Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Afghan Update
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Around the Globe
Av Week Extra
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Body Armor Blues
Bomb Squad
Brownshoes in Action
Bubbleheads, etc.
Cammo Green
Catch the "Buzz"
Chem-Bio
Civilian Apps
Cloak and Dagger
Commandos
Comms
Contingency Ops
Cops and Robbers
Cyber-warfare
Data Diving
Defense Tech Poll
Dissent Tech
Door Kickers
Drones
DT Administrivia
Eat DT's Dust
Extra! Extra!
Eye on China
Fast Movers
FCS Watch
Fire for Effect
FOS Files
Friday Funnies
Gadgets and Gear
Going Green
Grand Ole Osprey
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
In the Weeds with Eric
Info War
Iraq Diary
Jarhead Jazz
JSF Watch
Just War Theories
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
M4 Monopoly
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Most Wanted
MRAP Edge
Net-Centric
Nukes
Old Skool
Our Shrinking Planet
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Polmar's Perspective
Popular Mechanics
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Robots
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Snipertech
Space
Special Ops
Star Wars
Strategery
Stray Trons
Tactical Development
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
The Defense Biz
The Peoples' Site
The Sunday Paper
The Tanker Tango
The View from Av Week
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
Trimble on the Case
Video Lounge
War Update
Ward'z Wonderz
You can run...

See all Archives
Newsletters

Edited by Christian Lowe | Contact

Another Tanker Perspective

VC10-web.jpg

The Royal Air Force has achieved an interesting solution to the problem of replacing its aging fleet of aerial tankers -- VC-10 and TriStar aircraft. Meanwhile, the U.S. Air Force continues its lengthy and, at times torturous, path toward a replacement aerial tanker.

In London the Ministry of Defense has approved a private financing initiative to procure a fleet of 14 Airbus A330 tankers to provide aerial refueling services to the Royal Air Force. The tankers will be owned by the firm AirTanker but will be flown by RAF pilots under the operational control of the RAF. The aircraft will be based at RAF Brize Norton, the largest RAF station and home to the service’s air transport, tanker, and parachute communities.

The project is estimated to cost US$26 billion over 27 years.

Meanwhile, the U.S. Air Force has received proposals from an EADS (European Aeronautic Defense and Space) and Northrop Grumman team offering the Airbus A330 tanker -- with the U.S. designation KC-30 -- and from Boeing offering the KC-767 based on Boeing’s 767 passenger-cargo aircraft. The Air Force expects to make a selection by September 2007 with the winning aircraft replacing the 1950s-vintage KC-135E tankers and, most likely, the later KC-135R tankers. (The Air Force also flies the McDonnell Douglas KC-10 in the tanker role.)

The new tanker selected by the Air Force will automatically become a prime candidate to replace several of the numerous specialized variants of the C-135 and Boeing 707 in U.S. service. These include reconnaissance, surveillance, Airborne Warning And Control Systems (AWACS), and research aircraft as well as cargo carriers. (France, Turkey, and Singapore also fly Boeing-built KC-135 tankers. The A330 is the most likely replacement for the French aircraft.)

The EADS-Northrop Grumman tanker can carry 122 tons of fuel in its wings, reportedly about 20 percent more than the proposed KC-767 design. This fuel arrangement allows the A330/KC-30 to carry passengers, cargo, or additional fuel in its fuselage.

-- Norman Polmar

Comments

I really appreciate his wisdom and philosophy of life.Haw-haw !It is a very beaufitul writing! The moderator is really a man of

intention.
fake rolex watches replica
http://www.onestoptown.com/
http://www.watchinstyle.com/rolex-datedate-white-diamondsswiss-eta-2836-p-768.html?
replica nike shoes sale
zenid=teg6g8jtnlurrhkmbomsugkuj7
http://easyforbuy.com/002-puma-shoes-all-black-p-4029.html
http://lowestmall.com/9826-nike-king-black-sapphire-p-5367.html

http://www.rolex8u.com/

Posted by: rolexwatches at October 15, 2008 12:26 AM


Haw-haw !It is a very beaufitul writing! The moderator is really a man of intention. I

really appreciate his wisdom and philosophy of life
replica watch

http://www.watchinstyle.com/rolex-datedate-white-diamondsswiss-eta-2836-p-768.html?

