Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Afghan Update
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Around the Globe
Av Week Extra
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Body Armor Blues
Bomb Squad
Brownshoes in Action
Bubbleheads, etc.
Cammo Green
Catch the "Buzz"
Chem-Bio
Civilian Apps
Cloak and Dagger
Commandos
Comms
Contingency Ops
Cops and Robbers
Cyber-warfare
Data Diving
Defense Tech Poll
Dissent Tech
Door Kickers
Drones
DT Administrivia
Eat DT's Dust
Extra! Extra!
Eye on China
Fast Movers
FCS Watch
Fire for Effect
FOS Files
Friday Funnies
Gadgets and Gear
Going Green
Grand Ole Osprey
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
In the Weeds with Eric
Info War
Iraq Diary
Jarhead Jazz
JSF Watch
Just War Theories
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
M4 Monopoly
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Most Wanted
MRAP Edge
Net-Centric
Nukes
Old Skool
Our Shrinking Planet
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Polmar's Perspective
Popular Mechanics
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Robots
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Snipertech
Space
Special Ops
Star Wars
Strategery
Stray Trons
Tactical Development
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
The Defense Biz
The Peoples' Site
The Sunday Paper
The Tanker Tango
The View from Av Week
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
Trimble on the Case
Video Lounge
War Update
Ward'z Wonderz
You can run...

See all Archives
Newsletters

Edited by Christian Lowe | Contact

The Cost of War...

budget.jpg

It looks as if the White House is making some tough choices to fund its increase of 8,200 additional support and combat troops for Iraq and Afghanistan.

In documents released by OMB today, the Navy and Air Force are being forced to swallow some bitter pills. To free up $3.1 billion to fund the “surge” boost – about 4,700 for Iraq and 3,500 for Afghanistan – the White House sent Congress amendments to the fiscal 2007 Wartime Supplemental request March 9.

The amendments cut:

5 F/A-18G Growler electronic warfare planes (-$375 million)
5 C-130Js (-$388 million)
2 F-35 Lightening II JSFs (-$389 million)
1 CV-22 Osprey (-$146 million)

The list also includes a decrease of over $800 million in Navy operations and maintenance funds that would have gone to pay for “naval forces supporting combat forces in Iraq.”

But some – especially the ground-pounders – will be pleased with the changes.

Among other additions, the White House asked for:

$1.2 billion for Army urgent needs gear, including up-armor kits and MRAP vehicles
$250 million for Marine Corps MRAP purchases
$27 million for small arms and other equipment for Afghan army training teams

It will be interesting to see how Congress reacts to the amendments, since House Appropriations Defense Subcommittee Chairman John Murtha, D-Pa., recently released his own chop of the supplemental request – with additional policy restrictions. This could throw that plan back to the drawing board, though some of the OMB cuts reflect congressional sentiment anyway.

-- Christian

Comments

AF Cutting 900 firefighter/first responders is no way to pay for the war state side , AF planes to cut 650 military firefighters and 250 civilians across the us, thgese are first line first responsders and the military they cut will not be avaible to go back to Irac , this is a bad move to cut firefighters and first responders, the civilians are here in the states to back up the military when they go over seas.
So what is the AF thinking about making these cuts. We have ask congress to look in this AF move

Posted by: chester at March 14, 2007 11:12 PM


Somewhere there is a Russian blogger noting that a Russian general has had to sacrifice the snow on his driveway in order to get to work.

Out of every hundred, you post 99 stories about all the wonderful, whacky, pointless, and pie-in-the-sky projects the US military is able to throw it's excess funding at then 1 about they're short on cash.
Woops, sorry, not "short" on cash, just that they'll have to reallocate some from the navy. Awesome.

Posted by: Kilo at March 13, 2007 05:41 AM


That shows me for not staying up to date on this page. MRAP looks nice, but it's just stages up in difficulty when it comes to tying together more artillery shells.

Decentralizing to the neighborhoods would seem to imply that as a proportion, troop activity is no longer exclusively that of the non-inhabited highways that would seem easy to "prep" in the night when nobody is up and about. With more activity confined to neighborhoods IEDs are no longer the primary weapon of choice (unless you're in downtown Ramadi) since it'll be difficult to emplace without being seen by a IP/IA checkpoint or an American patrol. Car bombs are probably going to become the primary mechanism to hit American convoys and outposts.

Not sure if the MRAP is specifically configured to resist just IEDs or if it's ready for shaped charges and the like...

Posted by: Charles at March 13, 2007 12:38 AM


Armor kits are no longer viable. In addition to blast-based HE we are now facing shaped charges (and additionally, now it's like three 152mm's instead of 2 152mm's wired together). The Humvee cannot shoulder the additional burdens we ask of it.

Al Qaeda is already developing IEDs to combat the Buffalos and the other SA vehicles designed to work in a landmine/IED-rich environment. Any additional DoD funds programmed in areas to deal with this kind of thing? Or perhaps to bring in armored shoeboxes (which are better armored and heavier than Hummers in general, though with reduced ground clearance giving them a slight increase in vulnerability to explosions directly underneath). Most IEDs would look like roadside affairs, and M113s will probably do nicely.

They won't survive the triple-stacked linemines, but fixating on those is a straw man thing. Nothing in our arsenal will take that.

Posted by: Charles at March 13, 2007 12:29 AM


Post a comment




Remember Me?


Please enter the code as seen in the image below to post your comment.