Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Afghan Update
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Around the Globe
Av Week Extra
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Body Armor Blues
Bomb Squad
Brownshoes in Action
Bubbleheads, etc.
Cammo Green
Catch the "Buzz"
Chem-Bio
Civilian Apps
Cloak and Dagger
Commandos
Comms
Contingency Ops
Cops and Robbers
Cyber-warfare
Data Diving
Defense Tech Poll
Dissent Tech
Drones
DT Administrivia
Eat DT's Dust
Extra! Extra!
Eye on China
Fast Movers
FCS Watch
Fire for Effect
FOS Files
Friday Funnies
Gadgets and Gear
Going Green
Grand 'Ol Osprey
Grand Ole Osprey
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
In the Weeds with Eric
Info War
Iraq Diary
Jarhead Jazz
JSF Watch
Just War Theories
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
M4 Monopoly
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Most Wanted
MRAP Edge
Net-Centric
Nukes
Old Skool
Our Shrinking Planet
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Polmar's Perspective
Popular Mechanics
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Robots
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Snipertech
Space
Special Ops
Star Wars
Strategery
Stray Trons
Tactical Development
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
The Defense Biz
The Peoples' Site
The Sunday Paper
The Tanker Tango
The View from Av Week
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
Trimble on the Case
Video Lounge
War Update
Ward'z Wonderz
You can run...

See all Archives
Newsletters

Edited by Christian Lowe | Contact

Electric Lasers Shoot Mortars, Gain Strength

Real-life laser weapons continue to inch closer to reality. Two recent examples: Raytheon says its "prototype solid-state Laser Area Defense System (LADS) successfully detonated 60-millimeter mortars." And Northrop Grumman is opening up a new "directed energy production facility" for building high energy, solid-state lasers.

laser_lab.jpgRaytheon's announcement is interesting, because solid-state, electric lasers haven't yet hit the 100 kilowatt threshold which many people consider to be the minimum strength for weapons-grade lasers. (They're not too far off, though.) But Raytheon says they zapped these mortars using "an a proven, existing, off-the-shelf solid-state laser, coupled with commercially available optics technology."

So how did the company pull it off? I got a non-answer from a company flack, something about "view[ing] the problem from the user point of view."

Now, this was a very limited test. These mortars were small -- just 60 mm. The company wouldn't say how long they were zapped (even a weak laser can bore holes in metal, given enough time). And the mortars were on the ground, around 550 yards away, not flying through the air. But this LADS is built on the back on Raytheon's 4,500-round-per-minute Phalanx gun, which is already knocking down mortars in Iraq. So presumably, the targeting and tracking piece is won't be that hard to manage. In-air tests of the laser are planned for later this year.

Meanwhile, Northrop has opened up a new facility, south of Los Angeles, to build what the company hopes is the world's first 100 kilowatt, solid-state laser. It'll start by putting together the series of 32 garnet crystal "modules" that form the heart of the system. Shine light-emitting diodes into 'em, and they start the laser chain-reaction, shooting out focused light. Combine all those beams into one, and you've got yourself a battlefield-strength ray. The array is similar to what Northrop used in its 25 kw demonstrator. But the gum-stick-sized crystals have been shrunk by about 50% -- part of the company's effort to make the laser small and rugged enough for war zone use.

50 people should be hired over the next year in the new facility. Company officials say they're still on track on demonstrate their 100 kw laser by the end of next year. If everything works according to plan, there should be enough room in the new building to simultaneously build and test three weapons-grade lasers at once.

Comments

I had only a little lunia gold and the remedy was not enough, but I still to add the blood to our cavalier which were battling, we saw the enemy became more and more fearfulness, at last my best friend dead. At this time I needed the more lunia war gold to buy blood to save my best friend. I couldn’t go to save my friend, because the enemy was coming and carrying off his lunia online gold.

Posted by: lunia gold at August 5, 2008 11:04 PM


But I know it was a good game in people's mind. I could remember the thing which I asked the other role sold the cheap last chaos gold to me to buy last chaos gold. And then I play lots of different role, when I saw the beautiful role, I was very happy. I like the feeling that everybody wear own beautiful cloth. One time I saw a girl, wearing a white skirt.

