Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Afghan Update
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Around the Globe
Av Week Extra
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Body Armor Blues
Bomb Squad
Brownshoes in Action
Bubbleheads, etc.
Cammo Green
Catch the "Buzz"
Chem-Bio
Civilian Apps
Cloak and Dagger
Commandos
Comms
Contingency Ops
Cops and Robbers
Cyber-warfare
Data Diving
Defense Tech Poll
Defense Tech Radio
Dissent Tech
Door Kickers
Drones
DT Administrivia
Eat DT's Dust
Extra! Extra!
Eye on China
Fast Movers
FCS Watch
Fire for Effect
FOS Files
Friday Funnies
Gadgets and Gear
Going Green
Grand Ole Osprey
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
In the Weeds with Eric
Info War
Iraq Diary
Jarhead Jazz
JSF Watch
Just War Theories
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
M4 Monopoly
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Most Wanted
MRAP Edge
Net-Centric
Nukes
Old Skool
Our Shrinking Planet
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Podcast
Politricks
Polmar's Perspective
Popular Mechanics
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Robots
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Snipertech
Soldier Systems
Space
Special Ops
Star Wars
Strategery
Stray Trons
Tactical Development
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
The Defense Biz
The Peoples' Site
The Sunday Paper
The Tanker Tango
The View from Av Week
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
Trimble on the Case
Video Lounge
War Update
Ward'z Wonderz
You can run...

See all Archives
Newsletters

Edited by Christian Lowe | Contact

Behind the Kitty Hawk Incident (Updated)

Several readers have given me all kinds of grief for not posting about the USS Kitty Hawk incident. My apologies -- I didn't feel like I had a whole lot to add to the story, about a Chinese Song-class sub shadowing an American carrier group.

song_sub.jpgThe In From the Cold intel blog has some insights, however. "Spook86" notes that America's sub-detection capabilities have been on the decline for a while, now.

With the collapse of the old Soviet Navy in the early 1990s, the USN [U.S. Navy] began to de-emphasize its ASW [anti-submarine warfare] capabilities, figuring that the preeminent submarine threat had essentially evaporated, and it would take years -- perhaps decades -- for a similar challenge to emerge.

But Rear Admiral Hank McKinney, the former commander of the U.S. Pacific Fleet's submarine force, tells us not to be to hard on the sub-hunters:

Noah, I have no inside information on this event, but it is very difficult to detect a quiet diesel submarine and the Song-class submarines are quality submarines. Operating in international waters in the vicinity of a US battle group is perfectly normal -- good operational training.

The Chinese very well could have staged this event to make a point about the vulnerability of the Battle Group to submarine attack. The US Navy is fully aware of [those] vulnerabilities...

The Chinese are building a credible submarine force which will make it very difficult for the US Navy to maintain sea control dominance in or near coastal waters off of China.

McKinney concludes with a question: Did the Chinese "stage this event" to coincide with Adm. Gary Roughead's visit to China? Roughead currently serves as "CINCPACFLT" -- Commander of the U.S. Pacific Fleet.

(Big ups: Chuck)

UPDATE 11/15/06 11:25 AM: More from the Washington Times and In From the Cold.

UPDATE 11/15/06 11:50 AM: This will make China-hawks' heads explode. But the chief of U.S. forces in the Pacific, Admiral William Fallon, says the incident highlights the need for closer Sino-American ties.

"There is a need to have a fundamental understanding," he said, adding that Admiral Gary Roughead, head of the U.S. Pacific Fleet, was currently visiting China for the first naval exercise between the United States and the People's Liberation Army.

"This is the kind of thing that we must encourage and continue so we can move ahead from what I would characterize as kind of Cold War thinking and truly broaden the dialogue."

Meanwhile, as Brad notes in the comments, Barnett is yawning.