zenid=teg6g8jtnlurrhkmbomsugkuj7
http://easyforbuy.com/002-puma-shoes-all-black-p-4029.html
http://lowestmall.com/9826-nike-king-black-sapphire-p-5367.html?

zenid=iu1fq75j2cmr6534iltfb807i5
http://onestoptown.com/

Posted by: replicawatches at October 8, 2008 11:29 PM


we don't think it is reasonable to spend hundreds thousands dollars to buy a decorating watch. you can use those money to invest in other industry which will return you good profit.
but here you just need to spend 100-200 dollars to buy a replica rolex watches.
replica watches are made by the rating 1:1 according to the original watches, and you can't distinguish the original and the fake watches when you look at the surface of the watches.
http://www.dearwatches.com

Posted by: replica rolex watches at August 30, 2008 12:24 AM


replica rolex watches

Posted by: replica rolex watches at August 28, 2008 09:01 PM


fake watches

Posted by: fake watches at August 21, 2008 11:36 PM


watches replica

Posted by: watches replica at August 21, 2008 11:35 PM


If one day you want to buy Lunia gold you can go to the above company.

Posted by: buy Lunia gold at August 15, 2008 10:06 PM


My friends also told me that there is a web site http://www.hameim.com supplies cheap Lunia gold.

Posted by: cheap Lunia gold at August 15, 2008 10:02 PM


The company always supply cheap snw vis for every gamers. You can first try to buy vis to exchange your love equipment.

Posted by: buy vis at August 15, 2008 09:59 PM


Of course the Sword of the New World Gold is gained by I upgrade and kill the monsters.

Posted by: Sword of the New World Gold at August 15, 2008 09:55 PM


Now I already feel hungry, so I go to the shop to buy some food. But the shopper says that my holic money is not enough.

Posted by: holic money at August 11, 2008 09:43 PM


I want to forget you, but I cannot achieve, see the computer and I remember you, see my cheap imvu credits that I remember you once again.

Posted by: cheap imvu credits at August 11, 2008 09:41 PM


That is first time that I used the ice arrow, I was so excited, and in a week I got 4000 mabinogi money.

Posted by: mabinogi money at August 11, 2008 09:39 PM


If I cannot complete the duty, I will spend many hero gold and have no anything to receive.

Posted by: hero gold at August 11, 2008 09:38 PM


If we do not have the good fortune this life, we will see with each other and that time I will buy last chaos gold enough for you in next life.

Posted by: buy last chaos gold at August 11, 2008 09:33 PM


Because each people is not so rich, you have Hellgate London gold and you might save much time that practice the level.

Posted by: Hellgate London gold at August 11, 2008 09:31 PM


Your reality husband can buy LOTRO Gold for you, but I also can be.

Posted by: buy LOTRO Gold at August 11, 2008 09:30 PM


As your apprentice, I always waste your cheap Habbo Coins. But I really not to think that you left so suddenly, then am duty-bound not to turn back!

Posted by: cheap Habbo Coins at August 11, 2008 09:28 PM


And then click the warehouse to the elderly, he will give you a bear kill “tooth dental knife” (now seems all levels can carry weapons) so you put on it to “gear teeth knife” after the attacks of a very High upgrade, upgrade it easier and more! (Like the goddess role can not be used) of course definitely need Metin2 money!

Posted by: Metin2 money at August 7, 2008 07:41 PM


NPC in the game because of the economic system do not participate, Production of materials you must have bought only other players to earn potbs gold, but the spoils of war can be sold to NPC direct access to cash, its strong liquidity. You can use those in exchange for potb money.

