy in full-auto makes it a very short range weapon. It is extremely reliable however.

M16 Range-600 yrds.
Ammunition-5.56x45mm NATO

Kalashnikov AK-47 Range-350 yrds.
Ammunition- 7.62x39mm Soviet

Posted by: fmJK-47 at September 21, 2007 04:07 PM


Don't forget that the AK's durability and simplicity eventually blew back on the Russians. In building the perfect weapon for Third World armies and insurgents, they effectively armed the Chinese, mujahedin and Chechens. The excellence of your weaponry can come back to haunt you.

As to the XM8, IIRC, it had a problem with the plastic receiver melting in full auto fire. Maybe not a good idea, for general issue to your own troops. Maybe not a bad idea for arming proxies.

Posted by: Demophilus at May 10, 2007 08:45 PM


Served four years active duty. Had three M-16's, one in basic, and one each from two different permanent assignments. Each M-16 was a jam-o-matic. Sergeants said I didn't clean my rifle enough. Maybe so, but each M-16 still jammed. If it was dirty (i.e., had fired more than 50 to 100 rounds), it jammed.

As a civilian, I now own an AK-47. Never jams. Use Wolf ammo and still, it never jams. Just doesn't fail.

The question in my mind is why our military insists on defending the flawed M-16 design while berating our soldiers for not keeping their weapons clean? The M-16 is the only U.S. firearm I have ever heard of in which soldiers will frequently discard for something else they pick up off the ground after a battle.

Posted by: W. Mason at May 9, 2007 03:41 PM


My first thought before I read the other comments, but after I read the initial article on the M16 versus the AK47 was pretty close to the first comment posted on here. Use the mini-30 with some minor modifications such as a synthetic stock. The old philosophy of wound one Soldier and take three out of the fight, due to it taking two Soldiers to carry off a wounded one doesn't work in our present theater. The 7.62X39 is a much better kill round, which is what we need. I haven't had to shoot a man yet, but I've tried out a great many differant calibers on white tailed deer, and from that I can tell you that I've shot a white tail a dozen times with a CAR 15, basically the civilian version of the M4 in semi-auto, and shot white tail with the mini 30, once with much better effects. There is of course another option. I believe I saw, years ago, a version of the HBAR in 7.62X39 as well. I have little doubt that the 7.62X39 round is the way to go, and I do know that the mini 30 is an excellent weapon. My opinion is that we definately need to change over to the 7.62X39 and test it in a variety of rifles. I'm fairly certain the mini 30 with minor modifications would fair the best, but I also believe that Soldiers need to train on more than one weapon, and have the right tool for the job. When going out on patrol bring the mini 30. When working a checkpoint a shotgun with support from a much larger crew serve weapon would be best, and in urban warfare a mixture of differant weapons, since situations vary greatly, would be ideal, but as far as the M-16 and the M-9 the beliefs on which they were introduced simply don't work on today's battlefield.

Posted by: SSG Clark at April 20, 2007 10:34 PM


IMO the ruger mini 30, is the happy medium between the loose Ak and the precise m16.

The 7.62x39 round is a very clean firing round. I believe this is another aid to the AK.
The mini 30 uses simple assembly like the AK, but is much tighter and more accurate.

It has a wood stock, which could be replaced with modern lighter man made products, and needs a flash suppressor.
My brother has an AK, and I the Mini 30. This is how I can compare them.
I think we have the technology to make a rifle worthy of the stressers of war, without spending
billions to remake the wheel.
The more complicated a weapon, the more it will way, or the more thought it will take to operate it. The Ak is lock, load and fire.
Anything more may get the soldier killed.

How about just modifying what is out there rather then trying to design something from scratch.

Posted by: William Cramer at January 10, 2007 11:00 AM


I think that the main battle weapon should not be set. It should be flexible, based on location and characteristics of the enemy. For example, over in Iraq the soldiers should be able to use any and every AK they can get their hands on. If they need more, buy some new AK-104's, outfit each unit, and carry on. At the end of the day, when all is said and done, sell off excess weapons; either back to the occupied country government, gun dealers, or the U.S. to licensed individuals/dealers.

