Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Afghan Update
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Around the Globe
Av Week Extra
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Body Armor Blues
Bomb Squad
Brownshoes in Action
Bubbleheads, etc.
Cammo Green
Catch the "Buzz"
Chem-Bio
Civilian Apps
Cloak and Dagger
Commandos
Comms
Contingency Ops
Cops and Robbers
Cyber-warfare
Data Diving
Defense Tech Poll
Dissent Tech
Door Kickers
Drones
DT Administrivia
Eat DT's Dust
Extra! Extra!
Eye on China
Fast Movers
FCS Watch
Fire for Effect
FOS Files
Friday Funnies
Gadgets and Gear
Going Green
Grand Ole Osprey
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
In the Weeds with Eric
Info War
Iraq Diary
Jarhead Jazz
JSF Watch
Just War Theories
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
M4 Monopoly
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Most Wanted
MRAP Edge
Net-Centric
Nukes
Old Skool
Our Shrinking Planet
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Polmar's Perspective
Popular Mechanics
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Robots
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Snipertech
Space
Special Ops
Star Wars
Strategery
Stray Trons
Tactical Development
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
The Defense Biz
The Peoples' Site
The Sunday Paper
The Tanker Tango
The View from Av Week
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
Trimble on the Case
Video Lounge
War Update
Ward'z Wonderz
You can run...

See all Archives
Newsletters

Edited by Christian Lowe | Contact

Giant Blimp Deflated; Laser Jet Delayed

The big weapons -- the destroyers, the aircraft carriers, and the stealth jets -- all emerged pretty much unscathed in the Pentagon's latest budget. Some of the more bleeding-edge projects weren't so lucky. Especially at the Missile Defense Agency, which took about a half-billion dollar hit for fiscal year 2008.

HAA_alt.jpgTake the High-Altitude Airship, for instance. Just a year ago, the Pentagon handed Lockheed a $150 million contract to build the missile-spotting dirigible. No, it wouldn't be 25 times bigger than the Goodyear Blimp, as originally planned. Nor would it be powered by lasers. But it would still be built to "hover above the jet stream at an altitude of 65,000 feet for months at a time." That is, if major advances in solar panels, fuel cells, aerodynamic controls, and flexible materials could be overcome.

Lockheed won't get the chance any time soon, however. The High Altitude Airship "has been canceled due to funding constraints," according to the Missile Defense Agency. But get too distraught, blimp-lovers; the budget for the Aerostat Joint Program Office just jumped from $243 million to $481 mil.

The Airborne Laser -- the modified 747, meant to zap missiles as they take off -- still gets more than $500 million in the new budget. But its first live-fire test has been delayed, again. Originally scheduled for 2002, the blast has now been rescheduled for 2009, Inside Defense notes. The Laser Jet's alternative -- the "Kinetic Energy Interceptor," a non-explosive interceptor missile -- has been pared back, as well. There's no longer a "kill vehicle," or warhead, part to the program, Defense News observes. Instead, the KEI has been tweaked, to become a "common booster" for all sorts of missile interceptions.

There's much, much, much more in this budget to explore. Expect lots of posts in the week to come.

Comments

Medusa: Space Age Weapon

http://www.p2pnet.net/story/12661

Posted by: Michael Thomas at July 3, 2007 08:43 PM


The HAA is prospect project. And Russia try to part in such program.
Defense airships in stratosphere have to belong countries from G8.
By the way, HAA may use not only for the defense programme. For ex., such platform will be useful for telecom., altitude semi-space tourism, base for astronauts' halfway landing and renew onboard team, extremal parachute jumping etc.
I hope projects of HAA have to stay program for wide world scientist and technologiest prospective association for man's benefit

Posted by: S. Bendin at April 30, 2007 10:23 AM


Just in case anyone comes here this late:
What's the story on the Navy's pursuit of FEL (Free-electron laser) technology as a weapon ray?
My friends at "JLab" need to know - jobs depend on it.

Posted by: Neil at March 25, 2007 05:10 PM


Goodyear has one. Why not send it over?

