Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Afghan Update
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Around the Globe
Av Week Extra
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Body Armor Blues
Bomb Squad
Brownshoes in Action
Bubbleheads, etc.
Cammo Green
Catch the "Buzz"
Chem-Bio
Civilian Apps
Cloak and Dagger
Commandos
Comms
Contingency Ops
Cops and Robbers
Cyber-warfare
Data Diving
Defense Tech Poll
Dissent Tech
Door Kickers
Drones
DT Administrivia
Eat DT's Dust
Extra! Extra!
Eye on China
Fast Movers
FCS Watch
Fire for Effect
FOS Files
Friday Funnies
Gadgets and Gear
Going Green
Grand Ole Osprey
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
In the Weeds with Eric
Info War
Iraq Diary
Jarhead Jazz
JSF Watch
Just War Theories
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
M4 Monopoly
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Most Wanted
MRAP Edge
Net-Centric
Nukes
Old Skool
Our Shrinking Planet
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Polmar's Perspective
Popular Mechanics
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Robots
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Snipertech
Space
Special Ops
Star Wars
Strategery
Stray Trons
Tactical Development
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
The Defense Biz
The Peoples' Site
The Sunday Paper
The Tanker Tango
The View from Av Week
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
Trimble on the Case
Video Lounge
War Update
Ward'z Wonderz
You can run...

See all Archives
Newsletters

Edited by Christian Lowe | Contact

More Tomahawks May Fly

tomahawk-web.jpg

The continued problems being encountered in flight tests of the Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile (JASSM) could lead to resurrection of the air-launched Tomahawk missile. The JASSM -- designated AGM-158 -- was initiated in 1995 following cancellation of the Tri-Service Standoff Attack Missile (TSSAM) because of massive cost increases.

The Lockheed Martin AGM-158 had won out in competition with the McDonnell Douglas AGM-159 design. Procurement of the Lockheed Martin JASSM began in December 2001 with the missile intended for use on the F-15 Eagle, F-16 Fighting Falcon, F/A-18 Hornet, and F-35 Lightning II (Joint Strike Fighter) as well as on the B-1B, B-2A, and B-52H Stratofortress strategic bombers.

Some 600 JASSMs have been produced, but testing continues to indicate poor reliability. During tests launches from December 2006 to April 2007, the Air Force reported a system reliability of only 58 percent. Coupled with increased costs, this reliability factor has led Department of Defense officials to question the efficacy of the program, even at this late date.

The TSSAM cancellation -- and other never-completed air-launched programs, including the Medium-Range Air-to-Surface Missile (MRASM), which was based on the Tomahawk missile -- has led some weapon experts to believe that initiation of a new air-launched attack weapon of this type is beyond the near-term capabilities of the U.S. defense industry.

In this environment, the Air Force and Navy may be required to take another look at the Tomahawk cruise missile as a successor to the JASSM. The Tomahawk has been operational in U.S. surface ships since 1982 and submarines since 1983. Beginning with the Gulf War of 1991, the Tomahawk has a demonstrated a high effectiveness. During the 1991 conflict U.S. submarines launched 12 land-attack variants and U.S. surface ships launched 276. They had a launch success rate with transition to cruise flight of 98 percent, with a higher-than-predicted accuracy.

The General Dynamics Tomahawk was originally developed as a nuclear strike weapon, but all missiles carrying the W80 nuclear warhead have now been retired, as have the anti-ship missiles with conventional 1,000-pound warheads. The submarine-launched (UGM-109) and ship-launched (BGM-109) weapons in the fleet today are Tomahawk Land-Attack Missiles (TLAM). They carry several warheads and have undergone continued updates of engines and guidance. The large number of missiles being procured, which are also used by Britain and will be bought by Spain, have led to additional production by Raytheon and McDonnell Douglas.

Two proposed Tomahawk variants were not deployed, the Ground Launched Cruise Missile (GLCM) --named Gryphon -- which was cancelled because of the U.S.-Soviet Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces (INF) agreement, and the AGM-109 air-launched Tomahawk. The latter weapon was flight tested from A-6 Intruder aircraft.

Should the JASSM effort be terminated, a prime candidate for the long-range, air-to-ground missile role will thus be a modification of the latest Tomahawk variants.