When a new situation arises (oh, it will) just adapt to the environment.

Posted by: Tony at December 26, 2006 09:53 PM


Bring back the M14. Great Desert weapon. Very hard to jam and a good reach out and touch range. It is a little heavier than the AK but with modifications the weight can be reduced.

Posted by: Dan at December 9, 2006 03:20 PM


As I understand it, the AK-47 reflects the overall weapons design philosophy of the USSR/Russian Federation: KISS (Keep It Simple, Stupid). The T-34 also was a simple design, uncomplicated, yet reliable and easy to produce and repair. The Red Army saw the Wehrmacht's sophisticated (for the time) tanks break down and turn into expensive, useless monuments to over-design and over-engineering. Although this design philosophy goes hand-in-hand with a mass conscript army such as the Red Army, I wonder if it will continue as Russia goes to a professional army.

As for the ability of the AK-47 to function in adverse environments, this is just where the US will fight for the foreseeable future. The deserts of Iraq, Afghanistan, (and Iran?), the jungles of Southeast Asia, are dusty, dirty, wet, humid, and overall rough. Why send US forces to fight there without a weapon that will stand up to the local environment?

It seems telling that more than a few US forces in Iraq have dropped their M-16s in favor of the AK-47, just as they did in Vietnam. Friends of mine who fought in Vietnam tell me the AK-47 was superior weapon for one simple reason: it was there when you needed it.

Posted by: Nick at November 27, 2006 01:50 PM


The M4/M203 kit (collectively called and funded as "SOPMOD" for Special Operation MODification) is one of the more versitile individual-served weapon systems on the planet. The Russians have an analog of it for the AK series, and it's equally impressive. In fact, a couple facets of their array are superior.

The biggest thing wrong with SOPMOD is that it doesn't address the shortcomings of the M4 being a "cut-down" version of the M16. When designers wanted a shorter, easier-to-handle carbine version of the 16, they simpler shortened it. This included shortening the gas tube, resulting in imperfect timing, shorter time to tube failure, higher rates of bolt and bolt carrier failure, higher erosion rate at the gas tube inlet, and a host of other problems. A few MILSPEC being replaced w/ commercial parts (tested by engineers at NAVSEA, Crane) resulted in some improvements in reliability, but the root problem was never resolved fully.

The "accessories kit" aspect of SOPMOD is unsurpassed in the US inventory, and the folks at Picatenny are slowly catching on that the there is no single end-all, do-all rifle / sight/ cleaning kit solution.

Where the US grunts have there biggest advantage, however, is certainly not with their hot-rod 22 rounds, but with the "visual augmentation" gear (NVG's, Holosights, red dot sights, rugged and conventional dayscopes, etc.) and reliable means of mounting these items. That is what SOPMOD is all about. Although I haven't been a part of SOPMOD for a couple years now, I still believe it is money well spent -- and there are very few DoD programs that make me feel that way. OICW will likely result in an unweildy, unreliable, WAY-over-budget, WAY-too-complicated POS that no one will want to carry. Now you know why I no longer work for the DoD...

My personal weapon of choice for CQB is the M1A1 Carbine. I only wish it could accept all the accessories of the SOPMOD Kit.

Posted by: Oz at November 18, 2006 01:08 PM


I THOUGHT THE X-8 WAS DEAD. POSTINGS SAID IT COST TOO MUCH, DIDN'T OFFER ANYTHING EXTRA, THAT THE M-4 WAS SUPERIOR COZ OF THE EXTRAS YOU CAN ADD. SAME WITH THE M-16A2. I READ THERE IS NOW AN M-16A3, FULL AUTO, AND BETTER THAN X-8, AND THE AK. SO, WAT IS TRUE? SOMEONE FIND IT AND POST IT. EVERYONE IS AN EXPERT, SO FIND THE TRUTH, AND SHUT THEM UP. IS THERE A FULLY AUTO M-16A3?