Comments

Ugg Boots
Ugg Boot
Ugg Boots Sale
Uggs
Ugg Cardy
Ugg Cardy Boot
Ugg Cardy Boots
Ugg Crochet Boot
Ugg Crochet Boots
Crochet Boots
Ugg Mini Boots
Ugg Mini Boot
Classic Mini Boots
Ugg Classic Short Boots
Ugg Classic Short Boot
Classic Short Boots
Ugg Classic Tall Boots
Ugg Classic Tall Boot
Classic Tall Boots
Ugg Nightfall Boots
Ugg Nightfall Boot
Nightfall Boots
Ugg Sundance Boots
Ugg Sundance Boot
Sundance Boots
Ugg Ultra Short Boots
Ugg Ultra Short Boot
Ultra Short Boots
Ugg Ultra Tall Boots
Ugg Ultra Tall Boot
Ultra Tall Boots
Ugg Keychains
Ugg Insoles

Posted by: vivian at July 2, 2009 10:43 PM


dunk sb shoes

Posted by: jian at June 18, 2009 01:43 AM


dunk sb shoes

Posted by: jian at June 18, 2009 01:42 AM


dunk sb shoes

Posted by: jian at June 18, 2009 01:40 AM


dunk sb shoes

Posted by: jian at June 18, 2009 01:36 AM


tiffany jewerly

Posted by: angle at June 17, 2009 10:24 PM



adidas shoes

Posted by: jian at June 16, 2009 03:51 AM


nike dunks

Posted by: jian at June 15, 2009 02:03 AM


nike dunks

Posted by: jian at June 15, 2009 02:00 AM


nike dunks

Posted by: jian at June 15, 2009 01:59 AM


nike designer shoes

Posted by: jian at June 14, 2009 08:28 PM



nike designer shoes

Posted by: jian at June 14, 2009 08:27 PM


paul smith
buy paul smith
paul smith store
paul smith shop
paul smith outlet
paul smith online store
paul smith UK
paul smith authentic
paul smith sale
paul smith men's wear
paul smith women's wear
paul smith accessories
paul smith collections
buy paul smith shoes
buy paul smith trainers
cheap paul smith shoes
cheap paul smith trainers
paul smith shoes
paul smith trainers
authentic paul smith shoes
authentic paul smith trainers
Paul Smith Canvas Holdall bags
paul smith bags
paul smith bag
Paul Smith Blonde Naked Lady Belt
buy paul smith belt
paul smith belt
paul smith belts
paul smith clothing
paul smith clothes
buy paul smith t-shirt
paul smith men's tshirt
paul smith ps t-shirt
paul smith polo
paul smith clothes
buy paul smith cufflinks
paul smith cufflinks
paul smith credit card wallet
paul smith leather wallets
buy paul smith wallet
buy paul smith wallets
cheap paul smith mens' wallet
paul smith mini wallet
paul smith naked lady wallet
paul smith striped wallet
paul smith wallets
paul smith women's wallet
paul smith sweater
cheap paul smith sweaters
authentic paul smith sweater
buy paul smith sweaters
genuine paul smith sweater
paul smith flip flop
buy paul smith flip flop
authentic paul smith flip flop
paul smith scarves
buy paul smith scarves
authentic paul smith scarves
paul smith notebooks
paul smith neckties
paul smith underwears

Posted by: http://www.paulsmithsale.co.uk/ at June 13, 2009 08:00 AM


timberland boots

Posted by: jian at June 13, 2009 12:06 AM


ugg boots
nike designer shoes

Posted by: jian at June 11, 2009 03:35 AM



ugg boots
nike designer shoes

Posted by: jian at June 11, 2009 03:32 AM


nike air max
nike shox
nike dunk sb
puma shoes
coach shoes

Posted by: jian at June 6, 2009 02:51 AM


nike store,air max shoes,dunk sb shoes,nike shox shoes

Posted by: der at June 5, 2009 07:18 PM


nike shoes
nike shoe
nike air max shoes
air max shoes
buy air max shoes
cheap air max shoes
air max 88 shoes
air max 87 shoes
air max 90 shoes
air max 91 shoes
air max 95 shoes
air max 97 shoes
air max 360 shoes
air max shoes on sale
nike free shoes
nike shoes online
nike infant shoes
nike men's shoes
baby nike shoes
nike basketball shoes
shoes nike dunks
nike shoes sale
nike women's shoes
toddler nike shoes
nike walking shoes
nike athletic shoes
buy nike shoes
women nike shoes
nike shoes discount
nike shoes on sale
nike casual shoes
blazer nike shoes
6.0 nike shoes
nike football shoes
baseball shoes nike
shox nike shoes
wholesale nike shoes
nike running shoesnike air shoes
6.0 nike shoes skate
nike jordan shoes
nike dunk shoes
cheap nike shoes
nike soccer shoes
nikes shoes
buy nike shoes onlinenike sports shoes
shoes or nike
nike air jordan shoes
nike air force on shoes