Posted by: cheap last chaos gold at August 5, 2008 10:57 PM


I could remember the thing which I asked the other role sold the cheap last chaos gold to me to buy last chaos gold. And then I play lots of different role, when I saw the beautiful role, I was very happy. I like the feeling that everybody wear own beautiful cloth.

Posted by: buy last chaos gold at August 5, 2008 10:53 PM


rolex replica watches - $98 swiss , we don't sale replica watches.The Art of E-commerce

Posted by: replica watches at August 3, 2008 11:03 PM


nice to meet you

Posted by: wowpowerleveling at April 15, 2008 01:58 AM


gywos kinaguge gykma
tuje http://je485774.gz4ffgi.net/sitemap9.html [url=http://je485774.gz4ffgi.net/sitemap9.html ]webi[/url] kuciz

Posted by: je485774 at February 27, 2008 01:52 AM


zynos polugixy gikma
guwe http://be80697.scfk0kp.net/sitemap3.html [url=http://be80697.scfk0kp.net/sitemap3.html ]neri[/url] mycus

Posted by: be80697 at February 15, 2008 09:56 PM


cebos ropyjyza gykma
dyzy http://ka718465.jfmfsma.net/sitemap7.html [url=http://ka718465.jfmfsma.net/sitemap7.html ]gosa[/url] zazah

Posted by: ka718465 at February 15, 2008 06:36 AM


nynos rosigafy gakma
hoci http://ku434590.rc4s6ws.net/sitemap1.html [url=http://ku434590.rc4s6ws.net/sitemap1.html ]kymy[/url] hedik

Posted by: ku434590 at February 12, 2008 07:02 PM


xylos kirunily gikma
toro http://ce119910.ru7xdjv.net/sitemap4.html [url=http://ce119910.ru7xdjv.net/sitemap4.html ]kipu[/url] lorur

Posted by: ce119910 at February 11, 2008 02:18 PM


taxos pyhysire gukma
ziko http://fa519941.ydsolof.net/sitemap1.html [url=http://fa519941.ydsolof.net/sitemap1.html ]sucy[/url] duwaz

Posted by: fa519941 at February 6, 2008 12:30 AM


xahos mepufuby gikma
citi http://do590114.ydsolof.net/sitemap15.html [url=http://do590114.ydsolof.net/sitemap15.html ]nohu[/url] subar

Posted by: do590114 at February 5, 2008 02:32 PM


jovos zuxecizu gukma
zina http://lu635594.bmbf9rv.net/sitemap10.html [url=http://lu635594.bmbf9rv.net/sitemap10.html ]tesu[/url] vobad

Posted by: lu635594 at February 1, 2008 02:20 PM


kajos fecavuxo gykma
basy http://vu154716.je8h3jp.net/sitemap4.html [url=http://vu154716.je8h3jp.net/sitemap4.html ]fiko[/url] pidyw

Posted by: vu154716 at January 30, 2008 03:41 AM


dekos bocekahu gakma
duka http://ry820595.npmt0lw.net/sitemap23.html [url=http://ry820595.npmt0lw.net/sitemap23.html ]vuva[/url] xiboc

Posted by: ry820595 at January 29, 2008 07:25 AM


xufos zybapaji gikma
hogy http://dy326098.yd4o3ek.net/sitemap7.html [url=http://dy326098.yd4o3ek.net/sitemap7.html ]hiwi[/url] zytoh

Posted by: dy326098 at January 27, 2008 09:26 AM


mapos sefejino gykma
hafy http://le22019.xk9jhp5.net/sitemap9.html [url=http://le22019.xk9jhp5.net/sitemap9.html ]resu[/url] sejax

Posted by: le22019 at January 26, 2008 09:29 AM


wosos sotifewa gykma
lama http://ji813546.xk9jhp5.net/sitemap5.html [url=http://ji813546.xk9jhp5.net/sitemap5.html ]tyri[/url] xuxyh