Posted by: RHYNO at November 16, 2006 12:33 PM


fFnd the people that designed the Bell and Howell filmo movie cameras and put them together with the Ak-47 people. You'll have a durable and accurate weapon.

Posted by: kelly tippett at November 6, 2006 01:29 AM


The AK is a work of art. Allways goes bang, allways nails the target, allways does the job. Every AK I have ever shot has been about as accurate as I am; not to brag, but I'm a better shot than the average soldier. If you need 800 yard pin-point accuracy use a sniper rifle; the 7.62X39 is perfect for everything closer.

Posted by: Benjamin Davis at November 3, 2006 10:48 PM


The Israeli's are no slouches when it comes to knowing what does and what does not work in combat. Maybe that is why they designed their own '4th generation Kalishnikov' in the Galil rifle? Their choice of 5.56mm caliber to use existing ammo supplies was not very inspired. Their current use of a lighter weight version of the Galil with modular barrel lengths available for different missions makes sense in their primarily urban combat environment.

If it was up to me, I think a matte finish stainless steel Galil chambered in the available off the shelf 7mm-08 Remington would be about perfect. The short action cartridge of a 7mm-08 would be well suited for military use, and be an adequate one shot man stopper that the current 5.56mm is not. It would still retain the mild recoil characteristics that make training large numbers of inexperienced shooters more easy as well. It definitely could reach out and touch someone with greater range and precision than any 7.62X39mm rifle.

Posted by: David Honish at November 3, 2006 05:34 PM


Posted by: James Fahey at November 3, 2006 07:50 AM"Please remember that the AK-47 is a copy of the (WW2) German Mauser MP-44, which was scaled up for the new round! (also German) Kalsashnikov is just the man who scaled the MP-44 for the new round!!!"

In correct. The AK-47 was designed to perform the same job as the German MP series but shares little with the MP except overall layout. The function, operation, and design philosopy are compltetely different.
There are some similarities, but that is common in war/weapons. TO say that the AK-47 and MP series are copies would be similar to saying that the SU-27 is a copy of the F-15.

Posted by: Willis P. Dunlevey at November 3, 2006 04:40 PM


I have to aggree with the guys about the caliber. All of that hydrostatic shock hoopla is just that. And don't believe any of that tumbling nonsense either. M-16's haven't allowed the round to tumble since the introduction of the A1 in the early 70's.

Sectional desnity is the key to knockdown power and any .30 cal round will hit harder than any .22 cal round. The same holds true for the .45 ACP verses the 9mm Parabellum in handguns. Even the cops gave up on 9mm handguns.

What we really need is a move back to 7.62x52 (the good old NATO round) in a better platform (bullpup, better recoil buffering, and 30 round magazines). That would give us superior range, knockdown, and accuracy to the old AK. And for up close and personal defence an updated .45 (maybe the HK USP like you see the Delta boys using).

Posted by: Bill McGraw at November 3, 2006 12:34 PM


The addition of AK-47's does not transform thugs into armies, it transforms them into thugs with automatic weapons. There is much more to being a soldier than a rifle, much more.

And the OIC weapon program was never really aimed at creating a replacement rifle for the US military. It was simply an attempt by H&K to sell the US government expensive hardware, for which there was no practical need. Once the OIC (20mm) program was scrapped for being impractical, something any infantryman could have told them years and millions of dollars ago, the XM8 was spun off in an attempt to salvage at least some of the government contract dollars H&K craved.

The lesson to be learned from the AK-47 and from the MP-44 is that medium power rifle cartridges fit the tactical requirements for an assault rifle. The M-16 needs a calibre change, more than it needs a redesign, although I agree that any design can be made better and you might as well add as many functional improvements as possible while the calibre is being changed. But you can't base design change on urban myth and sales pitches.