Posted by: anna at June 1, 2009 02:06 AM


nike air jordan shoes
LeBron James shoes
nike dunk sb shes
nike air max shoes
nike air 2009
Nike Air Force 1

Posted by: http:www.brandswow.com at May 31, 2009 03:33 AM


nike air jordan shoes
LeBron James shoes
nike dunk sb shes
nike air max shoes
nike air 2009
Nike Air Force 1

Posted by: http:www.brandswow.com at May 31, 2009 03:29 AM


nike shox
nike shox fusion
nike shox nz
nike shox R2
nike shox R4
nike shox TZ
women's nike shox R5
nike shox Turb
 

Posted by: http://www.kicksadidas.com at May 25, 2009 12:23 PM


Links of London
Links of London Jewelry
Links of London Charm
Links of London Necklace
Links of London Bracelets
Links of London Earrings
Links of London Rings
Designer from UK
Diamond
Gold&Silver
Links Jewelry
Links Necklace
Links Charm
Links Earrings
Links Rings

Posted by: http://www.linksoflondons.co.uk at May 20, 2009 09:47 PM


Paul Smith
Paul Smith Sale
cheap paul smith wallets
buy paul smith wallet
paul smith leather wallets
Paul smith men's wallet
paul smith women's wallets
Paul Smith Wallets
Paul Smith Bags
Paul Smith Necktie
Paul Smith Notebook
Paul Smith Belts
Paul Smith Shoes
Paul Smith Trainers
Paul Smith Cufflinks
Paul Smith">Paul Smith T-shirts
buy paul smith belt
Paul Smith Authentic
paul smith belt
paul smith belts
black leather suit belt
Paul Smith Blonde Naked Lady Belt
trainers uk
trainers shop
trainers reviews
health trainer
trainers sale
new trainers
comfortable Trainer

Posted by: http://www.paulsmithsale.co.uk at May 15, 2009 03:56 AM


Replica A Lange & Sohne
Replica Accutron
Replica Audemars Piguet
Replica Baume & Mercier
Replica Bell & Ross
Replica Breitling
Replica Bvlgari
Replica Cartier
Replica Chanel
Replica Chopard
Replica Christian Bernard
Replica Christian Dior
Replica Citizen
Replica Coach
Replica Concord
Replica Corum
Replica D&G
Replica DKNY
Replica Ebel
Replica ESQ
Replica Fendi
Replica Fila
Replica Franck Muller
Replica Girard Perregaux
Replica Givenchy
Replica Gucci
Replica Guess
Replica Hamilton
Replica Haurex
Replica Invicta
Replica IWC
Replica Jacob & Co
Replica Jacques Lemans
Replica Jaeger LeCoultre
Replica Levis
Replica Longines
Replica Mont Blanc
Replica Movado
Replica Omega
Replica Orient
Replica Oris
Replica Panerai
Replica Patek Philippe
Replica Piaget
Replica Rado
Replica Rolex
Replica Sector
Replica Seiko
Replica Skagen
Replica Swatch
Replica Swiss
Replica Swiss Army Victorinox
Replica Tag Heuer
Replica Technomarine
Replica Timberland
Replica Tissot
Replica Ulysse Nardin
Replica Vacheron Constantin
Replica Wenger
Replica Wittnauer
Replica Zenith
Replica Zodiac ecommerce
open source
shop
online shopping
Rolex Sports watches
Rolex Datejusts watches
A Lange & Sohne watches
Aigner watches
Alain Silberstein watches
Audemars Piguet watches
Bell & Ross watches
Breguet watches
Breitling watches
Bvlgari watches
Cartier watches
Chanel watches
Chopard watches
Concord watches
Corum watches
Dior watches
Dolce & Gabbana watches
Ebel watches
Emporio Armani watches
Glashutte watches
Gucci watches
Hermes Watches
IWC watches
Jacob & Co watches
Jaeger LeCoultre watches
Longines watches
Louis Vuitton watches
Mont Blanc watches
Movado watches
Omega watches
Oris watches
Panerai watches
Patek Philippe watches
Philip Stein watches
Porsche Design watches
Rado watches Roger
Roger Dubuis watches
Sarcar watches
Tag Heuer watches
Technomarine watches
Vacheron Constantin watches
Zenith watches ecommerce
open source
shop
online shopping
rolex replica-
rolex replica watches-
best replica watches-
watches-
diamond watches-
replica watches-
rolex watches-
watches online-
timex watches-
ladies watch-
luxury watch-
wrist watches-
casio watches-
watches online-
ladies watch-
men's watch-
wrist watches-
replica watches-
fine watches-
casio watches-
watches online-
replica rolex watches-
rolex watch-