Posted by: Max Anderson at February 14, 2007 12:20 AM


So the first shot taken by a would be enemy is to knock out the blimp. Then what?
So I guess the pentagon will spend another few hundred million to protect the blimp.
Aren't we the guys who managed to keep the old USSR in check with it's thousands of war heads because of the threat of massive retaliation? The 'cover-and-duck' appeased the older generation. Pull it out, dust it off and sell it to the kids as the way to protect onesself from misssles.

Posted by: John Albright at February 13, 2007 12:43 PM


Just who in the hell are we 3 Billion dollars worth of worried about? North Korea? Iran? Certainly not!!! Russia?? Not any more!
ANY - I repeat - ANY launch of nuclear bearing missles would be detected by current defense mechanisms and disposed of LONG before it reached our shores - or any NATO nation for that matter! Why aren't we hlding on to those "pork barrel" funds for Vets and anti-terrorist policing and things that are really needed? Another ludicrous waste of tax bucks.
I worked for the VA for 9 years, and we were subjected to program and staffing cuts like crazy! Just so the politicians with stock in Lockheed rtc. could retire rich? Where's MY retirement "golden umbrella"?? BULL!!!!

Posted by: Neil Whitney at February 13, 2007 08:09 AM


Cut the Blimp, but buy more balloons. That makes no sense.
The Giant Blimp can stay at station for months without a tether and be useful as a comm relay or radar station.
These aerostats need to be tethered like a balloon. THAT is WWI tech.
The Giant Blimp needs a chance to be proven. It will save lives and protect borders, never mind the Star Wars angle.

Posted by: Scott at February 12, 2007 08:32 AM


Giant Blimp !! Someone Paid money to build a
Giant Blimp !! I sure hope they get Fired! A Blimp is a World-War-1 weapon ! Maybe they want to bring-Back the Horse & Wagon Too ! Maybe they can use the Horse & Wagon to Pull the "Black Powder Cannon !! No wonder the USA is running out of money.

Posted by: Rod at February 12, 2007 01:14 AM


If the Veteran's community (United Veteran Organizations) could convince the Orange County Board of Supervisors (California) to hand over the Blimp Hangar at LTA (Tustin USMC Air Base) we would have a large enough Hangar to house and preform maintenance on these proposed Giant Blimps. They are 1000 foot long, 300 foot wide, and 18 stories high. We want to preserve it as they were erected in 1943 to support our coastal defense. This is the largest wooden structure still standing which was (until recently) was in the National Resistry of Historical Buildings, however the Department of the Navy allowed it to be removed due to local political pressures from the City of Tustin and the O.C. Board of Supervisors. They turned down our $400,000,000.00 in redevelopment plans for their own plans and developers. Not Veteran friendly!

Posted by: Terry McCarty at February 9, 2007 04:30 PM


The MDA has a number of projects for the three phases of Ballistic Missile Defense, many of which are in development. Ones that are "proven" (like the Patriot PAC-3, early versions of which covered MY back over in OIF), Aegis Cruisers and THAAD need to be given the lions share of funding and made operational to counter a potential DPRK threat. Similarly, detection systems need to be "green lighted" to enable us to accurately detect potential missile launches. While the ABL is a promising project, they would be "too few, too far dispersed" to counter multiple launches. So, lets focus our efforts on the "best projects" and funnel the austere budget to those that show the best and fastest return on investment. With so many "Boots on the Ground" in OEF/OIF, and the challenges of this Budget, MDA needs to bite the bullet and select the best of the best, and defer the rest!

Posted by: Joe Keary at February 9, 2007 09:28 AM


It would be a big mistake to impede the ABL. In addition to the capability of taking out ballistic missiles in boost phase, I believe it also has the capability to damage satellites in low Earth orbit. The air to air potential is there too. Air to ground as well. This system has renewed strategic value.

**Note to Sen. Carl (The Penguin) Levin.

Posted by: RTLM at February 6, 2007 10:25 PM


Post a comment




Remember Me?


Please enter the code as seen in the image below to post your comment.