Posted by: B Richardson at November 3, 2006 10:30 AM


Please remember that the AK-47 is a copy of the (WW2) German Mauser MP-44, which was scaled up for the new round! (also German) Kalsashnikov is just the man who scaled the MP-44 for the new round!!!

Posted by: James Fahey at November 3, 2006 07:50 AM


A fairly good article I thought. Never had and AK with full automatic. Some examples are actually quite well made. The accuracy comment in the commentary is interesting. My comment last year was "for chrise sake you hit a jack rabbit running at 250 yards." Certainly the accuracy is within the range of whatever the shooter is capable of doing. Of course it doesnt have in excess of 3000 feet per second rounds like the M 16, but neither does it cost 1500 bucks a whack to buy one. Since I don't shoot that well anyway who cares if I can send and accurate bullet for 300 yards anyway. I think snipers for the military bring in the .308 or fifty caliber stuff anyway at that range.

I was watching TV when the Afghan thing started and the army mountain brigaid was in the video. They were carrying AKs. jeez the rifle must work, and then take the ammo from a dead Taliban instead of lugging that 223 stuff around.

Jams and training and cleaning rifles in the middle of a freaking life death situation seems problematic to me on the outside. To me the analogy would be rather the same with WWII rifles. You rather have a fine close tolerance K 98 Mauser or a cheapass Mosen Nagant?

Posted by: john gemoets at November 3, 2006 06:47 AM


Nice article, but you need to brush up on your Russian. Avtomat Kalashnikov does NOT mean "automatic Kalashnikov." Avtomat in Russian means "machine gun."

Posted by: R. Ryan at November 3, 2006 05:29 AM


Not all weapon manufacturers produce low quality AK-47s. I've shot myself a model that was deadly accurate upto ca. 600 meters range. It costed some 1000 euros and worked always like a charm.

I wetted it, froze it at -40 celsius degrees, hit it repeatedly to trees and ground, shot enough with it to make the barrel glow red hot (kids, that is HOT!), took it apart, cleaned, reassembled, ... I had only one failure to operate in weeks of 24/7 usage and that was because the box was literally full of ice (the ammo couldn't move anymore, I had to remove the ice).

It is a very pleasant weapon to shoot with. It practically has no back kick for shooter and for aimer it's pleasant push to back/up and practically returns automatically to the same spot. At 700m/s those 7.62s make pretty holes to stuff and they work through light leaves and rain - unlike the faster smaller caliber stuff.

AK47 and its derivatives > the rest.

Posted by: ninnano at October 29, 2006 09:52 AM


Interesting read!
Have you fired from AK47 before?

Steven Burda, MBA
http://www.linkedin.com/in/burda

Posted by: Steven Burda, MBA at October 28, 2006 01:30 PM


The ak is indeed a piece of reliable simplicity,
simplicity in operation is indeed a good thing in
any mechanism.however,simplicity without effectiveness does not a war win.The ak was created with the express purpose of skirmish warfare in mind,a function for which it is eminantly qualified.it is an outgrowth of the way the soviets fought close combat in ww2,emphasis on CLOSE combat.300 meters or less.Effective within that envelope in the hands of poorly trained conscripts and wahabist insergants, assuming their indexing the antiquated open,nagant inspired sights.
in an age where you can mount an electro-optic
on a finely tuned AR platform chambered in 6.5
grendel or 7.62 nato/300 winmag.sweetspotted to
strike at 600 meters and beyond,that simple rifle
and the close quarters,soviet era skirmish warfare
doctrine suddenly goes straight out the window,as
our friends the jihadis ar finding out,much to
their chagrin.
Let the badguys have the ak's and we,ll keep
the refined product we have now.Johnny Jihad can
go on rattling away with said simple rifle,using
the very ineffective technique of beirut offhand
(i,e,fireing overhead,around corner,blindly).
hopeing that allah will direct the bullets into
the infidels body(which will be protected by a
sapi plate,sorry hasan).While he's doing allahs
will the marine with the M-16a4 with ACOG reflex
sight loaded with MK 262/77grain sierra matchking
ammo will take calm,deliberate aim,hold breath and squeeze.The result will be one martyr sent to his
predestined reward with an empty kalashnikov next
to his now inert body and one marine,still living
with 29 more chances to help mr martyrs friends
reach paradise.

