Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Afghan Update
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Around the Globe
Av Week Extra
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Body Armor Blues
Bomb Squad
Brownshoes in Action
Bubbleheads, etc.
Cammo Green
Catch the "Buzz"
Chem-Bio
Civilian Apps
Cloak and Dagger
Commandos
Comms
Contingency Ops
Cops and Robbers
Cyber-warfare
Data Diving
Defense Tech Poll
Dissent Tech
Door Kickers
Drones
DT Administrivia
Eat DT's Dust
Extra! Extra!
Eye on China
Fast Movers
FCS Watch
Fire for Effect
FOS Files
Friday Funnies
Gadgets and Gear
Going Green
Grand Ole Osprey
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
In the Weeds with Eric
Info War
Iraq Diary
Jarhead Jazz
JSF Watch
Just War Theories
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
M4 Monopoly
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Most Wanted
MRAP Edge
Net-Centric
Nukes
Old Skool
Our Shrinking Planet
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Polmar's Perspective
Popular Mechanics
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Robots
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Snipertech
Space
Special Ops
Star Wars
Strategery
Stray Trons
Tactical Development
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
The Defense Biz
The Peoples' Site
The Sunday Paper
The Tanker Tango
The View from Av Week
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
Trimble on the Case
Video Lounge
War Update
Ward'z Wonderz
You can run...

See all Archives
Newsletters

Edited by Christian Lowe | Contact

What's Next for Deepwater?

What began as an ambitious but mostly overlooked scheme to modernize the Coast Guard’s entire fleet of ships and aircraft over a 20-year period has, just five years after conception, turned into one of the most troubled and criticized U.S. military programs.

303649466_b8bfdb24d6_m.jpgThe $24-billion Deepwater initiative was launched in 2002 with a contract naming Integrated Coast Guard Systems -- a partnership between electronics maker Lockheed Martin and shipbuilder Northrop Grumman -- the “lead systems integrator” for the program, meaning the firms, rather than the Coast Guard, would be responsible for selecting subcontractors to handle the aircraft, electronics and shipbuilding work.

Integrated Coast Guard Systems hailed the unusual arrangement as revolutionary -- and the best way to leverage the firms’ shared expertise. But the service has terminated the lead-systems-integrator relationship, citing shoddy work on a $100-million effort to stretch and modernize eight 110-foot patrol boats -- the first major shipbuilding portion of Deepwater. Those boats are being decommissioned due to hull buckling, leaving the Coast Guard with a 15-percent gap in its patrol boat force, Commandant Thad Allen said while announcing the decommissioning and the Deepwater changes on April 17. Earlier, Allen had cancelled the so-called Fast Response Cutter being designed from scratch by Integrated Coast Guard Systems to eventually fill that gap, instead expressing his intention to seek off-the-shelf boat designs.

The stretched boats also suffered from incomplete electronics integration and poor network security, according to Michael DeKort, a former Lockheed Martin engineer who worked on the boats but was fired, allegedly for challenging his bosses over the problems. Two weeks ago DeKort testified before a House committee investigating Deepwater. A Justice Department probe is also reportedly underway, following on the heels of several Coast Guard Inspector General reports that were critical of Deepwater.

316218860_1aeeeb2132_m.jpgThe long-term consequences of the Deepwater shakeup are far from clear -- and it’s possible that Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman will still do much of the work on the program, albeit strictly as contractors. According to Allen, all aspects of Deepwater that are already far advanced -- including work on patrol planes, helicopters, short-range boats and several large cutters -- will remain intact. But overall management of the program will pass from industry to the Coast Guard. That means the service will need more officers with acquisitions experience.

“I have already begun building my organic staff in the fiscal year 2008 budget request, and will combine that with other government assets as we transition to this new role,” Allen said.

But this might take years, so in the meantime, the Coast Guard will bring in experts from the American Bureau of Shipping and other third parties “to increase assurances that Deepwater assets are properly designed,” Allen said.

The Coast Guard’s renewal of its acquisitions forces comes hot on the heels of a similar initiative in the Navy, which has seen the price of its warships climb steeply, owing in part to poor contractor performance.

--David Axe, cross-posted at War Is Boring

Comments

A. This is old news!
B. It does not address the way ahead, and there have been several signifcant steps taken by Adm Allen to address problems.
C. The Navy can't help because the Navy doesn't have enough PC Cyclone class and they aren't particularly good seaboats anyway. But the USCG & USN have just negotiated a MOU for the Coasties to keep some of the PCs for a few more years.
D. There have been some success stories with Deepwater in the helo acquistion and new Rescue 21 C3 network being deployed and upgrades to older cutters.

Posted by: Lee Wahler at May 3, 2007 12:42 AM


"...Those boats are being decommissioned due to hull buckling, leaving the Coast Guard with a 15-percent gap in its patrol boat force,..." Hmm. Oops.

Cant that Navy lend a hand, instead of lettin freakin Lockheed Martin do it?

-Billy Big Spuds

Posted by: Billy Big Spuds at May 2, 2007 09:19 PM


Post a comment




Remember Me?


Please enter the code as seen in the image below to post your comment.