Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Afghan Update
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Around the Globe
Av Week Extra
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Body Armor Blues
Bomb Squad
Brownshoes in Action
Bubbleheads, etc.
Cammo Green
Catch the "Buzz"
Chem-Bio
Civilian Apps
Cloak and Dagger
Commandos
Comms
Contingency Ops
Cops and Robbers
Cyber-warfare
Data Diving
Defense Tech Poll
Dissent Tech
Door Kickers
Drones
DT Administrivia
Eat DT's Dust
Extra! Extra!
Eye on China
Fast Movers
FCS Watch
Fire for Effect
FOS Files
Friday Funnies
Gadgets and Gear
Going Green
Grand Ole Osprey
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
In the Weeds with Eric
Info War
Iraq Diary
Jarhead Jazz
JSF Watch
Just War Theories
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
M4 Monopoly
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Most Wanted
MRAP Edge
Net-Centric
Nukes
Old Skool
Our Shrinking Planet
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Polmar's Perspective
Popular Mechanics
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Robots
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Snipertech
Space
Special Ops
Star Wars
Strategery
Stray Trons
Tactical Development
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
The Defense Biz
The Peoples' Site
The Sunday Paper
The Tanker Tango
The View from Av Week
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
Trimble on the Case
Video Lounge
War Update
Ward'z Wonderz
You can run...

See all Archives
Newsletters

Edited by Christian Lowe | Contact

Getting yer RACK On!

LBE-gear.jpg

I have a love-hate relationship with my web-gear.

Back in the day (the late 80’s for me) the only thing available was the LBE (Y-harness) and pistol belt. While the LBE itself wasn’t good for much, it did help take the weight of the loaded pistol belt off your hips, and my pistol belt was loaded. I carried 5 three-mag pouches, 2 canteens, and a butt pack (in addition to the regulation bent neck flashlight, compass, NOD bag and first aid pouch.) In the pack went an MRE, socks, NBF powder and small toilet kit, alcohol pens and tape for maps and such, and trioxane tabs for cooking water.

For years this arrangement worked because all of the dismounted stuff I did was truly dismounted. We might get delivered somewhere in a deuce and a half or hummer, but we didn’t patrol in one; all that we did on the ground.

Then came “modern” times, where everything you do is “mounted”, even getting to the point that you can’t go 50 feet without having to get back into the truck. That, coupled with the fact that “uniformity” was now our primary focus (meaning you had to have your kit on when ever you got more than 5 feet from your vehicle) meant that a change in how I carried my equipment was in order. As much as I liked the canteens (with their attendant cooking stand and cup) and the butt pack, they both had to go.

There was simply no way I could ride in a Humvee wearing my LBE with those canteens sticking out of my back like 2 cancerous tumors, and going through the chore of donning, removing, and stowing the LBE every time I got in and out of the vehicle was not only a waste of time and a big pain in the ass, but it was tactically unsound; you ought to dismount the vehicle in a fighting condition.

So I started looking for an LBE replacement. The one I settled on was the RACK (Ranger Assault Carrying Kit.) Developed by Specialty Defense, I’m told that it was developed specifically to meet the Ranger’s requirements for “assault” oriented gear. The RACK, in effect, is a MOLLE apron. All it is is a wrap around vest with MOLLE loops on it for you to attach bags and pouches too.

What you attach, where you attach, and how much you attach is completely up to you. In addition, everything on the RACK is in your front plane, meaning you can see it and get to it without having to grope behind you, and with nothing behind you, you can wear it while in a vehicle without any discomfort or loss of mobility.

As great as I think the RACK is, it isn’t without limitations. While the RACK is easy to wear in a vehicle because there’s nothing behind you, that does limit the amount of stuff you can carry. I could carry more with my old LBE-pistol belt rig than I can with the RACK, but I couldn’t carry it all the time, so the trade off is now, if I go on walkabout, I need a bail-out bag as well (Camelbak in my case) to carry a few additional essentials.

The RACK, by today’s standards, is also relatively old technology – there are systems out there that are much more advanced than my lash up, made of more exotic materials and what not, but mine’s bought and paid for, and I’m disinclined to spend modern money to upgrade something that currently still meets my mission requirements.

-- Eric Daniel

Comments

A couple of things. To address your question Dennis, yes, I am always looking for the lightest load possible. Going to the rack actually reduced my load, but it allowed me to remain tactically functional at all times (driving with those canteens digging into my kidneys was simply not an option.) I only pack what the mission requires, as well as my “bug out” gear (what I need to survive 24 hours on the run.) In addition to their normal loadout, I’ve seen folk pack the largest Blackhawk/Special Ops/Eagle/Camelbak backpack they could find. These are man-portable dumpsters that would put the CFP-90 to shame. Inside they would have sleeping bag, spare boots, radio batteries, ammunition, firewood, milking goat, etc… All great and wonderful stuff, but when the pack takes up more space in the truck than you do, you aren’t very mobile.

Me, I take enough to get by. Ammo, night vision, spare batteries, first aid, some water, snacks, and that’s about it.

I tried strapping all my crap onto my IBA but 1) since the IBA is a front open armor carrier, there’s an awful lot of wasted space on the front of the vest, and 2) since we were obligated to wear armor 24/7, I thought packing my combat load to the porta-john or the chow hall was not only cumbersome, but also a bit of overkill, so I stripped my armor and hung everything on the rack (funny thing though, we didn’t have to wear full kit while doing PT, or going to the gym -- I guess we were untouchable during those periods.) If ever I was issued a side-entry carrier, like the Eagle vests our local ODA team wore, or if we were allowed to take off the armor inside the wire, I’d look at putting my stuff back on my armor.

Posted by: Eric Daniel at May 29, 2007 11:13 AM


THere's a big difference between civilian hiking in the woods versus humin' thru the boonies.

Now we strap all that stuff to our body armor, my LCE is gathering dust until we have a parade.

Posted by: SFC SKI at May 26, 2007 05:41 AM


The good news is that with the RACK, you now fall forward if you trip on something rather than looking like an overturned turtle ... :-)

Posted by: John at May 25, 2007 01:35 PM


Eric,
I admire your fiscal responcibility, but as someone who has done a great deal of hiking, don't you continaully look to lighten your load?
My basic question is about proven reliability vs potential weight loss.
Where does this fit into your thinking?

Posted by: Dennis at May 25, 2007 10:58 AM


Post a comment




Remember Me?


Please enter the code as seen in the image below to post your comment.