Posted by: ji813546 at January 25, 2008 01:47 PM


kuzos rerafyni gokma
zejo http://su82407.hvmjhoy.net/sitemap21.html [url=http://su82407.hvmjhoy.net/sitemap21.html ]gify[/url] taxyj

Posted by: su82407 at January 24, 2008 10:15 AM


zehos renexape gukma
tilo http://vo316151.hvmjhoy.net/sitemap23.html [url=http://vo316151.hvmjhoy.net/sitemap23.html ]tawo[/url] gogyt

Posted by: vo316151 at January 23, 2008 05:59 PM


curos limipoty gukma
daky http://ho852657.mc0ltil.net/sitemap10.html [url=http://ho852657.mc0ltil.net/sitemap10.html ]bipy[/url] bydum

Posted by: ho852657 at January 20, 2008 09:52 AM


lohos holynymi gakma
type http://fo862703.acsxwye.in/sitemap16.html [url=http://fo862703.acsxwye.in/sitemap16.html ]wejy[/url] faxac

Posted by: fo862703 at January 17, 2008 09:28 PM


xokos kimosyse gokma
dydi http://ry896058.nlqtow4.info/sitemap23.html [url=http://ry896058.nlqtow4.info/sitemap23.html ]fymu[/url] xuvap

Posted by: ry896058 at January 15, 2008 09:09 AM


zimos lujowoja gikma
zuno http://wy345746.vivw1xv.info/sitemap1.html [url=http://wy345746.vivw1xv.info/sitemap1.html ]tepa[/url] nehyt

Posted by: wy345746 at January 13, 2008 01:20 PM


bujos vibofuna gykma
vizo http://fo415235.ylvr1n3.info/sitemap11.html [url=http://fo415235.ylvr1n3.info/sitemap11.html ]nanu[/url] giror

Posted by: fo415235 at January 11, 2008 07:34 PM


fudos roluhagi gukma
vury http://dy967409.ivyz7is.info/sitemap6.html [url=http://dy967409.ivyz7is.info/sitemap6.html ]jufy[/url] decew

Posted by: dy967409 at January 10, 2008 02:36 PM


tenos hynejane gokma
huxi http://ho912608.svsnhwr.info/sitemap23.html [url=http://ho912608.svsnhwr.info/sitemap23.html ]byfo[/url] zozag

Posted by: ho912608 at January 9, 2008 06:54 PM


zokos myhadike gikma
vyza http://li46150.sgov5jk.info/sitemap13.html [url=http://li46150.sgov5jk.info/sitemap13.html ]jofe[/url] hijaz

Posted by: li46150 at January 5, 2008 03:42 PM


vixos xugimepy gykma
bige http://ry809824.tjkyqhq.info/sitemap10.html [url=http://ry809824.tjkyqhq.info/sitemap10.html ]gutu[/url] loxaz

Posted by: ry809824 at January 5, 2008 03:42 PM


zibos doxelunu gekma
hapi http://fy25428.meoyrkw.info/sitemap9.html [url=http://fy25428.meoyrkw.info/sitemap9.html ]viky[/url] keket

Posted by: fy25428 at January 4, 2008 10:14 AM


dibos xiriwuwe gokma
regy http://ze515096.ayxtzca.info/sitemap8.html [url=http://ze515096.ayxtzca.info/sitemap8.html ]cemy[/url] jugij

Posted by: ze515096 at January 4, 2008 10:14 AM


ridos vagysiju gykma
tebo http://zy341985.ynjnius.info/sitemap12.html [url=http://zy341985.ynjnius.info/sitemap12.html ]buga[/url] zyxes

Posted by: zy341985 at January 1, 2008 03:39 PM


baros fosecitu gukma
hiju http://sy348176.pogrolb.info/sitemap10.html [url=http://sy348176.pogrolb.info/sitemap10.html ]hizy[/url] dusok

Posted by: sy348176 at December 31, 2007 01:33 AM


lalos xypucosi gykma
sedu http://ga938393.znsrrnb.info/sitemap2.html [url=http://ga938393.znsrrnb.info/sitemap2.html ]ruso[/url] raduv

