Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Afghan Update
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Around the Globe
Av Week Extra
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Body Armor Blues
Bomb Squad
Brownshoes in Action
Bubbleheads, etc.
Cammo Green
Catch the "Buzz"
Chem-Bio
Civilian Apps
Cloak and Dagger
Commandos
Comms
Contingency Ops
Cops and Robbers
Cyber-warfare
Data Diving
Defense Tech Poll
Dissent Tech
Door Kickers
Drones
DT Administrivia
Eat DT's Dust
Extra! Extra!
Eye on China
Fast Movers
FCS Watch
Fire for Effect
FOS Files
Friday Funnies
Gadgets and Gear
Going Green
Grand Ole Osprey
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
In the Weeds with Eric
Info War
Iraq Diary
Jarhead Jazz
JSF Watch
Just War Theories
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
M4 Monopoly
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Most Wanted
MRAP Edge
Net-Centric
Nukes
Old Skool
Our Shrinking Planet
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Polmar's Perspective
Popular Mechanics
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Robots
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Snipertech
Space
Special Ops
Star Wars
Strategery
Stray Trons
Tactical Development
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
The Defense Biz
The Peoples' Site
The Sunday Paper
The Tanker Tango
The View from Av Week
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
Trimble on the Case
Video Lounge
War Update
Ward'z Wonderz
You can run...

See all Archives
Newsletters

Edited by Christian Lowe | Contact

The Sunday Paper's Comix Page

Tech meets politics in this Mad TV skit. Enjoy . . . or get really confused by our leanings . . .

(Gouge: CM)

-- Ward

Comments

DElightful!

Posted by: campbell at March 19, 2007 11:51 AM


Believe it or not, even we liberals believe the USA should have a strong military. We just disagree with neocons on what shape that military should take. We believe in responsible expenditure, and getting what we pay for. We believe in funding a military that is suited to meeting our defensive needs, not one that is designed to be the police force for the world.

I love Defense Tech. It provides me a window into what the military is doing, and how it's thinking.

Posted by: Mark R. Brown at March 19, 2007 10:10 AM


Lighten up people, that was a pretty funny sketch, you should be happy that defensetech.org has a sense of humor.

Personally, I am always amazed at progress in technology. Twenty years ago, you could never have imagined an iRan in an iRack--they were so incompatible the two OSs would just fight for control of the BIOS.

Just look at the progress we've made!

Posted by: Hoax Meister at March 19, 2007 08:59 AM


Lighten up, guys... Funny is funny, regardless of the side of the aisle you happen to be sitting on.

Posted by: Rob1855 at March 19, 2007 06:43 AM


A strategic blunder is a strategic blunder regardless of your politics...

Posted by: Matt at March 18, 2007 09:57 PM


Clear bias is created when politics not relevant to the discussion are continually thrown in. Can we expect a global warming skit on the next post.

Posted by: bob at March 18, 2007 06:24 PM


Being accused of being pro-Bush doesn't make it true. Unless a site or media organization is very far to the left, people further to the left of that organization's stance are going to accuse it of being too pro-bush or too conservative or whatever, because the person throwing that accusation is even further left themselves.

The mainstream media uses this defense all the time, "Oh we cant be liberal because we get people calling us conservative all the time, so we must be in the middle." Hardly. There are far people people who think the media is liberal than conservative, because the media is, on average, left of center, just not to the extreme, so you still have people even further left who will complain the media is too conservative.

So yes, defensetech has been consistently left of center in its views, which is not really surprising because the communities the contributors are drawn from: media people like reporters/writers and arms control and military watchdog type stuff, are themselves left of center as far as their institutional culture.

The funny thing is, people INTEREST in defense technology, the consumer end of things, are probably more right-of-center, so there is a disparity there. The same is true of singers and their audiences, with the dixie chicks being an extreme example.

So just realize that, and accept it for what it is. I don't have much of a problem with this particular defensetech post, but really it is out of place on defensetech because it really has nothing to do with tech. Ward says "tech meets politics" but there is no actual tech, especially not DEFENSE tech. The iPod is mentioned as part of the premise for the joke, which is really just a long drawn out criticism of Bush and US policy in Iraq. Yes at least they put some thought into it, so it is moderately funny, but there is no question that an anti-war leftist is going to find this clip a lot more funny than a pro-war conservative would.

People don't come to defensetech for funny clips. There are TONS of other sites for that. This is probably the first 'funny clip' Ive ever seen a post being made for on defensetech. If you are going to do a post about a funny clip, at LEAST make it truly topical, do a post on something like this: http://youtube.com/watch?v=uDAPOM--cCk

So my main criticism of the post would be that it isnt "defense tech" enough. There is a secondary consideration that the site's contributors are probably a good bit further to the left than the average reader, and toning down the politics so as not to chafe the readership would be a good idea. Of course you can tell the readers: if you don't like it, go elsewhere. It really just depends on whether this site is really putting the readers first or not. The contributors to defensetech can go off on politics on their own personal blogs, Im not sure why they feel the need to antagonize readers by doing that here. That said, there are many contributors who I don't remember ever really getting political. I don't think Ward does it much.

Posted by: Kaltes at March 18, 2007 03:21 PM


What happened to the crowd that accused us of pro-Bush tendencies with Christian's "The War We're In" post a few days ago? You guys are giving us an identity crisis. Who are we?

Posted by: Ward at March 18, 2007 02:21 PM


Indeed, the slant is so obvious its funny when they sometimes take offense to anyone even suggesting it.

Posted by: Arbiter at March 18, 2007 01:35 PM


Funny. Although there isn't much confusion about DefenseTech's leanings. DefenseTech has been consistently left-of-center as long as I've read it. DefenseTech is best when it sticks to reporting on cool ... defense technology (surprise). But I understand the temptation of the writers to let loose their inner politico or grand strategist, so I tend to overlook the occasional Bush sneer that inevitably pops up. This MadTV clip at least was reasonably clever.


Posted by: jim at March 18, 2007 12:04 PM


What would happen if we throw in iRan into iRack?

Posted by: pedestrian at March 18, 2007 11:10 AM


Post a comment




Remember Me?


Please enter the code as seen in the image below to post your comment.