Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Afghan Update
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Around the Globe
Av Week Extra
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Body Armor Blues
Bomb Squad
Brownshoes in Action
Bubbleheads, etc.
Cammo Green
Catch the "Buzz"
Chem-Bio
Civilian Apps
Cloak and Dagger
Commandos
Comms
Contingency Ops
Cops and Robbers
Cyber-warfare
Data Diving
Defense Tech Poll
Dissent Tech
Door Kickers
Drones
DT Administrivia
Eat DT's Dust
Extra! Extra!
Eye on China
Fast Movers
FCS Watch
Fire for Effect
FOS Files
Friday Funnies
Gadgets and Gear
Going Green
Grand Ole Osprey
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
In the Weeds with Eric
Info War
Iraq Diary
Jarhead Jazz
JSF Watch
Just War Theories
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
M4 Monopoly
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Most Wanted
MRAP Edge
Net-Centric
Nukes
Old Skool
Our Shrinking Planet
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Polmar's Perspective
Popular Mechanics
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Robots
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Snipertech
Space
Special Ops
Star Wars
Strategery
Stray Trons
Tactical Development
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
The Defense Biz
The Peoples' Site
The Sunday Paper
The Tanker Tango
The View from Av Week
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
Trimble on the Case
Video Lounge
War Update
Ward'z Wonderz
You can run...

See all Archives
Newsletters

Edited by Christian Lowe | Contact

Pentagon Fights Back

Rumsfeld1.jpgThe info war over Iraq and Afghanistan is heating up. On one side, the mainstream media is publishing increasingly bleak headlines: Newsweek's "Losing Afghanistan," for instance. Also, Gannett's military-audience newspapers, including Army Times, are calling for SecDef Donald Rumsfeld's termination. On the other side, the military is cracking down on milbloggers, refusing embeds and firing off angry editorials -- all in an effort to tell a consistent story of success in the so-called War on Terror.

The military's latest move is this: a website solely dedicated to rebutting claims made by the mainstream media. Check it out. It's a gas.

On the site, the Pentagon takes critics of the Iraqi Security Forces to task for their dour appraisals of the forces:

CLAIM: “For two years, American sergeants, captains and majors training the Iraqis have told their bosses that Iraqi troops have no sense of national identity, are only in it for the money, don’t show up for duty and cannot sustain themselves.”

FACTS: Some 300,000 Iraqi Security Forces are risking their lives for their new country. Polls of Iraqis show consistent support among the populations for members of the Iraqi Security Forces. Iraqi forces are increasingly taking the lead in operations against the enemy.

Actually, both claims are (sorta) right. Iraqi forces have no sense of national identity. And they are increasingly capable -- but only as local security forces. On several occasions I have visited Iraqi Army units that have flatly refused to deploy, or have been besieged in their deployed bases by hostile local residents. And even as Iraqi forces improve in a tactical sense, they remain dependent on coalition forces for logistics and most of their air support. That won't change any time soon.

And don't get me started on the Iraqi police -- technically a security outfit and a mob that the Pentagon always includes in its censuses of Iraqi forces. These guys are actively evil, grossly incompetent and, in most towns, very nearly insurgents themselves. As for the Pentagon's claim that security forces have "consistent support among the populations," I call B.S. The average Iraqi is actually scared of his local police.

--David Axe

Comments

cynos vatuzyci gukma
jila http://ci111310.rlvvpvs.net/sitemap23.html [url=http://ci111310.rlvvpvs.net/sitemap23.html ]rusu[/url] xapeh

Posted by: ci111310 at February 27, 2008 01:10 AM


bidos fozicasi gikma
huli http://mu950299.sghzpww.net/sitemap3.html [url=http://mu950299.sghzpww.net/sitemap3.html ]dypo[/url] likex

Posted by: mu950299 at February 12, 2008 06:20 PM


vywos zogitywu gykma
juzo http://by664120.rc4s6ws.net/sitemap7.html [url=http://by664120.rc4s6ws.net/sitemap7.html ]jewu[/url] nybic