-- Norman Polmar

Comments

If you ask me, the US DoD should seriously consider converting their Advanced Cruise Missiles, which they are currently planning to destroy, into Conventional Advanced Cruise Missiles. They already have stealth, range and payload advantages, an existing launch platform (B-52) and support infrastructure. All they need is a conventional warhead, some flight tests and they are set to go.

Posted by: Strategic Thinker at August 17, 2007 12:06 PM


If you ask me, the US DoD should seriously consider converting their Advanced Cruise Missiles, which they are planning to destroy into Conventional Advanced Cruise Missiles. They already have stealth, range and payload advantages, an existing launch platform (B-52) and support infrastructure. All they need is a conventional warhead, some flight tests and they are set to go.

Posted by: Strategic Thinker at August 17, 2007 12:05 PM


I have been doing some research. I found a way to build a rocket at 2,500 feet self guided with cams in the nose cone. I researched for 6 hours and found over the counter materials accesible by via drop ship to the net. The rocket surprisingly costs under $500.00 per unit. I never realized rocketry could be so fun. When I come into some money I'll send over a dvr copy off of the portable receiver hooked to portable tv remote access area. The rocket cam is surprisingly under $50.00 over the counter. For home security , rocketry cams are innie and adt is outtie.

Posted by: Max Anderson at June 20, 2007 04:20 PM


Lockheed Martin seems to be having more and more problems of this kind. They squandered the greatest program they ever had with the "Skunk Works". Such an organization needs only the right people and an upper management with the courage and intellegence to allow it to work. The Skunk Works "worked" because of the principles Kelly Johnson and Ben Rich applied. Good people are out there, what is missing is proper management decisions and operational doctrine. But with the way upper management is no doubt stuffing thier pockets anyway, the man is right, why change? Every one reading this should get the book "Skunk Works" by Ben Rich and read it. The speed at which great planes like the U-2 and SR-71 where built, along with thier fantastic performace, is nothing short of fantastic. Today, this kind of performance is impossible. At least, right now.It is a pitiful shame a legendary plane like the SR-71 could be built and operational in HALF the time this relatively simple JASSM system has had and is a failure. If one listens to the commentary by Ben Rich, its as if he had a crystal ball. Too bad people do not listen.
Its tough to see a great company dieing a slow death, like so many other companies seem to be doing these days...

Posted by: L Plasek at June 19, 2007 09:11 PM


i was wondering if anyone had considered looking at the UK's Stormshadow long-range air-launched missile, or is this another case of the USA having to have American-developed weapons (got to keep those missile-making voters happy) regardless of cost/performance?

Posted by: elizzar at June 19, 2007 02:09 AM


>>> The JASSM ..was initiated in 1995 ... a system reliability of only 58 percent.

Why should Lockheed care if the thing works or not? I mean, twelve freaking years in production and the thing still doesn't even and work -- but the government continues to fund it. Why would Lockheed spend money to fix or imrpove the thing?

This kind of military procurement process drives me insane because it's a scam from start to finish. The government knows it and Lockheed knows it, and they both know nobody is paying attention. But it keeps a lot of Pentagon and Lockheed employees busy shuffling papers, looking like they care if the taxpayers money is being squandered.

Any weapon system, especially something that is nothing more than a flying bomb (which was invented long ago with the cruise missile), that cannot be designed and fielded in 5 to 7 years is simply a waste of money.

That's all, rant over. You may resume squandering the national wealth.

Posted by: John at June 18, 2007 09:05 PM


The Navy's SLAM-ER would be a much better fit, the R&D costs would be almost non existent because the missiles already been tested, and its got the possibility of being more accurate.

Also, the term JASSM shouldnt be used anymore, I find it funny that its called a joint air to surface stand off missile, despite the fact that the Navy has left the program. ASSM is more fitting.

Why is there a need for such accuracy like the JASSM, especially when the thing cant even hit mobile targets like the SLAM ER can.

Posted by: James at June 18, 2007 06:09 PM


Maybe it's just me, but whenever I read about a defense programs that has "cost overruns" and "reliability problems", Lockheed Martin seems to be the culprit a lot of the time.

Posted by: Rick at June 18, 2007 02:08 PM


Post a comment




Remember Me?


Please enter the code as seen in the image below to post your comment.