Posted by: luxury watch at April 21, 2009 02:28 AM


nice to meet you

Posted by: wowpowerleveling at April 15, 2008 01:11 AM


During the latest conflict in Irak, a Danish type 106/107 did the same thing to a battle gruop in the Gulf. It was in shooting distance of a carrier and was not detected.

Posted by: S. Thomsen at February 7, 2008 06:06 AM


USS Kitty Hawk passed through Taiwan Straight 12/08/2007. Only super power can do that!! Imaging Chinese Aircraft carrier showed up at San Diego! Not going to happen.

Posted by: William chao at December 10, 2007 12:23 AM


Lets see. #1 china shoots down weather satellite.
#2 China's Song Class Sub surfaces near Kittty Hawk.
#3 Bejin denies entry to Hong Kong port to USS Kitty Hawk and Support Vessels, for Thanksgiving Day liberty.

I cant be the only one here that sees a pattern.

Posted by: andy pote at November 28, 2007 06:31 AM


counter intel gentleman, very simple.
read some sun tzu or mercer.

allow your enemy advances on your watch , not theres.

Modern passive array can detect and distiguish aquatic and non aquatic signatures over 300KM.
Active is much greater than that, do not discount the USA, never underestimate.

Posted by: man at October 28, 2007 03:10 PM


In a major war, every carrier would be nuked in the first hour. They are the modern day gunboat.

Posted by: Ed at October 15, 2007 04:24 PM


Scrap the carriers and build subs? Are you nuts? Of course we need subs, but subs can't carry planes, and air power trumps subs every day of the week, especially in a land conflict. What we really need are some intimidating Battleships, like the Iowa-class. During the Iraq War #1, the Iraqis were terrified of the Battleships off their coastline lobbing VW-weight shells their way. I think we need to spook the Iranians with them again, just for the fun of it.

Posted by: Max at January 19, 2007 08:53 PM


The elephant in the room here is that the carrier is no longer the capital ship. It has gone the way of the battleship and been replaced by the submarine. ASW efforts only waste resources - scrap the carriers and build subs...

Posted by: Phaedrus at December 22, 2006 05:27 PM


The Collins class boats used by Australia gave a good account of themselves http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/09/23/1064082993693.html not I think powered by an AIP system but good old fashioned diesel & batteries from Kockums of Sweden. Train hard and fight easy on the lessons learned.

Posted by: JQP at November 16, 2006 10:36 AM


Senario #1 - Was the Chinese Song-class submarine under the total (100%) control of a U.S. friendly crew (military or otherwise) 100% allied with the United States or NATO? If so, then this goes a long way in explaining why the sub was permitted within or near the sensitive security perimeter of the USS Kitty Hawk.

Senario #2 - Now if Senario #1 is not the case then we have a huge problem; and it does not matter what the reason(s) is(are) for the sub's surfacing. And that's because if the Chinese Song-class submarine was armed it could have taken out the USS Kitty Hawk (4000+ lives) and whatever other ships it desired; and doing this with the full expectation that after such an attack the submarine itself would probably be destroyed, either by the sub's crew or by the United States assets in the region. While one shudders at the thought of Senario #2, have we forgotten about the USS Cole disaster?

Posted by: L. at November 16, 2006 10:26 AM



Why interpret the actions of the SONG as super aggressive? Yeah, the US got humiliated, sure, but no navy person worth their salt will begrudge any rival crew a chance to enjoy some public laurels from successful compeletion of a competent tactical manuever. I mean, I ask you guys this--Would it not have been MUCH more aggressive to remain submerged, and to allow the carrier group to pass without "detecting" the SONG? China sacrificed both tactical AND strategic advantage to, essentially, be diplomatic and wave as the Kitty Hawk passed by.