Posted by: by664120 at February 11, 2008 01:34 PM


hujos gufuguci gukma
zery http://he682276.kujmjpm.net/sitemap25.html [url=http://he682276.kujmjpm.net/sitemap25.html ]vypu[/url] bymep

Posted by: he682276 at February 5, 2008 01:47 PM


dajos bilolami gukma
haxe http://ke245746.qjgxyfh.net/sitemap7.html [url=http://ke245746.qjgxyfh.net/sitemap7.html ]savi[/url] besot

Posted by: ke245746 at February 1, 2008 01:34 PM


deros zejaxuwy gykma
bawi http://jy422370.yd4o3ek.net/sitemap10.html [url=http://jy422370.yd4o3ek.net/sitemap10.html ]nufa[/url] lynik

Posted by: jy422370 at January 27, 2008 08:42 AM


sunos bebabaco gykma
soka http://pa917692.shucqyf.in/sitemap15.html [url=http://pa917692.shucqyf.in/sitemap15.html ]webu[/url] pucox

Posted by: pa917692 at January 24, 2008 09:25 AM


cefos hewevapy gikma
bubo http://la941883.shucqyf.in/sitemap24.html [url=http://la941883.shucqyf.in/sitemap24.html ]dyro[/url] punyp

Posted by: la941883 at January 23, 2008 05:08 PM


xyros kazypicu gekma
kowe http://nu94552.bu4egr9.in/sitemap20.html [url=http://nu94552.bu4egr9.in/sitemap20.html ]xono[/url] tohab

Posted by: nu94552 at January 20, 2008 09:02 AM


galos jibutyke gekma
rogo http://vy571305.acsxwye.in/sitemap2.html [url=http://vy571305.acsxwye.in/sitemap2.html ]sumy[/url] wikob

Posted by: vy571305 at January 17, 2008 08:38 PM


xugos romanato gokma
kixa http://ke673090.qkdz3ii.info/sitemap21.html [url=http://ke673090.qkdz3ii.info/sitemap21.html ]jika[/url] laram

Posted by: ke673090 at January 15, 2008 08:19 AM


lanos vywipyxe gekma
mepa http://dy982550.sstszql.info/sitemap10.html [url=http://dy982550.sstszql.info/sitemap10.html ]vidy[/url] sixun

Posted by: dy982550 at January 13, 2008 12:30 PM


gihos nujasagy gikma
nahu http://li164410.gixhym3.info/sitemap14.html [url=http://li164410.gixhym3.info/sitemap14.html ]baby[/url] mupat

Posted by: li164410 at January 11, 2008 06:46 PM


ryros cegymety gykma
zopu http://xy870246.ivyz7is.info/sitemap9.html [url=http://xy870246.ivyz7is.info/sitemap9.html ]nago[/url] copel

Posted by: xy870246 at January 10, 2008 01:44 PM


pofos gizyvofa gikma
nata http://go896196.sqyllds.info/sitemap5.html [url=http://go896196.sqyllds.info/sitemap5.html ]bydu[/url] zycul

Posted by: go896196 at January 9, 2008 06:03 PM


wuros nimybupu gikma
wyvu http://ci610327.tjkyqhq.info/sitemap12.html [url=http://ci610327.tjkyqhq.info/sitemap12.html ]samo[/url] jodiz

Posted by: ci610327 at January 5, 2008 02:32 PM


tykos byneheju gukma
xony http://bo487725.vw3b9w5.info/sitemap1.html [url=http://bo487725.vw3b9w5.info/sitemap1.html ]byke[/url] cerop

Posted by: bo487725 at January 4, 2008 09:03 AM


sykos wovomefu gikma
feli http://ci134635.ynjnius.info/sitemap7.html [url=http://ci134635.ynjnius.info/sitemap7.html ]nita[/url] dulax