Posted by: potb money at August 7, 2008 07:40 PM


Leasing makes sense when either you can't afford the capitol cost, significant tax breaks, or you may not want them for long (and there is someone else who would then use them). Neither are the case here, so why get the Udvar-Hazys of the world a cut of this deal?

Posted by: 出会い at August 7, 2008 04:18 AM


My friends in order to help me, send me much Requiem gold, I was very thank him.

Posted by: Requiem gold at August 4, 2008 08:26 PM


Therefore, when I practiced this role, I have also spent much energy and the 2moons gold.

Posted by: 2moons gold at August 4, 2008 08:23 PM


NOTICE - This message contains confidential information, which may also be privileged, intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that you must not disseminate, copy or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this message in error please notify the sender immediately.

Posted by: video poker game at July 8, 2008 11:53 PM


wow power leveling http://www.coolingame.com
wow powerleveling http://www.coolingame.com
world of warcraft power leveling http://www.coolingame.com
ffxi power leveling http://www.coolingame.com
ffxi powerleveling http://www.coolingame.com
ffxi http://www.coolingame.com/ffxi-gil.php
ffxi gil http://www.coolingame.com/ffxi-gil.php
lotro powerlevelinghttp://www.coolingame.com/powerleveling/index.php?gid=14
lotro power leveling http://www.coolingame.com/powerleveling/index.php?gid=14
lotro gold http://www.coolingame.com/lotro-gold.php

Posted by: wow power leveling at May 26, 2008 01:55 AM


how are you

Posted by: cheap wow gold at April 13, 2008 07:49 PM


As a "OLD" hand at refueling the B-29 Hose method, then on to the KC135, then as instructor Capt for United Airline on the DC10. I gave the inspection committee at Denver a very positive report on the DC10. The KC-10 was an upgrade, now choose the 787 and you will upgrade again. When better airplanes are Built BOEING will win every time.

Posted by: Jerome Kimminau at January 11, 2008 08:45 PM


wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow power leveling
wow powerleveling
wow power leveling
wow power leveling
wow powerleveling
wow powerleveling
wow power leveling
wow power leveling
wow powerleveling
wow powerleveling
翻译公司
rolex
翻译公司
rolex replica
wow gold
wow gold
World of Warcraft Gold
World of Warcraft Gold
wow powerleveling
wow powerleveling
wow power leveling
wow power leveling

powerleveling
powerleveling
powerleveling
powerleveling
power leveling
power leveling
powerleveling
powerleveling
power leveling
power leveling
wow powerleveling
wow powerleveling
wow power leveling
wow power leveling
rs Gold
rs Gold
Runescape Gold
Runescape Gold
rs powerleveling
rs powerleveling
Runescape powerleveling
Runescape powerleveling

lotro gold
lotro gold
LOTRO US Gold
LOTRO US Gold
LOTRO EU Gold
LOTRO EU Gold
buy lotro gold
buy lotro gold
cheap lotro gold
cheap lotro gold
LOTRO Powerleveling
LOTRO Powerleveling
LOTRO Power leveling
LOTRO Power leveling
SilkRoad Gold
SilkRoad Gold
SilkRoad Powerleveling
SilkRoad Powerleveling
SilkRoad Power leveling
SilkRoad Power leveling
SR Gold
SR Gold
SR Powerleveling
SR Powerleveling
SR Power leveling
SR Power leveling

Posted by: 121 at November 6, 2007 02:44 AM


Politics a usual, we pay more and get less and our soldiers suffer.

It's a tanker not a bomber. The technology isn't that sophisticated!!!!!

We have computers right and programmers right. Maybe they should hire competent ones.

Both Colt and Boeing are prime examples of large companies who are mismanaged yet the pentagon continues to subsideize them with barrels of the green stuff.

I know someone who handles Boeing accounts and they(Boeing) are a mess.

Our armed services have to reinvent themselves and should start with the Kiss principle. Make it work and keep it simple until new technologies come along. Then upgrade the exsiting air frame until a quantum leap in technology requires a completly new air frame.

They did that with the C-47, then the C-130 and C-135. What's wrong with the KC-10?