Sure, China's a challenging country, but don't reject the idea that China's Navy MIGHT JUST actually be more grateful for high-level USN attention than some of the DC China baiters realize!

Back to the SONG. You guys may not know that HMS Gotland did a similar thing to an unnamed carrer (in almost identical conditions, I suspect..hmm) relatively recently. Navy's response--knowing the navy--was probably an immediate hobbling HMS Gotland (reduce zone of ASW operations, limit the sub's operational options, etc.) and thus insuring ASW "success." (See some of the effusive stuff on US ASW capability in Proceedings..shesh!) Rather than "solve" the darn ASW problem, I fear some Naval bureaucrats made the problem "go away."

Now, at least, that SONG may have done double duty in diplomacy AND in alerting us--in a very up-front fashion--to mend our ASW shortcomings, and, hopefully, force a needed injection of reality into AIP-sub threatened operations (AND into the HMS Gotland exercises off San Diego, for that matter!).

What the heck--The Navy should invite that ballsy SONG captain to the US and have him give a lecture to the ASW commanders on the importance of conducting real-world--rather than sham--ASW exercises! Give him a six-course meal and enough drink and we might get some neat info from him too, hey...

Posted by: Springbored at November 16, 2006 12:54 AM


We are being short-sighted. Everyone's saying "terrorism" and being caught up in this post-9/11 frenzy, while losing sight of the big picture.


Conventional Cold-War type conflicts must be prepared for. That means, yes, things like the F-22 and Virginia submarine which are NOT Cold War relics. They are still needed against Russia and China.

Hopefully this incident (Song sub with US carrier) will get the Navy to boost more anti-sub warships, Virginia subs, and P-8 MMA.

Posted by: Benjamin Fan at November 15, 2006 07:51 PM


A quick search of Google reveals that the Chinese fitted AIP to Song Class submarines back in 2004.

http://www.strategypage.com/military_photos/200471823.aspx

Posted by: blowback at November 15, 2006 05:47 PM


In response to "Kaltes" comment:

"And I'm sure your solution there is to roll over and betray Taiwan, to just stand by while a communist government invades and devastates an ally we have been protecting for over 50 years...

The last thing we should be doing is gutting our capabilities in order to design our military to win the previous war. There will be both conventional nation-state conflicts and insurgencies, and we need to be able to deal with both instead of gutting the force to deal with one and not the other."
---

My answer isn't to abandon Taiwan, my answer is that the likelihood of China making such a move is nowhere near high enough to justify the kind of emphasis on a Leviathan army that the cold-warrior faction of the US Military has been pursuing.

I wholeheartedly agree that our military needs to be capable of dealing with multiple styles of conflicts, but as long as we're so worried about "Taiwan getting invaded by the evil commies," we'll never be able to fully balance our military. The cost of the Leviathan is just too high. We can remain capable of fighting a state-state war without constantly funding weapons designed for a China versus America war. That war is simply so improbable (for a myriad of economic, political and military reasons) that it is folly to dedicate so many resources to it.

For a full explanation and description of supporting material, check out Barnett's two books; The Pentagon's New Map and Blueprint for Action. Both are excellent.

Posted by: Brad at November 15, 2006 04:26 PM


Didn't half the Russian Air Force buzz one of our carriers during an exercise in the Western Pacific off Kamchatka not too long ago? So now it is China's turn and so what if we got shaken by a Chinese sub off our stern, and some Chinese admirals got some tales to tell. What are we allowed to tell them about the ongoing research underway on antisubmarine warfare in joint partnership with that navy that flies the flag with the rising sun? Not a smart move if you are trying to demilitarize the region.

Posted by: satellite pete at November 15, 2006 03:17 PM


"The sooner we can take the China scenario off the table, and the related "America versus China over Taiwan!" scenario, the sooner and faster we can retool our military for the type of irregular warfare currently going on in Iraq."

And I'm sure your solution there is to roll over and betray Taiwan, to just stand by while a communist government invades and devastates an ally we have been protecting for over 50 years...

The last thing we should be doing is gutting our capabilities in order to design our military to win the previous war. There will be both conventional nation-state conflicts and insurgencies, and we need to be able to deal with both instead of gutting the force to deal with one and not the other.

Posted by: Kaltes at November 15, 2006 03:08 PM


HOW COULD A CHINESE SUB KEEP UP WITH AN AMERICAN NUCLEAR CARRIER WHILE STILL REMAINING QUIET?!