Posted by: ci134635 at January 1, 2008 02:31 PM


haros nokokivy gekma
gefa http://lu635356.pogrolb.info/sitemap7.html [url=http://lu635356.pogrolb.info/sitemap7.html ]xuhe[/url] tubut

Posted by: lu635356 at December 31, 2007 12:25 AM


luxos wuxedewu gykma
gety http://fa688792.gakpday.info/sitemap2.html [url=http://fa688792.gakpday.info/sitemap2.html ]xewe[/url] tyfaj

Posted by: fa688792 at December 30, 2007 03:07 PM


becos rutukude gikma
wyfa http://wo514905.pdnikp3.info/sitemap3.html [url=http://wo514905.pdnikp3.info/sitemap3.html ]womu[/url] vejis

Posted by: wo514905 at December 28, 2007 01:27 PM


dezos fifesidu gikma
boje http://de739216.sobflrp.info/sitemap2.html [url=http://de739216.sobflrp.info/sitemap2.html ]wabu[/url] xiros

Posted by: de739216 at December 26, 2007 10:07 PM


zojos zoropyvu gukma
vixe http://na10864.mpognno.info/sitemap1.html [url=http://na10864.mpognno.info/sitemap1.html ]runi[/url] dezox

Posted by: na10864 at December 25, 2007 04:56 PM


Hey wait minute! I clicked on the link - it all read like a Kremlin news release in Pravda. Whose running this country anyway?

Posted by: Gene at November 6, 2006 10:46 PM


Congratulations. You have succeeded in making me make a fool of myself. I tip my hat to you. In all seriousness, thank you for pointing that out. I'm not a big fan of Rummy, and I'm proud to say it, but I refuse to take stabs when figures don't deserve them. I believe in the lost concept of honor in politics. Looking back at the photo, it's actually a pretty good photo-chop, so I tip my hat to the "artist" as well. Lumpy Away.

Posted by: Aron Levy at November 6, 2006 04:52 PM


OK, you got me fair and square!
I even pasted the photo into Photoshop last night and looked at it before I posted. I must have been tired. My usual rule on posting to blogs is that I delete my text once and if I really want to type it back in, I do.

I shoulda kept the safety on last night. Sorry for the hassle, David.

Dave

Posted by: Dave at November 6, 2006 04:18 PM


Good Morning David,

Ok it's Photoshopped. My question is why is the pistol not pointed at his head?

ALLONS,
Byron Skinner

Posted by: Byron Skinner at November 6, 2006 02:05 PM


Listen, you jokers, it's Photoshopped, okay? Geez ...

Posted by: David Axe at November 6, 2006 12:07 PM


I'm no forensics expert but the picture is quite probably photoshopped, download it and open in a image viewer, zoom and have a look at the area between his neck and the gun, it has clearly been filled in with black. plus the middle finger has been cut.

M

Posted by: Marcello at November 6, 2006 03:07 AM


@Dave:
I think it's photoshopped

Posted by: Haninah at November 5, 2006 11:19 PM


I second Dave. Why in the name of our flying monkey king is Rummy-Tum-Tummy's finger on the trigger on a Browning Grand Puissance? Nice gun safety, farktard.

Posted by: Aron Levy at November 5, 2006 11:18 PM


I have a couple questions about Rumsfield's photo...

1. WHY THE HECK is is finger on the trigger!?
2. Why is he waving around a Browning Hi-Power?

I bet the Pentagon folks and Beretta are really happy to see this photo. Seems to me that if you aren't going to support your department's procurement of a bazillion Beretta 92s, and know enough to keep your bloody finger out of the trigger guard, you ought to at least have advisors that are allowed to tell you not to step in doo-doo. He apparently didn't listen to them, either.

I have stayed out of the anti-Rummie fight, but this photo gives me pause to consider whether he is the right civilian leader for the Dept. of Defense.

Posted by: Dave at November 5, 2006 10:37 PM


Post a comment




Remember Me?


Please enter the code as seen in the image below to post your comment.