This is the ultimate lesson of the simplicity
to be found in the AK and its effectiveness.

Posted by: katsesama at October 26, 2006 09:53 PM


... good for fragging treads and 90 day wonders, too.

Posted by: Noah (the other one) at October 26, 2006 06:11 PM


Every squad should have one man armed with an AK-47. That way, if you want to smoke some bastard's
ass for killing your buddy - they find "bad guy"
shell casings and AK47 holes in his dead ass.....
Fuck fighting fair - just make it to the "Freedom
Bird" home..........


Get some!


Sarge

Posted by: Ron Axley at October 26, 2006 08:55 AM


.....and what was true for my unit in Vietnam forty years ago remains true. M14's became priceless as backup SAW's and penetrators of light cover.

The first requirement of an infantry weapon is that it function reliably. Any perputed advantage of technical sophistication is pointless when it doesn't work. The 7.62X39MM cartridge is to the 5.56MM as the 5.56 was to the 7.62 NATO (.308); a seeming devolution in performance that masks a superior utility, while the AK47 is a superb battle weapon for short range infantry use. Lets face it, over a hundred meters is now the province of specialized marksmen or mounted weapons. In practical terms it always has been.

During World War II the Allied navies and air services discovered that more sophisticated and capable platforms were battle winners, even though the crews were resentful of the required training and increased maintenance. Somehow, this lesson has come to be applied in every area of force application. It doesn't always work, especially in land warfare. Usually you end up with 20-50% more effectiveness at 20 times the price. The Hummer and the 1/2 ton truck are an excellent example. You can't make a Hummer an AFV, no matter how hard you try, so go Hi-Lo with AFV's escorting cheap trucks and jeeps and spend the money saved on improved surveillance. Similarly, you can't make Joe Jarhead a killer at 100% yards in the heat of battle. Give him a weapon that shoots a decent AP ALL THE TIME at the 30-40 meter range of urban combat. As for mounting accessories, an American variant of the AK47 can have any damn mounting system we want. Just don't get too fancy....

Posted by: Harry Hamlin at October 26, 2006 01:48 AM


As long as collateral damage remains a concern for US forces, the AK is not a solution.

There is a lot to be said for the reliability of the AK, but the real reality is that in modern warfare, the rifle itself is rather insignificant in deciding battle outcomes -= but don't tell that to an Infantryman.

The M-16 is now America's longest serving rifle. Perhaps not as reliable as as the AK, but more accurate. It is better suited to mounting optical sights, lasers and other items that inprove the soldiers ability to deliver effective fire.

But don't expect to see any real improvements in the rifle anyway. The technology has reached it's apex. The next big step in infantry weapons will be with a whole new technology. Consider the OICW/SABR.

Posted by: Tod Glenn at October 25, 2006 10:39 PM


Hrm..... it seems the people at my gun forum do not like this article at all.

http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=230072

Posted by: wacki at October 25, 2006 01:57 PM


Same reason the M1911 is still so popular. Reliable as all hell, solid, and you'll know when it hits you. On the other hand, M1911 also shows that you can have all that and still have some precision. Hence, my love of the Mk. 17 SCAR.

Posted by: Moose at October 25, 2006 01:48 PM


Good Morning Folks,

Ah, at last the AK myth debunked. This story could have been writen exactly as is fourty years ago. As the author of the above article say the only virtue of the AK's, there are now two types the 47 and 74, is that the damn thing works.

ALLONS,
Byron Skinner

Posted by: Byron Skinner at October 25, 2006 01:09 PM


Post a comment




Remember Me?


Please enter the code as seen in the image below to post your comment.