Posted by: Justin Hughes at November 15, 2006 02:51 PM


Good Morning Folks,

The unasked question regard the Kitty Hawk issue is where was the normal SSN escort, at least one submarine if not two, that any Carrier Battle group doesn't leave home with out?

The Chinese Song Class of D/E Submarines are noy AIP, HMS Gotland or Hydrogen, U-212's, state of the art subs but is well know the the ASW communitry of the USN. It appears that the fruits are ripening on the tree that was planted by the Navy a couple of years ago when ASW was merged as asubnorate activity into Mine Counter Warfare. This is a Rumsfeld cost cutting measure that should be top on the list of whom ever replace Rumsfeld for undoing.

There is not excuse for this inicident to have happened, as usual the Americans are blameing the Chinese, bull sh**, the last I heard all countries have rights in international waters.

The fault here rest with the USN's chain of command and heads should start to roll starting with the CNO Adm Mullens and go all the way down to the CO of the Kitty Hawk. God know there is not shortage of Admirals and Captains waiting to take the places.

ALLONS,
Byron Skinner

Posted by: Byron Skinner at November 15, 2006 01:47 PM


Perhaps a more informed reader could help me on this; but I thought diesel subs, while very quiet, are somewhat limited in top speed and battery endurance. If true, a CBG, operating at 15 - 20 knots, could easily outrun a diesel, or at least force it to snorkel while chasing, an evolution I thought fairly easy to detect. An ambush, by straddling a known line of transit, would be more likely. Any thoughts?

Posted by: Agricola at November 15, 2006 01:45 PM


Please go read Thomas Barnett's comments on this issue here: http://www.thomaspmbarnett.com/weblog/archives2/003980.html

While it's fascinating to read details about these kinds of incidents, Tom is right on the money - this sort of thing happens all the time and is only news to the alarmist, sabre-rattling Cold Warriors who still think the next century of conflict will be characterized by wars between high-tech powers; which it absolutely wont be.

The sooner we can take the China scenario off the table, and the related "America versus China over Taiwan!" scenario, the sooner and faster we can retool our military for the type of irregular warfare currently going on in Iraq.

Posted by: Brad at November 15, 2006 11:46 AM



It would be useful to establish exactly what happened. What seems to be established is that a US airplane spotted the Song on the surface within 5 nm of Kitty Hawk. What is asserted is that Song approached submerged to within 5 nm of Kitty Hawk and then surfaced. Finding out just when and where (relative to the carrier) the submarine actually did surface would help in discussing this event.

Posted by: Allen Thomson at November 15, 2006 10:25 AM


It seems unlikely that the Chinese timed the stunt to coincide with the admiral's visit, since as the article notes the event occurred last month. It seems more likely that news about the event was leaked to Gertz at a time that would coincide with the visit, perhaps by someone (maybe in the US government) who wanted to spoil the visit or knew that the news would get more attention if it coincided with the visit.

Posted by: J. at November 15, 2006 08:56 AM


HMS Gotland powered with a Stirling AIP (Air Independent Propulsion) system is so hard to detect that the US have extended the lease for another year so as to gather more information about working with and against this type of craft.

http://www.kockums.se/News/oldnews/041105lease.html
http://www.navy.mil/search/display.asp?story_id=21464

Posted by: JQP at November 15, 2006 05:02 AM


I think the words RAdm McKinney are pretty astute. Air Independent Diesel Electrics are really tough to spot with Hydrophones when they are running on batteries.

The question I have is why active sonar is not used by the battle group? It seems like their position isn't that hard to find and stealth, at least not on a global scale, is their greatest ally. So why not fire off a few active pings every now and again to see whats out there? It seems to me that that would provide a pretty good way of knowing if there were any of those pesky D-E Subs out there.

The stunt factor of this seems pretty high to me too. This incident happened in blue water which hasn't been the territory that the PLAN frequents. Now granted they have obviously been seeking to increase their influence in blue water operations, but the timing does seem rather convenient. It could be as the RAmd said a way to show American weakness when the Pacific Fleet Commander rolled into town.

Posted by: Endyr at November 15, 2006 03:17 AM


Post a comment




Remember Me?


Please enter the code as seen in the image below to post your comment.