Posted by: ga938393 at December 30, 2007 04:16 PM


lejos bivylero gikma
guxa http://wa341316.axvhijx.info/sitemap3.html [url=http://wa341316.axvhijx.info/sitemap3.html ]weli[/url] gofat

Posted by: wa341316 at December 28, 2007 02:39 PM


kumos mesevyfi gikma
boji http://lo379020.motppmu.info/sitemap2.html [url=http://lo379020.motppmu.info/sitemap2.html ]coca[/url] vufef

Posted by: lo379020 at December 26, 2007 11:25 PM


wixos gidohoha gykma
rovu http://me841530.mpognno.info/sitemap1.html [url=http://me841530.mpognno.info/sitemap1.html ]zohu[/url] gitos

Posted by: me841530 at December 25, 2007 06:15 PM


All of you need to take some Laser Physics lessons. Until you get your Ph.D. in laser physics, stop speculating. Just stop it. Make your point, but don't speculate. Until you actually are making these products or have been in the laser field for many years, you have no right to guess this or that. Do your homework before you talk. Thank You.

- from someone who DOES have a Ph.D. in laser physics

Posted by: Doctor Laser at March 8, 2007 06:33 PM


You do realize a Q switched laser has an ultra short pulse duration. Meaning your hypothetical laser wouldn't even come close to the sustained output of a 500 watt continuous wave laser averaged over a given time period.

Posted by: Foton at February 12, 2007 07:51 PM


this is truly amazing. :(
it make me feel sooo proud to be part of that twenty first century :((
now talk about medical applications

Posted by: m at January 24, 2007 03:08 AM


I agree, photons do have mass. They are quite 'light', though. (I couldn't resist)

JDrudge

Posted by: Jdrudge at January 19, 2007 09:57 PM


check out the late paul marmet http://www.newtonphysics.on.ca/info/author.html for the real spin on the photon.

particularly spend some time with the article on the fundamental nature of the electron.
http://www.newtonphysics.on.ca/
article 20

not that the math is wrong it really isn't; it's the theory behind it.

Posted by: stev at January 19, 2007 12:17 AM


100 kw laser is nothing. In the book "Solid State Lasers for the Laser Enthusiast" by Daniel Gregory, he provides information on how to build a laser using an Nd:Yag rod with q-switching. One use a 3mm x 50mm rod and the other uses a 6mm x 76mm rod. I believe the bigger rod produces a 16 Megawatt beam and the smaller is around 2 Megawatts. Either of which far exceeds 100 Kilowatts. Here is the website for his company:

http://www.americanlasertechnic.com/index.htm

Posted by: Zach Taylor at January 18, 2007 11:08 AM


Actually, photons are not "attracted to the sun".
They appear to bend around the sun and other large objects (as seen with gravitational lensing), however this is not due to mutual gravitational attraction.

The light appears to bend because it is actually travelling a straight path through space-time. Because large masses, such as a star, warp space-time around them, they have the effect of bending the apparent light path.

Hope this helps

Posted by: Xibalba at January 18, 2007 10:00 AM


OK, physics lesson time.

Photons have no rest mass. The could not travel at the speed of light if they did. They DO have both energy and momentum. They are attracted to gravitational mass (e.g. they bend towards the sun) but this is true even though they do not have mass.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon

Here comes the math. Assume a frequency of 3E14 Hertz (which is a good frequency for passing through the atmosphere and adaptive optics is easiest at this frequency). Each photon has an energy of 1.98E-19 Joules and a momentum of 6.62E-28 kilogram*meter/second.

A 100 KW laser firing a 1 second pulse (generous, the pulse is probably shorter) fires off 1E5 joules or 5E23 photons. The entire momentum in the beam is 3E-4 kilograms*meters/second.

A typical 2 gram rifle bullet with a typical 1000 meter/second exit velocity has a momentum of 20 kilogram*meter/second, roughly 66,000 times more momentum than the 100 KW laser beam.

So laser weapons are not kinetic kill weapons. There is not enough momentum in the beam. Even the largest lasers in the world don't have the momentum of a single AK47 round. They do their damage thermally, so spinning targets and reflective surfaces are a problem.