Reopen the line and build some new one's with upgrades. Until we have a real leap in technology.

Posted by: Big daddy at June 16, 2007 12:54 AM


I don't understand why we aren't buying the 787 as a replacement for the tankers. It is a FAR superior product with the potential to have zero fuselage metal fatigue and far lower operating costs over time with a newer generation of engines.

EADS is DOA. Anyone proposing a foreign design will be shot by the politicians. With good reason.

Posted by: mixon at June 15, 2007 06:46 PM


A330 is a non-player for a myriad of reasons. Size is its biggest constraint (I won't even mention that the boom on the A330 is a new creation from a rookie in the field and has not been tested over time like the Boeing built boom). Of the 2 existing tankers, KC-135R and KC-10, and the two competitors, A330 and Boeing 767, anyone who has been in the tanker business will say the KC-135R is the perfect tanker. The KC-10 has been a great compliment and very strong player in the strategic, dual role, boom/drogue world. To have a fleet of KC-10's would be impractical on size alone. With that being said, the A330 is 8,000 sq feet of ramp footprint larger than the KC-10 and 13,000 square feet larger than the 767, and 20,000 square feet larger than the 135. When you look at fuel loads, offload potential, fuel flow per hour, and several other factors, the Boeing 767 offers more fuel offload potential than the A330 per square foot of ramp space that it occupies. If anyone believes MOG is not an issue, (max on ground), or the number that can bedded down, does not fully understand tanker employment in combat operations. The A330 can accommodate 28 to 32 463L pallets while the 76 can hold 19 463L pallets. Why is this significant? The C-17 only can carry 18 463L pallets. We are buying a TANKER, not an airlifter, though economy says that dual role is smart business. I can tell you from first hand experience and 30+ years in the tanker business, that I don't want a tanker with ~28+ pallet positions when I go to combat.

Many other points to make, but in short, Boeing is a proven leader, they offer the most balanced tanker for a lot less money, and has been tested over time. The British venture is great for a small Air Force and is a great move for them. This would not be a good move for the worlds largest and most powerful airpower force, the USAF!

Posted by: Stu at June 15, 2007 06:43 AM


The KC-767 would be my choice. Several reasons. First of all it is a more proven airframe. Yes its older but its also smaller and more rugged. The KC-30 is bigger but that doesn't necessarily mean better. Bigger means heavier and more fragile in terms of military use. Its also more cumbersome on the tarmac and needs more runway to take off. The KC-30 is also a gas hog. The KC-767 is cheaper to produce.

And if we're to procure up to 200 of these aircraft I'd prefer they were indigenous to the United States - not an American made version of an Airbus.

Posted by: RTLM at June 15, 2007 01:13 AM


When Boeing took over McDonald Douglas they closed the MD11 line and the plane can no longer be built, word has it that the Air force wanted a bunch of MD11's but Boeing just wanted to shut all McDonald Douglas plants down as fast as they could, the KC10 is one fine airplane and preforms great.

Posted by: Dan Schmidt at June 14, 2007 11:20 PM


Is there something wrong with the KC-10? Why doesn't the Air Force just buy a bunch more of those. From what I've read they carry more fuel the the KC-135. Could someone please fill me in here.

Posted by: Jonathan at June 14, 2007 08:31 PM


That crazy comment earlier has been removed...

Posted by: Christian Lowe at June 14, 2007 09:22 AM


uh

Posted by: C at June 14, 2007 08:45 AM


Actually, the creative british "solution" smells an awful lot like the disasterous Boeing lease deal, as a way of turning a procurement program into a running operational contract at perhaps significantly higher cost.

Leasing makes sense when either you can't afford the capitol cost, significant tax breaks, or you may not want them for long (and there is someone else who would then use them). Neither are the case here, so why get the Udvar-Hazys of the world a cut of this deal?

Posted by: Nicholas Weaver at June 14, 2007 07:53 AM


Post a comment




Remember Me?


Please enter the code as seen in the image below to post your comment.