Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Afghan Update
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Around the Globe
Av Week Extra
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Body Armor Blues
Bomb Squad
Brownshoes in Action
Bubbleheads, etc.
Cammo Green
Catch the "Buzz"
Chem-Bio
Civilian Apps
Cloak and Dagger
Commandos
Comms
Contingency Ops
Cops and Robbers
Cyber-warfare
Data Diving
Defense Tech Poll
Dissent Tech
Door Kickers
Drones
DT Administrivia
Eat DT's Dust
Extra! Extra!
Eye on China
Fast Movers
FCS Watch
Fire for Effect
FOS Files
Friday Funnies
Gadgets and Gear
Going Green
Grand Ole Osprey
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
In the Weeds with Eric
Info War
Iraq Diary
Jarhead Jazz
JSF Watch
Just War Theories
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
M4 Monopoly
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Most Wanted
MRAP Edge
Net-Centric
Nukes
Old Skool
Our Shrinking Planet
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Polmar's Perspective
Popular Mechanics
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Robots
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Snipertech
Space
Special Ops
Star Wars
Strategery
Stray Trons
Tactical Development
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
The Defense Biz
The Peoples' Site
The Sunday Paper
The Tanker Tango
The View from Av Week
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
Trimble on the Case
Video Lounge
War Update
Ward'z Wonderz
You can run...

See all Archives
Newsletters

Edited by Christian Lowe | Contact

Robotapalooza!

Robot.jpg

DefenseLink has posted a Navy contract awarded to Remotec, Inc., Clinton, Tenn., for $45,000,000. This is a firm-fixed-price, indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract for robotic systems, accessories, spare parts, depot level repair support, and operator and technician training.

("Indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity"? And you make a cool $45 mil? Where do you sign up for that kind of work? No wonder the defense budget is so gynormous.)

Meanwhile over at National Defense, Stew Magnuson has a nice capture of the Navy's next gen bomb disposal robots.

Check it out.

And speaking of robots, here's a classic from a couple of years ago. (Not sure who "Gruntie the Knucklehead" is at the end):

-- Ward

Comments

ORIS Games
オンラインカジノ
オンラインカジノ


お金借りる
オンラインカジノ
FX初心者
初心者 FX 入門
消費者金融 比較
FX 為替 初心者
外国為替取引
為替取引
FX比較

Posted by: fds at June 11, 2008 10:41 AM


Add Mini LASER pod to Robotics & UVHF sonics to disable IEDs.
Then save for ALL forces in area.
Yes use Lasers to Burn IEDs.
& have Robots with M60s & 30cal MGs for defense.
Control base can be 5- 10 miles behind Lines
NO LOS req.
Nice.
Send em to Iraq.

Posted by: stephen russell at January 1, 2008 10:11 PM


An ID/IQ contract guarantees the vendor a minimum amount of work. The remainder of the contract value is only potential work. Sometimes that work depends on demand from military users (we blew up a robot and need a replacement or we need 10 more because we are fielding a new team of users and that wasn't known when the contract was let). Sometimes the additional work depends on additional funding being obtained by the activity that let the contract. This saves the government the cost and trouble of letting a new contract each time additional funding becomes available. Prices for all work are set when the contract is negotiated. The quantities and when they are needed get defined at a later date.

Posted by: EZ at March 27, 2007 03:35 PM


Respectfully
By law the government cant make such a contract as described.
Your info on how an IDIQ works is just a little misreported. The statement of work has to be spelled out even if its indefinite delivery indefinite quantity for support or even for research. Otherwise its some ones but in a sling.
Just want to say.
Everyone should try to get into selling to the government. Its easy. Robots are great I wish we had more of them to kick T-butt.


Posted by: Edward Munster at February 23, 2007 08:54 PM


What is up with the last couple of seconds of that vid. I think it broke my brain.

Posted by: Keith at February 22, 2007 02:34 PM


Thanks for the explanation, KW. Good stuff.

Posted by: Ward at February 22, 2007 12:02 PM


IDIQ contracts are common. Basically the company is put under contract to perform services related to robotic engineering, but, the 'tasks' aren't well defined yet.

The contract may say robotic systems while a task may be to design tracked undercarriage, with another task to design automated sensor technology. The deliverable is indefinite as the exact tasks are being worked. There is always negotiations between govt & contractor regarding each task. The quantity is indefinite as its unsure how much robotic work will be tasked.

The govt is probably responsible for a small guaranteed $ amount. More indefinites.

The entire contract may never hit that ceiling amount noted.

Posted by: KW at February 22, 2007 11:45 AM


Post a comment




Remember Me?


Please enter the code as seen in the image below to post your comment.