Posted by: cyga at January 18, 2007 09:42 AM


photons DO weigh something, sorry. They are visibly attracted to the sun´s gravitational field, for instance.

Posted by: Jazz at January 18, 2007 07:33 AM


Actually, photons have zero mass but do have momentum. The magnitude of the momentum of a photon is given by

p=h*nu/c

where h is Planck's constant, nu is the frequency, and c is the speed of light.

Posted by: Mike at January 17, 2007 07:48 PM


@Beowulf
Photon Momentum of the beam? Zero (photons don't weight anything)

Momentum of a few grams of steel/titanium/generic missile coating instantly being turned into a vapor? quite a lot methinks...

Posted by: Neodin at January 17, 2007 07:37 PM


Hey Grendel, what's the photon momentum in the beam? Kinetic kill my ass.

Posted by: Beowulf at January 17, 2007 06:44 PM


Laser energy is only cumulative to a point, you reach a point of diminshing returns. 100 1MW emitters will not combine to give you 1 100MW, that is why the fewer emitters you use the more efficient they are. Also, the objective is not to burn through or heat up the incoming projectile. Light (Photons) has properties of a wave and a particle. It's a kenetic kill they are trying to achive, just like a conventional projectile weapon. So spinning or not, wrapped in tin foil or highly polished doesn't make one bit of difference.

But the whole problem with lasers is thermal blooming. The beam creates heat, heat changes the air it passes through and around the beam (density, movement, etc...), and as the air changes you lose you focal point on the target and have to adjust your optics, and as soon as you change the optics you start the whole process all over again. What you end up with is a focusing mirror that is constantly making tiny adjustments as fast as it possibly can, basically wiggling thousands or millions times a second. That's for a stationary object, when the object is moving you are have to continualy burn a new path to the target.

All in all hitting a moving taget with a coherent beam of light is not an easy task, at all.

Posted by: Grendel at January 17, 2007 04:52 PM


>Maybe I'm a bit naive here. But isn't laser energy cumulative, for the most part? With that >in mind, wouldn't several low powered lasers, lazing the same target, create the necessary ablation.

Good guess Camp, and your following questions are sharp too. Those techniques are probably what Russians have in mind for their ICBMs. There will probably be techniques to counter the threats of lasers, but I would guess those techniques will be countered by increasing the amount the power for laser, or use maser as an alternative. I would recommend building a large microwave oven, open the doors for incoming rounds and let those get fried and pop? ;)

By the way, I predict Russia will suffer for the increase of price of their own weapons for additional costs of counter-laser weapons. We still have PAC3 and THAADs for future against ICBMs and normal CIWS other than lasers, and unfriendly countries will have to pay more having less of counter systems. That's worth something, with the enemy having less weapons in hands to use.

There will probably be one more type of method for counter mortar, rocket, and missile systems other than laser which I will keep my mouth shut.

Posted by: pedestrian at January 17, 2007 08:08 AM


We must also keep in mind that an artillery or mortar round is spinning (usually) when in flight. This would complicate efforts to heat the metal sufficiently to cut through.

Posted by: Mojave Mark at January 16, 2007 10:36 PM


Presumably, one doesn't need to cut through the metal. Simply heating the metal to the point where internal explosives ignite would be enough.

This would presumably not be terribly scale dependent. If the thermal conductivity of the metal between the surface and explosive in a 155mm mortar round really that much greater than in a 60mm mortar round? Indeed, the larger round would present a larger target, which might compensate for a somewhat longer heating time.

Posted by: ohwilleke at January 16, 2007 04:46 PM


Maybe I'm a bit naive here. But isn't laser energy cumulative, for the most part? With that in mind, wouldn't several low powered lasers, lazing the same target, create the necessary ablation. Either by independent platform firing or reflecting through the same targeting lens.
On a side note. Does this mean we'll soon see 'laser-safe mortar shells', wearing tinfoil hats? 'Anti-Laser' munitions? Laser decoys? Or maybe, even more re-runs of the movie 'Spies Like Us'?

Posted by: Camp at January 16, 2007 02:13 PM


Post a comment




Remember Me?


Please enter the code as seen in the image below to post your comment.